16.12.2013 Views

Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson

Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson

Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPETENCY IN PLEADINGS<br />

In some cases the courts themselves have punished a lack of competency<br />

<strong>and</strong> expertise of legal practitioners by way of refusal to accept what it<br />

considers sub-st<strong>and</strong>ard pleadings.<br />

Gunns Limited v Marr [2005] VSC 251, Bongiorno J. At a Directions<br />

Hearing of the Matter, the Plaintiffs applied to file an amended Statement<br />

of Claim some 360 pages long with 528 paragraphs against some 20<br />

defendants. The Claim was filed in lieu of late Particulars of Claim,<br />

however the court, in dismissing the Statement of Claim, stated that “the<br />

function of a statement of claim is to set out with sufficient clarity the case<br />

which the defendant must meet”, limit generality of the allegations <strong>and</strong> to<br />

limit <strong>and</strong> define the issues to be tried. Bongiorno J found that the crossreferencing<br />

of paragraphs failed to assist <strong>and</strong> in fact “often renders the<br />

original paragraph at best ambiguous <strong>and</strong> at worst misleading”. The<br />

pleadings were described as prolix <strong>and</strong> that the “Court will not tolerate<br />

laxity of pleadings or deficiency of particulars to the disadvantage of those<br />

against whom the proceeding is brought”.<br />

His Honour went on to say that a new statement of claim should be<br />

accompanied by a detailed table of contents or index, a glossary of every<br />

term or phrase used in it which requires definition, <strong>and</strong> it should employ a<br />

uniform method of referring to the parties.<br />

Murphy v Council of the Municipality of Strathfield [2012] NSWSC 85<br />

(17 February 2012), Schmidt J<br />

Recent case relying on Gunns. Pleading struck out, amended pleadings<br />

to be filed in proper form.<br />

COMPETENCY IN ADVICE GIVEN<br />

As in Gunns v Marr above, competency of legal practitioners is not<br />

restricted to pleadings. Where advice is sought clients will not be<br />

backward in seeking recompense where they consider the advice has<br />

been bad, or at best insufficient.<br />

In Austrust Ltd v Astley & Ors (1999) 197 CLR 1, the High Court<br />

considered an appeal by Austrust against a Full Court ruling of the South<br />

Australian Supreme Court.<br />

The case involved a company seeking advice regarding changing its<br />

business practice from managing Trusts in relation to deceased estates,<br />

settlements, “conventional trusts” managed pursuant to non-trading trusts<br />

with some property management trusts, to the field of commercial trading<br />

trusts.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!