- Page 1: Learning Motor Skills: From Algorit
- Page 6 and 7: epresenting sub-tasks, can be combi
- Page 8 and 9: durch das Anpassen einer kleinen An
- Page 11 and 12: Contents Abstract Zusammenfassung A
- Page 13: 6 Learning Prioritized Control of M
- Page 16 and 17: Policy search, also known as policy
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 1.1: This figure illustrates
- Page 21 and 22: 2 Reinforcement Learning in Robotic
- Page 23 and 24: (a) OBELIX robot (b) Zebra Zero rob
- Page 25 and 26: the task’s performance. This prob
- Page 27 and 28: the policy is considered a conditio
- Page 29 and 30: POLICY SEARCH Approach Employed by.
- Page 31 and 32: SMART STATE-ACTION DISCRETIZATION A
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 2.3: Boston Dynamics LittleD
- Page 35 and 36: DEMONSTRATION Approach Employed by.
- Page 37 and 38: Benefits of Noise: A complex real-w
- Page 39 and 40: (a) Schematic drawings of the ball-
- Page 41 and 42: The policy converges to the maximum
- Page 43: obot reinforcement learning tractab
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 3.1: This figure illustrates
- Page 48 and 49: This canonical system has the time
- Page 50 and 51: 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 3 2
- Page 52 and 53:
with f ref containing the values of
- Page 54 and 55:
Figure 3.7: Generalization to vario
- Page 56 and 57:
We evaluate the algorithms derived
- Page 58 and 59:
2007], such a derivation results in
- Page 60 and 61:
Algorithm 4.2 episodic Natural Acto
- Page 62 and 63:
Algorithm 4.3 episodic Reward Weigh
- Page 64 and 65:
Open Parameters DoF Rollouts Policy
- Page 66 and 67:
(a) minimum motor command (b) passi
- Page 68 and 69:
1 average return 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 FD
- Page 70 and 71:
Figure 4.7: This figure shows the i
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 4.10: This figure illustrate
- Page 74 and 75:
1 0.8 average return 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
- Page 76 and 77:
updates in simulation (such as Dyna
- Page 78 and 79:
complex. We modeled the system in a
- Page 80 and 81:
and, thus, ∂ θ log π = σ −2
- Page 83 and 84:
5 Reinforcement Learning to Adjust
- Page 85 and 86:
parameters for scaling the duration
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.2: This figure illustrates
- Page 89 and 90:
egression solution w = (Φ T RΦ +
- Page 91 and 92:
100 (a) Velocity 2 (b) Precision 3
- Page 93 and 94:
The setup is given as follows: A to
- Page 95 and 96:
1.4 1.2 Cost−regularized Kernel R
- Page 97 and 98:
(a) Left. (b) Half left. (c) Center
- Page 99 and 100:
0.9 cost/success 0.7 0.5 0.3 Succes
- Page 101 and 102:
position and velocity of the arm, t
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5.21: This figure illustrate
- Page 105:
favor behaviors with a higher numbe
- Page 108 and 109:
are possible. This redundancy can b
- Page 110 and 111:
6.2.1 Single Primitive Control Law
- Page 112 and 113:
(a) Exaggerated schematic drawing.
- Page 114 and 115:
Dominance Structure Number of Hits
- Page 117 and 118:
7 Conclusion In this thesis, we hav
- Page 119 and 120:
Learning Motor Skills The presented
- Page 121 and 122:
Learning Layers Jointly For the bal
- Page 123:
Book Chapters J. Kober and J. Peter
- Page 126:
J. A. Bagnell and J. C. Schneider.
- Page 129 and 130:
H. Fässler, H. A. Beyer, and J. T.
- Page 131 and 132:
F. Kirchner. Q-learning of complex
- Page 133 and 134:
J. A. Martín H., J. de Lope, and D
- Page 135 and 136:
L. Peshkin. Reinforcement Learning
- Page 137 and 138:
F. Sehnke, C. Osendorfer, T. Rücks
- Page 139:
A. Ude, A. Gams, T. Asfour, and J.
- Page 142 and 143:
3.2 In this figure, we convey the i
- Page 144 and 145:
4.11 This figure shows schematic dr
- Page 146 and 147:
5.17 This figure illustrates the si
- Page 149:
List of Tables 2.1 This table illus
- Page 152 and 153:
As symbols in this PhD thesis, the