11.10.2013 Views

Upper Rock Nature Reserve: A Management and Action Plan

Upper Rock Nature Reserve: A Management and Action Plan

Upper Rock Nature Reserve: A Management and Action Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 170 -<br />

Barbary Macaques<br />

gy only became clearer once culling ceased, with the transfer of management to the Gibraltar<br />

Tourism Agency, after which the population levels rose considerably. In recent years, approximately<br />

seventy-five animals have been culled as a result of a lack of dem<strong>and</strong> for zoos or<br />

wildlife parks to take the surplus animals, <strong>and</strong> also because of aggressive behaviour on the<br />

part of some individuals.<br />

In 1998 a group of macaques from the former <strong>Rock</strong> Gun/Princess Caroline’s group took<br />

up residence in the Moorish Castle Estate area, remaining there as they were fed by residents.<br />

A decision to cull was taken <strong>and</strong> about 19 animals were put down.<br />

In 1999 the increase in population levels resulted in a group establishing themselves at<br />

Catalan Bay outside the Caleta Hotel. They remained there because of the frequent illegal<br />

feeding on the part of tourists <strong>and</strong> the general public <strong>and</strong> because of lack of enforcement of<br />

the feeding laws. After all attempts to relocate/export the group had been exhausted, the<br />

decision to cull them was taken, <strong>and</strong> the twenty-four animals were regrettably put down.<br />

In 2003 a section of the Middle Hill group again settled down at Catalan Bay outside the<br />

Caleta Hotel, as a result of enticement with food items <strong>and</strong> the presence of the Hotel’s refuse<br />

bins, that provided the macaques with additional titbits. The macaque management officials<br />

where frequently called out to tackle the problem, but the group would descend on a daily<br />

basis. They would also frequently make their way across to the s<strong>and</strong> slopes above S<strong>and</strong>y<br />

Bay, where workers were dismantling the MOD area of the water catchment’s corrugated<br />

metal sheets. The problem came to a head in late July, a period when the beaches <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Hotel are full to the brim. This provided the macaques with the greatest interaction with people.<br />

There were frequent letters in the Gibraltar Chronicle complaining about this issue,<br />

especially by the residents of the area beside the hotel. This lead to the controversial decision<br />

on the part of the Ministry for Tourism, who instructed the Gibraltar Veterinary Clinic to<br />

cull the animals. The Ape <strong>Management</strong> officials <strong>and</strong> the GONHS were not fully informed. By<br />

the time GONHS had intervened, 27 macaques had been culled, including whole family lineages<br />

<strong>and</strong> mature animals, leaving many females with young on the basis that they were<br />

cute. This endeavour was illegal. It was not licensed under the <strong>Nature</strong> Protection Ordinance<br />

<strong>and</strong> was carried out at r<strong>and</strong>om, not respecting the family lineage <strong>and</strong> hierarchy. It also<br />

destroyed very valuable, ongoing data collection <strong>and</strong> the work of two postgraduate students<br />

from Zurich University.<br />

This action led to cancellation, in protest, of the visit of the co-organiser <strong>and</strong> speaker Prof.<br />

Bob Martin to the Barbary Macaque conference in November 2003. In a press statement,<br />

Prof. Martin complained about the action taken by the Gibraltar authorities against the group<br />

of macaques that had been the focus of an ongoing study for more than two decades. This<br />

major setback resulted in a loss of confidence in academic students visiting Gibraltar, an<br />

embarrassment to GONHS, particularly on the eve of the conference, <strong>and</strong> the resulting financial<br />

implications, which include £2500 per annum in lab fees.<br />

14.4.2 Re-location<br />

The first option to be considered, <strong>and</strong> the most desirable is exportation. The ‘Martin <strong>Plan</strong>’<br />

favoured this, with the possibility of exporting macaques to zoological parks in North America.<br />

Another possibility was to re-introduce some animals back into the wild in Morocco (Martin<br />

1997). This is a costly affair, which involves a great deal of time <strong>and</strong> trouble, but the rewards<br />

would outweigh the problems. GONHS embarked in such a project in 1999 when the<br />

Farringdon group was captured <strong>and</strong> shipped in a specially chartered Antonov plane to the<br />

Wildpark, Daun, in Germany, (see Fig. 1). The cost was borne by the Gibraltar Government<br />

<strong>and</strong> received much publicity in the local press, but at £32,000 it was expensive, <strong>and</strong> the public<br />

purse could ill afford to spend such large sums regularly.<br />

Figure 3. Barbary<br />

macaques from Gibraltar,<br />

foraging in their new<br />

home at Wildpark, Daun,<br />

Germany.<br />

<strong>Upper</strong> <strong>Rock</strong> <strong>Nature</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>: A <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!