The Limitations of Family Reconstitution

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Incredible Shrinking Error conventional unbiased difference Simulation 24.8 27.6 2.8 May 1990 25.3 27.7 2.4 Sep. 1990 25.5 27.1 1.6 Jan. 1991 25.6 26.9 1.3 14
The Incredible Shrinking Error conventional unbiased difference Simulation 24.8 27.6 2.8 May 1990 25.3 27.7 2.4 Sep. 1990 25.5 27.1 1.6 Jan. 1991 25.6 26.9 1.3 Jan 1994 26.0 26.8 0.8 Wrigley: 0.8 years almost the same as the effect of mortality censoring I had estimated; therefore, migration censoring does not exist! 15
Page 1 and 2: The Limitations of Family Reconstit
Page 3 and 4: Mother Born: 1550 Dies: 1617 Marrie
Page 5 and 6: Why reconstitute families? • Henr
Page 7 and 8: Franklin Bowditch Dexter, Biographi
Page 9 and 10: My assertion: Assume that at the ma
Page 11 and 12: Censoring is a Denominator Problem
Page 13: The Incredible Shrinking Error conv
Page 17 and 18: Percent migrant by age at marriage:
Page 19 and 20: The Reconstitution Volume: Publishe
Page 21 and 22: 1. Nonrepresentativeness • 34 par
Page 23 and 24: 2. Selection bias • Last section
Page 25 and 26: 3. Censoring • Censoring bias is
Page 27 and 28: 5. Random error • No estimates of

The Limitations of Family Reconstitution

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?