18.12.2013 Views

Medical Necessity - American Health Lawyers Association

Medical Necessity - American Health Lawyers Association

Medical Necessity - American Health Lawyers Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix A Issue Paper to Establish a Common Basis for the Colloquium Discussion<br />

■ Identification of stakeholders in<br />

the medical necessity debate and<br />

their key concerns and interests;<br />

■ A preliminary list of issues for<br />

consideration by the Colloquium<br />

panel, focusing on potential<br />

bases for improving the systems<br />

for making medical necessity<br />

determinations; and<br />

■ A set of five core questions<br />

developed by AHLA to guide<br />

the Colloquium discussion.<br />

HEALTHCARE IN CRISIS:<br />

RISING COSTS AND<br />

REDUCED ACCESS TO CARE<br />

Access to affordable and adequate<br />

healthcare for residents of the<br />

United States has been an issue<br />

of concern at least since the end<br />

of World War II. The perceived<br />

relative importance of the issue<br />

has varied over time, often in<br />

response to changes in the rates<br />

of healthcare cost inflation and<br />

the impact of measures taken to<br />

address that trend. A dramatic rise<br />

in healthcare spending preceded<br />

the managed care revolution that<br />

occurred in the early 1990s, for<br />

example.<br />

As <strong>American</strong>s born during the<br />

post-war “baby boom” approach<br />

retirement age, the issue has taken<br />

on particular critical importance for<br />

the largest government program,<br />

Medicare, which faces not only the<br />

rising per capita costs experienced<br />

by all health plans, but also<br />

substantial growth in the number<br />

of newly-eligible beneficiaries.<br />

Costs for private and employmentrelated<br />

health insurance rates are<br />

again soaring; the government<br />

programs designed to provide care<br />

for the aged, disabled, and impoverished<br />

are struggling under rising<br />

per capita costs and dramatically<br />

increasing eligible populations;<br />

and the number of persons without<br />

any form of health insurance is<br />

rising to levels unprecedented<br />

since health insurance became<br />

common after World War II.<br />

Several statistics from the Center<br />

for Medicare and Medicaid<br />

Services’ (CMS) most recently<br />

issued report on national healthcare<br />

expenditures highlight the<br />

dimension of the problem of<br />

providing healthcare to all<br />

<strong>American</strong>s: 5<br />

■ It is estimated that $1.6 trillion<br />

was spent on healthcare in the<br />

United States in 2002.<br />

■ <strong>Health</strong>care spending constituted<br />

approximately 15 percent of the<br />

gross domestic product in 2002.<br />

■ <strong>Health</strong>care spending is projected<br />

rise to $3.1 trillion, or 17.7<br />

percent of the gross domestic<br />

product, by 2012.<br />

■ Per capita healthcare expenditures<br />

between 1970 and 2002 —<br />

adjusted for inflation —<br />

increased more than 400<br />

percent (from $1,300 to<br />

$5,540), and are expected to<br />

double again within six years.<br />

■ Per capita healthcare expenditures<br />

in the United States are<br />

materially higher than those<br />

of many other developed<br />

countries, while some health<br />

indicators in the United States<br />

are materially lower.<br />

■ Government sources provided<br />

less than 25 percent of healthcare<br />

spending in 1960; in 2000,<br />

they provided more than 43<br />

percent.<br />

Skyrocketing healthcare costs<br />

always generate debate over<br />

reforming the nation’s healthcare<br />

“system.” A variety of factors typically<br />

are cited as the culprit: rising<br />

high prices in the “market basket”<br />

of healthcare goods and services;<br />

alleged overutilization by physicians<br />

and hospitals; alleged price-gouging<br />

by private health insurers; our<br />

aging population; the exponential<br />

growth of high-cost medical<br />

technology; 6 the costs of medical<br />

malpractice insurance; and the<br />

costs of “defensive” medicine.<br />

Not surprisingly, the reality is far<br />

more complex. For example,<br />

estimates of the impact of new<br />

medical technology on healthcare<br />

costs have ranged from 19 percent<br />

to 50 percent of the increases,<br />

both from the added costs of using<br />

the technology in appropriate<br />

cases and alleged overutilization.<br />

At the same time, it is undisputed<br />

that such technology can generate<br />

significant positive effects on the<br />

economy, including — but not<br />

limited to — healthcare costsavings<br />

over the long-term. 7<br />

Similarly, although the “graying<br />

of America” increases aggregate<br />

national healthcare costs to the<br />

extent that per capita expenses for<br />

seniors are higher, the absolute<br />

increase in healthcare costs that<br />

can be attributed to age is very<br />

small. At the same time, the fact<br />

that people are living longer and<br />

will increase the demand for<br />

healthcare also must be taken into<br />

consideration. America’s aging<br />

population adds to government<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!