The Limitations of Family Reconstitution
The Limitations of Family Reconstitution
The Limitations of Family Reconstitution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mean intervals between successive births:<br />
Difference probably due to censoring, not selection bias<br />
35<br />
34<br />
Non-migrants<br />
Migrants<br />
33<br />
Mean Intervals (months)<br />
32<br />
31<br />
30<br />
29<br />
28<br />
1550-99 1600-24 1625-49 1650-74 1675-99 1700-24 1725-49 1750-74 1775-99 1800-37<br />
Period<br />
4. Linkage failures and underregistration<br />
• Entries may be illegible; old manuscripts may be<br />
damaged; researchers transcribing the records<br />
may make a mistake; parish priest may omit<br />
someone<br />
• Failures for any reason lead to bias in one<br />
direction: fertility, mortality, and marriage are<br />
underestimated.<br />
• Unlike Louis Henry, the English family<br />
reconstitutions assume perfection: no attempt to<br />
adjust the numbers for under registration or<br />
linkage failure<br />
26