12.10.2013 Views

Franklin Delano Roosevelt A Man of the Century

Franklin Delano Roosevelt A Man of the Century

Franklin Delano Roosevelt A Man of the Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dramatic moment in our history. Would <strong>the</strong> economic and social revolution enacted by<br />

<strong>the</strong> elected representatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people be defeated – not at <strong>the</strong> polls but by a Court<br />

whose majority philosophy <strong>the</strong> people had decisively repudiated? Would it now return<br />

<strong>the</strong> demand for change to <strong>the</strong> anarchy and violence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> streets? The<br />

conservative/radical justices who dominated <strong>the</strong> Court, though aged and in declining<br />

health, were determined to stay in <strong>of</strong>fice as long as <strong>Roosevelt</strong> was President in order to<br />

frustrate his programs. President <strong>Roosevelt</strong> took comfort in reading <strong>the</strong>se words from<br />

Abraham Lincoln’s first inaugural:<br />

The candid citizen must confess that if <strong>the</strong> policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government upon<br />

vital questions affecting <strong>the</strong> whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by<br />

decisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, <strong>the</strong> people will have ceased to be <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned <strong>the</strong>ir government into<br />

<strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> that eminent tribunal…<br />

<strong>Roosevelt</strong> had enormous respect for <strong>the</strong> constitutional framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> power and for <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court as an independent branch <strong>of</strong> our<br />

government. But he stood with Lincoln in rejecting <strong>the</strong> concept that <strong>the</strong> Constitution was<br />

a rigid, inflexible instrument that could prevent <strong>the</strong> government from responding to crises<br />

that threatened to destroy <strong>the</strong> nation. FDR presented his reorganization proposal to<br />

Congress on February 5, 1937. Within weeks, under pressure from Chief Justice Hughes,<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r Centurion, <strong>the</strong> Court reversed its course, upholding <strong>the</strong> Wagner Act and <strong>the</strong><br />

Social Security legislation and even <strong>the</strong> State Minimum Wage laws it had ruled<br />

unconstitutional just months before. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reorganization proposals were adopted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Congress including <strong>the</strong> provision that obliges federal judges, o<strong>the</strong>r than those on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, to take senior status at <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 70 so that <strong>the</strong> President can appoint<br />

new justices to <strong>the</strong> bench on which <strong>the</strong>y serve. Wendell Willkie, elected to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

on December 5, 1936, having been nominated by John W. Davis, wrote: “Mr. <strong>Roosevelt</strong><br />

has won. The Court is now his… Mr. <strong>Roosevelt</strong> has accomplished exactly what he<br />

would have accomplished if Congress had approved his proposal…”<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!