26.10.2013 Views

Fuel Tank Inerting Harmonization Working Group Team Reports

Fuel Tank Inerting Harmonization Working Group Team Reports

Fuel Tank Inerting Harmonization Working Group Team Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ground-Based <strong>Inerting</strong> Designs Task <strong>Team</strong> Final Report<br />

failures that will prevent the system from allowing the tanks to be inerted. In the case of the more likely<br />

failures, i.e., failure of the shut off valve, maintenance procedures can be devised which will still allow<br />

the airplane to be dispatched with the tanks inerted. This aspect is considered further in the Safety<br />

Analysis <strong>Team</strong> Appendix H and the Airline Operations & Maintenance <strong>Team</strong> Appendix F.<br />

6.7 SYSTEM COSTS<br />

System costs are examined in detail in the Estimating and Forecasting <strong>Team</strong> Appendix G.<br />

6.8 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES<br />

The GBI system may introduce additional VOCs to the atmosphere as a result of the ullage washing<br />

procedure. Since the center tanks would be inerted every flight, the ullage and its associated VOCs from<br />

residual fuel would be exhausted out the vent system at each turn around whether the center tank was<br />

utilized or not. The detailed environmental analysis of this GBI system is beyond the scope of the Tasking<br />

Statement and is not addressed here.<br />

7.0 GROUND SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS<br />

7.1 NEA PURITY<br />

Nitrogen Enriched Air (NEA) purity effects a number of different aspects of the ground based inerting<br />

system, however the primary effect on the aircraft system is one of varying the volume of NEA required<br />

to be loaded. The precise volume would be determined during development (analysis and testing) testing<br />

of the particular aircraft model and would be for a particular purity of NEA. NEA purity can also have an<br />

effect on the initial design to support the desired turn times to inert the aircraft. NEA 95% (95% nitrogen<br />

and 5% oxygen) was recommended for use in this inerting study in the beginning. Later, it was<br />

determined that NEA of slightly higher nitrogen concentration of 97 % or 98 % may be more desirable<br />

from overall cost and commercial standpoint. (See Figure 7.1-1 below). The cost of the gas is slightly<br />

higher for the higher purity, but the volume required to inert the fuel tank would be less. Consequently,<br />

the price of the total load of NEA may be lower.<br />

C-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!