2004 Annual Report - Girls Inc.
2004 Annual Report - Girls Inc.
2004 Annual Report - Girls Inc.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Programs and Programming<br />
Direct, Focused Engagement:<br />
The <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. Strength<br />
In <strong>2004</strong>, <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. observed its 140th anniversary.<br />
Across those years, we have consistently advanced a<br />
forward thinking view of the role of girls and young<br />
women in society and the resources they deserve to be<br />
given as they prepare for their own futures.<br />
In the 1960s, the realities of women’s lives<br />
underwent historic change. <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. responded to the<br />
significant opportunities of the civil rights and women’s<br />
movements, the flood of women entering the workforce,<br />
and the adolescent turbulence of the time. This generation<br />
was preparing for very different adulthoods, and<br />
the role of <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. in their lives changed as well.<br />
In the 1970s and early 80s, program development<br />
at <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. was undertaken on a relatively small scale.<br />
But there was growing interest in investing more<br />
resources in girls’ development, and a growing network<br />
of child development experts, educators, women’s<br />
colleges and foundations eager to get involved.<br />
<strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. set out to develop programs on a national<br />
scale that would be unlike anything any other organization<br />
was doing. And we were willing to focus on topics<br />
others wouldn’t touch, like sex education.<br />
“We were especially concerned about sex education<br />
because the profile of many of the girls we served was<br />
the same as that of most at risk for early pregnancy,”<br />
recalls Margaret Gates, National Executive Director of<br />
<strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. from 1983 to 1993.<br />
“At the time, the only effort in this area was called<br />
family life planning. The idea was to talk to young<br />
people about the appropriate time to have children, that<br />
children needed a home, that a home required marriage<br />
and marriage required thought, and sex required<br />
marriage, and so forth. It wasn’t all that effective.”<br />
<strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. decided to build a more comprehensive<br />
approach. <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. Preventing Adolescent Pregnancy ®<br />
showed girls they had the power to control their<br />
sexuality and reproductive future. In a rigorous<br />
evaluation, the program was deemed successful in its<br />
dual goals of postponing the age of first sexual activity<br />
and reducing the incidence of adolescent pregnancy.<br />
Another program priority was to help prepare girls<br />
for success in the world of work. Everything pointed to<br />
the fact that future job growth was going to be in the<br />
technological sector. There would be a need for more<br />
people with skills in math and science — areas girls<br />
were still being socialized to avoid.<br />
<strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. developed <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. Operation SMART ® ,<br />
which offered girls a way to learn that was linked to<br />
adventure and discovery. While other educators were<br />
talking about this method, it was the first real opportunity<br />
many of the girls we served had to experience it.<br />
“After the launch of Operation SMART, the organization<br />
knew it was on to something big,” says Susan<br />
Houchin, <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. Director of National Services. “We<br />
were poised to create a framework of programming that<br />
affiliates across the country could offer, grounded in the<br />
core principles of our <strong>Girls</strong>’ Bill of Rights, and reflecting<br />
rigorous standards of research, testing and evaluation.”<br />
In the mid-1980s, Houchin was Executive Director<br />
of <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. of Sioux City, Iowa, and she recalls the<br />
real hunger on the part of affiliates for substantive<br />
programming resources.<br />
“Many of us were small centers with very limited<br />
budgets,” says Houchin. “We were pretty much on our<br />
own in terms of what to offer. So when <strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>Girls</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>orporated<br />
Strong<br />
Smart