25.12.2013 Views

View/Open

View/Open

View/Open

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1*1<br />

Library and<br />

Archives Canada<br />

Published Heritage<br />

Branch<br />

395 Wellington Street<br />

Ottawa ON K1A0N4<br />

Canada<br />

Bibliothèque et<br />

Archives Canada<br />

Direction du<br />

Patrimoine de l'édition<br />

395, rue Wellington<br />

Ottawa ON K1A0N4<br />

Canada<br />

Your file Votre référence<br />

ISBN: 978-0-494-41343-2<br />

Our file Notre référence<br />

ISBN: 978-0-494-41343-2<br />

NOTICE:<br />

The author has granted a nonexclusive<br />

license allowing Library<br />

and Archives Canada to reproduce,<br />

publish, archive, preserve, conserve,<br />

communicate to the public by<br />

telecommunication or on the Internet,<br />

loan, distribute and sell theses<br />

worldwide, for commercial or noncommercial<br />

purposes, in microform,<br />

paper, electronic and/or any other<br />

formats.<br />

The author retains copyright<br />

ownership and moral rights in<br />

this thesis. Neither the thesis<br />

nor substantial extracts from it<br />

may be printed or otherwise<br />

reproduced without the author's<br />

permission.<br />

AVIS:<br />

L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive<br />

permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives<br />

Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver,<br />

sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public<br />

par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter,<br />

distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans<br />

le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres,<br />

sur support microforme, papier, électronique<br />

et/ou autres formats.<br />

L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur<br />

et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse.<br />

Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de<br />

celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement<br />

reproduits sans son autorisation.<br />

In compliance with the Canadian<br />

Privacy Act some supporting<br />

forms may have been removed<br />

from this thesis.<br />

While these forms may be included<br />

in the document page count,<br />

their removal does not represent<br />

any loss of content from the<br />

thesis.<br />

Conformément à la loi canadienne<br />

sur la protection de la vie privée,<br />

quelques formulaires secondaires<br />

ont été enlevés de cette thèse.<br />

Bien que ces formulaires<br />

aient inclus dans la pagination,<br />

il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant.<br />

i* i<br />

Canada


ABSTRACT<br />

Effects of elevated greenhouse gasses (GG: O3, CO2, CO2+O3, and control) on aspen<br />

leafminer oviposition were studied. Most eggs were found on leaves from the control and<br />

fewest on those from elevated O3 but treatment effect on oviposition was not significant.<br />

Epicuticular wax components differed among aspen clones. Elevated O3 increased<br />

deposition of wax and raised the amounts of alkyl esters. Numbers of leafminer eggs<br />

declined with increasing amounts of fatty acids and primary alcohols in the leaf wax.<br />

Leaves from the treatments used in an oviposition-preference experiment did not differ in<br />

wax composition and no preference for any treatment was detected. Epicuticular wax on<br />

leaves from elevated O3 (and somewhat less from the other GGs) was dense and<br />

amorphous, lacking the crystalline configuration and plate-like structures seen in the<br />

control. The leafminer preferred to lay eggs in larger leaves and those with crystalline<br />

wax with low amounts of alkanes.


There have been many people and organizations that provided me with valuable<br />

assistance and advice throughout the completion of my thesis. I am grateful to my cosupervisors<br />

Drs. Kevin Percy, Canadian Forest Service (CFS), Atlantic Forestry Center<br />

and Marek Krasowski, University of New Brunswick Faculty of Forestry and<br />

Environmental Management. I am also grateful for Professor Dan Quiring’s support as<br />

member of my advisory committee. I also appreciate the advice and support of Dr.<br />

William Mattson, United States Forest Service (USFS). I sincerely thank the CFS for my<br />

stipend and facilities for laboratory analysis and office space.<br />

I thank Professor Miloslav Nosal, University of Calgary Division of Statistics and<br />

Actuarial Science and Dr. Peter Ott, Government of British Columbia, Ministry of<br />

Forests for their careful and thorough statistical guidance.<br />

I<br />

cannot express more sincerely, my appreciation towards Mr. Jaak Sober and Ms.<br />

Wendy Jones at the Aspen-FACE site in Harshaw, Wisconsin. Gratitude is also extended<br />

to Ms. Joanne Lund and all the staff at the USFS Research Station in Rhinelander,<br />

Wisconsin who offered support and services. I would also like to thank Mr. Gerry Bance<br />

at the UNB Microscopy Unit, and Mr. Gary Henderson, Ms. Gretta Goodine, Mr. John<br />

Malcolm and Dr. Gaetan Moreau at the CFS.<br />

Thanks to Mr. R.C. Johns for his earlier reviews and feedback. Dr. Caroline<br />

Awmack provided motivating energy in the early days of my research therefore, I am<br />

grateful for the time and enthusiasm she offered.<br />

And, of course, my warmest acknowledgements towards my family and all my<br />

friends.


ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ ii<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................................................iii<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................. iv<br />

LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................v<br />

LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................vi<br />

1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1<br />

2.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS............................................................................... 10<br />

2.1 Study Overview................................................................................................10<br />

2.1.1 Site location and experimental design...........................................10<br />

2.1.2 Fumigation.........................................................................................12<br />

2.2 FACE Ring Population Survey......................................................................13<br />

2.2.1 Leafminer Density............................................................................ 13<br />

2.2.2 Leaf Epicuticular Wax Production and<br />

Chemical Composition.....................................................................14<br />

2.2.3 Statistical Analysis...........................................................................16<br />

2.3 Leafminer Preference..................................................................................... 17<br />

2.3.1 Leafminer Egg Density....................................................................17<br />

2.3.2 Leaf Epicuticular W ax....................................................................19<br />

2.3.3 Epicuticular Wax Structure........................................................... 19<br />

2.3.4 Statistical Analysis...........................................................................21<br />

3.0 RESULTS...................................................................................................................... 23<br />

3.1 FACE Ring Population Survey......................................................................23<br />

3.1.1 Leafminer Density............................................................................23<br />

3.1.2 Leaf Epicuticular W ax....................................................................25<br />

3.2 Leafminer Preference Study..........................................................................33<br />

3.2.1 Leafminer Egg Density....................................................................33<br />

3.2.2 Leaf Epicuticular W ax....................................................................35<br />

3.2.3 Leaf Morphology.............................................................................. 38<br />

3.2.4 Dependence of Egg Quantity on Leaf Area and Wax................ 40<br />

4.0 DISCUSSION................................................................................................................42<br />

5.0 LITERATURE CITIED..............................................................................................53<br />

APPENDIX A ...................................................................................................................... 60<br />

CURRICULUM VITAE


1. Summary of number of cages that contained eggs and number of wax samples<br />

collected from leaves with and without eggs in preference tests replicated four<br />

times........................................................................................................................19<br />

2. Results of analysis of variance on effects on egg density in the population<br />

survey. The REML method of the Mixed Procedure of SAS was used to<br />

test effects of the fixed factor. The random statement identified random<br />

factors of the design (Blk; Blk*Treatment) enabling the program to determine<br />

appropriate error terms for testing the effects of the fixed factor. Covariance<br />

parameter estimates are also included, showing percent of variance<br />

(bracketed) attributed to each random factor........................................................24<br />

3. Results of the analysis of variance on leaf epicuticular wax and its constituents<br />

in leaves of clone 271,216,259 used in the population survey........................ 26<br />

4. Results of analysis of variance on the proportions of eggs on leaves of aspen<br />

from the four greenhouse gas treatments in the preference study. The REML<br />

method of the Mixed procedure of SAS was used to test effects of fixed<br />

factors. All random factors were entered into the Random Statement of the<br />

Mixed Procedure enabling the program to use appropriate error terms for<br />

testing the effects of the fixed factor (treatment). Covariance parameter<br />

estimates for random factors are included, indicating percent of random<br />

variation explained by each.................................................................................. 34<br />

5. Results of the analysis of variance on leaf epicuticular wax and its constituents<br />

in leaves of clone 42E used in the leafminer preference experiment (leaves<br />

from test 3 only)..................................................................................................... 36<br />

6 . Best Subsets Regression: Egg quantity versus leaf surface area, total wax<br />

amount, alkanes, fatty acids, alcohols and alkyl esters....................................... 41


1. Temporal distribution of the ontogenic stages of Phyllonorycter apparella.<br />

Adapted from Martin (1956)..................................................................................... 6<br />

2. The Aspen - FACE site in northern Wisconsin, USA. Block (1,2, 3) and rings<br />

(1 = control; 2 = CO2; 3 = O3; 4 = CO2+O3) distribution....................................... 10<br />

3. A typical allocation of tree species in an experimental ring at the Aspen -<br />

FACE site.................................................................................................................11<br />

4. Typical cage set-up, which included three leaves per treatment and four<br />

treatments per cage...................................................................................................18<br />

5. Effect of treatment with elevated greenhouse gases on leaftniner oviposition<br />

preference (Clone 42E) from population survey. Bars marked with the same<br />

letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05.<br />

Capped lines represent halves of standard errors...................................................24<br />

6 . Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leaf epicuticular wax amount averaged<br />

across clones (259, 216, 271) in leaves from the population survey. Bars of<br />

the same color marked by the same letters are not significantly different from<br />

each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors...........27<br />

7. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leaf epicuticular wax composition<br />

averaged across clones (259, 216, 271) in leaves from the population survey.<br />

Bars of the same color marked by the same letters are not significantly<br />

different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of<br />

standard errors.......................................................................................................... 27<br />

8 . Effect of clone on total epicuticular wax amount averaged across treatments (4)<br />

in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with the same letter<br />

represent means not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05.<br />

Capped lines represent halves of standard errors...................................................28<br />

9. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax alkyl ester amount averaged across<br />

treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with the<br />

same letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a =<br />

0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors........................................ 29<br />

10. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax alkane amount averaged across<br />

treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with the<br />

same letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a =<br />

0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors......................................... 29


11. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax fatty acid amount averaged across<br />

treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with the<br />

same letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a =<br />

0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors......................................... 30<br />

12. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax primary alcohol amount averaged<br />

across treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with<br />

the same letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a<br />

= 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors..................................... 30<br />

13. Comparison of epicuticular wax amount on unmined and mined leaves<br />

averaged across treatments (4) and clones (3) in leaves from the population<br />

survey. Bars marked with the same letter represent means not significantly<br />

different from each other at p=0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard<br />

errors........................................................................................................................31<br />

14. Mean amounts of wax constituents (alkyl esters, alkanes, fatty acids and<br />

primary alcohols) on mined and unmined leaves from the population study<br />

averaged across all clones (259,216,271) and treatments. Letters pertain<br />

separately to each pair of bars representing the same compound. Pairs of bars<br />

marked with the same letter represent means not significantly different from<br />

each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors............32<br />

15. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leafminer oviposition preference<br />

(Clone 42E was used). Bars marked with the same letter represent means not<br />

significantly different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent<br />

halves of standard errors..........................................................................................34<br />

16. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leafminer oviposition preference<br />

(Clone 42E was used) in preference Test 4. Bars marked with the same letter<br />

represent means not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05.<br />

Capped lines represent halves of standard errors...................................................35<br />

17. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on epicuticular wax composition of<br />

leaves from clone 42E used in the leafminer preference experiment. Bars of<br />

the same color marked by the same letters are not significantly different from<br />

each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors...........37<br />

18. Mean amounts of wax constituents (alkyl esters, alkanes, fatty acids and<br />

primary alcohols) on leaves (clone 42E used) with and without eggs from the<br />

preference study. Letters pertain separately to each pair of bars representing<br />

the same compound. Pairs of bars marked with the same letter represent<br />

means not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines<br />

represent halves of standard errors.........................................................................37


19. Impacts of elevated CO2 and O3 on abaxial leaf epicuticular wax structure<br />

shown in scanning electron micrographs from aspen clone 42E grown under<br />

a) control, b) elevated CO2, c) elevated O3 and d) elevated CO2 + O3. Arrows<br />

indicate wax features. “S” indicates location of stomata.................................... 40


1.0 - Introduction<br />

Since the mid 18 century, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases<br />

(GHG’s) such as CO2 and O3 have increased by 30-35% (IPCC, 2001). Exposure to<br />

elevated O3 is detrimental to forest health (Percy et al., 2003). The increasing release of<br />

CO2 and O3 into the atmosphere affects both climate and the structure and functioning of<br />

ecological communities on local and/or global scales (IPCC, 2001). Many experiments<br />

evaluating the ecological impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems have focused<br />

on its effects on plant growth (eg. Chappelka and Samuelson, 1998; Isebrands et al.,<br />

2001; Kamosky et al., 2003) and the preference and performance of individual<br />

phytophagous insects (eg. Awmack et al., 1996; Bezemer and Jones, 1998; Coviella and<br />

Trumble, 1999; Heagle et al., 1994; Lindroth et al., 1993; Percy et al., 2002; Watt et<br />

al.,1995; Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). Of relevance to this study, it has been reported<br />

that elevated CO2 reduces foliar nitrogen concentration and increases synthesis of carbonbased<br />

defensive metabolites (Wilsey, 1996).<br />

In trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), CO2 increases height, diameter<br />

and volume growth, (Isebrands et al., 2001). As well, there are increases in root biomass,<br />

phenolic glycosides and in the carbon-nitrogen ratio (Lindroth et al., 2001; King et al.,<br />

2001; Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). Elevated CO2 also increases foliar consumption by<br />

herbivorous insects, resulting in reduced performance and high mortality rates (Hughes<br />

and Bazzaz, 1997; Stiling et al., 1999). Some herbivore species, particularly aphids, show<br />

increased fecundity at elevated CO2 (Awmack et al., 1997; Goverde et al., 2002; and<br />

Stacey and Fellowes, 2002), although these benefits to insects may be offset by increases<br />

in vulnerability to natural enemies due to a decrease in aphid response to alarm<br />

pheromones (Percy et al., 2002; Stiling et al., 1999).


In general, increased concentrations of O3 have been associated with high<br />

frequency of insect attack (Dahlsten et al., 1997), increases in enzyme activity associated<br />

with general plant defence mechanisms (Kangasjarvi et al., 1994) and potentially with an<br />

increase in insect fecundity (Percy et al., 2002). Specifically, elevated levels of O3 have<br />

been shown to increase pupal weight of forest tent caterpillars (Percy et al., 2002).<br />

Our knowledge about the combined effects of CO2 and O3 on herbivore<br />

performance is limited (Lindroth et al., 1993; Bezmer and Jones, 1998; Isebrands et al.,<br />

2001; Percy et al., 2002), yet we need to investigate combined effects of the two<br />

pollutants interacting with living organisms before we can reliably predict their future<br />

impacts on terrestrial ecosystems (Heagle et al., 1994; Coviella and Trumble, 1999; Watt<br />

et al., 1995; Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). Only one study (Kopper and Lindroth, 2003)<br />

has examined the combined effects of CO2 and O3 on herbivore oviposition preference<br />

and performance, investigating the colonization rates and survivorship of the herbivore.<br />

Although studies have shown individual effects of greenhouse gases, CO2 and O3, on<br />

plant tissue composition and plant-herbivore relationships (preference), no study has<br />

directly investigated the interactions of both gases on leaf surface quality and their<br />

resultant changes in behavioral and reproductive strategies of herbivorous insects.<br />

Insect preference and performance are determined by both plant quality and the<br />

insect’s vulnerability to natural enemies. Plant nutritional status and defensive<br />

mechanisms both affect the preference and performance of individual herbivores<br />

(Awmack and Leather, 2002a). They may be affected by changes in their nutrition, their<br />

defences, and susceptibility to their natural enemies. These factors may all be affected by<br />

both the biotic and abiotic environment (Awmack and Leather, 2002a,b). Although


changes in plant tissue quality caused by elevated CO2 and O3 have been investigated<br />

(Lindroth et al., 2001; Kangasjarvi et al., 1994; Kamosky et al., 2002), less is known<br />

about how these changes affect host preference by herbivorous insects (Awmack et al.,<br />

1996).<br />

Leaf epicuticular waxes influence herbivory directly or indirectly through various<br />

cues including chemical, morphological and visual stimuli (Bemays and Chapman, 1994;<br />

Dutton et al., 2000; Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995). However, these influences are only<br />

partly understood (Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995). Leaf epicuticular waxes are located<br />

on the outermost layer of the plant cuticle and comprised of long-chain, saturated<br />

aliphatic molecules (Baker, 1982). The most common types of aliphatic compounds are<br />

alkanes, alkyl esters, primary alcohols, fatty acids and aldehydes (Barthlott et al., 1998).<br />

Chemical composition of epicuticular waxes determines their morphology (Baker, 1982;<br />

Barthlott et al., 1998; Holloway, 1982; Jeffree, 1994). Many plant species can be<br />

identified based on wax morphology and chemistry. Most epicuticular wax studies have<br />

involved plants such as wheat, cabbage and other crop species (Baker, 1974; Baker and<br />

Jeffree, 1981; Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995). Some studies have investigated the<br />

characteristics of epicuticular waxes of trees such as Eucalyptus sp. (Neinhuis et al.,<br />

2001) and Prunus sp. (Jetter et al., 2000; Jetter and Schaffer, 2001) and Populus sp.<br />

(Kamosky et al., 1999; Percy et al., 2002).<br />

The main function of epicuticular waxes is providing protection against insects,<br />

diseases, and pollutants. They also act as barriers against excessive water loss<br />

(Holloway, 1994). Chemical wax components are biosynthesized by the plant epidermal<br />

cells (Kolattukudy, 1996). Chemical components of epicuticular waxes move within the


cuticular water current to the site of their disposition in a process similar to steam<br />

distillation (Neinhuis et al., 2001). Leaf epicuticular wax morphology and chemistry<br />

vary with changing environmental conditions (Baker, 1982). Air pollutants, such as CO2<br />

and/or O3, alter epicuticular wax composition through direct modification of wax<br />

biosynthesis (Kamosky et al., 1999; Kamosky et al., 2002; Kamosky et al., 2003; Percy<br />

et al., 1994; Percy et al., 2002). Epidermal cells are sensitive to environmental factors;<br />

therefore, the biosynthetic process of wax formation also responds to environmental<br />

factors (Kolattukudy, 1996) such as changes in concentrations of CO2 and O3. Kamosky<br />

et al. (2 0 0 2 ) determined an increase of alkane homologue ratio, increased wax amount,<br />

and a change in wax structure from a crystallite to an amorphous form as a result of<br />

exposure of trembling aspen to elevated O3 and CO2. These alterations to leaf-surface<br />

chemistry and morphology may affect the preference and performance of phytophagous<br />

insects (Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995) and those of their enemies. The chemical cues<br />

used by the parasitoid to locate its concealed host after landing on an infested area are<br />

plant-derived, as in other tri-trophic systems and not insect-derived (Dutton et al., 2000).<br />

Relevant to this study, Phyllonorycter spp. has been shown to rely on plant-derived<br />

semiochemicals (chemical signals) for host location and ovipositional preference (Dutton<br />

et al., 2 0 0 0 ).<br />

Herbivore population dynamics may be affected by food quality and quantity, by their<br />

natural enemies (Price, 1992), and by changes in the abiotic environment. Bottom-up and<br />

top-down population regulation may both be affected by changes in atmospheric<br />

composition (Awmack and Leather, 2002b). Food webs may be directly impacted via<br />

changes in the relative strength of this dynamic, determined by changes in specific


mechanisms in response to abiotic factors (eg. greenhouse gases) (Price, 1992). The<br />

relationship between oviposition preference and the subsequent performance of offspring<br />

is one of the most important aspects in the evolution of associations between herbivores<br />

and host plants (Thompson, 1988). Some studies have shown a positive relationship<br />

between preferred oviposition and larval performance (McClure et al., 1998). However,<br />

others have provided evidence that some insects show no relationship between<br />

oviposition preference and offspring fitness (Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). As elevated<br />

levels of greenhouse gases affect plant quality, herbivore oviposition preferences may<br />

change and natural selection should favor those females that lay on hosts with best<br />

nutritional status (Quiring and McNeil, 1987). This might be expected, providing they<br />

obtain the correct cues and are not choosing oviposition sites to avoid natural-enemy<br />

attack. Plant nutritional quality is not the only factor determining a female insect’s choice<br />

of oviposition sites since higher-trophic level interactions must also be considered. Plant<br />

quality may affect tri- trophic relationships either via prey/host food source modification<br />

or by the provision of refiigia allowing prey to avoid predators and parasitoids (Awmack<br />

and Leather, 2002a). In other words, herbivores may select poorer quality hosts, in order<br />

to decrease risk of attack by natural enemies.<br />

This study is a part of the world’s largest international FACE (Free Air Carbon<br />

Dioxide Enrichment) project examining the effects of increased levels of carbon dioxide<br />

and ozone on trembling aspen ecosystems (http://aspenface.rntu.edu). Independent and<br />

interacting effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on the preference and performance of aspen<br />

blotch leafminer (Phyllonorycter apparella Herrich-Schaffer (Gracillariidae)) will be<br />

examined.


Martin (1956) was the first to describe the life history of Phyllonorycter apparella.<br />

The distribution of ontogeny stages is shown in Fig. 1. Phyllonorycter apparella is a<br />

univoltine leaf-mining moth that has a wide native distribution in North America (Martin,<br />

1956). The adult moth prefers to oviposit on trembling aspen as oviposition sites, but<br />

also will lay eggs on Populus grandidentata Michx. and Populus balsamifera L.<br />

(Auerbach, 1991). The overwintering adult oviposits on the margins of the abaxial<br />

(underside) surface of leaves in late May until mid-June. Adult moth wings are small and<br />

slender with bronzy-brown forewings, which range from 3.6 to 4.8mm in length (Davis<br />

and Deschka, 2001). There are five larval instars, the timing of which is shown in Figure<br />

1 .<br />

Stage April May June July August September<br />

Egg<br />

1st Instar<br />

2nd Instar<br />

—<br />

3rd Instar<br />

4th Instar<br />

5th Instar<br />

Pupa<br />

Adult<br />

(overwintering)<br />

Figure 1. Temporal distribution of onto genic stages of Phyllonorycter apparella.<br />

Adapted from Martin (1956).<br />

The following description of the ontogenic stages of the aspen blotch leafminer is<br />

based on Martin (1956). The first instar larva feed on the spongy mesophyll by moving<br />

its head from side to side, in a fan shape, advancing towards the mid-vein of the leaf.<br />

The mine width is approximately 3mm after the initial instar. In the second instar, the<br />

larva continues to feed in the same way as the first (Martin, 1956). The larva begins to<br />

form the mine in a circular shape and the mine reaches a diameter of approximately 6 mm.<br />

The third instar larva continues to feed on the mesophyll forming a more oblong mine.


Larva frass, which is black and round, is quite apparent around the edges of the mine. In<br />

the fourth instar, the larva undergoes the most obvious changes. The body becomes<br />

cylindrical, opaque and yellowish, while the mouthparts are extending ventrally, allowing<br />

the larva to feed into the upper palisade mesophyll layer. During the latter stages of this<br />

instar, the larva begins to spin silk webbing in the mine, which attaches the upper mine<br />

surface with the lower surface.<br />

By the fifth instar, the mine is completely woven with silk. Some feeding continues<br />

with the larva avoiding the vascular bundles. Unique identifying feature of this stage is<br />

the appearance of the body, which is dark yellowish-brown, and of the frass, which has<br />

been piled neatly and attached to the upper epidermal wall. At this stage, the mine has<br />

attained an oval shape and reaches its maximum size, averaging 17 mm long and 1 2 mm<br />

wide.<br />

During late-July and early August, the larva pupates within the mine. The fifth and<br />

sixth abdominal segments remain exposed, which permits the pupa a great deal of<br />

movement within the mine. Immediately before adult emergence in mid-August, the<br />

pupa pierces a hole through the lower epidermis and the pupal case remains in this<br />

protruding position for a few weeks.<br />

Only a small percent of individuals reach the adult stage of development due to<br />

predators and parasites (Martin, 1956). From the period of emergence until<br />

overwintering, male and female moths mate. Overwintering sites are located in the<br />

cervices of bark of coniferous trees such as Pinus strobus L., Pinus resinosa Ait., and<br />

Pinus bankisana Lamb.


At high density, leafminers can cause premature browning of the foliage (Martin,<br />

1956). Information regarding economic impacts at times of severe infestations is not<br />

available. Since trembling aspen is the most important deciduous species in the North<br />

American boreal forest (Hogg, 2001), any reduction to its growth and yield may have a<br />

significant economic impact. The leafminer was chosen as a model species for this study<br />

for four reasons: 1) its presence on the research site at endemic population levels; 2 )<br />

ability to identify this species based on mine size. Mine size has been shown to vary in<br />

other Phyllonorycter spp. under CO2 treatments (Stiling et al., 1999); 3) observed<br />

differences in oviposition behavior on different aspen clones reared at elevated CO2<br />

and/or O3 (Kopper and Lindroth, 2003); and 4) leafminers are ideal experimental subjects<br />

because the larvae spend their entire lives inside mines that they form within leaves<br />

(Hesman, 2000); therefore, one can accurately determine population behavior. There is<br />

evidence of larval presence whether the herbivore is living or dead (from parasitoid) or<br />

has emerged (leaving behind frass and the pupal case) (Awmack, unpublished data,<br />

2001).<br />

Natural enemies of P. apparella include parasitoids from the family Braconidae (eg.<br />

Apanteles sp. and Pholetesor salicifliella), Eulophidae (eg. Chrysocharis sp., Cirrospilus<br />

sp., Pediobius sp., Pnigalio sp., Sympiesis sp.), Ichneumonidae (eg. Alophosterum<br />

foliicola, Diadegma sp., Scambus decorus) and Pteromalidae (Davis and Deschka, 2001).<br />

The main objective of this study was to link the changes in aspen leaf epicuticular<br />

wax chemical composition and morphology, due to exposure to elevated levels of CO2<br />

and/or O3, with aspen blotch leafminer oviposition site selection. This was the first study


to use population and bioassay studies to examine this link for aspen blotch leafminer.<br />

This objective was addressed by developing the following hypotheses:<br />

1 - If ovipositing leafininers prefer leaves with higher amounts of alkanes and<br />

fatty acids in epicuticular wax (Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995), and these amounts are<br />

increased by the individual and combined effects of elevated CO2 and O3 levels<br />

(Kamosky et al., 2002; Percy et al., 2002), then colonization should be highest on leaves<br />

exposed to elevated CO2 and O3. Furthermore, on clones more sensitive to O3, alkane<br />

and fatty-acid amounts should increase more than in less sensitive clones (Kamosky et<br />

al., 1999).<br />

2 - If ovipositing leafininers prefer leaves with amorphous epicuticular wax surface<br />

structure (Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995), and structure type changes from crystallite to<br />

amorphous by the individual and combined effects of elevated CO2 and O3 levels<br />

(Kamosky et al., 2002), then colonization should be highest on leaves exposed to<br />

elevated CO2 and O3 treatments.<br />

Based on these two hypotheses, it is predicted that colonization will be higher on<br />

clones more sensitive to O3. Furthermore, a critical component of defining the linkage<br />

between leaf surface properties and aspen blotch leafminer oviposition is to verify that<br />

leaf surface chemistry and morphology of aspen change in response to additive and/or<br />

interacting effect of CO2 and O3, as shown in previous studies (Kamosky et al., 2002;<br />

Percy et al., 2002).


2.1 Study Overview<br />

2.1.1 Site location and experimental design<br />

The Aspen-FACE (Free Air Carbon Enrichment) site (Fig. 2) is located near<br />

Rhinelander in northern Wisconsin, USA (45 .06 N; 89 .071W), on the Harshaw<br />

Experimental Farm (32ha) of the USDA Forest Service. The experiment established in<br />

1997 on the site comprises three randomized blocks each containing four 30-m diameter<br />

FACE rings, each randomly assigned to one of four treatments (control, elevated CO2,<br />

elevated O3 and elevated CO2+ O3). Rings are spaced at least 100 m apart to exclude<br />

ring-to-ring air drift.<br />

Figure 2. The Aspen - FACE site in northern Wisconsin, USA. Block (1, 2, 3)<br />

and rings (1 = control; 2 = C 02; 3 = 0 3; 4 = C 0 2 + 0 3) distribution.


Spaced at 1 m x 1 m, 760 trees were planted in each ring. Half of each ring<br />

contains trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.; 5 genotypes). The other half<br />

consists of two quarters: one quarter has white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) mixed<br />

with trembling aspen and the other has sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) with<br />

trembling aspen (Fig. 3). Samples for this study were taken exclusively from the pure<br />

aspen communities.<br />

Figure 3. A typical allocation of tree species in an experimental ring at the<br />

Aspen - FACE site.


2.1.2 Fumigation<br />

In 2003, ambient levels in the control rings for CO2 and O3 were 362 ppm and<br />

38.4 ppb, respectively. In 2004, they were 373 ppm and 34.9 ppb, respectively. Elevated<br />

levels of CO2 and O3 were based on concentrations predicted for the year 2050 in the<br />

Great Lakes region (Dickson et al., 2000). Trees inside the CO2 rings were fumigated<br />

from dawn until twilight (i.e. when the sun elevation angle exceeded 6 ° from the<br />

horizon).<br />

During 2003, elevated CO2 levels were 537 ppm (averaged across three rings)<br />

from May to October for 145 days. During 2004, elevated CO2 levels were 512 ppm<br />

(averaged across three rings) from May to October for 150 days.<br />

During 2003, the O3 elevated hourly average levels were 51.4 ppb, that is, 1.34 X<br />

ambient (averaged across three rings). During 2004, the O3 elevated hourly average<br />

levels were 41.1 ppb, that is, 1.18 X ambient (averaged across three rings). Elevated<br />

levels of O3 were aimed at 1.34 -1.4 times that of ambient levels. The intended<br />

concentrations were based on a daily-alternating exposure that followed a diurnal<br />

ambient profile based on actual O3 data (Kamosky et al., 1999). Depending on<br />

meteorological conditions and forecasts, during both years, O3 maximum hourly average<br />

concentrations ranged from 46 ppb (on cool, cloudy days) to 85 ppb (on hot, sunny days).<br />

Trees fumigated with CO2 + O3 were exposed to a combination of the elevated levels.


2.2 FACE Ring Population Survey<br />

2.2.1 Leafminer Density<br />

Aspen clone 216 was intended for use in the population survey of leafminer<br />

density and leafminer preference study in order to maintain consistency with the wax<br />

analysis in the population survey. However, in the spring of 2004, the FACE site<br />

suffered from an outbreak of the pathogen, Venturia sp. Aspen clone 216 was particularly<br />

susceptible to this fungus. Although it does not induce tree mortality, it significantly<br />

affected crown form and leaf surface quality. Hence, aspen clone 42E (moderate<br />

sensitivity to O3) was used in leafminer density assessment because it was relatively<br />

unaffected by the pathogen. Leaves affected by the fungus were not selected. Fiftycentimeter<br />

branch segments were sampled from the middle of the upper tree canopy<br />

(approx. 4-5 m above ground). Branch segments were excised from full-sun laterals<br />

using a pole pruner. In order to reach live-leaf crowns in the CO2 rings, which began at<br />

approximately three meters height, a ladder was used. One segment was sampled from<br />

each of five haphazardly selected trees in each of the twelve FACE rings. On average,<br />

there were 73 leaves per branch segment. In total, 4400 leaves were examined for<br />

presence of eggs or early mines.<br />

The total number of leaves per segment was tallied. The proportion of the<br />

leafminer was expressed as a number of eggs or mines per leaf. Parasitized eggs (i.e.<br />

collapsed-dome shaped and no mine present) and parasitized mines (i.e. light brownish<br />

and/or with a tear/hole) were included in the count because they included a chosen<br />

oviposition site. These criteria were used because the survey was carried out during the


second week of June 2004 when moth oviposition was already ending and egg hatch and<br />

mine initiation began.<br />

2.2.2 Leaf Epicuticular Wax Production and Chemical Composition<br />

Leaves for wax analysis were collected in spring 2003, before the Venturia sp.<br />

outbreak. Aspen clones 259,216 and 271 (in decreasing sensitivity to O3) were used in<br />

epicuticular wax analysis. Leaves were selected based on the leaf plastachron index (LPI)<br />

system. The LPI is a method used to identify the physiological age of a leaf on a plant<br />

shoot (Percy, pers. com.). Leaves from LPI 6 - 8 located on full-sun, first order laterals<br />

were removed. Trees were selected based on average height and diameter in a ring,<br />

within 5m of the ring center. There were 215 samples collected; three leaves per clone<br />

(one tree), three clones per ring, twelve rings, and two levels of leafminer damage (mined<br />

or unmined). Leaf epicuticular wax was collected on the site by rinsing the adaxial and<br />

abaxial leaf surfaces with 3ml of CHCL3 using a glass syringe. Mined leaves were cut<br />

with a razor blade into mined and unmined portions. Wax was collected only from the<br />

unmined portion. Leaf surface area was measured (± 1cm2) at the USDA Forest Service<br />

lab in Rhinelander, Wisconsin using a leaf surface area meter (Type LI-3050A/2, Lambda<br />

Instrument Corporation, Lincoln, NB, USA).<br />

The solvent/wax solution was filtered, solvent evaporated, and wax weighed to<br />

the nearest ±10 ng and expressed as p,g cm'2 leaf area. Wax samples were analyzed using<br />

a Varian 3410 (Varian Incorporated, Walnut Creek, CA, USA) gas chromatograph (GC).<br />

Retention times were determined on a DB1-HT capillary column (15 m; 0.32 mm inner<br />

diameter [i.d.]) with methyl silicone liquid phase (0.1 |xm film thickness). Carrier gas<br />

(He) flow was 7.5 mL/min. Column programming was 70°C to 120°C at 20°C m in 1;


121°C to 390°C at 6 °C min'1. The septum programmable injector was programmed at<br />

75°C to 125°C at 18°C min'1; 126-395°C at 12°C min'1; hold 15min. The flame<br />

ionization detector (FID) was operated at 400°C. Wax samples were silylated with n-<br />

trimethylsilylacetimide (TMSI) at 35°C for 30 min. The homologue assignments and<br />

peak integration were determined with Varían version 6.0 Workstar (Varían Incorporated,<br />

Walnut Creek, CA, USA) software and injection of pure reference homologues and<br />

reference wax mixtures.<br />

A Hewlett-Packard 5989 GC-MS (Hewlett Packard - Palo Alto, CA, USA mass<br />

spectrometer was used in final confirmation of homologue assignments. A DBH1-HT<br />

column (15m; 0.32mm i.d.; 0.1 jim film thickness) was temperature programmed from<br />

70°C to 345 at 12°C m in _1 (hold 30 min). Helium carrier gas flow rate was 1.0 mL'1.<br />

Injection was on-column at 250°C. The electron impact (El) mass spectra were searched<br />

against Wiley, NIST and CFS pure homologue libraries. Ion source and quadrupole<br />

temperatures were 275°C and 100°C, respectively.<br />

The number of counts, associated with each homologue was combined into<br />

classes (alkanes, fatty acids, primary alcohols, and alkyl esters; 98% of resolved peaks).<br />

Homologue class value was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of wax per unit<br />

leaf surface area (ng/cm2). The counts for each sample were then normalized to account<br />

for the FID efficiency response by multiplying all values by a previously determined ratio<br />

for each homologue class.


2.2.3 Statistical Analysis<br />

The analyses of variance (ANOVA) were done using the REML method of the<br />

Mixed Procedure (PROC MIX) of SAS© (Version 8.2 for Windows - The SAS Institute<br />

Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The ANOVA was performed according to the completely<br />

randomized block design. In all analyses of variance in the thesis, differences between<br />

means were compared using the Least Square Means option.<br />

The analysis of leafminer egg density was performed on the average number of<br />

eggs per sample. In the analysis, the random statement was used (here and in other<br />

analyses made in Mixed Procedure of SAS) listing the random factors (i.e. block and<br />

block*treatment) enabling SAS to use correct error terms for testing the fixed variable(s)<br />

(here, the treatment). Analysis of leaf wax was performed on the total amount of wax and<br />

on each of its constituents; alkyl esters, alkanes, fatty acids, and primary alcohols. The<br />

elements of experimental design included three blocks; four treatments (CO2, O3, CO2 +<br />

O3 and control); three clones (259,216,271); and the presence of damage from leafminer<br />

(mined or unmined).<br />

Residuals in the analyses of variance were tested for normality of distribution<br />

using the Univariate Procedure of SAS. Where the data were found not to be normally<br />

distributed, the Box-Cox option of SAS’ Transreg Procedure was used to determine the<br />

most appropriate transformation of the data for normalization of their distribution. Then,<br />

the Box-Cox transformation was applied to the data. A transformation was required for<br />

the leafminer egg density analysis but not for the wax data. All data shown in the thesis<br />

are untransformed, even when transformation was used for their analyses. This approach


to testing and transformation of continuous data requiring normalization of distribution is<br />

consistently applied throughout this thesis.<br />

2.3 Leafminer Preference<br />

2.3.1 Leafminer Egg Density<br />

Female moths were collected from the surface of trunks of mature softwood trees (i.e.<br />

white pine, red pine, Abies balsamea (L.) Mill., Picea glauca (Moench) Voss and Picea<br />

mariana (P. Mill.) B.S.P.). Moths were removed from trunks using an aspirator and<br />

placed into 30 ml clear plastic vials. Moths were refrigerated for no longer than 48 hours<br />

at 2°C before the beginning of the experiment. After refrigeration, one female moth was<br />

added to each vial.<br />

Leaves were collected in 2004 from aspen clone 42E, from all FACE rings.<br />

Leaves from L P I6 - 8 on full-sun, main laterals were removed with attention not to<br />

damage the petiole. To ensure maximum leaf turgidity, petioles of excised leaves were<br />

placed in water sprigs. Three leaves on one shoot of each ring were placed in each water<br />

sprig. Leaves were transported to the United States Forest Service (USFS) greenhouse<br />

located near the site, in Rhinelander, Wisconsin. Mean temperature within the<br />

greenhouse was 25.4°C daytime and 19.3°C night time. Mean relative humidity was<br />

40.8% daytime and 60.9% night time. One sprig per treatment (i.e. 3 leaves/treatment)<br />

was inserted into a stryofoam base and covered in a 0.5 mm white mesh cage held in<br />

place by a metal cage (Fig. 4).


Figure 4. Typical cage set-up, which included three leaves per treatment and four<br />

treatments per cage.<br />

The cage was a conical structure, approximately 50 cm in height. Moths were removed<br />

from cool storage to adjust to greenhouse temperature. One live female was added to<br />

each cage. After 24 hours, eggs laid on each leaf were counted. Egg position on the leaf<br />

and the status of the female moth (i.e. dead or alive) was also recorded because some<br />

moths were found dead.<br />

This experiment was carried out at four different times over a 20-day period.<br />

Cages without eggs were not used in preference analysis. Where the female moth was<br />

found dead, it was assumed it died before it could oviposit. When no eggs were found,<br />

but the female was alive, it was assumed she did not have any eggs to lay. The numbers<br />

of cages from which data were gathered are given in Table 1.


Table 1. Summary of the number of cages that contained eggs and number of<br />

wax samples collected from leaves with and without eggs in preference<br />

tests replicated four times.<br />

Replicate Number of Cages Wax Samples<br />

With Eggs Without Eggs With Eggs Without Eggs<br />

1 48 45 0 0<br />

2 25 11 0 0<br />

3 2 0 16 39 1 0 1<br />

4 24 1 2 37 6 6<br />

2.3.2 Leaf Epicuticular Wax<br />

Epicuticular wax was removed from leaves from replicates three and four (Table<br />

1). Leaf wax was collected from abaxial sides of leaves with or without eggs (Table 1)<br />

using 3 mL of CHCL3 dispensed with a syringe. The wax samples were labeled for<br />

identification (including the treatment from which the leaves were originally collected,<br />

the cage, and the replicate number). The solvent/wax solution was filtered, solvent<br />

evaporated, and wax weighed to the nearest ± 1 0 |ig and expressed as ^g cm' 2 leaf area.<br />

Wax was analyzed using GC-MS from replicate three only. Time constraints did<br />

not permit wax samples from replicate four to be analyzed. Thirty-two and thirty-six<br />

samples were analyzed from leaves with eggs and without eggs respectively. The<br />

procedure for epicuticular wax analysis was that used in the population survey described<br />

in section 2 .2 .2 .<br />

2.3.3 Epicuticular Wax Structure<br />

Leaves for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were collected from<br />

FACE and stored in coolers to maintain leaf turgidity. In order to maintain consistency<br />

with the preference experiment, leaves were removed from full-sun, main lateral


anches at L P I6 -8 . Leaves from the same LPI were presumed to be at the same stage of<br />

wax development, based on Baker (1982). One day after leaf excision, leaves were<br />

viewed and photographed under cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Only turgid leaves<br />

were viewed. Surfaces of twelve leaves were examined (i.e. one leaf/treatment/block).<br />

The University of Minnesota Hitachi S-3500N SEM with Quartz PCI digital<br />

imaging, photo CRT recording camera, environmental secondary electron detector<br />

(ESED) and Windows NT operating system was used. Optimum SEM operating<br />

conditions were: 5kV-accelerating voltage and 12mm detector working distance. The<br />

SEM was adapted cryogenically with the Emitech K-l 150 Cryogenic System, including a<br />

cryo-preparation unit, airlock interface to SEM and sputter coater. The liquid nitrogen<br />

reservoir for the cryo-SEM system was frequently replenished during specimen<br />

preparation and viewing to maintain low temperatures in the devices.<br />

Square sections approximately 1cm2 were removed from the mid-section of the<br />

leaves using a scalpel and razor blade. Care was taken not to abrade or damage the<br />

epicuticular wax structure by specimen handling. Each specimen was mounted onto a<br />

bronze stub with the abaxial surface exposed for viewing. Non-conductive, self-sticking<br />

adhesive tabs were used to mount the section to the stub. Conductive carbon paint was<br />

then applied to the edges of the leaf section. The stub was then placed on the transfer rod<br />

and slowly plunged into liquid nitrogen slush under vacuum. Upon freezing, the<br />

specimen stub was transferred under vacuum to the cryo-SEM preparation chamber. The<br />

preparation stage was pre-cooled with liquid nitrogen to -1 83°C. Any ice or frost that


was present was removed using sublimation by heating (to the maximum of -75°C) the<br />

stub from below and above. Stub temperature was lowered again to -183°C.<br />

The specimen was then transferred to the coating area of the cryo-SEM system<br />

preparation chamber. The specimen stub was sputter coated twice for two minutes at a<br />

sputtering current of 35mA. The gold-coated sample was then available for examination<br />

under the SEM. Leaf surface characteristics that were deemed to be representative of the<br />

viewed leaf surface were photographed over a consistent set of magnifications.<br />

2.3.4 Statistical Analysis<br />

The analysis of variance on leafminer egg density and leaf wax data were done<br />

using the REML method of the Mixed Procedure of SAS© (Version 8.2 for Windows -<br />

The SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Egg density was expressed as a proportion of<br />

eggs on leaves from the four treatments. The ANOVA on leafminer egg density was<br />

performed according to split-split plot with treatment being the main plot, test the splitplot,<br />

and the bench as the split-split plot. The analysis was performed on proportions of<br />

eggs whereby eggs in each treatment per cage were expressed as a proportion of the total<br />

number of eggs in that cage. The model random statement was used listing the random<br />

factors (i.e. bench*replicate, bench*treatment, replicate*treatment, bench*replicate*<br />

treatment). In terms of experimental design, “bench” is considered a replicate.<br />

The ANOVA on leaf wax data was performed according to the split-plot design with the<br />

main plot being the treatment, leaf-damage status as the split-plot. The bench was treated<br />

as a replicate and was the only random factor. The random statement was used again<br />

specifying the random factor and its interactions with the fixed factors. Leaf wax total


amount and its constituents; alkane, fatty acid, primary alcohol and alkyl ester were<br />

analyzed separately in this way. All data were found to be normally distributed and no<br />

transformations were required.<br />

Residuals for both analyses were tested for normality using the Univariate<br />

Procedure of SAS. Regression analysis in MINITAB® was used to examine the<br />

relationship between leafminer preference, as indicated by the number of leafminer eggs<br />

and epicuticular wax composition. In addition to total wax amount and composition, leaf<br />

surface area was included as a predictor variable. Best subsets regression is an efficient<br />

method used for building a best-fitting regression model with as few predictor variables<br />

as possible (MINITAB® Release 14.1). The strength of this model was then determined<br />

based on p- and R-squared values for different predictor variables.<br />

The predictors were selected based on Best Subsets Regression (BSR) analysis<br />

that results in the best model. The best model is determined by the minimum number of<br />

parameters (p) with the highest R-squared (R2) adjusted value, while taking standard<br />

deviation (S) and the C-p into account. The C-p is the measure of the difference of a<br />

fitted regression model from a true model, along with the random error. The objective<br />

was to select a model with a C-p of (p+1) or below.


3.0 - Results<br />

3.1 FACE Ring Population Survey<br />

Egg density was assessed in the spring of 2003, however data collected did not<br />

accurately reflect the status of the population due to extremely low numbers of eggs<br />

surveyed on leaves. Therefore, improved sampling techniques were employed in spring<br />

2004. Moths were observed flying at the FACE site May 25,2004. This date was later<br />

than in previous years (Kopper, pers. com.) due to spring meteorological conditions (i.e.<br />

cool, wet weather).<br />

The first flight of leafminer moths corresponded with leaf expansion. They were<br />

observed flying during twilight hours. The beginning of flight appeared to be<br />

synchronized among the majority of moths, as also perceived by others (Kopper, pers.<br />

com.; Auerbach, pers. com.). Upon landing on an aspen branch, leafminer moths were<br />

observed rapidly walking to leaves. When reaching the leaf, moths did not appear to<br />

encounter difficulty walking on either adaxial or abaxial surfaces. However, the act of<br />

oviposition was not observed.<br />

3.1.1 Leafminer Density<br />

Density was assessed in mid-June, 2004 and egg density was not significantly<br />

affected by treatment (Table 2). Differences in least squares means comparison between<br />

the control treatment and the O3 treatment revealed that density was marginally not<br />

significantly (p=0.055) greater on leaves from the control (Fig. 5). Egg density tended to<br />

be greater in the control and least in the O3 treatment (Fig. 5).


0.8<br />

co<br />

^ 0.6-<br />

(O<br />

o> 0.5<br />

a><br />

* 0.4-<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

«<br />

1 0 .3 -<br />

©<br />

Q 0.2-<br />

O)<br />

u? 0.1<br />

0 -<br />

Control C02 03 C02+03<br />

T reatment<br />

Figure 5. Effect of treatment with elevateci greenhouse gases on leafminer<br />

oviposition preference (Clone 42E) from population survey. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.<br />

Among the random factors, the least of variation was explained by block (Table<br />

2). The greater density of eggs was in block 3, followed in decreasing order by block 1<br />

and block 2. Block*treatment explained almost one fifth of the random variation (Table<br />

2 ), indicating inconsistent distribution of eggs in treatments in different blocks.<br />

Table 2. Results of analysis of variance on effects on egg density in the population<br />

survey. The REML method of the Mixed Procedure of SAS was used to test<br />

effects of the fixed factor. The random statement identified random factors of the<br />

design (Blk; Blk*Treatment) enabling the program to determine appropriate error<br />

terms for testing the effects of the fixed factor. Covariance parameter estimates<br />

are also included, showing percent of variance (bracketed) attributed to each<br />

random factor.<br />

Dependent<br />

Variable<br />

Sources of<br />

Variation<br />

Num<br />

df<br />

Den<br />

df<br />

F-<br />

value<br />

P-<br />

value<br />

Covariate<br />

Parameter<br />

Estimate<br />

Eggs Treatment 3 6 2.04 0.20<br />

Block<br />

Block*Trt<br />

Residual<br />

Total<br />

0.0028 (7.2%)<br />

0.0075 (19.4%)<br />

0.0284 (73.4%)<br />

0.0387 (100%)<br />

Block: 1,2, 3; Treatment: 1- control, 2-C02, 3-03, 4-C02+ 0 3; df=degrees of freedom,<br />

Num = numerator, Den = denominator


3.1.2 Leaf Epicuticular Wax<br />

ANOVA are presented in Table 3. Results are described following the source of<br />

variation effects on different wax constituents. Averaged across clones 271,216, and<br />

259, total wax amount was significantly (p


Table 3. Results of the analysis of variance on leaf epicuticular wax and its<br />

constituents in leaves of clone 271,216,259 used in the population survey<br />

Dependent Sources o f Variation Num Den F P-value<br />

Variable df df<br />

Total Wax Treatment 3 6 7.52


Treatment<br />

Figure 6. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leaf epicuticular wax amount<br />

averaged across clones (259, 216, 271) in leaves from the population<br />

survey. Bars marked with the same letter represent means not significantly<br />

different from each other at p = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of<br />

standard errors.<br />

Eo<br />

a><br />

o<br />

E<br />

<<br />

Control<br />

Alkyl Ester<br />

Alkane<br />

Fatty Acid<br />

Primary Alcohol<br />

C 0 2<br />

Treatment<br />

C O 2 + O 3<br />

Figure 7. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leaf epicuticular wax<br />

composition averaged across clones (259, 216, 271) in leaves from the<br />

population survey. Bars of the same color marked by the same letters are<br />

not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines<br />

represent halves of standard errors.


Clones varied significantly in the total amount of wax and the differences were<br />

consistent across treatments (no interaction) (Table 3). Leaves from clone 259 had a<br />

significantly larger amount of total wax than leaves from clones 271 and 216 (Fig. 8).<br />

Clones varied significantly in alkyl ester amount and the differences were consistent<br />

across treatments (no interaction) (Table 3). Leaves from clone 259 had a significantly<br />

larger amount of alkyl esters than leaves from clones 271 and 216 (Fig. 9) corresponding<br />

with decreasing 0 3 -sensitivity in clones as reported by Kamosky et al. (1999). The effect<br />

of clone on alkyl esters was significant (Table 3). Wax from leaves of clone 271 had<br />

significantly more alkanes compared to clones 216 and 259 (Table 3, Fig. 10). The<br />

amounts of fatty acids on leaves from clone 271 were greater than in clones 216 and 259<br />

(Fig. 11), but the clone effect was not significant (Table 3). The amounts of primary<br />

alcohols were not significantly affected by clone (Table 3) even though the mean of clone<br />

259 was the smallest (Fig. 12).<br />

D)<br />

3<br />

C<br />

O<br />

3<br />

X<br />

CO<br />

CO<br />

•+-»<br />

o<br />

Figure 8. Effect of clone on total epicuticular wax amount averaged across<br />

treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked with the<br />

same letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a<br />

0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.


E<br />

o<br />

~Q)<br />

3<br />

<br />

CD<br />

-*-»<br />

0)<br />

LU<br />

Figure 9. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax alkyl ester amount averaged<br />

across treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.<br />

271<br />

e<br />

O<br />

O)<br />

D<br />

<br />

© C(0<br />

216<br />

259<br />

C lone<br />

Figure 10. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax alkane amount averaged<br />

across treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a - 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.


271 216 259<br />

C lone<br />

Figure 11. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax fatty acid amount averaged<br />

across treatments (4) in leaves from the population survey. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a - 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.<br />

C lone<br />

Figure 12. Effect of clone on leaf epicuticular wax primary alcohol amount<br />

averaged across treatments (4) from the population survey. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.


The total wax amount was not significantly different between leaves that were<br />

mined and those that were unmined (Table 3, Fig. 13). The amounts of alkyl esters and<br />

alkanes in mined and unmined leaves were not affected by leafminer presence (LP)<br />

(Table 3, Fig. 14). There was a significant effect of LP on amounts of fatty acids (Table<br />

3) that were smaller in mined than unmined leaves (Fig. 14). Primary alcohol amounts<br />

were also significantly (Table 3) larger in unmined than in mined leaves (Fig. 14).<br />

unmined<br />

mined<br />

Leafminer Presence<br />

Figure 13. Comparison of epicuticular wax amount on unmined and mined leaves<br />

averaged across treatments (4) and clones (3) in leaves from the population<br />

survey. Bars marked with the same letter represent means not significantly<br />

different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of<br />

standard errors.


20<br />

E<br />

o<br />

15> =3C<br />

3 O<br />

E<br />

<<br />

15<br />

10 -<br />

5 -<br />

a a<br />

Il I.<br />

Ester<br />

Unm ined<br />

Mined<br />

A lkane Fatty Acid Alcohol<br />

Wax Constituent<br />

Figure 14. Mean amounts of wax constituents (alkyl esters, alkanes, fatty acids<br />

and primary alcohols) on mined and unmined leaves from the population<br />

study averaged across all clones (259, 216, 271) and treatments. Letters<br />

pertain separately to each pair of bars representing the same compound.<br />

Pairs of bars marked with the same letter represent means not significantly<br />

different from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of<br />

standard errors.<br />

The only significant (p=0.05) interaction in the analysis of wax constituents was<br />

between treatment and clone for alkyl ester amount. There are different responses in the<br />

amount of alkyl esters to treatments in different clones.


3.2 Leafminer Preference Study<br />

It was challenging to keep moths alive from the period of collection to initiation<br />

of the preference tests. Twice the amount of moths required was collected to ensure a<br />

sufficient number of moths for the tests.<br />

Moths were not observed ovipositing on leaf (clone 42E) surfaces.<br />

Approximately 50% of cages contained leaves with successfully ovipositing moths. Eggs<br />

may not have been laid because female moths either did not have eggs to lay or they died<br />

before laying eggs.<br />

3.2.1 Leafminer Egg Density<br />

Eggs were located on the abaxial surface of aspen leaves, usually towards leaf<br />

margins and were visible with a 10X hand lens (Appendix A, Fig. 1). Analysis was<br />

performed on proportions of eggs whereby eggs in each treatment per cage were<br />

expressed as a proportion of the total number of eggs in that cage. When all tests were<br />

combined for the analysis of variance, egg proportion was not significantly affected by<br />

treatment (Table 4). There was a trend for more eggs on leaves from the control and CO2<br />

(Fig. 15), similar to the population survey. Contribution of random elements of the<br />

experimental design to the overall random variation was very small. They jointly<br />

explained only 8.3% of variation in the distribution of eggs while the unexplained<br />

(residual) random variation accounted for the remaining 91.7% of variance (Table 4).


Table 4. Results of analysis of variance on the proportions of eggs on leaves of aspen<br />

from the four greenhouse gas treatments in the preference study. The REML<br />

method of the Mixed procedure of SAS was used to test effects of fixed factors.<br />

All random factors were entered into the Random Statement of the Mixed<br />

Procedure enabling the program to use appropriate error terms for testing the effects<br />

of the fixed factor (treatment). Covariance parameter estimates for random factors<br />

are included, indicating percent of random variation explained by each.<br />

Dependent<br />

Variable<br />

Sources of<br />

Variation<br />

Num<br />

df<br />

Den<br />

df<br />

F-<br />

value<br />

P-<br />

value<br />

Eggs Treatment 3 6 0.33 0.80<br />

Covariate<br />

Parameter<br />

test<br />

bench<br />

Test*bench<br />

Test*Trt<br />

Bench*Trt<br />

Test*bench*trt<br />

Residual<br />

Estimate<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

38.70 (3.5%)<br />

49.82 (4.5%)<br />

3.72 (0.3%)<br />

1011.67(91.7%)<br />

Total 1103.91 (100%)<br />

Test: 1,2, 3; Bench: 1,2, 3; Treatment: 1- control, 2-C02, 3-03, 4-C02+ 0 3; df=degrees of freedom,<br />

Num = numerator, Den = denominator<br />

0)<br />

B><br />

RS<br />

.O<br />

IS o> o><br />

d><br />

"rë<br />

c<br />

o<br />

r oaos_<br />

a.<br />

o><br />

O)<br />

LU<br />

Control CO2 O3<br />

Treatment<br />

C02+03<br />

Figure 15. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leafminer oviposition<br />

preference (Clone 42E was used). Bars marked with the same letter<br />

represent means not significantly different from each other at a = 0.05.<br />

Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.


When tests were analyzed individually, there were no significant effects of<br />

treatment in first three tests (the earliest tests). However, there was a significant (p=0.03)<br />

effect of treatment on egg proportion in test 4. The egg proportion in the control was<br />

greater than in the CO2, O3 and CO2 + O3 (Fig. 16).<br />

Control C 02 0 3<br />

Treatment<br />

CO2+O3<br />

Figure 16. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on leafminer oviposition<br />

preference (Clone 42E was used) in preference replicate 4. Bars marked<br />

with the same letter represent means not significantly different from each<br />

other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.<br />

3.2.2 Leaf Epicuticular Wax<br />

There were no statistically significant effects of treatment or leafminer<br />

presence on total wax amount and wax constituent classes (Table 5). Unlike the<br />

population survey, total wax amount was not significantly greater in the O3 treatment<br />

compared to the control, CO2 and CO2 + O3 treatments ( Table 5). As in the population<br />

survey, alkyl esters composed the largest proportion of leaf epicuticular wax deposit (Fig.<br />

17). However, there was not a significant effect of treatment on alkyl ester amount (Table


5). As a matter of fact, there were no significant effects of treatment or leafminer<br />

presence on any wax constitiuents (Table 5). The leaves with eggs tended to have<br />

smaller amounts of alkyl esters than leaves without eggs (Fig. 18), but this trend was not<br />

significant (Table 5).<br />

Table 5. Results of the analysis of variance on leaf epicuticular wax and its constituents<br />

in leaves of clone 42E used in the leafminer preference experiment (leaves from<br />

test 3 only).<br />

Dependent Sources of Num Den F P-value<br />

Variable Variation df df<br />

Total Wax Treatment 3 5 0.40 0.75<br />

LP 1 2 2.36 0.26<br />

Treatment x LP 3 5 2.45 0.17<br />

Error 68<br />

Alkyl Esters Treatment 3 5 0.17 0.91<br />

LP 1 2 3.51 0.20<br />

Treatment x LP 3 5 2.28 0.19<br />

Error 16<br />

Alkanes Treatment 3 5 0.78 0.55<br />

LP 1 2 0.02 0.91<br />

Treatment x LP 3 5 1.68 0.28<br />

Fatty Acids<br />

Error 16<br />

Treatment 3 5 0.20 0.89<br />

LP 1 2 0.31 0.63<br />

Treatment x LP 3 5 1.67 0.28<br />

Error 16<br />

Primary Alcohols Treatment 3 5 0.35 0.79<br />

LP 1 2 1.42 0.35<br />

Treatment x LP 3 5 1.23 0.39<br />

Error 16<br />

♦Treatment: 1- control, 2-C02, 3-03, 4-CO2+O3; LP: 1 - unmined, 2 - mined<br />

+ LP = Leafminer Presence


a<br />

25<br />

I 20<br />

là<br />

§ 15 -<br />

o<br />

E<br />

<<br />

c§ 10 -<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Treatment<br />

Alkyl Ester<br />

Alkane<br />

Fatty Acid<br />

Primary Alcohol<br />

Figure 17. Effect of greenhouse gas treatments on epicuticular wax composition<br />

of leaves from clone 42E used in the leafminer preference experiment. Bars<br />

of the same color marked by the same letters are not significantly different<br />

from each other at a = 0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.<br />

25<br />

20 -<br />

a<br />

No Eggs<br />

Eggs<br />

Ester Alkane Fatty Acid Alcohol<br />

Wax Constituent<br />

Figure 18. Mean amounts of wax constituents (alkyl esters, alkanes, fatty acids<br />

and primary alcohols) on leaves (clone 42E used) with and without eggs<br />

from the preference study. Letters pertain separately to each pair of bars<br />

representing the same compound. Pairs of bars marked with the same<br />

letter represent means not significantly different from each other at a =<br />

0.05. Capped lines represent halves of standard errors.


3.2.3 Leaf Morphology<br />

Wax production in the control treatment resulted in crystalline and irregular platelike<br />

structures projecting from the leaf surface (Fig. 19a). In the CO2 treatment,<br />

crystalline projections were prevalent, however amorphous surfaces were also present on<br />

the epicuticular ridges (Fig. 19b). Epicuticular wax appeared to be amorphous, with<br />

dense agglomerations lacking irregular plate-like structures projecting from the leaf<br />

surface (Fig. 19c). Leaves from the combined CO2 and O3 treatment had dense wax<br />

structures on the guard cells around the stomata, however the area surrounding the<br />

stomata was covered by a combination of amorphous and agglomerated wax formation<br />

(Fig. 19d).<br />

lOuitl<br />

a) Crystalline and irregular plate-like structures projecting from epicuticular ridges.


) Crystalline projections and amorphous surfaces present on the epicuticular ridges.<br />

lOum<br />

c) Amorphous, dense agglomerations of wax, without irregular plate-like structures.


d) Combination of amorphous and agglomerated wax formation.<br />

Figure 19. Impacts of elevated CO2 and O3 on abaxial leaf epicuticular wax structure<br />

shown in scanning electron micrographs from aspen clone 42E grown under a)<br />

control, b) elevated CO2, c) elevated O3 and d) elevated CO2 + 0 3. The entire leaf<br />

surface was examined before a representative sample area was selected. Arrows<br />

indicate wax features. “S” indicates location of stomata.<br />

3.2.4 Dependence of Egg Quantity on Leaf Area and Wax<br />

The model for predicting leafminer oviposition was optimized when leaf surface<br />

area (p


Table 6. Best Subsets Regression: Egg quantity versus leaf surface area, total wax<br />

amount, alkanes, fatty acids, primary alcohols and alkyl esters.<br />

Vars R2 R2<br />

(adj)<br />

Mallows<br />

C-p<br />

S<br />

Leaf<br />

Surface<br />

Area<br />

Wax<br />

Amount<br />

Alkanes<br />

Fatty<br />

Acids<br />

Primary<br />

Alcohols<br />

1 65.7 64.3 -1.3 0.25205 X<br />

1 25.2 22.1 23.3 0.37249 X<br />

2 68.1 65.4 -0.7 0.24836 X X<br />

2 66.3 63.4 0.4 0.25534 X X<br />

3 70.2 66.2 -0.0 0.24537 X X X<br />

3 69.4 65.1 0.0 0.24549 X X X<br />

4 72.3 67.1 0.7 0.24212 X X X X<br />

4 71.4 65.9 1.3 0.24630 X X X X<br />

5 73.1 66.3 2.3 0.24481 X X X X X<br />

5 73.0 66.3 2.3 0.24501 X X X X X<br />

6 74.1 65.9 3.7 0.24625 X X X X X X<br />

Alkyl<br />

Esters<br />

Each model appears on a different line in the output. “Vars” is the number of<br />

predictor variables used in the model. The R-sq (R2), Adj. R-sq (Adj. R2), C-p and S are<br />

then displayed. The list of possible predictors appears next. If the predictor is included<br />

in that particular model, then an 'X' is placed under the column header for that variable.<br />

For example, the first line tells us that the first model included in the output has a R-sq of<br />

65.7%, an adjusted R-sq of 64.3%, a C-p of-1.3 and s is 0.25205. The only predictor<br />

included in this model is leaf surface area.<br />

Best subset regression analysis determined that the 5th model was optimal. The<br />

results of this model were: R-sq of 70.2%, an adjusted R-sq of 66.2%, a C-p of 0.0 and S<br />

is 0.24537.


In the FACE Ring population survey, aspen blotch leafminer exhibited no<br />

preference for any treatment. Egg density was lowest on O3 leaves but did not differ<br />

significantly from leaves in the other treatments. The preference for leaves in control<br />

treatments may be attributable to specific host-plant characteristics.<br />

These data do not support previous investigations which determined leafminer<br />

egg densities at the FACE site were significantly larger in the control treatment compared<br />

to the CO2 ,0 3 and CO2 + O3 treatments (Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). A distinct<br />

difference between Kopper and Lindroth (2003) and this study at FACE was the overall<br />

leafminer population density. The former data were collected in 1999, when aspen blotch<br />

leafminer populations were more than double 2004 FACE leafminer egg density. Mean<br />

egg density was 0.25 eggs per leaf in 1999 (Kopper and Lindroth, 2003) and 0.12 eggs<br />

per leaf in 2004.<br />

Additionally, in this study, there were significant effects of block and<br />

block/treatment interaction. These effects have not been reported in other publications<br />

from research conducted at the FACE site (eg. Percy et al., 2002; Kamosky et al., 1999;<br />

Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). However, there were no effects of block or block/treatment<br />

interaction in the wax population survey analysis. It is important to point out that egg<br />

density in blocks 1 and 3 responded similarly to the treatment effects and that these two<br />

blocks contained the greatest densities of eggs compared to block 2. In fact, there<br />

appeared to be no effect of treatment on egg density in block 2. As a result, the lack of<br />

treatment effect in block 2, potentially due to lower egg densities, should be considered


as an explanation of not only the block effect but, the influence of treatment in the<br />

present and 1999 investigation.<br />

In the preference study, there was no significant effect of treatment. However,<br />

there did appear to be a trend similar to the population survey in that the control treated<br />

leaves tended to have higher densities of eggs than the O3 treated leaves. In fact, this<br />

trend was significant in the fourth and last test. This study was replicated four times<br />

during a 20-day period. Egg density was significantly greater in the control compared to<br />

the O3 treatment in the fourth test. Although there was subtle variation in the results, egg<br />

quantity on O3 treated leaves were smallest in each replicate. This variation may be due<br />

to the time difference when the replicates took place. Leaves in the last tests were<br />

exposed to O3 for a longer duration, and therefore any deterring qualities of the leaf may<br />

have been augmented by longer exposure to O3. Furthermore, moth age may have been a<br />

factor. Moths used in replicate one emerged earlier from overwintering sites than those<br />

used in replicate four and were therefore younger and potentially carrying more eggs than<br />

moths in replicate four.<br />

The population survey results suggest that O3 treated leaves may have been least<br />

preferred due to phenology of the aspen blotch leafminer. The initiation of aspen blotch<br />

leafminer moth oviposition takes place shortly after P. tremuloides bud burst, when<br />

leaves have flushed (Martin, 1956). O3 delays aspen bud break (Kamosky et al., 1999;<br />

Kamosky et al., 2005). Therefore, while control and CO2 treatments had leaves available<br />

for oviposition, leaves from O3 treatments may not have reached the development stage<br />

corresponding with the timing of leafminer oviposition site selection. However, the<br />

preference study offers evidence that oviposition cues for the aspen blotch leafminer are


plant-based despite the lack of significant results in all but one of the preference tests,<br />

trends indicate that control leaves had higher egg densities and O3 leaves lower densities.<br />

The effects on oviposition are apparently due to O3 and CO2 mediated changes in plant<br />

chemistry and not due to the direct effects of 0 3 and CO2 on the leafminer. This<br />

conclusion is based on the similar trends in the manipulated preference and the<br />

population studies.<br />

Plant epicuticular waxes are typically composed of at least four major chemical<br />

classes of aliphatic compounds; 1) alkyl esters, 2) alkanes, 3) primary alcohols, and 4)<br />

fatty acids (Baker, 1982). GC analysis and MS confirmation confirmed 99% of wax<br />

chemical composition. In both population and preference samples, the epicuticular<br />

waxes of trembling aspen were approximately 50% alkyl esters. Alkanes (24%), fatty<br />

acids (20%) and primary alcohols (5%) composed the remaining total wax amount.<br />

In the population survey, epicuticular wax was significantly affected by CO2, O3<br />

and CO2 + O3 treatments, clones and leafminer presence. Total wax amount was largest in<br />

the O3 treatment. Total wax amount from the O3 sensitive clone 259 was largest<br />

compared to clones 271 and 216 when averaged across all treatments. The effects of<br />

treatment and clone are supported by the findings of others (Kamosky et al., 2002).<br />

Leaves from the O3 treatment produced significantly larger amounts of alkyl esters. The<br />

effect of clone on wax amount may explain some of the variation in these results. Alkyl<br />

esters, which composed the largest proportion of total wax amount, were significantly<br />

larger on leaves from clone 259. Additionally, the interaction between clone and


treatment had a significant effect on alkyl ester amount. The effects of O3 result in an<br />

increased production of alkyl esters on clone 259.<br />

The interaction between clone and treatment was also significant (p=0.03) for<br />

fatty acids. In contrast to alkyl esters, production of fatty acids decreased in the 0 3 -<br />

sensitive clones 216 and 259. This interaction of the tolerant clone 271 and treatment,<br />

suggests that clone 271 may not be predisposed to decreases in fatty acid amount under<br />

elevated levels of O3.<br />

It has been proposed that aspen blotch leafminers least prefer clone 271 leaves<br />

(Kopper and Lindroth, 2003). Wax class amounts, other than alkyl esters and primary<br />

alcohol, were higher from 0 3 -tolerant clone 271. This suggests that greater alkane and<br />

fatty acid amounts would have a negative effect on leafminer oviposition preference<br />

while alkyl esters and primary alcohols would have a positive effect. In fact, mined<br />

leaves had significantly lesser amounts of fatty acids than leaves without eggs.<br />

In the preference study, wax trends corresponded with those from the population<br />

survey (clone 42E), despite the lack of significant effects. Wax production tended to<br />

increase in the O3 treated leaves, which supports Percy et al. (2002). Neither treatment<br />

nor leafminer presence significantly affected wax and its constituents. However, leaves<br />

selected for oviposition that were treated with O3 singly and in combination with CO2<br />

tended to have larger amounts of total wax amount than leaves without eggs.<br />

It is difficult to speculate based on non-significant results, however, leaves upon<br />

which eggs were laid either possessed stimulating oviposition cues or leaves without eggs<br />

possessed deterrent oviposition cues. Leaves without eggs in the O3 treatment had total


wax amounts similar to those in the other treatments (eg. control), which were preferred.<br />

Therefore, total wax amount may not be a critical cue affecting egg lay.<br />

Alkyl ester amounts tended to be larger on leaves with eggs. This suggests that<br />

alkyl esters stimulated oviposition. Although, there was not a significant effect of<br />

leafminer presence on alkyl esters in the population survey, it may suggest that alkyl<br />

esters had a role this plant-insect interaction.<br />

Air pollutants, such as CO2 and/or O3, alter epicuticular wax composition through<br />

direct modification of wax biosynthesis (Percy et al., 1994). Wax chemical composition<br />

influences the formation of epicuticular waxes on plant surfaces (Baker, 1982; Jeffree,<br />

1994). Alkanes and primary alcohols produce plate-like structures while alkyl esters and<br />

fatty acids form an amorphous wax surface.<br />

Here, leaves from the control have morphologically distinct crystalline wax<br />

structure. Amorphous surface features, characterized by agglomeration of waxes on<br />

leaves in the CO2 ,0 3 and CO2 + O3 treatments were prominent, which is supported by<br />

others (Kamosky et al., 1999; Kamosky et al., 2002). The formation of this amorphous<br />

surface was directly influenced by the increase in total wax production in those<br />

treatments. Moreover, it has been shown that morphological leaf characteristics are at<br />

least as important as chemical characteristics as oviposition signals (Eigenbrode and<br />

Espelie, 1995). Therefore, it is suggested that reduced crystalline wax structure<br />

correlates with reductions in aspen blotch leafminer egg density.<br />

Epicuticular waxes are considered crucial to oviposition site selection<br />

(Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995). Leaf epicuticular waxes influence insect movement<br />

(Eigenbrode et al., 1991; Powell et al., 1999), feeding (Adati and Matsuda, 2000) and


oviposition (Cervantes et al., 2002; Ulmer et al., 2002; Kanno and Harris, 2000;<br />

Steinbauer et al., 2004; Muller and Hilker, 2001). Insect oviposition site selection could<br />

be either stimulated (Steinbauer et al., 2004) or deterred (Hagley et al., 1980, Uematsu<br />

and Sakanoshita, 1989, Justus et al., 2000) on plants with large amounts of wax.<br />

The regression analysis showed that increasing wax amount had a negative effect<br />

on egg density. Kamosky et al. (2002) suggested this increased production of<br />

epicuticular waxes may be “.. .an O3 - mediated stimulation of de novo synthesis, which<br />

maybe a protective adaptation..<br />

This implication is supported by the reduction in<br />

leafminer preference for O3 treated leaves. Therefore, we would expect to observe wax<br />

amounts to be smaller from leaves without eggs or mines. However, total wax amount<br />

was larger from leaves with eggs or mines from both population and preference studies.<br />

This suggests the effects of epicuticular wax on the plant-insect interaction are complex<br />

and not well explained by the total amount of wax amount.<br />

One explanation may be that oviposition on O3 treated leaves was due to the<br />

moths maximizing stimulating cues of the leaf epicuticular waxes. These cues are<br />

specific wax classes, that this study suggests leafminers prefer, such as alkyl ester and<br />

primary alcohol, which are increased due to exposure to O3. However, at the population<br />

level, these stimulants are not strong enough to overcome the combined ovipositiondeterring<br />

characteristics of increased total wax amount, decreased leaf surface area and<br />

amorphous leaf surface morphology. In other words, the leafminers that choose O3<br />

treated leaves may make the best of a bad situation.<br />

The results from this study suggest the factors influencing aspen blotch leafminer<br />

oviposition site selection are, at least in part, isolated around leaf surface characteristics,


namely: surface area, epicuticular wax morphology and chemical composition. Of these<br />

characteristics, two factors, surface area and wax chemical composition, could be<br />

modeled on data collected. Modeling determined that leaf surface area, total wax amount<br />

and alkane proportions are strong predictors of egg density. Others have determined<br />

specific chemical wax compounds that affect oviposition (Udayagiri and Mason, 1997,<br />

Muller and Hilker, 2001, Steinbauer et al., 2004, Shepard et al., 1999). Fatty acids have<br />

been shown to positively influence oviposition in some beetles (Parr et al., 1998) and<br />

aphids (Eigenbrode, 1996). Also, alkanes are suggested to stimulate oviposition<br />

(Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995). Fatty acids and alkanes are both considered to stimulate<br />

host recognition, however based on evidence from this study, we suggest the opposite is<br />

true for aspen blotch leafminer.<br />

These chemical characteristics of epicuticular wax are known to be indicators of<br />

plant quality (Baker, 1982). Plant quality changes (eg. phenolic glycoside, carbonnitrogen<br />

ratio, tannins, starch) when exposed to CO2 and O3 (Kamosky et al., 2003; Percy<br />

et al., 2002) therefore it is likely that moths detect these differences in leaf quality<br />

resulting from epicuticular wax chemical alterations.<br />

A higher number of eggs were observed on leaves with larger surface areas. Leaf<br />

surface area had a significant influence on leafminer egg density, however it is difficult to<br />

separate its effect from those of other factors that are critical to oviposition site selection.<br />

It has been shown that leaf surface area is largest in CO2 treated leaves (Kamosky et al.,<br />

2003). Since leafminers did not prefer CO2 treated leaves, leaf surface area cannot be the<br />

single factor influencing leafminer oviposition preference.


Other studies have shown that larger surfaces areas have a lower amount of<br />

epicuticular wax per unit area (Hagley et al., 1980). Regression analysis also determined<br />

leafminers preferred leaves with lower wax amounts. Leaftniner density results, which<br />

were not statistically significant, exhibited a trend in the population and preference<br />

studies that leaves exposed to CO2 singly or in combination with O3 tended to be<br />

preferred over leaves exposed singly to O3. This suggests that the implications of leaf<br />

surface area on leaftniner oviposition site selection are not fully understood.<br />

This was the first investigation using bioassays to examine if microlepidoptera<br />

exhibit a preference for leaves exposed to elevated levels of CO2 and O3, both singly and<br />

in combination. As a result, there are many suggestions for improved methods to<br />

determine proximate cues for leaftniner oviposition.<br />

Future investigations would involve choice bioassays testing the direct effects of<br />

leaf epicuticular wax. Two experiments are suggested: 1) offer adult gravid female<br />

moths choices between leaves with and without wax. Crystalline waxes can be removed<br />

using cellulose acetate, which does not damage the plant tissue (Baker et al., 1983; Percy<br />

and Baker, 1988). Obtaining images from scanning electron microscopy and comparing<br />

the different treatments would be used in both tests to illustrate the surface morphological<br />

differences of leaves with and without waxes intact; 2) apply waxes to artificial substrate<br />

(eg. glass) from four different treatments. The results of this experiment would<br />

determine the specific effect of epicuticular waxes on aspen blotch leaftniner host-plant<br />

oviposition site selection while minimizing biological influences. Furthermore, specific


chemical compounds could be isolated, both singly and in combination that directly<br />

influence leafminer oviposition site selection.<br />

To further test the effect of leaf surface area on leafminer preference, female<br />

moths could be given a choice of a variation of leaf sizes and ages. Others have shown<br />

that leaf age affects insect behavior (Steinbauer et al., 2004). Generally, the amount of<br />

wax decreases as leaves become older. As amount and composition of epicuticular wax<br />

changes throughout leaf development, leaves of different development stages could be<br />

selected and tested for preference. To this end, as older leaves in this experiment were<br />

used in the fourth test of the preference experiment, and this was the only test in which<br />

leafminer preference was exhibited, then analysis of the wax samples from that test may<br />

have proven useful.<br />

An additional suggestion for future investigations would be to standardize the<br />

status of the number of eggs adult female moths possessed as in Hora and Roessingh<br />

(1999). The moths used in the preference study were selected randomly from pure aspen<br />

stands within a 10km radius of the population survey site. As a result, the complement of<br />

eggs females possessed was unknown. The number of eggs a female moth has often<br />

influences the selectiveness of oviposition site (Singer, 1982). This can be addressed by<br />

standardizing the complement of adult female moth eggs. Rearing female and male<br />

moths together from pupae achieves this, as there is a higher probability females will be<br />

gravid because they are provided the opportunity to copulate and they have not been<br />

exposed to oviposition substrate. Adult female aspen blotch leafminer moths have a<br />

complement of approximately 45 eggs to lay (Auerbach, 1992). In this study, the range<br />

of eggs laid was from 0 to 51, with an average of 10 eggs/female.


It could also be interesting to test the effect of clones on oviposition preference<br />

because clones of varying sensitivity to O3 had significant effects on epicuticular wax.<br />

Therefore, in order to elucidate characteristics, which have a marked influence on<br />

leafminer oviposition, clones (from the same treatment) should be tested in a choice<br />

bioassay.<br />

Eggs were located on the margins of leaves, which supported what others have<br />

reported (Martin, 1956; Auerbach, 1991). It would be useful to analyze waxes from leaf<br />

margins to determine if there are differences in their composition or morphology. Any<br />

differences in wax chemical composition and morphology on leaf margins may be further<br />

linked to oviposition.<br />

Quantifying epicuticular wax crystalline density from different treatments and<br />

clones would be another parameter that could be incorporated into models, which predict<br />

aspen blotch leafminer preference. Systematically measuring epicuticular wax density<br />

could be done with SEM modifications (eg. Cervantes et al., 2002).<br />

The main objective of this research was to link the changes in aspen leaf<br />

epicuticular wax chemical composition and morphology, due to exposure to elevated<br />

levels of CO2 and/or O3, with aspen blotch leafminer oviposition site selection. This was<br />

the first study to offer evidence, using population and bioassay studies, that aspen blotch<br />

leafminer moths assess the suitability of oviposition sites using epicuticular wax cues.<br />

Regression analysis using parameters of wax composition and leaf surface area to<br />

predict egg density, along with wax morphological interpretation, suggest that specific<br />

wax components are involved in plant/insect interactions. These data suggest that


amorphous epicuticular wax morphology, increased total wax amount and alkane amount<br />

had negative effects on leafininer oviposition, however they were not the only factor<br />

affecting leafininer oviposition. Rather, this behavior appears to involve a suite of cues,<br />

including leaf surface areas.<br />

Future investigations could reveal other factors which are involved in aspen<br />

blotch leafininer oviposition site selection. Nevertheless, the results of this study strongly<br />

suggest that epicuticular waxes influence aspen blotch leafininer oviposition. In addition,<br />

these results have improved the understanding of the role of epicuticular waxes in aspen<br />

blotch leafininer oviposition site selection.<br />

Further investigation is recommended on the general effects of leaf surface<br />

epicuticular waxes on aspen blotch leafininer oviposition site selection. These methods<br />

should be incorporated with further leafininer bioassays and leaf physiological responses<br />

to CO2 and/or O3. As a result, our knowledge of epicuticular waxes with respect to<br />

leafininer oviposition and elevated levels of greenhouse gases will be further improved.


Adati, T. and Matsuda, K. 2000. The effect of leaf surface wax on feeding of the<br />

strawberry leaf beetle, Galerucella vittaticollis, with reference to host plant<br />

preference. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 50 (3-4): 57-61.<br />

Auerbach, M. 1991. Relative impact of interactions within and between trophic levels<br />

during an insect outbreak. Ecology 72 (5): 1599-1608.<br />

Auerbach, M. and Alberts, J.D. 1992. Occurrence and performance of the aspen blotch<br />

miner, Phllonorycter salicifoliella, on three host-tree species. Oecologia 89 (1):<br />

1-9.<br />

Awmack, C.S., Harrington, R., Leather, S.R. and Lawton, J.H. 1996. The impacts of<br />

elevated C0 2 on aphid-plant interactions. Aspects of Applied Biology 45: 317-22.<br />

Awmack, C.S., Harrington, R. and Leather, S.R. 1997. Host plant effects on the<br />

performance of the aphid Aulacorthum solani (Homoptera: Aphididae) at ambient<br />

and elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 3: 545-549.<br />

Awmack, C.S. and Leather, S.R. 2002a. Host plant quality and fecundity of herbivorous<br />

insects. Annual Review Entomology 47: 817-844.<br />

Awmack, C.S. and Leather, S.R. 2002b. Does variation in offspring size reflect strength<br />

of preference performance index in herbivorous insects? Oikos 96 (1): 192-195.<br />

Baker, E.A. 1974. The influence of environment on leaf wax development in Brassica<br />

oleracea var. gemmifera. New Phytologist 73: 955-966.<br />

Baker, E.A., 1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes, pp. 139-166.<br />

In: Culter, D.F., Alvin, K.L., Price, C.E., (Eds), TTie Plant Cuticle. Academic<br />

Press, London.<br />

Baker, E.A., and Jeffree, C.E. 1981. Characterization of extraneous particles located on<br />

the leaf surface of several plant species. New Phytologist 87: 115-119.<br />

Baker, E.A., Hunt, G.M., and Stevens, P.J.G. 1983. Studies of plant cuticle and spray<br />

droplet interactions: A fresh approach. Pesticide Science 14: 645-658.<br />

Barthlott, W., Neinhuis, C., Cutler, D., Ditsch, F., Meusel, I., Theisen, I. and Wilhelmi,<br />

H. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botantical<br />

Journal of Linnean Society 126: 237-260.<br />

Bemays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F. 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects.<br />

Chapman and Hall, Toronto. 312p.


Bezemer, T.M., and Jones, T.H. 1998. Plant-insect herbivore interactions in elevated<br />

atmospheric CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effects. Oikos 82: 212-222.<br />

Coviella, C.E. and Trumble, J.T. 1999. Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on<br />

insect-plant interactions. Conservation Biology 13 (4): 700-11.<br />

Cervantes, D.E., Eigenbrode, S.E., Ding, H-J., Bosque-Perez, N.A. 2002. Oviposition<br />

responses by hessaion fly, Mayetiola destructo, to wheats varying in surfaces<br />

waxes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28 (1): 193-210.<br />

Chappelka, A.H. and Samuelson, L.J. 1998 Ambient ozone effects on forest trees of the<br />

Eastern United States: a review. New Phytologist 139: 91-108.<br />

Dahlsten, D.L., Rowney, D.L., and Kickert, R.N. 1997. Effects of oxidant air pollutants<br />

on western pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Populations in southern<br />

California. Environmental Pollution 96 (3): 415-423.<br />

Davis, D.R. and Deschka, G. 2001. Biology and systmeatics of the North American<br />

Phyllonorycter leafininers on Salicaceae, with a synoptic catalog of the palearctic<br />

species (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology,<br />

number 614. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C.<br />

Dickson, R.E., Lewin, K.F., Isebrands, J.G., Coleman, M.D., Heilman, W.E.,<br />

Riemenschneider, D.E., Sober, J., Host, G.E., Zak, D.R., Hendrey, G.R.,<br />

Pregitzer, K.S., and Kamosky, D.F. 2000. Forest Atmosphere Carbon Transfer<br />

and Storage (FACTS-II) The Aspen Free-Air CO2 and O3 Enrichment (FACE)<br />

Project: an overview. General Technical Report. NC-214. USDA Forest Service.<br />

North Central Experimental Station.<br />

Dutton, A., Letizia, M., and Dorn, S. 2000. Plant-derived semiochemicals as contact host<br />

location stimuli for a parasitoid of leafininers. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26<br />

(10): 2259-2273.<br />

Eigenbrode, S.D. 1996. Plant surfaces waxes and insect behaviour. In: Kersteins, G.<br />

(Eds), Plant Cuticles, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp. 201-221.<br />

Eigenbrode, S.D. and Espelie, K.E., 1995. Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect<br />

herbivores. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 171-194.<br />

Eigenbrode, S.D., Espelie, K.E. and Shelton, A.M. 1991. Behavior of neonate<br />

diamondback moth larvae Plutella xylostella L. on leaves and on extracted leaf<br />

waxes of resistant and susceptible cabbages. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17 (8):<br />

1691-1704.


Goverde, M., Erhardt, A. and Niklaus, P. 2002. In situ development of a satyrid butterfly<br />

on calcareous grassland exposed to elevated carbon dioxide. Ecology 83: 1399-<br />

1411.<br />

FACTS II, 2002. The Aspen FACE Experiment. Available at http://aspenface.mtu.edu<br />

Hagley, E.A.C., Bronskill, J.F. and Ford, E.J. 1980. Effect of the physical nature of leaf<br />

and fruit surfaces on oviposition by the codling moth, Cydia pomonella<br />

(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 112: 503-510.<br />

Heagle, A.S., Brandenburg, R.L., Bums, J.C. and Miller, J.E. 1994. Ozone and carbon<br />

dioxide effects on spider mites in white clover and peanut. Journal of<br />

environmental quality 23: 1168-1176.<br />

Hesman, T. 2000 Greenhouse Gassed: Carbon dioxide spells indigestion for food chains<br />

http://www.sciencenews.org/20000325/bobl.asp<br />

Hogg, E.H. 2001. Modelling aspen responses to climatic warming and insect defoliation<br />

in western Canada, pp. 325-338. In Sustaining aspen in Western Landscapes:<br />

Symposium Proceedings, 13-15 June 2000, Grand Junction, Colo. Compiled by<br />

W.D. Sheppard, D. Binkley, D.L. Bartos, T.J. Stohlgren, and L.G. Eskew. USDA<br />

Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collines, Colorado. Proc.<br />

RMRS-P-18.<br />

Holloway, P.J. 1982. Structure and histochemistry of plant cuticular membranes: an<br />

overview, pp. 1-31. In: Culter, D.F., Alvin, K.L., Price, C.E., (Eds), The Plant<br />

Cuticle. Academic Press, London.<br />

Holloway, P.J. 1994. Plant cuticles: Physiochemical characteristics and biosynthesis, pp.<br />

1-14. In: Percy, K.E., Cape, J.N., Jagels, R., and Simpson, C.J., (Eds) Air<br />

Pollutants and the Leaf Cuticle. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.<br />

Hora, K.H. and Roessingh, P. 1999. Oviposition in Yponomeuta cagnagellus: the<br />

importance of contact cues for host plant acceptance. Physiological Entomology<br />

24: 109-120.<br />

Hughes, L. and Bazzaz, F.A. 1997. Effect of elevated CO2 on interactions between the<br />

western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thrpidae) and<br />

the common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 109: 286-290.<br />

IPCC. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Report of the Working Group I of the<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/spm22-01 .pdf. (IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland,<br />

2001).


Isebrands, J.G., McDonald, E. P., Kruger, E., Hendrey, G., Pregitzer, K., Percy, K.,<br />

Sober, J., and Kamosky, D.F. 2001. Growth responses of Populus tremuloides<br />

clones to interacting carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental<br />

Pollution 115: 359-371.<br />

Jeffree, C.E. 1994. Structure and ontogeny of plant cuticles, pp. 33-82. In: Percy, K.E.,<br />

Cape, J.N., Jagels, R., and Simpson, C.J., (Eds) Air Pollutants and the Leaf<br />

Cuticle. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.<br />

Jetter, R., Schaffer, S. and Riederer, M. 2000. Leaf cuticular waxes are arranged in<br />

chemically and mechanically distinct layers: evidence from Prunus laurocerasus<br />

L. Plant, Cell and Environment 23: 619-628.<br />

Jetter, R. and Schaffer, S. 2001. Chemical composition of the Prunus laurocerasus leaf<br />

surface. Dynamic changes of the epicuticular wax film during leaf development.<br />

Plant Physiology 126: 1725-1737.<br />

Justus, K.A., Dosdall, L.M., and Mitchell, B.K. 2000. Oviposition by Plutella xylostella<br />

(Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and effects of phylloplane waxiness. Ecology and<br />

Behavior 93 (4): 1152-1159.<br />

Kanno, H. and Harris, M.O. 2000. Leaf physical and chemical features influence<br />

selection of plant genotypes by Hessian fly. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26 (10):<br />

2335-2354.<br />

Kamosky, D.F., Mankovska, B., Percy, K., Dickson, R.E., Podila, G.K., Sober, J.,<br />

Noormetsm A., Hendrey, G., Coleman, M.D., Kubiske, M., Pregitzer, K.S. and<br />

Isebrands, J.G. 1999. Effects of tropospheric O3 on trembling aspen and<br />

interaction with CO2: Results from an 0 3 -gradient and a FACE experiment.<br />

Water, Soil and Air Pollution 116: 311-322.<br />

Kamosky, D.F., Percy, K.E., Chappelka, A.H., Simpson, C., Pikkarainen, J. 2003. Air<br />

pollution, global change and forests in the new millennium. Amsterdaw: Elsevier,<br />

xxii, 467 p.<br />

Kamosky, D.F., Percy, K.E., Xiang, B., Callan, B., Noormets, A., Mankovska, B.,<br />

Hopkin, A., Sober, J., Jones, W., Dickson, R.E. and Isebrands, J.G. 2002.<br />

Interacting elevated CO2 and tropospheric O3 predisposes aspen (Populus<br />

tremuloides Michx.) to infection by rust (Melampsora medusae f. sp.<br />

tremuloidae) Global Change Biology 8: 329-338.<br />

Kamosky, D.F., Pregitzer, K.S., Zak, D.R., Kubiske, M.E., Hendrey, G.R., Weinstein, D.,<br />

Nosal, M., amd Percy, K.E. 2005. Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the<br />

ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant, Cell, and Environment 28: 965-981.


Kamosky, D.F., Zak, D.R., Pregitzer, K.S., Awmack, C.S., Bockheim, J.G., Dickson,<br />

R.E., Hendrey, G.R., Host, G.E., King, J.S., Kopper, B.J., Kruger, E.L., Kubiske,<br />

M.E., Lindorth, R.L., Mattson, W.J., Mcdonald, E.P., Noormets, A., Oksanen, E.,<br />

Parsons, W.F.J., Percy, K.E., Podila, G.K., Riemenschneider, D.E., Sharma, P.,<br />

Thakur, R., Sober, A., Sober, J., Jones, W.S., Anttonen, S., Vapaavuori, E.,<br />

Mankovska, B., Heilman, W., and Isebrands, J.G. 2003. Tropospheric O3<br />

moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis<br />

of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Functional<br />

Ecology 17: 289-304.<br />

Kangasjarvi, J., Talvinen, J., Utriainen, M. and Kaijalainen. 1994. Plant defence systems<br />

induced by ozone. Plant, Cell and Environment 17: 783-794.<br />

Kanno, H. and Harris, M.O. 2000. Leaf physical and chemical features influence<br />

selection of plant genotypes by hessian fly. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26 (10):<br />

2335-2354.<br />

King, J., Pregitzer, K., Zak, D., Sober, J., Isebrands, J., Dickson, R., Hendrey, D., and<br />

Kamosky, D.F. 2001. Fine-root biomass and fluxes of soil carbon in young stands<br />

of paper birch and trembling aspen as affected by elevated atmospheric CO2 and<br />

O3. Oecologia 128 (2): 237-250.<br />

Kolattukudy, P.E. 1996. Biosynthetic pathways of cutin and waxes, and their sensitivity<br />

to environmental stresses, pp. 83-108. In: Kerstiens, G. (Ed), Plant Cuticle: An<br />

integrated functional approach. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., 1996, Oxford,<br />

UK.<br />

Kopper, B.J., and Lindroth, R.L. 2003. Responses of trembling aspen (Populus<br />

tremuloides) phytochemistry and aspen blotch leafminer (Phyllonorycter<br />

tremuloidiella) performance to elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 and O3.<br />

Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5 (1): 17-26.<br />

Lindroth, R.L., Kinney, K.K., and Platz, C.L. 1993. Responses of deciduous trees to<br />

elevated atmospheric CO2: productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance.<br />

Ecology 74 (3): 763-777.<br />

Lindroth, R.L., Kopper, B.J., Parsons, W.F., Bockheim, J.G., Kamosky, D.F., Hendrey,<br />

G.R., Pregitzer, K.S., Isebrands, J.G. and Sober, J. 2001. Consequences of<br />

elevated carbon dioxide and ozone for foliar chemical composition and dynamics<br />

in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera).<br />

Environmental Pollution 115: 395-404.<br />

Martin, J.L. 1956. The bionomics of the aspen blotch miner, Lithocolletis salicifoliella<br />

Cham. (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Canadian Entomologist 88:155-168.


McClure, M., Quiring, D.T. and Turgeon, J.J. 1998. Proximate and ultimate factors<br />

influencing oviposition site selection by endoparasites on conifer seed cones: two<br />

sympatric species on larch. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87:1-13.<br />

Mueller, C. and Hilker, M. 2001. Host finding and oviposition behavior in a chrysomelid<br />

specialist-the importance of host plant surface waxes. Journal of Chemical<br />

Ecology 27 (5): 985-994.<br />

Neinhuis, C., Koch, K., and Barthlott, W. 2001. Movement and regeneration of<br />

epicuticular waxes through plant cuticles. Planta 213: 427-434.<br />

Parr, M.J., Tran, B.M.D., Simmonds, M.S.J., Kite, G.C., Credland, P.F. 1998. Influence<br />

of some fatty acids on oviposition by the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus<br />

maculates. Journal of Chemical Ecology 124 (10): 1577-1593.<br />

Percy, K.E., Awmack, C.S., Lindroth, R.L., Kubiske, M.E., Kopper, B.J., Isebrands, J.G.,<br />

Pregitzer, K.S., Hendrey, G.R., Dickson,R.E., Zak, D.R., Oksanen, E., Sober, J.,<br />

Harrington, R., and Kamosky, D.F. 2002. Altered performance of forest pests<br />

under CO2 and O3 enriched atmospheres. Nature 420: 403-407.<br />

Percy, K.E. and Baker, E.A. 1988. Effect of simulated acid rain on leaf wettability, rain<br />

retention and uptake of some inorganic ions. New Phytologist 108: 75-82.<br />

Percy, K.E., Legge, A.H., and Krupa, S.V. 2003. Tropospheric ozone: A continuing<br />

threat to global forests? pp. 85-118. In: Kamosky, D.F., Percy, K.E., Chappelka,<br />

A.H., Simpson, C., and Pikkarainen, J., (Eds), Air Pollution, Global Change and<br />

the Forests in the New Millenium. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford.<br />

Percy, K.E., McQuattie, C.J., and Rebbeck, J.A. 1994. Effects of air pollutants on<br />

epicuticular wax chemical composition, pp. 67-79. In: Percy, K.E., Cape, J.N.,<br />

Jagels, R., and Simpson, C.J., (Eds), Air Pollutants and the Leaf Cuticle.<br />

Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.<br />

Powell, G., Maniar, S.P., Pickett, J.A., and Hardie, J. 1999. Aphid responses to non-host<br />

epicuticular lipids. Entomogia Experimentalis et Applicata 91: 115-123.<br />

Price, P. 1992. Plant resources as the mechanistic basis for insect herbivore population<br />

dynamics, pp. 139-171. In: Hunter, M.D., Ohgushi, T, Price, P.W. (Eds) Effects<br />

of resource distribution on animal-plant interactions. San Diego: Academic Press.<br />

Inc.<br />

Quiring, D.Q. and McNeil, J.N. 1987. Foraging behavior of a Dipteran leaf miner on<br />

exploited and unexploited hosts. Oecologia (Berlin) 73: 7-15.<br />

SAS Version 8.2 for Windows - The SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., U.S.A.


Shepherd, T., Robertson, G.W., Griffiths, D.W., and Birch, A.N.E. 1999. Epicuticular<br />

wax composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance in red raspberry<br />

Rubus idaeus L. Phytochemistry 52: 1239-1254.<br />

Singer, M.C. 1982. Quantification of oviposition preference by manipulation of<br />

oviposition behaviour in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 52: 224—229.<br />

Stacey, D.A. and Fellowes, M.D.E. 2002. Influence of elevated CO2 on interspecific<br />

interactions at higher trophic levels. Global Change Biology 8: 668-678.<br />

Steinbauer, M.J., Schiestl, F.P. and Davies, N.W. 2004. Monoterpenes and epicuticular<br />

waxes help female autumn gum moth differentiate between waxy and glossy<br />

Eucalyptus and leaves of different ages. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30 (6):<br />

1117-1142.<br />

Stiling, P., Rossi, A.M., Hungate, B., Dijkstra, P., Hinkle, C.R., Knott III, W.M., and<br />

Drake, B. 1999. Decreased leaf-miner abundance in elevated CO2 : Reduced leaf<br />

quality and increased parasitoid attack. Ecological Applications 9 (1): 240-244.<br />

Thompson, J.N. 1988. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition<br />

preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia<br />

Experimentalis et Applicata 47: 3-14.<br />

Udayagiri, S. and Mason, C.E. 1997. Epicuticular wax chemical in Zea mays influence<br />

oviposition in Ostrinia nubilalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23 (7): 1675-1687.<br />

Uematsu, H. and Sakanoshita, A. 1989. Possible role of cabbage leaf wax bloom in<br />

suppressing diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae)<br />

oviposition. Applied Entomology and Zoology 24: 253-257.<br />

Ulmer, B., Gillott, C., Woods, D., Erlandson, M. 2002. Diamondback moth, Plutella<br />

Xylostella (L.), feeding and oviposition preferences on glossy and waxy Brassica<br />

rapa (L.) lines. Crop Protection 21: 327-331.<br />

Watt, A.D., Whitaker, J.B., Docherty, M., Brooks, G., Lindsay, E., and Salt, D.T. 1995.<br />

The impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 on insect herbivores, pp. 197-217. In:<br />

Harrington, R. and Stork, W.E. (Eds.) Insects in a changing environment.<br />

Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.<br />

Wilsey, B.J. 1996. Plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 among terrestrial biomes.<br />

Oikos 76(1): 201-205.


APPENDIX A


200om<br />

Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of Phyllonorycter apparella Herrich-Schaffer<br />

egg on abaxial surface of Populus tremuloides Michx.


CURRICULUM VITAE<br />

Candidate's full name: Robert Frank Partridge<br />

Universities attended: University of New Brunswick, 2002, Bachelor of Science in<br />

Forestry<br />

Publications: none<br />

Conference Presentations: University of New Brunswick Graduate Student Association<br />

Conference, February 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!