24.12.2013 Views

Catheter Ablation of Mahaim Fibers With Nodal ... - Circulation

Catheter Ablation of Mahaim Fibers With Nodal ... - Circulation

Catheter Ablation of Mahaim Fibers With Nodal ... - Circulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Catheter</strong> ablation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers with preservation <strong>of</strong> atrioventricular nodal<br />

conduction.<br />

M Haissaguerre, J F Warin, P Le Metayer, L Maraud, L De Roy, P Montserrat and J P<br />

Massiere<br />

<strong>Circulation</strong>. 1990;82:418-427<br />

doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.82.2.418<br />

<strong>Circulation</strong> is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231<br />

Copyright © 1990 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539<br />

The online version <strong>of</strong> this article, along with updated information and services, is located on<br />

the World Wide Web at:<br />

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/82/2/418<br />

published Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions <strong>of</strong> articles originally<br />

in <strong>Circulation</strong> can be obtained via RightsLink, a service <strong>of</strong> the Copyright Clearance Center, not the<br />

Editorial Office. Once the online version <strong>of</strong> the published article for which permission is being requested is<br />

located, click Request Permissions in the middle column <strong>of</strong> the Web page under Services. Further<br />

information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document.<br />

by guest on August 25, 2013<br />

Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at:<br />

http://www.lww.com/reprints<br />

Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to <strong>Circulation</strong> is online at:<br />

http://circ.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/


418<br />

<strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> <strong>With</strong><br />

Preservation <strong>of</strong> Atrioventricular<br />

<strong>Nodal</strong> Conduction<br />

Michel Haissaguerre, MD, Jean-Frangois Warin, MD, Philippe Le Metayer, MD,<br />

Luc Maraud, MD, Luc De Roy, MD, Paul Montserrat, MD, and Jean-Paul Massiere, MD<br />

Three patients with refractory preexcited tachycardia implicating <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers underwent<br />

attempted catheter ablation <strong>of</strong> the accessory pathway. In the absence <strong>of</strong> demonstrable<br />

retrograde conduction in <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers, we located the accessory pathway ventricular<br />

insertion site using the criteria <strong>of</strong> concordance between paced and spontaneous QRS morphologies<br />

during pace-mapping and earliest onset <strong>of</strong> local electrogram relative to surface preexcited<br />

QRS. At this site, a QS-like pattern <strong>of</strong> unfiltered unipolar electrograms with steep downstroke<br />

was recorded. The optimal site appeared radiologically at the right ventricular anterior wall or<br />

the adjacent septum, 2-4 cm from the tricuspid anulus. Three to six 160-J shocks were<br />

delivered at this site using an anterior chest wall plate as anode. After fulguration, conduction<br />

through the <strong>Mahaim</strong> tract was absent. A right bundle branch block persisted in two patients.<br />

All patients remained free <strong>of</strong> preexcited tachycardia during 12-16 months <strong>of</strong> follow-up.<br />

Postablation electrophysiological assessment showed no preexcitation in any patient. No<br />

reciprocating tachycardia was inducible, even during isoproterenol infusion. Atrioventricular<br />

nodal conduction parameters were unchanged from baseline study. <strong>Catheter</strong> ablation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers is an effective alternative method for the treatment <strong>of</strong> tachycardias that include<br />

the accessory pathway in the circuit. (<strong>Circulation</strong> 1990;82:418-427)<br />

P atients with <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers are prone to paroxysmal<br />

reciprocating tachycardias.1-23 These<br />

anomalous conduction pathways can either<br />

participate in the reentrant circuit or serve a bystander<br />

role.6,8,10,12,14-16,21 Recently, specific surgical<br />

interruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers has been reported by<br />

several authors24-27 for disabling and drug-refractory<br />

tachycardias. Because <strong>of</strong> their presumed intimate<br />

relation with the atrioventricular node, these fibers<br />

have been thought to be unapproachable by ablative<br />

techniques due to the risk <strong>of</strong> complete atrioventricular<br />

block. However, His bundle ablation has been<br />

performed in some patients12,28-30; although anterograde<br />

conduction continued over the accessory pathway<br />

in certain patients,12,28,29 a permanent pacemaker<br />

was <strong>of</strong>ten implanted. In this report, we<br />

describe three patients whose <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers were<br />

successfully ablated by endocardial DC shocks<br />

applied at the ventricular insertion <strong>of</strong> the pathway.<br />

From the Service de Cardiologie et Medecine Interne (M.H.,<br />

J.-F.W., P.L.M., L.M., P.M., J.-P.M.), Hopital Saint-Andre, Bordeaux,<br />

France, and Cliniques Universitaires (L.D.R.), UCL,<br />

Mont-Godinne, Belgium.<br />

Address for correspondence: Michel Haissaguerre, MD, Hopital<br />

Saint-Andre, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075 Bordeaux, France.<br />

Received May 16, 1989; revision accepted April 3, 1990.<br />

Moreover, this study provides some anatomical and<br />

electrophysiological insights into <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers.<br />

Methods<br />

Patient Characteristics<br />

Three patients (52, 25, and 31 years old) were<br />

referred for treatment <strong>of</strong> disabling paroxysmal wide<br />

QRS tachycardias with left bundle branch block<br />

morphology and superior axis (Figure 1). Patient 1<br />

also had episodes <strong>of</strong> atrial tachycardia with narrow<br />

QRS complexes. Patient 3 had two episodes <strong>of</strong> atrial<br />

fibrillation with minimal preexcited RR interval <strong>of</strong><br />

260 msec. A fourth patient with <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers was<br />

referred during the same period; after catheter ablation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a left posterior accessory pathway serving as<br />

retrograde limb <strong>of</strong> the reentrant circuit, no tachycardia<br />

remained inducible. Thus, no ablation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Mahaim</strong> tract was attempted.<br />

Tachycardia recurred daily in patient 1 and every<br />

1-3 months in the other patients. Ineffective drugs<br />

included quinidine, 8-blocking drugs, flecainide, and<br />

amiodarone, either singly or in multiple combinations.<br />

Physical examination, surface electrocardiogram,<br />

and echocardiogram were normal in patients 1<br />

and 2. In patient 3, the QRS complexes were perma-<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


Haissaguerre et al <strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> 419<br />

R<br />

A B c<br />

V.~W<br />

4I<br />

6 7 , F \<br />

-4<br />

FIGURE 1. Electrocardiograms during reciprocating tachycardia<br />

in patients 1(A), 2 (B), and 3 before first ablation<br />

attempt (C).<br />

nently preexcited, and an echocardiogram revealed a<br />

dilated cardiomyopathy. Clinical characteristics are<br />

summarized in Table 1.<br />

Baseline Electrophysiological Study<br />

The patients were studied after all cardioactive<br />

medications had been discontinued for 5 days. Amiodarone<br />

was discontinued more than 6 months<br />

before the study in two patients and was prescribed<br />

to patient 1 at the time <strong>of</strong> referral.<br />

Three or four 6F USCI, Billerica, Mass., multipolar<br />

electrode catheters were introduced through a<br />

femoral or subclavian vein and positioned within the<br />

right atrium, right ventricle, and coronary sinus and<br />

across the tricuspid valve for recording the His<br />

bundle and right bundle branch electrograms. In<br />

addition to the intracardiac recordings (filtered<br />

between 30 to 500 Hz), surface leads I, II, III, and V1<br />

were recorded on an Electronics for Medicine VR12<br />

recorder at a paper speed <strong>of</strong> 100 mm/sec. Programmed<br />

electrical stimulation was performed from<br />

the right atrium and right ventricular apex with a<br />

Savita stimulator, VPA Medical, Paris, with a pulse<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> 1 msec at twice-diastolic threshold.<br />

Presence and participation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> connections<br />

as components <strong>of</strong> the tachycardia circuit were<br />

defined according to criteria suggested by Gallagher<br />

et al.10 <strong>With</strong> incremental atrial pacing and progressive<br />

prematurity <strong>of</strong> atrial extrastimuli, the QRS<br />

became increasingly preexcited as the H deflection<br />

merged into the QRS complex and the AV interval<br />

concurrently lengthened. The QRS complexes<br />

assumed a left bundle branch morphology identical<br />

to the configuration during tachycardia. During right<br />

ventricular pacing, the earliest atrial activation was<br />

recorded at the His bundle lead. Baseline accessory<br />

pathway conduction properties and refractory periods<br />

are listed in Table 2. Spontaneous tachycardia<br />

was reproducible by a premature atrial or ventricular<br />

stimulus (Table 2) or by rapid atrial or ventricular<br />

pacing in all patients. In patient 1, tachycardia induction<br />

was concomitant with a sudden prolongation <strong>of</strong><br />

the AH interval, which lengthened from 180 to 250<br />

msec for an atrial coupling interval decreasing from<br />

360 to 350 msec. In this patient, atrial tachycardia<br />

with narrow QRS complexes (cycle length, 430-500<br />

msec) could also be induced. In all patients, the<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> retrograde atrial activation was the same<br />

during tachycardia as it was during ventricular pacing.<br />

Tachycardia induction and preexcitation were<br />

also associated with a reversal in the relation<br />

between His and right bundle electrograms (Figure<br />

2); the His-to-right-bundle electrogram interval<br />

shifted from +10 to -5 or -10 msec, and the right<br />

bundle electrogram occurred within the first 30 msec<br />

<strong>of</strong> QRS complex onset. It is noteworthy that a<br />

catheter-induced right bundle branch block in<br />

patient 2 did not prevent tachycardia reinduction but<br />

instead lengthened retrograde conduction (Table 2<br />

and Figure 3); furthermore, patient 3 had underlying<br />

right bundle branch block as evidenced by atrial<br />

extrastimuli performed during the refractory period<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers and by spontaneous escape rhythm<br />

arising in the His bundle. This patient had the most<br />

TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics and Drugs Used in Each Patient<br />

Age Age at first ECG during<br />

Patient (yr)/sex Cardiac diagnosis Sinus rhythm tachycardia (yr) tachycardia Previous ineffective drugs<br />

1 52 /F ... Narrow QRS 10 (160 beats/mim) Verapamil, quinidine,<br />

LBBB<br />

sotalol, flecainide, and<br />

amiodarone<br />

2 25 /F ... Narrow QRS 14 (200 beats/min) Verapamil, quinidine,<br />

LBBB<br />

flecainide, amiodarone,<br />

amiodarone, and flecainide<br />

3 31/M Dilated Preexcitation 17 (180 beats/mim) Quinidine, sotalol,<br />

cardiomyopathy LBBB propafenone, flecainide,<br />

and amiodarone<br />

ECG, electrocardiogram; LBBB, left bundle branch block morphology.<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


420 <strong>Circulation</strong> Vol 82, No 2, August 1990<br />

TABLE 2.<br />

Baseline Electrophysiological Evaluation<br />

Retrograde conduction via<br />

normal AV conducting system<br />

(msec)<br />

Anterograde conduction via <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fibers (msec)<br />

Tachycardia<br />

(msec)<br />

Patient<br />

WCL<br />

VA HA'<br />

VA'<br />

time ERP<br />

WCL<br />

AV<br />

AV<br />

increment ERP HV H-RB<br />

Tachycardia<br />

initiation<br />

Cycle<br />

length A'V VA' VH HA'<br />

1 300 40 105-155


Haissaguerre et al <strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> 421<br />

1<br />

I<br />

i;N1za 1-~~~'- 1t<br />

'Wlm.: _.<br />

WITH<br />

11<br />

1300<br />

I VH 25 \ fL P4<br />

2VHZ5<br />

HrSe II<br />

..<br />

1<br />

11<br />

RBBB<br />

1-<br />

1<br />

,..<br />

.200mr.1 P<br />

:1<br />

stH 55 1<br />

JA4.<br />

IIESr2 x-<br />

FIGURE 3. Intracardiac recordings during reciprocating<br />

tachycardia in patient 2, with (right panel) or<br />

without (left panel) right bundle branch block during<br />

sinus rhythm. H, His bundle potential; RA, lateral right<br />

atrium; RV, right ventricle; MCS and PCS, middle and<br />

proximal coronary sinus; V, onset <strong>of</strong> ventricular activity<br />

(vertical line from top to bottom); A', atrial activity at<br />

His bundle region. This atrial electrogram is clearly seen<br />

in tight panel but is partially concealed on left panel<br />

(withdrawal <strong>of</strong> recording catheter allows differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> atrial component <strong>of</strong> electrogram). Tachycardia has a<br />

cycle length increasing from 270 to 300 msec with<br />

production <strong>of</strong> right bundle branch block; this change is<br />

linked to a prolongation <strong>of</strong> VI interval from 25 to<br />

55 msec.<br />

VH interval in patient 3 was probably not linked to<br />

atrioventricular nodal reentry, with <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers<br />

intervening in a bystander role.<br />

<strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> Protocol<br />

After a discussion <strong>of</strong> the options available, the<br />

patients provided informed consent for catheter electrical<br />

ablation.<br />

In the absence <strong>of</strong> demonstrable retrograde conduction<br />

in the <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers, all efforts were made to<br />

locate the ventricular insertion site <strong>of</strong> the accessory<br />

pathway. Concordance <strong>of</strong> two parameters was<br />

required to identify the optimal preablation sitepace-mapping<br />

reproducing spontaneous tachycardia<br />

morphology (or maximal preexcitation during atrial<br />

pacing) in the 12 electrocardiographic leads (best<br />

pace-mapping was chosen by comparing slightly different<br />

patterns obtained through adjacent bipoles <strong>of</strong> a<br />

multipolar electrode catheter) and the earliest ventricular<br />

electrogram (relative to QRS complex onset)<br />

during maximal preexcitation. This mapping was performed<br />

with two electrode catheters (bipolar or multipolar)<br />

previously tested for fulguration.31 When an<br />

early ventricular potential was detected at one site, the<br />

other catheter was moved around this point to record<br />

possible earlier potential and so on until a site not<br />

surrounded by an earlier activated zone was found.<br />

Activation times were measured from the main rapid<br />

deflection to the earliest onset <strong>of</strong> preexcited QRS.<br />

At the preablation site, unipolar electrogram morphology<br />

was recorded to analyze its characteristics<br />

(see "Results").<br />

Before fulguration, the position <strong>of</strong> the preablation<br />

site in the right ventricle relative to His bundle<br />

location was documented by radiographs performed<br />

in the anterior, left anterior oblique (600), right<br />

anterior oblique (300), and left pr<strong>of</strong>ile views. Then, a<br />

pigtail catheter was introduced, and contrast material<br />

was injected into the right ventricle to outline the<br />

tricuspid anulus. By using the known interelectrode<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> the catheters, the location <strong>of</strong> the preablation<br />

site was defined.<br />

The selected electrode was connected to the<br />

cathodal output <strong>of</strong> a defibrillator (Robert et Carriere,<br />

Paris). The anode was a 66-cm2 plate placed on<br />

the anterior chest wall. The patients were then<br />

anesthetized with sodium thiopental, and three successive<br />

160-J discharges synchronized to the QRS<br />

were delivered at the selected site -two through the<br />

distal electrode and one through the immediately<br />

more proximal electrode.<br />

Atrial and ventricular stimulations were repeated<br />

after fulguration to assess short-term effects on atrioventricular<br />

conduction. A 6F multipolar electrode<br />

catheter was left in place at the end <strong>of</strong> the procedure<br />

to reevaluate anterograde and retrograde conduction.<br />

Creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB fraction<br />

levels were measured 6 hours after fulguration.<br />

Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring was<br />

performed for 3 days, and a 24-hour ambulatory<br />

electrocardiographic recording was obtained during<br />

the 24 hours after fulguration. Exercise testing and<br />

electrophysiological study were performed between<br />

days 4 and 6. No antiarrhythmic drug was prescribed<br />

after discharge.<br />

A follow-up electrophysiological study was repeated<br />

2-5 months after fulguration in all patients.<br />

Results<br />

<strong>Ablation</strong> Procedure<br />

The preablation site had the following characteristics<br />

(Table 3). First, pace-mapping was achieved in the<br />

three patients with no resulting significant difference<br />

between paced and preexcited QRS complexes (Figure<br />

4). Second, the earliest recorded peak ventricular<br />

electrogram occurred 0-5 msec before the onset <strong>of</strong><br />

surface electrocardiographic QRS. A small, rapid<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


422 <strong>Circulation</strong> Vol 82 No 2, August 1990<br />

TABLE 3. Data on Preablation Site and Delivered Energy<br />

Bipolar<br />

Unipolar<br />

electrograms electrograms Delivered Creatine<br />

Patient<br />

Pacemapping<br />

VR<br />

Small<br />

potential Pattern<br />

Amplitude<br />

(mV)<br />

Slope <strong>of</strong> downstroke<br />

(mV/10 msec)<br />

energy (J)<br />

(160 J)<br />

kinase-MB<br />

level (IU/l)<br />

1 Concordant -5 - QS 11 (d) 2.6 3 x 71<br />

10 (p)<br />

2 Concordant 0 + 3x 176<br />

3 Concordant 0 + QS 8.5 (d) 3.4 3x 84<br />

7 (p)<br />

Concordant 0 + QS 10 (d) 3.3 3 x 120<br />

8 (p)<br />

d and p, distal and immediately more proximal electrode <strong>of</strong> electrode catheter. VR, interval from peak ventricular<br />

electrogram (V) to onset <strong>of</strong> QRS complex (R).<br />

deflection possibly arising in the specialized conducting<br />

system preceded the main potential in two patients<br />

(Figures 5 and 6). This rapid deflection disappeared<br />

when the mapping catheter was moved a short distance<br />

away from the preablation site; no atrial activity<br />

was present at the preablation site. Third, unfiltered<br />

unipolar electrograms showed a high, steep uniphasic<br />

QS-like pattern through the two electrodes <strong>of</strong> a bipolar<br />

catheter in patient 1 and through the two most<br />

distal electrodes <strong>of</strong> a quadripolar catheter in patient 3.<br />

This morphology changed when the electrode was<br />

moved slightly, the patterns becoming QS-like with a<br />

smooth slope or rS-like. In patient 2, no unipolar<br />

recording mode could be used due to the disappearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> tachycardia and preexcitation during mapping.<br />

This phenomenon was presumed to be attributable to<br />

a catheter-induced block in <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers.<br />

Multiple radiographic views and right ventricular<br />

angiography revealed that the preablation site was at<br />

the right ventricular anterior wall (Figure 7) or the<br />

adjacent anterior septum, 2-4 cm from the tricuspid<br />

valve. Between this site and the anulus, new attempts<br />

to record an earlier ventricular electrogram during<br />

preexcitation were unsuccessful.<br />

Three 160-J shocks were delivered in each patient-ttwo<br />

through the distal electrode and one<br />

through the adjacent electrode. No atrioventricular<br />

block, ventricular arrhythmia, or hemodynamic instability<br />

occurred after the shocks. A right bundle branch<br />

block was present since the first shock. No tachycardia<br />

or preexcitation was inducible after fulguration.<br />

Short-term Results<br />

Preexcitation remained absent in patients 1 and 2<br />

as demonstrated by repeated atrial pacing. In patient<br />

3, it reappeared 3 hours after shocks with a left<br />

deviated axis <strong>of</strong> QRS complexes and a QS pattern in<br />

lead V2 (Figure 6). In the latter patient, a second<br />

ablation session was performed the next day; maximal<br />

preexcitation was notably different from initial<br />

morphology, and tachycardia remained inducible<br />

(Figure 4). The criteria for the optimal lead position<br />

(Table 3) were met at a site located 1.5 cm more<br />

apically inferior and toward the septum than the site<br />

<strong>of</strong> the previous attempt. No earlier ventricular potential<br />

could be recorded between this distant point and<br />

the tricuspid anulus. Three 160-J shocks (two distal<br />

and one proximal) were delivered at this site and led<br />

to the disappearance <strong>of</strong> preexcitation. This patient<br />

complained <strong>of</strong> chest pain on waking, but echocardiograms<br />

on days 1 and 5 revealed no trace <strong>of</strong> pericardial<br />

effusion or other anomaly.<br />

Echocardiographic studies were normal in the<br />

other two patients. The mean value <strong>of</strong> creatine<br />

kinase-MB fraction (Table 3) was 112 IU/l (normal<br />

values, 0-16 IU/I).<br />

Exercise testing led to a mean maximal heart rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 165 min-1 without significant change in ST or T<br />

waves or arrhythmia.<br />

Electrophysiological study confirmed the disappearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> preexcitation and reciprocating tachycardia.<br />

Despite the right bundle branch block, anterograde<br />

and retrograde atrioventricular nodal conduction values<br />

were unchanged from baseline values. In patient<br />

1, atrial tachycardia with the same cycle length<br />

remained inducible with one atrial extrastimulus.<br />

Long-term Follow-up<br />

Patients were discharged without antiarrhythmic<br />

drugs. No recurrence <strong>of</strong> preexcited tachycardia<br />

occurred during follow-up periods <strong>of</strong> 16, 14, and 12<br />

months, respectively. Two months after discharge,<br />

patient 1 complained <strong>of</strong> palpitations that were associated<br />

with unsustained episodes <strong>of</strong> atrial tachycardia;<br />

she is now asymptomatic with quinidine. Patient<br />

3 complained <strong>of</strong> marked pains in the subclavian<br />

region where a catheter had been left in place; he<br />

then presented in chest pain with pleural effusion.<br />

Pulmonary scintigraphy showed perfusion defects.<br />

Despite normal phlebography <strong>of</strong> upper and lower<br />

limbs, the diagnosis was pulmonary embolism complicating<br />

a subclavian vein thrombosis.<br />

Electrocardiograms showed persistence <strong>of</strong> right<br />

bundle branch block in patients 2 and 3 and its<br />

disappearance in patient 1.<br />

Electrophysiological study performed 2-5 months<br />

after fulguration (after discontinuation <strong>of</strong> drug therapy<br />

in patient 1) demonstrated the absence <strong>of</strong> an-<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


AOF<br />

4<br />

PM<br />

AXA'<br />

RA ST PM SVT<br />

;r m TlIII imX1,.l.l...l;lI.,<br />

YV 4V<br />

6~~~<br />

FIGURE 4. Two examples <strong>of</strong> concordant pace-maps (PMs)<br />

in patient 3. Upper panel occurred during first ablation<br />

attempt, and lower panel occurred during second session.<br />

Note differences in QRS complexes between two right atrial<br />

stimulations (RA ST), particularly in leads II, aVR, V,, V2,<br />

and V6. A 12-lead electrocardiogram <strong>of</strong> tachycardia (SVT) is<br />

shown during the second ablation attempt; it is also slightly<br />

differentfrom the morphology <strong>of</strong> clinical tachycardia shown in<br />

Figure 1G. QRS complexes <strong>of</strong> PMs are very similar to preexcited<br />

QRS complexes resulting from atrial stimulation. Arrows<br />

indicate stimulation artifacts. In lower panel, first QRS complex<br />

shown during RA ST is spontaneous and clearly preceded<br />

by a P wave.<br />

terograde and retrograde <strong>Mahaim</strong> fiber conduction.<br />

Reciprocating tachycardia was not inducible in any<br />

patient, even during isoproterenol infusion. Despite<br />

Haissaguerre et al <strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> 423<br />

right bundle branch block, the proximal right bundle<br />

branch electrogram could be recorded in all patients.<br />

Retrograde right bundle branch potential was<br />

recorded in patient 1 during ventricular pacing, thus<br />

indicating its activation after the His bundle potential.<br />

Therefore, despite the disappearance <strong>of</strong> right<br />

bundle branch block on electrocardiography in this<br />

patient, retrograde conduction in this branch<br />

remained altered. No significant alteration <strong>of</strong> atrioventricular<br />

nodal conduction was apparent (Table 4).<br />

The mean atrioventricular nodal AH and infranodal<br />

(HV) conduction times were 100 and 48 msec,<br />

respectively. The mean minimum paced atrial cycle<br />

length associated with 1:1 conduction was 324 msec.<br />

During ventricular pacing, 1: 1 retrograde conduction<br />

was present at a paced cycle length <strong>of</strong> 243 msec with<br />

a ventriculoatrial conduction time increasing from<br />

137 to 175 msec; these times were slightly longer<br />

(+25, +20, and + 15 msec, respectively) than before<br />

ablation. The mean atrioventricular nodal effective<br />

refractory period was equal to or less than the atrial<br />

functional refractory period in patients 1 and 2 and<br />

was 320 msec in patient 3. Duality (Table 4) was<br />

noted in patient 1. In patients 2 and 3, single echo<br />

beats considered atrioventricular nodal reentry were<br />

inducible (HA' intervals, 35 and 40 msec, respectively).<br />

No sudden jump (>40 msec) in A2H2 interval was<br />

observed before the appearance <strong>of</strong> echo beats. In<br />

patient 2, echo beats followed A2H2 interval <strong>of</strong> 190<br />

msec obtained with an atrial premature stimulus<br />

(A1A2) <strong>of</strong> 240 or 230 msec. In patient 3, echo beats<br />

followed A2H2 interval ranging from 230 to 340 msec<br />

obtained with an atrial premature stimulus ranging<br />

from 410 to 320 msec. No more prolonged reentrant<br />

arrhythmia could be obtained, even during isoproterenol<br />

infusion.<br />

Discussion<br />

Results from this study suggest that transcatheter<br />

shocks applied to the ventricular insertion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fibers are effective and safe. The only complication<br />

was the creation <strong>of</strong> a permanent right bundle branch<br />

block in two <strong>of</strong> the three patients, but in one <strong>of</strong> these<br />

two patients, anomalous conduction in right bundle<br />

branch was present before the procedure. Therefore,<br />

this technique appears to be an attractive alternative<br />

to other therapeutic options <strong>of</strong>fered to patients with<br />

disabling and drug refractory tachycardias associated<br />

with <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers. It can be applied to patients with<br />

or without retrograde conduction. Indeed, specific<br />

surgical interruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers has been<br />

reported in some patients.24,27 However, catheter<br />

ablation obviates the mortality and morbidity <strong>of</strong> open<br />

heart surgery. Furthermore, surgical25 or catheter<br />

ablation28,30 <strong>of</strong> the atrioventricular conducting system<br />

has been used successfully with antegrade conduction<br />

continuing over the anomalous pathway. In most<br />

<strong>of</strong> these patients, a permanent pacemaker was<br />

inserted as a precautionary measure because the<br />

reliability and durability <strong>of</strong> accessory pathway conduction<br />

is unknown. Despite the induced right bun-<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


424 <strong>Circulation</strong> Vol 82, No 2, August 1990<br />

PM<br />

ME 1 1 ~~~~~i1<br />

1% /<br />

V3<br />

SIT<br />

t,X~Hi<br />

FIGURE 5. Bipolar and unipolar recordings<br />

in patient 1 (left) and bipolar recordings<br />

inpatient 2 (right) at preablation site<br />

during reciprocating tachycardia. Main<br />

bipolar potential occurs 5 msec before<br />

QRS onset in patient 1: It is synchronous<br />

with occurrence <strong>of</strong> right bundle potential<br />

shown in Figure 3. It is also synchronous<br />

with QRS onset in patient 2 and preceded<br />

by a small potential (arrow). Unfiltered<br />

unipolar electrograms show steep negative<br />

deflection with a uniphasic QS-like<br />

pattem.<br />

cited tachycardias, but these pathways have also been<br />

mentioned as having bystander roles during atrioventricular<br />

nodal reentry tachycardia.6A8,10,1214-"16,21<br />

Thus, accurate identification <strong>of</strong> the tachycardia circuit<br />

is crucial to avoid ablating "innocent" pathways.<br />

In our patients, several criteria10 converged to demonstrate<br />

the participation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers in the<br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> reciprocating tachycardia. Constancy<br />

<strong>of</strong> VA' interval during initiation <strong>of</strong> preexcited tachycardia,<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> ventricular premature beats, and<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> right bundle branch block on tachycardia<br />

suggest the participation <strong>of</strong> the right ventricle in the<br />

dle branch block in two patients, we did not feel that<br />

our patients needed a permanent pacing system<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> atrioventricular block after<br />

shocks and because other parameters <strong>of</strong> anterograde<br />

conduction were unchanged.<br />

In our patients, typical features <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

tract10 were present, that is, progressively premature<br />

atrial depolarizations resulted in progressive prolongation<br />

<strong>of</strong> atrioventricular nodal conduction, with<br />

progressive fusion <strong>of</strong> the His potential within the<br />

QRS complex. In most reported cases, it has been<br />

concluded that <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers participate in preexg<br />

{ i-'- -h '-\l W ti /<br />

3<br />

FIGURE 6. Bipolar and unipolar recordings at preablation<br />

site in patient 3 at first session (left) and at second<br />

session (right). Note that the preexcited QRS complex<br />

notably differs in lead V2 between the two sessions. Bipolar<br />

recordings are vety similar to each other and to the pattems<br />

<strong>of</strong>patient 2. Peak potential is synchronous with QRS onset<br />

and is preceded by a small deflection (arrow); no bipolar<br />

atial activity is present. Unipolar wave forms are high and<br />

QS-like through distal (D) and immediately proximal (P)<br />

electrodes <strong>of</strong> ablation catheter.<br />

1<br />

H2v<br />

H<br />

.i ... - :1<br />

lOOms<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


Haissaguerre et al <strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> 425<br />

1cm<br />

FIGURE 7. Radiographic position <strong>of</strong> catheters at preablation<br />

site (right anterior oblique 300 in upper panel and left pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

in lower panel) in patient 2. A quadripolar electrode catheter<br />

introduced via a subclavian vein is on right ventricular inferior<br />

wall. A bipolar catheter is at His bundle region (small arrow).<br />

Two adjacent catheters are on preablation site on right<br />

ventricular anterior wall, 4 cm from distal electrode <strong>of</strong> His<br />

bundle catheter. Concordant pace-map and earliest ventricular<br />

activity during preexcitation were obtained with bipolar<br />

catheter (1 cm interelectrode distance, large arrow) before<br />

observing the disappearance <strong>of</strong> preexcitation. Three 160-J<br />

shocks through this bipolar catheter resulted in accessory<br />

pathway ablation.<br />

tachycardia circuit. Furthermore, disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />

tachycardias after ablation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mahaim</strong> tract and<br />

without alteration <strong>of</strong> the atrioventricular node is<br />

another strong argument for active participation <strong>of</strong><br />

the nodoventricular pathway. Nevertheless, after<br />

ablation, two patients had atrioventricular nodal<br />

echo beats, and the third patient had duality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

atrioventricular node, as described in several other<br />

reports <strong>of</strong> patients with proved antidromic reciprocating<br />

tachycardia.2A9Jll1314,2022 It was not, however,<br />

possible to obtain more than one echo beat despite<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> isoprenaline; HA' intervals <strong>of</strong> these echo<br />

beats were lower than during tachycardia, providing<br />

another argument against atrioventricular nodal<br />

reentry being the mechanism <strong>of</strong> the tachycardia<br />

circuit. Moreover, no tachycardia was observed during<br />

a 12-16 month follow-up in any patient. We do<br />

not know if the occurrence <strong>of</strong> nodal echo beats is<br />

coincidental or relates to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> nodoventricular<br />

pathways. It is to be noted that a link<br />

between enhanced atrioventricular nodal retrograde<br />

conduction and the occurrence <strong>of</strong> nodal echo beats<br />

has been suggested.32,33 The "enhanced" retrograde<br />

conduction (more than 200 beats/min) observed in<br />

our patients might be an important (but not specific)<br />

condition for maintaining the reciprocating tachycardia;<br />

it was also frequently noted in other reports and<br />

in eight <strong>of</strong> Gallagher et al's 11 patients,12 in whom<br />

the shortest mean cycle length for 1:1 retrograde<br />

conduction was 280 msec.<br />

<strong>With</strong> the aid <strong>of</strong> right bundle branch recording,10,19,23<br />

the accessory pathway was demonstrated to<br />

have close anatomical continuity with the right bundle<br />

branch or immediately surrounding ventricular<br />

muscle. Indeed, the short VH interval and the reversal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the His and right bundle branch relation during<br />

tachycardia (or rapid atrial pacing) strongly suggest<br />

that the ventricular insertion site is linked to the<br />

middle or distal portion <strong>of</strong> the right bundle branch.<br />

Thus, the <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers may be more properly<br />

termed "a nod<strong>of</strong>ascicular tract."10,12,23 In two <strong>of</strong> our<br />

patients, preexistent or catheter-induced right bundle<br />

branch block did not prevent reentrant tachycardia<br />

but appeared to influence its characteristics. In<br />

patient 2, production <strong>of</strong> right bundle branch block<br />

lengthened the retrograde ventriculoatrial interval<br />

from 30 msec; patient 3 had the longest retrograde<br />

conduction time during tachycardia. In these two<br />

patients, such data might be linked to retrograde<br />

conduction over the left bundle branch due to the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a right bundle branch block. No additional<br />

effort was made to specify the exact anatomical<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the circuit or, as suggested by Tchou et al,23<br />

to identify the proximal insertion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fibers (i.e., to discriminate between nod<strong>of</strong>ascicular<br />

<strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers and atri<strong>of</strong>ascicular connection).<br />

In our patients, retrograde conduction was not<br />

demonstrable in the <strong>Mahaim</strong> tract. Like in other<br />

reports, it is possible that retrograde conduction does<br />

not occur27 29 or that it is concealed by the conduction<br />

over the normal pathway. Thus, the electrophysiological<br />

technique used for identifying the optimal<br />

ablation site was directed at the ventricular pole <strong>of</strong><br />

the accessory pathway.<br />

Local ventricular electrogram was recorded at, or 5<br />

msec before, QRS complex onset. The accuracy <strong>of</strong> this<br />

mapping was supported by pace-mapping and, in<br />

patient 2, by disappearance <strong>of</strong> preexcitation, probably<br />

induced by the mechanical action <strong>of</strong> the catheter.<br />

Moreover, unfiltered unipolar electrogram morphology<br />

supplied additional information corroborating the<br />

mapping; it simultaneously showed a high, steep<br />

deflection with uniphasic QS-like activity. This pattern<br />

is considered to indicate the immediate proximity <strong>of</strong><br />

the excitation onset site.34 Indeed, Spach et a134 have<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013


426 <strong>Circulation</strong> Vol 82, No 2, August 1990<br />

TABLE 4.<br />

Follow-up Electrophysiological Study<br />

Months Anterograde conduction (msec) Retrograde conduction (msec)<br />

after WCL AV <strong>Nodal</strong> Pre- WCL VA VA H2A2<br />

Patient ablation AH HV AV ERP Duality echo beats excitation VA increment ERP interval<br />

1 5 100 45 315


Haissaguerre et al <strong>Catheter</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> 427<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> Tachycardias. Baltimore, Md, University Park<br />

Press, 1971, pp 97-109<br />

3. Tonkin AM, Dufan FA, Svenson Rh, Sealy WC, Wallace AG,<br />

Gallagher JJ: Coexistence <strong>of</strong> functional Kent and <strong>Mahaim</strong>type<br />

tracts in the preexcitation syndrome: Demonstration by<br />

catheter techniques and epicardial mapping. <strong>Circulation</strong> 1975;<br />

52:193-202<br />

4. Lev M, Fox SM, Bharati S, Greenfield JC, Rosen KM, Pick A:<br />

<strong>Mahaim</strong> and James fibers as a basis for a unique variety <strong>of</strong><br />

ventricular preexcitation. Am J Cardiol 1975;36:880-889<br />

5. Touboul P, Vexter RM, Chatelain MT: Re-entry via <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fibres as a possible basis for tachycardia. Br Heart J 1978;<br />

40:806-811<br />

6. Morady F, Scheinman MM, Gonzales R, Hess D: His ventricular<br />

dissociation in a patient with reciprocating tachycardia<br />

and a nodoventricular bypass tract. <strong>Circulation</strong> 1981;<br />

64:839-844<br />

7. Ko PT, Naccarelli GV, Gulamhusein S, Prystowsky PN, Zipes<br />

DP, Klein GJ: Atrioventricular dissociation during paroxysmal<br />

junctional tachycardia. PACE 1981;4:670-678.<br />

8. Ward DE, Camm AJ, Spurell RAJ: Ventricular preexcitation<br />

due to anomalous nodoventricular pathways: Report <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

patients. Eur J Cardiol 1979;9:111-127<br />

9. Motte G, Brechenmacher C, Davy JM, Belhassen B: Association<br />

de fibres nodo-ventriculaires et atrio-ventriculaires a<br />

l'origine des tachycardies reciproques. Arch Mal Coeur 1980;<br />

73:737-746<br />

10. Gallagher JJ, Smith WM, Kasell JH, Benson D, Sterba R,<br />

Grant AO: Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers in cardiac arrhythmias in<br />

man. <strong>Circulation</strong> 1981;64:176-189<br />

11. Sung RJ, Stypereck JL: Electrophysiologic identification <strong>of</strong><br />

dual atrioventricular nodal pathway conduction in patients<br />

with reciprocating tachycardia using anomalous bypass tracts.<br />

<strong>Circulation</strong> 1979;60:1464-1476<br />

12. Gallagher JJ, German LD, Broughton A, Guarnieri T, Trantham<br />

JL: Variants <strong>of</strong> the preexcitation syndromes, in Rosenbaum<br />

MB, Elizari MV (eds): Frontiers <strong>of</strong> Cardiac Electrophysiology.<br />

La Hague, Nijh<strong>of</strong>f, 1983, pp 724-772<br />

13. Lerman BB, Waxman HL, Proclemer A, Josephson ME:<br />

Supraventricular tachycardia associated with nodoventricular<br />

and concealed atrioventricular bypass tracts. Am Heart J<br />

1982;104:1097-1102<br />

14. Motte G, Grolleau R, Rebuffat G, Sebag C, Davy JM, Slama<br />

R: Tachycardies reciproques et conduction anterograde par<br />

une voie nodo-ventriculaire. Arch Mal Coeur 1983;76:155-166<br />

15. Ward DE, Bennett DH, Camm J: Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> junctional<br />

tachycardia showing ventricular preexcitation. Br Heart J 1984;<br />

52:369-376<br />

16. Bardy GH, German LD, Packer DL, Coltorti F, Gallagher JJ:<br />

Mechanism <strong>of</strong> tachycardia using a nodoventricular <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fiber. Am J Cardiol 1984;54;1140-1141<br />

17. Gmeiner R, Choi Keung Ng, Hammer I, Becker AE: Tachycardia<br />

caused by an accessory nodoventricular tract: A clinicopathologic<br />

correlation. Eur Heart J 1984;5:233-242<br />

18. Bardy GH, Fedor JM, German LD, Packer DL, Gallagher JJ:<br />

Surface electrocardiographic clues suggesting presence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

nod<strong>of</strong>ascicular <strong>Mahaim</strong> fiber. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;<br />

3:1161-1168<br />

19. Benditt DG, Epstein MK, Benson DW: Dual accessory nodoventricular<br />

pathways: Role in paroxysmal wide QRS reciprocating<br />

tachycardia. PACE 1983;6:577-586<br />

20. Murabit I, Sosa E, Pileggi F, Denes P: Multiple reentry<br />

tachycardia in patients with ventricular preexcitation: Report<br />

<strong>of</strong> three cases. Am Heart J 1986;111:69-80<br />

21. Abbott JA, Scheinman MM, Morady F, Shen EN, Miller R,<br />

Ruder MA, Eldar M, Seger JJ, Davis JC, Griffin JC, Dicarlo<br />

LA: Coexistent <strong>Mahaim</strong> and Kent accessory connections:<br />

Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol<br />

1987;10:364-372<br />

22. Strasberg B, Coelho A, Palileo E, Bauernfeind R, Swiryn S,<br />

Scagliotti D, Rosen KM: Pharmacological observations in<br />

patients with nodoventricular pathways. Br Heart J 1984;<br />

51:84-90<br />

23. Tchou P, Lehmann MH, Jazayeri M, Akhtar M: Atri<strong>of</strong>ascicular<br />

connection or a nodoventricular <strong>Mahaim</strong> fiber? Electrophysiologic<br />

elucidation <strong>of</strong> the pathway and associated reentrant<br />

circuit. <strong>Circulation</strong> 1988;77:837-848<br />

24. Gillette PC, Garson A Jr, Cooley DA, McNamara DG:<br />

Prolonged and decremental antegrade conduction properties<br />

in right anterior accessory connections: Wide QRS antidromic<br />

tachycardia <strong>of</strong> left bundle branch block pattern without Wolff-<br />

Parkinson-White configuration in sinus rhythm. Am Heart J<br />

1982;103:66-74<br />

25. Gallagher JJ, Selle JG, Sealy WC, Fedor JM, Svenson RH,<br />

Zimmern SH, Cox JC: Surgical interruption <strong>of</strong> nodoventricular<br />

<strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers with preservation <strong>of</strong> normal A-V conduction<br />

(abstract). JAm Coll Cardiol 1986;7:133A<br />

26. Ross DL, Johnson DC, Koo CC: Surgical treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

supraventricular tachycardia without the WPW syndrome:<br />

Current indications techniques and results, in Brugada P,<br />

Wellens HJJ (eds): Cardiac Arrhythmias: Where to Go From<br />

Here? Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing, 1987, pp 591-603<br />

27. Klein GJ, Guiraudon GM, Kerr CR, Sharma AD, Yee R,<br />

Szabo T, Yeung Lai Wah JA: "Nodoventricular" accessory<br />

pathway: Evidence for a distinct accessory atrioventricular<br />

pathway with atrioventricular node-like properties. JAm Coil<br />

Cardiol 1988;11:1935-1940<br />

28. Bhandari A, Morady F, Shen EN, Schwartz AB, Botvinick E,<br />

Scheinman MM: <strong>Catheter</strong>-induced His bundle ablation in a<br />

patient with reentrant tachycardia associated with a nodoventricular<br />

tract. JAm Coll Cardiol 1984;4:611-616<br />

29. Ellenbogen KA, O'Callaghan VG, Colavita PG, Packer DL,<br />

Gilbert MI, German LD: <strong>Catheter</strong> atrioventricular junction<br />

ablation for recurrent supraventricular tachycardia with<br />

nodoventricular fibers. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:1277-1279<br />

30. Bokeria LA, Revishvili AS: Transvenous elimination <strong>of</strong> resistant<br />

supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, in Fontaine G,<br />

Scheinman MM (eds):<strong>Ablation</strong> in Cardiac Arrhythmias. Mount<br />

Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing, 1987, p 171<br />

31. Fontaine G, Cansell A, Lechat P, Frank R, Grosgogeat Y:<br />

Method <strong>of</strong> selecting catheters for endocavitary fulguration.<br />

Stimucoeur 1984;12:285-289<br />

32. Strasberg B, Bauernfeind R, Swiryn S, Wyndham CR, Dhingra<br />

RC, Denes P: Retrograde dual AV nodal pathways (abstract).<br />

<strong>Circulation</strong> 1980;62:47<br />

33. Perrot B, Cherrier F, Faivre G: Significance <strong>of</strong> supraventricular<br />

arrhythmias induced by electrophysiologic studies. Eur<br />

Heart J 1984;5:295-303<br />

34. Spach MS, Miller WT, Geselowitz DB, Barr RC, Kottsey JM,<br />

Johnson EA: The discontinuous nature <strong>of</strong> propagation in<br />

normal canine cardiac muscle: Evidence for recurrent discontinuities<br />

<strong>of</strong> intracellular resistance that affect the membrane<br />

currents. Circ Res 1981;48:39-54<br />

35. Corbin V, Scher AM: The canine heart as an electrocardiographic<br />

generator: Dependence on cardiac cell orientation.<br />

Circ Res 1977;41:58-67<br />

36. Schechtmann N, Botvinick EH, Dae M, Scheinman MM,<br />

O'Connell W, Davis J, Winston S, Schwartz A, Abbott J: The<br />

scintigraphic characteristics <strong>of</strong> ventricular preexcitation<br />

through <strong>Mahaim</strong> fibers with the use <strong>of</strong> phase analysis. J Am<br />

Coil Cardiol 1989;13:882-891<br />

37. Haissaguerre M, Warin JF, Regaudie JJ, Le Metayer Ph,<br />

Blanchot P: Fulguration apres enregistrement electrique<br />

direct de la voie de Kent: Resultats preliminaires a propos de<br />

3 cas. Arch Mal Coeur 1986;79:1072-1081<br />

38. Warin JF, Haissaguerre M, Le Metayer Ph, Guillem JP,<br />

Blanchot P: <strong>Catheter</strong> ablation <strong>of</strong> accessory pathways with a<br />

direct approach: Results in 35 patients. <strong>Circulation</strong> 1988;<br />

78:800-817<br />

39. Haissaguerre M, Warin JF: Closed-chest ablation <strong>of</strong> left<br />

lateral atrioventricular accessory pathways. Eur Heart J 1989;<br />

10:602-610<br />

KEY WORDS * accessory pathway * fulguration * <strong>Mahaim</strong><br />

fibers * catheter ablation * tachycardias<br />

Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 25, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!