cinematic experience, film space, and the child's world - Film Studies

005.Kuhn.19.2:005.Kuhn. 11/18/10 5:32 PM Page 95
route from one place to another. However, in scenes towards the end of the film,
the canal does begin to take on some qualities of a place of passage—albeit an
uncertain kind of passage—between “home” and Margaret-Anne’s flat. The passage
is dis-located and un-placed, in that the beginning and end points of
James’s journeys between the one and the other are not spatially tied in. The
canal is distinctive, too, in that it morphs from being tightly, almost claustrophobically,
framed at the start to figuring in an increasingly extensive spatial
context as the film progresses, until at the end it is seen in a wide, extreme long
shot that shows a broad expanse of waste ground edged in the far distance by
high-rise flats and other buildings.
The new house and its adjoining field appear on three occasions in the
course of the film, the first in a lengthy sequence that opens with James sitting
on a step at the threshold of the Gillespies’ tenement close watching his older
sister as she crosses the road to wait at a bus stop. In a bid to discover her mysterious
destination, James goes back into his flat and filches some coins from his
father’s trousers pocket. He returns to the street and boards the bus. In expanded
time, the bus conveys him from his street out to the terminus, apparently far
into the countryside. Here James comes upon an estate of partially-built houses,
enters one, and explores the white spaces inside, eventually discovering an
unglazed window space beyond which a golden, empty field is visible. He clambers
out and runs and plays in the field; and is then next seen walking back
home along an empty road.
Throughout this sequence, the various spaces (close, street, “home,” new
house) are tied together, either by spatiotemporal editing and/or by point-of-view
shots. The whole passage is exactly a journey from home to an unfamiliar space
and then back home again, much as described by Balint in his discussion of
“home” and “friendly expanses.” The thresholds and the intermediate spaces are
clear, and the unfamiliar spaces of the new house and field possess the qualities
of Balint’s “friendly expanses” and of the real/imaginal space of playing. The bus
journey is the film’s only instance of locomotion other than on foot. In relation
to the defining characteristics of children’s geographies, the bus journey—along
with the temporal expansiveness of James’s journey—marks the space of the
new house as “other” in terms of the child’s world. In this way, too, the new
house is set up as both real and imaginary. In every one of these respects, this
sequence is in clear contrast to all of the canal scenes. It is also markedly different
from the subsequent two occasions on which the new house is seen. 27
* * *
The metapsychological argument about film and cinema advanced here is that
through its organization within the frame of spatiality, liminality and motion, the
medium is capable of replaying or invoking states of being that are commonly
experienced as inner, and which operate largely at a preconscious, rather than at
CINEMATIC EXPERIENCE, FILM SPACE, AND THE CHILD’S WORLD 95