1 CA-CV 11-0796 - Arizona Judicial Department
1 CA-CV 11-0796 - Arizona Judicial Department
1 CA-CV 11-0796 - Arizona Judicial Department
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A. A.R.S. § 13-43<strong>11</strong>(G) does not supply a ten-day<br />
grace period.<br />
19 Appellants contend that, although they failed to file<br />
within the twenty-day period after March 3, 2009, their answer<br />
is timely because a ten-day grace period is provided under<br />
A.R.S. § 13-43<strong>11</strong>(G). Although A.R.S. § 13-4314 may be “the<br />
functional equivalent of a default judgment,” Jackson, 210 Ariz.<br />
at 469, 13, <strong>11</strong>3 P.3d at <strong>11</strong>5, A.R.S. § 13-43<strong>11</strong>(G) provides the<br />
controlling procedures.<br />
Subsection (G) requires the State to<br />
proceed with an application for forfeiture in accordance with<br />
A.R.S. §§ 13-4314 and -4315 with ten days’ notice. The<br />
forfeiture application is filed “with” the notice, not after the<br />
notice is given. A.R.S. § 13-43<strong>11</strong>(G).<br />
20 Nowhere in the statute is there a reference to a grace<br />
period. Jackson states that the failure to timely answer<br />
“triggered the provision that the state ‘shall proceed as<br />
provided in §§ 13-4314 and -4315.’” 210 Ariz. at 471, 22, <strong>11</strong>3<br />
P.3d at <strong>11</strong>7 (quoting A.R.S. § 13–43<strong>11</strong>(G)).<br />
Jackson goes on to<br />
state that “the plain language of § 13-43<strong>11</strong>(G) expressly<br />
provides that §§ 13-4314 and -4315 apply even though a timely<br />
claim has been filed so long as a timely answer has not been<br />
filed.” Id. at 24.<br />
21 Jackson notes that the applicable party in that case<br />
failed “to answer the state’s complaint after receipt of the<br />
10