World Championship --Jules Rimet Cup 1966 Final ... - FIFA.com
World Championship --Jules Rimet Cup 1966 Final ... - FIFA.com
World Championship --Jules Rimet Cup 1966 Final ... - FIFA.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
from preliminary <strong>com</strong>petition, but that winners should not have open<br />
entry to the next final <strong>com</strong>petition .<br />
There is also a suggestion that consideration should again be given to<br />
"seeding" of the teams taking part. In the first place it is suggested that<br />
some emerging countries (in the sense of football) should be allowed to<br />
take part in a "B" or "Junior" tournament, the winners of the sections<br />
of this tournament challenging in the <strong>com</strong>petition proper with the "A"<br />
teams . Classification on this basis tends to be resented, but for a <strong>com</strong>petition<br />
on the scale of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Cup</strong> it may be inevitable .<br />
Other suggestions include :<br />
(a) Increasing the number of countries from Sixteen to Twenty for the<br />
final <strong>com</strong>petition to give opportunity for more teams from the<br />
geographical preliminary <strong>com</strong>petitions to take part .<br />
(b) Having a central financial pool to meet some of the travelling costs<br />
involved, particularly if teams are to be grouped in such a way to<br />
ensure that weaker teams do not have easy entry to the final group .<br />
(c) Relying on the international <strong>com</strong>petitions in each continent or<br />
region to produce team entry to the final <strong>com</strong>petition .<br />
The Study Group is conscious of the many political, geographical and<br />
financial factors which need to be considered before deciding upon a new<br />
procedure for the preliminary <strong>com</strong>petition, and re<strong>com</strong>mend that <strong>FIFA</strong><br />
should set up a small study group of expert administrators to analyse the<br />
many possibilities before changes are re<strong>com</strong>mended by <strong>FIFA</strong> Executive<br />
Committee .<br />
<strong>Final</strong> Competition<br />
There is always the basic problem of reconciling the desire to produce a<br />
<strong>com</strong>petition arrangement which is equally fair to participating teams,<br />
against the need to provide the public, and especially overseas visitors<br />
with <strong>World</strong> <strong>Cup</strong> interests, with the opportunities to see as much football<br />
as possible and, indeed, what is considered to be equally important, to<br />
have the best match arrangement to ensure the greatest financial returns<br />
from attendances and television .<br />
Nevertheless, there is strong feeling from the national coaches of the<br />
<strong>com</strong>peting countries in this Competition in England that some steps<br />
should be taken to make future <strong>Final</strong> Competitions more fairly balanced .<br />
For example, no team should be <strong>com</strong>pelled to play twice within 48 hours<br />
and possibly with a change of headquarters, and each team should have<br />
equal periods of relaxation between games . Then, too, it is suggested that<br />
the groupings in the final sixteen should be drawn by open and not<br />
geographical lot .