LIN 1152: Variation in Language Contact Contexts - University of ...
LIN 1152: Variation in Language Contact Contexts - University of ...
LIN 1152: Variation in Language Contact Contexts - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 1 <br />
<strong>LIN</strong> <strong>1152</strong>: <strong>Variation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Contexts</strong> <br />
Bibliography <br />
1. <strong>Contact</strong>‐<strong>in</strong>duced language change – general <br />
Aikenvald, Alexandra & R.M.W. Dixon. 2006. Grammars <strong>in</strong> <strong>Contact</strong>: A cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
typology. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Braunmüller, Kurt & Juliane House. 2009. Convergence and Divergence <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong><br />
Situations. Benjam<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
http://www.benjam<strong>in</strong>s.com/cgib<strong>in</strong>/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=HSM%208<br />
Dixon, R.M. W. & A. Aikenvald. 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic <strong>in</strong>heritance: Case Studies <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Language</strong> Change. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Labov, W. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. <strong>Language</strong> 83:344-87.<br />
Matras, Yaron. 2009. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong>. Cambridge.<br />
McMahon, April. 1994. Understand<strong>in</strong>g language change. NY: Cambridge.<br />
Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f, M. & N. Nagy, eds. 2008. Social Lives <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> -- Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and<br />
multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s: Amsterdam.<br />
Nichols, Joanna. 1992. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Diversity <strong>in</strong> Space and Time. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.<br />
Roma<strong>in</strong>e, Suzanne. 1989. The role <strong>of</strong> children <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic change. In Leiv Egil Breivik & Ernst<br />
Håkon Jahr, eds. <strong>Language</strong> change: Contributions to the study <strong>of</strong> its causes. Berl<strong>in</strong>, New<br />
York: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />
Silva-Corvalan, Carmen. 2001. Lenguas en contacto y bil<strong>in</strong>güismo. Sociol<strong>in</strong>güistica y<br />
pragmatica. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: Georgetown UP. 269-332.<br />
Thomason, Sarah. 2001a. <strong>Contact</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced typological change. In Mart<strong>in</strong> Haspelmath, Ekkehard<br />
König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, eds., <strong>Language</strong> typology and language<br />
universals, Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien: An <strong>in</strong>ternational handbook.<br />
Berl<strong>in</strong> & New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1640-1648.<br />
Thomason, Sarah. 2001b. <strong>Contact</strong> languages. In Rajend Mesthrie and R.E. Asher, eds. Concise<br />
Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics. Oxford: Elsevier Science. 461-464.<br />
Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. <strong>Language</strong> contact, creolization, and genetic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>guistics. Berkeley: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. L<strong>in</strong>guistic change and diffusion: description and explanation <strong>in</strong><br />
sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic dialect geography. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>in</strong> Society 3:215-46.<br />
Valois, Daniel, Edouard Beniak & Raymond Mougeon. 1985. A sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic study <strong>of</strong><br />
language contact, shift and change. L<strong>in</strong>guistics 23: 455-87.<br />
van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types <strong>in</strong> language contact.<br />
Dordrecht: Foris.<br />
We<strong>in</strong>reich, Uriel. 1974. [1953] <strong>Language</strong>s <strong>in</strong> contact. Mouton: The Hague.<br />
2. Grammaticization & Grammatical change <br />
Blondeau, Hélène and Naomi Nagy. 2008. Subord<strong>in</strong>ate clause mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Montreal Anglophone<br />
French and English. In M. Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f & N. Nagy, eds. Social Lives <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> --
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 2 <br />
Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s: Amsterdam.<br />
273–313.<br />
Comrie, Bernard. 2008. Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to<br />
mixed languages. In P. Siemund & N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong><br />
<strong>Language</strong>s. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 15-32.<br />
Emeneau, Murray. 1980 [1962]. Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism and structural borrow<strong>in</strong>g. In Anwar Dil (ed.)<br />
<strong>Language</strong> and l<strong>in</strong>guistic area. Stanford <strong>University</strong> Press 38-65. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted from<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the American Philosophical Society 106:430-442.<br />
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Er<strong>in</strong> Shay. 2008. <strong>Language</strong>-Internal versus <strong>Contact</strong>-Induced Change:<br />
The Split Cod<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Person and Number: A Stefan Elders Question. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Language</strong><br />
<strong>Contact</strong> – THEMA 2:274-298.<br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd. 2008. <strong>Contact</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced word order change without word order change. In P.<br />
Siemund & N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Language</strong>s. John<br />
Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 33-60.<br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and Grammatical Change. CUP.<br />
Chs. 1-3 (pp. 1-122).<br />
Johanson, Lars. 2008. Copy<strong>in</strong>g, conventionalization, grammaticalization. In P. Siemund &<br />
N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Language</strong>s. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 61-80.<br />
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Investigat<strong>in</strong>g the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> pattern replication <strong>in</strong><br />
language convergence. Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> 31.4:829-65.<br />
Poplack, Shana & Levey, Stephen. In press/2010. <strong>Contact</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced grammatical change. In<br />
Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.) <strong>Language</strong> and Space – An <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
handbook <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic variation: Volume 1 – Theories and methods. Berl<strong>in</strong>: Mouton de<br />
Gruyter. [added on Joanne's recommendation]<br />
Siemund, Peter & Noemi K<strong>in</strong>tana. 2008. Introduction. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong><br />
<strong>Language</strong>s. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 3-14. P 130 .5 L333 2008<br />
3. Methods <br />
Montrul, Silv<strong>in</strong>a. 2009. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> tense-aspect and mood <strong>in</strong> Spanish heritage speakers. Int’l<br />
J. <strong>of</strong> Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism 13:239-69.<br />
Noonan, Michael. 2008. <strong>Contact</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced change: The case <strong>of</strong> the Tamangic languages. In<br />
P. Siemund & N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Language</strong>s. John<br />
Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 81-106.<br />
Sanchez, Tara. 2008. Accountability <strong>in</strong> morphological borrow<strong>in</strong>g: Analyz<strong>in</strong>g a l<strong>in</strong>guistic <br />
subsystem as a sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic variable. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong> and Change 20.2:225‐<br />
254. <br />
Schleef, Eric & Miriam Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f. 2009 ms. Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic methods for data collection and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation. Routledge.<br />
Wilkerson, Miranda & Joseph Salmons. 2008. 'Good old immigrants <strong>of</strong> yesteryear' who<br />
didn't learn English: Germans <strong>in</strong> Wiscons<strong>in</strong>. American Speech 83:3.259-283.<br />
Quantify<strong>in</strong>g similarity difference/change <br />
Auger, Julie and Anne-José Villeneuve. 2008. Ne deletion <strong>in</strong> Picard and <strong>in</strong> regional French:<br />
Evidence for dist<strong>in</strong>ct grammars . In M. Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f & N. Nagy, eds. Social Lives <strong>in</strong>
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 3 <br />
<strong>Language</strong> -- Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s:<br />
Amsterdam. 223–247.<br />
4. Null subjects <br />
Bayley, Robert and Luc<strong>in</strong>da Pease-Alvarez. 1997. Null pronoun variation <strong>in</strong> Mexicandescent<br />
children's narrative discourse. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong> and Change 9:349-371.<br />
Cameron, Richard. 1996. A community-based test <strong>of</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>guistic hypothesis. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Society 25:61-111.<br />
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2004. Spanish subject personal pronoun use <strong>in</strong> NYC Puerto Ricans: Can<br />
we rest the case <strong>of</strong> English contact? <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong> and Change 16:49-73.<br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and Grammatical Change.<br />
Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press. 68-70.<br />
Hyams, N<strong>in</strong>a. 1986. <strong>Language</strong> acquisition and the theory <strong>of</strong> parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.<br />
Mesthrie, Raj & Rakesh Bhatt. World Englishes: The Study <strong>of</strong> new l<strong>in</strong>guistic varieties.<br />
Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press. 167-172<br />
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. <strong>Contact</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistics: Bil<strong>in</strong>gual encounters and grammatical<br />
outcomes. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.<br />
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ana Celia Zentella & Eric Livert. 2007. <strong>Language</strong> and dialect contact <strong>in</strong><br />
Spanish <strong>in</strong> New York: Toward the formation <strong>of</strong> a speech community. <strong>Language</strong><br />
83.4:770-803.<br />
Paredes Silva, Vera Lúcia. 1993 Subject omission and functional compensation: Evidence from<br />
written Brazilian Portuguese. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong> and Change 5:35–50<br />
Pol<strong>in</strong>sky, Maria. 1995. Cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic parallels <strong>in</strong> language loss. Southwest Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
L<strong>in</strong>guistics 14:1-2: 87-123.<br />
Pol<strong>in</strong>sky, M. 2006. Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal <strong>of</strong> Slavic L<strong>in</strong>guistics.<br />
14:191-262. PG1 .J68<br />
Schmitt, Elena. 2000. Overt and covert codeswitch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> immigrant children from Russia. Int'l<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism 4:9-28.<br />
Schmitt, Elena. 2001. Beneath the surface: Signs <strong>of</strong> language attrition <strong>in</strong> immigrant children<br />
from Russian. PhD diss., Columbia, SC: Univ. <strong>of</strong> South Carol<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1996. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and Change: Spanish <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles. NY:<br />
Oxford.<br />
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Cather<strong>in</strong>e E. Travis. (forthcom<strong>in</strong>g-2009). Variable yo<br />
expression <strong>in</strong> New Mexico: English <strong>in</strong>fluence? Spanish <strong>of</strong> the Southwest: A language<br />
<strong>in</strong> transition, Susana Rivera-Mills & Daniel Villa (eds.). Frankfurt:<br />
Iberoamericana/Vervuert.<br />
Null subjects <strong>in</strong> English <br />
Cote, Sharon. 1996. "Grammatical and discourse properties <strong>of</strong> null arguments <strong>in</strong> English"<br />
(January 1, 1996). Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI9712913.<br />
http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI9712913<br />
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Non-overt subjects <strong>in</strong> diary contexts. In Mascaro, J. and M. Nespor<br />
(eds.). Grammar <strong>in</strong> Progress: GLOW Essays for Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris<br />
Publications.<br />
Harvie, Dawn.1998. Null subject <strong>in</strong> English: Wonder if it exists? Cahiers L<strong>in</strong>guistiques<br />
d'Ottawa 26: 15–25.
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 4 <br />
Lattey, Elsa. 1980. Grammatical Systems Across <strong>Language</strong>s: A Study <strong>of</strong> Participation <strong>in</strong><br />
English, German and Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation. City <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New York.<br />
<strong>University</strong> Micr<strong>of</strong>ilms 8023716.<br />
Massam, Diane. 1989. Middles, Tough and Recipe Constructions: Licens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Null Objects and<br />
Non-Thematic Subjects. Ms., <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Toronto.<br />
Rizzi, Luigi. 1992. Early Null Subjects and Root Null Subjects. Ms., <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Geneva.<br />
Roberge, Yves. 1990. The Syntactic Recoverability <strong>of</strong> Null Arguments. Montreal: McGill-<br />
Queen's <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
5. Grammatical constra<strong>in</strong>ts & common collocations <br />
Blondeau, Hélène and Naomi Nagy. 2008. Subord<strong>in</strong>ate clause mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Montreal<br />
Anglophone French and English. In M. Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f & N. Nagy, eds. Social Lives <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Language</strong> -- Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s:<br />
Amsterdam. 273–313.<br />
Bybee, Joan L., and Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2009. The role <strong>of</strong> prefabs <strong>in</strong> grammaticization: How<br />
the particular and the general <strong>in</strong>teract <strong>in</strong> language change. In Roberta L. Corrigan, Edith<br />
A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.). Formulaic language: Volume<br />
1. Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam: John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 187-217.<br />
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and James A. Walker. 2009a. On the persistence <strong>of</strong> grammar <strong>in</strong><br />
discourse formulas: a variationist study <strong>of</strong> that. L<strong>in</strong>guistics 47: 1-43.<br />
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and James A. Walker. 2009b. The present <strong>of</strong> the English future:<br />
Grammatical variation and collocations <strong>in</strong> discourse. <strong>Language</strong> 85: 321-354.<br />
6. Borrowability Hierarchies <br />
Matras, Yaron. 2009. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong>. Cambridge. §6.2 Generalisations on borrow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
and §8.4 Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> contact-<strong>in</strong>duced change <strong>in</strong> phonology.<br />
more on Pol<strong>in</strong>sky '95 (See Week 4)<br />
Treffers-Daller, J. 1999. Borrow<strong>in</strong>g and shift-<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>terference: Contrast<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>in</strong><br />
French-German contact <strong>in</strong> Brussels and Strasbourg. Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism: <strong>Language</strong> and<br />
Cognition 2.1:1-22.<br />
7. Universals vs. the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> contact <br />
Biberauer, T., G. Newton & M. Sheehan. to appear/2009b. Impossible changes and <br />
impossible borrow<strong>in</strong>gs. A. Breitbarth, C. Lucas, S. Watts & D. Willis, eds. <br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uity and Change <strong>in</strong> Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. <br />
Filppula, Markku, Juhani Klemola & Heli Paulasto. 2009. Vernacular Universals and <br />
<strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong>s: Evidence from Varieties <strong>of</strong> English and Beyond. London: <br />
Routledge. An Overview. 116 <br />
Good, Jeff (ed.). 2008. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Universals and <strong>Language</strong> Change. Oxford: Oxford <strong>University</strong> <br />
Press. P204 .L567 2008 Due Apr 14, 2010<br />
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Lev<strong>in</strong>son. 2009. The myth <strong>of</strong> language universals: <strong>Language</strong><br />
diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Bra<strong>in</strong> Sciences.<br />
Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 5 <br />
Stolz, Thomas. Total reduplication vs. echo-word formation <strong>in</strong> language contact situations.<br />
In P. Siemund & N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Language</strong>s. John<br />
Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 107-32.<br />
W<strong>in</strong>ford, Donald. 2009. The Interplay <strong>of</strong> 'Universals' and contact-<strong>in</strong>duced change <strong>in</strong> the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> New Englishes. In FK&P 206-30.<br />
8. Social/demographic factors <br />
Guy, Gregory R. 1990. The sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic types <strong>of</strong> language change. Diachronica. VII:1.47-<br />
67. [This is a non-circulat<strong>in</strong>g volume <strong>in</strong> the library. P1 A1 D52]<br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and Grammatical Change. CUP.<br />
Chapter 6. (219-259)<br />
Holmes, Janet. 1992. An Introduction to Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics. Longman. Ch. 9 (204-232). P40<br />
.H56 2001<br />
Lynch, Andrew. 2009. A sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic analysis <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al /s/ <strong>in</strong> Miami Cuban Spanish.<br />
<strong>Language</strong> Sciences 31:766-90.<br />
Milroy, J. & L. Milroy. 1985. L<strong>in</strong>guistic change, social network, and speaker <strong>in</strong>novation. J. <strong>of</strong><br />
Lx. 21.2:339-384.<br />
Stanford, James N. 2009. “Eat<strong>in</strong>g the food <strong>of</strong> our place”: Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic loyalties <strong>in</strong><br />
multidialectal Sui villages. Lg. <strong>in</strong> Soc. 38:287-309.<br />
Trudgill, Peter. 1989. <strong>Contact</strong> and isolation <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic change. In Leiv Egil Breivik &<br />
Ernst Håkon Jahr, Eds. <strong>Language</strong> change: Contributions to the study <strong>of</strong> its causes.<br />
Berl<strong>in</strong>, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. P142 .L26 1989<br />
Trudgill, P. 2004. The impact <strong>of</strong> language contact and social structure on l<strong>in</strong>guistic structure:<br />
Focus on the dialects <strong>of</strong> Modern Greek. Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar<br />
from a cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic perspective. B. Kortmann, ed. NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 435-52.<br />
9. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g similarity/change <br />
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Alex D’Arcy. 2009. Localized globalization: A multi-local,<br />
multivariate <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> quotative be like. Journal <strong>of</strong> Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics 13.3:291-<br />
331.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g, Ruth. 2008. Chiac <strong>in</strong> context: Overview and evaluation <strong>of</strong> Acadie’s Joual. <strong>in</strong> M.<br />
Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f & N. Nagy, eds. Social Lives <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> – Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and<br />
multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. 137-178.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g, Ruth. 2000. The lexical basis <strong>of</strong> grammatical borrow<strong>in</strong>g: A Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Edward Island case<br />
study. Amsterdam: John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f, Miriam. 2009. A quantitative approach to transfer and calqu<strong>in</strong>g: Us<strong>in</strong>g variation as a<br />
tool <strong>in</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> language contact. Under review. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong> and Change.<br />
(and return to Auger & Villeneuve)<br />
10. Complexity measures & Simplification <br />
Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f, Miriam. Empirical problems with doma<strong>in</strong>-based notions <strong>of</strong> "simple" . In M.<br />
Meyerh<strong>of</strong>f & N. Nagy, Eds. 2008. Social Lives <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> -- Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics and<br />
multil<strong>in</strong>gual speech communities. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s: Amsterdam. 327–355.
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 6 <br />
Nichols, J. 2006. The robust bell curve <strong>of</strong> morphological complexity. (With Jonathan Barnes<br />
and David A. Peterson.) L<strong>in</strong>guistic Typology 10:1.98-108.<br />
Nichols, J. 2009. L<strong>in</strong>guistic complexity: A comprehensive def<strong>in</strong>ition and survey. Ge<strong>of</strong>frey<br />
Sampson, ed., <strong>Language</strong> Complexity as an Evolv<strong>in</strong>g Variable. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
109-124.<br />
Richards, Mark. 2009. Two k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> a M<strong>in</strong>imalist system. ms. Institut für<br />
L<strong>in</strong>guistik, Universität Leipzig.<br />
Sampson, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill. 2009. <strong>Language</strong> Complexity as an<br />
Evolv<strong>in</strong>g Variable. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
http://l<strong>in</strong>guistlist.org/issues/20/20-4275.html for review<br />
http://www.grsampson.net/BLCA.html for Overview [read this]<br />
11. Accommodation Theory <br />
Bullock, B., & C. Gerfen (2004). Phonological convergence <strong>in</strong> a contract<strong>in</strong>g language<br />
variety. Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism: <strong>Language</strong> and Cognition 7-2. 95-104.<br />
Niedzielski, Nancy & Giles, Howard. (1996). L<strong>in</strong>guistic Accommodation. In H. Goebl, P.<br />
Nelde, Z. Stary & W. Wölck , (Eds.), <strong>Contact</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guistics: An International<br />
Handbook <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Research. Berl<strong>in</strong>/New York: de Gruyter. 332–42.<br />
Hyperforeignization (still Week 11) <br />
Janda, Rich, Brian Joseph, & Neil Jacobs. 1994. Systematic hyperforeignisms as maximally<br />
external evidence for l<strong>in</strong>guistic rules. In Susan Lima, Roberta Corrigan and<br />
Gregory Iverson (eds.) The Reality <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic rules. Amsterdam, Philadelphia:<br />
Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. P126 .R37 1994x<br />
Nagy, N. 1996. <strong>Language</strong> contact and language change <strong>in</strong> the Faetar speech community.<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania PhD dissertation. Philadelphia: IRCS. (Section 6.7:<br />
Hyperforeignization)<br />
12. Conclusions <br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and Grammatical Change. CUP.<br />
Ch. 7 (pp. 260-6).
<strong>LIN</strong><strong>1152</strong>_biblio.doc 2/12/10, Naomi Nagy 7 <br />
Lexical borrow<strong>in</strong>g (not a focus <strong>of</strong> this class) <br />
Haugen, E<strong>in</strong>ar. 1950. The analysis <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic borrow<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Language</strong>. 26:210-231.<br />
van Hout, Roeland & Pieter Muysken 1994. Model<strong>in</strong>g lexical borrowability. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Variation</strong><br />
and Change 6.1:39-86.<br />
<strong>Language</strong> specific <br />
Italian<br />
Talk to Franca Iacovetta, a UT pr<strong>of</strong> who is a historian <strong>of</strong> Italian (and other) <br />
immigration to Canada: <br />
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/history/faculty/facultypr<strong>of</strong>iles/iacovetta.html <br />
Danesi, M. 1985. Ethnic <strong>Language</strong> and Acculturation: The Case <strong>of</strong> Italian Canadians. <br />
Canadian Ethnic Studies/Études ethniques au Canada 17 (1):48‐103. <br />
Fortier, A.‐M. 1991. Langue et rapports sociaux: analyse des langues d'usage chez des Italiens <br />
de deuxième génération. Québec: Centre <strong>in</strong>ternational de recherche en aménagement <br />
l<strong>in</strong>guistique. <br />
Vizmuller‐Zocco, J. 1993. Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics <strong>of</strong> a M<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>Language</strong>: Italians <strong>in</strong> Toronto and <br />
Vic<strong>in</strong>ity. Romance <strong>Language</strong>s Annual: 324‐8. <br />
French<br />
Beech<strong>in</strong>g, Kate, Nigel Armstrong & Françoise Gadet. 2009. Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic <strong>Variation</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Contemporary French. IMPACT: Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> and Society 26. Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. Book<br />
URL: http://www.benjam<strong>in</strong>s.com/cgi-b<strong>in</strong>/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=Impact%2026 (I have<br />
draft ms.)<br />
Russian<br />
Also, see the pro‐drop references. <br />
He<strong>in</strong>e, Bernd. 2008. <strong>Contact</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced word order change without word order change. In P.<br />
Siemund & N. K<strong>in</strong>tana, eds. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Contact</strong> and <strong>Contact</strong> <strong>Language</strong>s. John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
33-60.<br />
Sussex, Ronald. 1993. Slavonic languages <strong>in</strong> emigration. In The Slavonic <strong>Language</strong>s. B. Comrie<br />
& G. G. Corbett (eds), 999-1035. London: Routledge.<br />
Korean<br />
Choi, H.‐W. 2003. Paradigm Level<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> American Korean. <strong>Language</strong> Research 39 (1):183‐<br />
204. <br />
Suh, E. 2008. The Usage and <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> Korean tul 'Plural' by heritage language <br />
speakers. Selected Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 2007 Second <strong>Language</strong> Research Forum. Melissa <br />
Bowles, Rebecca Foote, Silvia Perpiñán, and Rakesh Bhatt, eds. Cascadilla <br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs Project. 239‐251. http://www.l<strong>in</strong>gref.com/cpp/slrf/2007/<strong>in</strong>dex.html. <br />
misc.<br />
We<strong>in</strong>reich, Uriel. 1954. L<strong>in</strong>guistic convergence <strong>in</strong> immigrant America. Report <strong>of</strong> the 5th Annual<br />
Round Table Meet<strong>in</strong>g on L<strong>in</strong>guistics and <strong>Language</strong> Teach<strong>in</strong>g, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C. 40-49.