The trend for bundling products in ICT - Frontier Economics
The trend for bundling products in ICT - Frontier Economics
The trend for bundling products in ICT - Frontier Economics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>trend</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>products</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>ICT</strong><br />
A PRESENTATION FOR ITS CONFERENCE - ISTANBUL<br />
September 5 th , 2007<br />
© <strong>Frontier</strong> <strong>Economics</strong> Ltd, London.
3<br />
<strong>The</strong> rise of triple-play and quad-play<br />
Traditional divisions between voice (fixed and mobile), broadband <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />
access and digital TV are break<strong>in</strong>g down<br />
A number of providers have launched high profile offers of bundled <strong>products</strong><br />
Fixed telephony<br />
Internet access<br />
Mobile<br />
Core product Extension to new <strong>products</strong><br />
TV<br />
Content
4<br />
Bundles are available and valued by consumers<br />
<strong>The</strong> emergence of these developments has been spurred by technological and<br />
regulatory change:<br />
Technology provides operators the ability to offer TV and VoD over<br />
broadband with Mobile-TV and IP-TV<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>trend</strong> <strong>for</strong> liberalisation have made wholesale <strong>products</strong> available that enable<br />
more providers to offer full suite of retail services<br />
Evidence suggests that consumers <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly value the ability to buy these<br />
bundled <strong>products</strong>
5<br />
… but the fact that it is feasible and valued, does not<br />
mean is always profitable<br />
In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is the best commercial option, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
questions need to be addressed:<br />
Does <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease the lifetime profitability of a customer?<br />
Can <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> give a provider more susta<strong>in</strong>able competitive advantage to<br />
enable it to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased profitability?
6<br />
Can <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> impact lifetime profitability?<br />
Lifetime profitability of a given customer depends on:<br />
<strong>The</strong> costs <strong>in</strong>curred to acquire the customer;<br />
<strong>The</strong> length of time that customer stays with the provider (customer retention)<br />
<strong>The</strong> profitability of that customer dur<strong>in</strong>g that period<br />
If <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> improves any of these metrics, <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> may be a profitable<br />
strategy
7<br />
But <strong>for</strong> <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> to be profitable, cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs should be<br />
greater than the discounts<br />
With unbundled product offer<strong>in</strong>g, operator can earn a NPV per customer of £182*<br />
Product<br />
Voice (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rental)<br />
Broadband<br />
Total<br />
Revenue/<br />
month<br />
20<br />
20<br />
40<br />
Cost/<br />
month<br />
18<br />
18<br />
36<br />
Profit/<br />
month<br />
N.B. Example is based on some of the most aggressive bundled offers <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
* Calculations assume a 10% discount rate<br />
2<br />
2<br />
4<br />
Customer lifetime<br />
(months)<br />
60<br />
60
8<br />
With bundled offer, NPV can be negative<br />
With bundled product offer<strong>in</strong>g, NPV per customer down to -£728*<br />
Product<br />
Voice (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rental)<br />
Broadband<br />
Total<br />
Revenue/<br />
month<br />
20<br />
0<br />
40<br />
Cost/<br />
month<br />
18<br />
18<br />
36<br />
Profit/<br />
month<br />
N.B. Example is based on some of the most aggressive bundled offers <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
* Calculations assume a 10% discount rate<br />
2<br />
-18<br />
-16<br />
Customer lifetime<br />
(months)<br />
60<br />
60
9<br />
To earn similar profit to unbundled situation, need to<br />
reduce costs by more than 50%....<br />
With cost reduction of 53%, NPV per customer is £136*<br />
Product<br />
Voice (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rental)<br />
Broadband<br />
Total<br />
Revenue/<br />
month<br />
20<br />
0<br />
40<br />
Cost/<br />
month<br />
8.5<br />
8.5<br />
17<br />
Profit/<br />
month<br />
N.B. Example is based on some of the most aggressive bundled offers <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
* Calculations assume a 10% discount rate<br />
11.5<br />
-8.5<br />
3<br />
Customer lifetime<br />
(months)<br />
60<br />
60
10<br />
… and <strong>in</strong>crease average customer lifetime (reduce churn)<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g lifetime per customer to 96 months, NPV per customer is £192*<br />
Product<br />
Voice (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rental)<br />
Broadband<br />
Total<br />
Revenue/<br />
month<br />
20<br />
0<br />
40<br />
Cost/<br />
month<br />
8.5<br />
8.5<br />
17<br />
Profit/<br />
month<br />
N.B. Example is based on some of the most aggressive bundled offers <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
* Calculations assume a 10% discount rate<br />
11.5<br />
-8.5<br />
3<br />
Customer lifetime<br />
(months)<br />
96<br />
96
11<br />
A rush <strong>for</strong> market share?<br />
If discount<strong>in</strong>g passes on, or even goes beyond, cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs, it would seem to<br />
characterise a rush amongst participants <strong>for</strong> market share. But could greater<br />
market share provide a competitive advantage?<br />
For providers with fixed costs, a higher market share can promote economies<br />
of scale<br />
A greater market share might improve an operator’s chance of gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
favourable access to valuable content and advertisement spend<br />
A rush <strong>for</strong> market share now, be<strong>for</strong>e customers become entrenched with<br />
chosen supplier
12<br />
Should all providers jo<strong>in</strong> the rush?<br />
Challenges and opportunities from <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and the aggressive pric<strong>in</strong>g, likely<br />
to differ <strong>for</strong> providers accord<strong>in</strong>g to:<br />
<strong>The</strong> portfolio of services they already offer<br />
<strong>The</strong> competition they face<br />
<strong>The</strong> technology available to them<br />
In the rush to bundle, providers should not neglect the factors that are valued<br />
by their customers<br />
Overall, not evident that <strong>bundl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on its own can provide susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
competitive advantage
14<br />
<strong>Frontier</strong> <strong>Economics</strong> Limited <strong>in</strong> Europe is a member of the <strong>Frontier</strong> <strong>Economics</strong> network, which consists of separate companies based<br />
<strong>in</strong> Europe (Brussels, Cologne and London) and Australia (Melbourne & Sydney). <strong>The</strong> companies are <strong>in</strong>dependently owned, and legal<br />
commitments entered <strong>in</strong>to by any one company do not impose any obligations on other companies <strong>in</strong> the network. All views<br />
expressed <strong>in</strong> this document are the views of <strong>Frontier</strong> <strong>Economics</strong> Limited.
15<br />
FRONTIER ECONOMICS EUROPE<br />
BRUSSELS | COLOGNE | LONDON<br />
<strong>Frontier</strong> <strong>Economics</strong> Ltd, 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6DA<br />
Tel. +44 (0)20 7031 7000 Fax. +44 (0)20 7031 7001 www.frontier-economics.com