Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
Athanasios Gromitsaris, Expropriations, Takings - ius-publicum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
_____________________________________________________________<br />
object of property. Nowadays, however, "Situationsgebundenheit" is considered as a circu-<br />
lar concept “Zirkelbegriff”. 81 “`Situation´ ist Beurteilungsgegenstand nicht Beurteilung-<br />
skriterium”. “Situation” is the subject, not the criterion of the assessment. The norms are<br />
not inherent in the situation. In order to find out where the limits on the power of using and<br />
disposing of the property asset are to be set, an assessment of the conflict between the af-<br />
fected public interests and the relevant private property interests of the owner is neces-<br />
sary. 82<br />
The doctrine of the intensity of the encroachment or the severity of the burden im-<br />
posed upon property (Schweretheorie) has been developed by the Federal Administrative<br />
Court: When the burden placed upon the property is so onerous that it goes beyond the bor-<br />
der of the general reasonable limits on property, it is no longer bearable and should be con-<br />
sidered as a material expropriation, and this without regard to the number of the affected<br />
owners and without the need of any comparison with other owners. 83<br />
In the wake of the abandonment of a wide ranging concept of expropriation by the<br />
Federal Constitutional Court these theories of distinction between expropriation and legisla-<br />
tive determination of property have become irrelevant for defining expropriation. Neverthe-<br />
less, they have not become obsolete, but they have found a new area of application in so far<br />
as they provide guidance in evaluating the permissibility and constitutionality of the legisla-<br />
tive determination of property under Article 14.1 sentence 2 of the Basic Law. Although it<br />
is true that according to the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court a content determi-<br />
nation of property rights can never turn into expropriation, such content determinations are<br />
81 Walter Leisner, Eigentum, in: Isensee/Kirchhof (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, 3. Auflage, Band VIII, C.F.<br />
Müller, Heidelberg 2010, p. 370, para 176, 178.<br />
82 Walter Leisner, Situationsgebundenheit Des Eigentums: Eine Uberholte Rechtssituation, de Gruyter, Berlin,<br />
1990.<br />
83 See for instance BVerwGE 32, 173 (179).<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
Copyleft – Ius Publicum<br />
44