Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson
Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson
Ethics and - Gordon & Jackson
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COMPETENCY IN PLEADINGS<br />
In some cases the courts themselves have punished a lack of competency<br />
<strong>and</strong> expertise of legal practitioners by way of refusal to accept what it<br />
considers sub-st<strong>and</strong>ard pleadings.<br />
Gunns Limited v Marr [2005] VSC 251, Bongiorno J. At a Directions<br />
Hearing of the Matter, the Plaintiffs applied to file an amended Statement<br />
of Claim some 360 pages long with 528 paragraphs against some 20<br />
defendants. The Claim was filed in lieu of late Particulars of Claim,<br />
however the court, in dismissing the Statement of Claim, stated that “the<br />
function of a statement of claim is to set out with sufficient clarity the case<br />
which the defendant must meet”, limit generality of the allegations <strong>and</strong> to<br />
limit <strong>and</strong> define the issues to be tried. Bongiorno J found that the crossreferencing<br />
of paragraphs failed to assist <strong>and</strong> in fact “often renders the<br />
original paragraph at best ambiguous <strong>and</strong> at worst misleading”. The<br />
pleadings were described as prolix <strong>and</strong> that the “Court will not tolerate<br />
laxity of pleadings or deficiency of particulars to the disadvantage of those<br />
against whom the proceeding is brought”.<br />
His Honour went on to say that a new statement of claim should be<br />
accompanied by a detailed table of contents or index, a glossary of every<br />
term or phrase used in it which requires definition, <strong>and</strong> it should employ a<br />
uniform method of referring to the parties.<br />
Murphy v Council of the Municipality of Strathfield [2012] NSWSC 85<br />
(17 February 2012), Schmidt J<br />
Recent case relying on Gunns. Pleading struck out, amended pleadings<br />
to be filed in proper form.<br />
COMPETENCY IN ADVICE GIVEN<br />
As in Gunns v Marr above, competency of legal practitioners is not<br />
restricted to pleadings. Where advice is sought clients will not be<br />
backward in seeking recompense where they consider the advice has<br />
been bad, or at best insufficient.<br />
In Austrust Ltd v Astley & Ors (1999) 197 CLR 1, the High Court<br />
considered an appeal by Austrust against a Full Court ruling of the South<br />
Australian Supreme Court.<br />
The case involved a company seeking advice regarding changing its<br />
business practice from managing Trusts in relation to deceased estates,<br />
settlements, “conventional trusts” managed pursuant to non-trading trusts<br />
with some property management trusts, to the field of commercial trading<br />
trusts.<br />
16