Predicting the water-use of Eucalyptus nitens plantations in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Growth: Age MDH BA Vol MAI (yr) (m) (m²/ha) (m³/ha) (m³/ha/yr) 3 10 6 20 7 4 12 10 46 12 5 14 15 78 16 6 16 20 114 19 7 18 24 153 22 8 20 28 196 24 9 22 32 239 27 10 23 35 279 28 11 25 38 325 30 12 26 41 367 31 13 27 43 407 31 14 29 45 451 32 15 30 47 490 33 16 31 49 528 33 17 32 51 568 33 18 33 52 604 34 19 34 54 642 34 20 35 55 680 34 21 36 56 712 34 22 37 57 747 34 23 38 59 782 34 24 39 60 810 34 25 40 61 843 34 26 40 61 874 34 27 41 62 899 33 28 42 63 928 33 29 42 64 957 33 30 43 65 985 33 31 44 65 1006 32 32 44 66 1032 32 33 45 67 1058 32 34 45 67 1083 32 35 46 68 1107 32 36 46 68 1123 31 37 47 69 1146 31 38 47 69 1167 31 39 48 70 1189 30 40 48 70 1209 30 41 49 71 1229 30 42 49 71 1241 30 43 50 72 1260 29 44 50 72 1278 29 45 50 72 1296 29 46 51 73 1313 29 47 51 73 1329 28 48 51 73 1345 28 49 52 74 1361 28 50 52 74 1368 27
SQ is Site Quality Vol is the sum of all tree stem wood volumes under bark from ground to top SQ index is MDH at age 15 yrs BA is Basal Area (cross-sectional area of all trees over bark at 1.3m high) MDH is Mean Dominant Height MAI is Mean Annual Increment of Vol LAI is Leaf Area Index (ratio of leaf area to ground area) NOTE: Growth data are for an unthinned stand planted at 1000 stems/ha. WARNING: Results shown are based on assumptions regarding input costs, revenues. Product yields from growth models may be indicative only. Professional advice should be sought before acting on any output model.
Page 1 and 2: RESOURCES PROJECT NUMBER: PNC143.08
Page 3 and 4: Publication: Predicting the water-u
Page 5 and 6: A simple empirical model (below) wa
Page 7 and 8: 1. Introduction Plantation developm
Page 9 and 10: use functions based on growth param
Page 11 and 12: 975 mm/yr during the experiment. Th
Page 13 and 14: Water Use (mm/yr) 08 09 10 08 09 10
Page 15 and 16: It is important to note that the ba
Page 17 and 18: 3. Forestier Plantation Water-use A
Page 19 and 20: 3.2. Weather Station An automatic w
Page 21 and 22: Rainfall Collected in Throughfall T
Page 23 and 24: Stemflow (L) 500 450 400 350 300 25
Page 25 and 26: 4. Comparison of Florentine and For
Page 27 and 28: triangle), Florentine thinned (blue
Page 29 and 30: the Florentine Valley, but that it
Page 31 and 32: 6. Final water-use function The rec
Page 33 and 34: Wood Volume Standing Wood Volume Cu
Page 35 and 36: In addition to producing the charts
Page 37 and 38: Figure 20. FEM screenshot showing v
Page 39 and 40: Table 4. Schedule of activities tha
Page 41 and 42: single Forestier site of age 6 -7 y
Page 43 and 44: • FEMs represent the best availab
Page 45 and 46: 11. References Battaglia, M., and S
Page 47 and 48: Macfarlane, C., Bond, C., White, D.
Page 49 and 50: 12. Acknowledgements This research
Page 51: Site productivity FFT v4.158 Saved
Page 55 and 56: Growth: Age MDH BA Vol MAI (yr) (m)

Predicting the water-use of Eucalyptus nitens plantations in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?