Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application - Minnesota ...
Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application - Minnesota ...
Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application - Minnesota ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> <strong>Legacy</strong> <strong>Grant</strong> Program<br />
FY2011 Round 1 Technical Review Comments and Scoring, Regional and Divisional Directors Comments<br />
Proj<br />
ID<br />
49<br />
Organization<br />
Name<br />
Crow Wing<br />
County<br />
Project Name<br />
Crow Wing<br />
County Jack<br />
Pine/White<br />
Pine<br />
Restoration<br />
Technical Review<br />
Committee Scoring<br />
Comments<br />
Amtount<br />
Requested<br />
Score<br />
Technical Review<br />
Committee Final<br />
Rank Comments<br />
Regional<br />
Comments<br />
Meets<br />
Regional<br />
Plan? Rank Region<br />
County land, open<br />
to public use $79,727 143 Y 2<br />
Division<br />
Director's<br />
Comments<br />
This project<br />
fits better,<br />
includes<br />
both plant<br />
and protect;<br />
no question<br />
of<br />
supplanting.<br />
General<br />
ranking<br />
comments- all<br />
habitat<br />
projects<br />
All are good<br />
projects, meet<br />
goals of<br />
program. All<br />
should move<br />
forward.<br />
All could have<br />
had better<br />
partnerships--<br />
go to NGOs for<br />
$$ and<br />
support.<br />
County projects--tree<br />
planting: is it<br />
supplanting? Are<br />
these over and above<br />
regular funding?<br />
Land purchases<br />
have more<br />
urgency than<br />
plantings.<br />
No fluff in the<br />
costs for any<br />
of these.<br />
If need to cut,<br />
spread $$ out<br />
among all<br />
applicants.<br />
Crow Wing County_49_Jack Pine<br />
7)Sound<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong><br />
Science<br />
8)Adjacent<br />
to<br />
Protected<br />
Lands<br />
9)Full<br />
Funding<br />
of<br />
Project<br />
10)Supplants<br />
Existing<br />
Funding<br />
11)Public<br />
Access<br />
for<br />
Hunting<br />
and<br />
Fishing<br />
13)Use of<br />
Native<br />
Plant<br />
Materials<br />
1)Amount<br />
of Habitat<br />
2)Local<br />
Support<br />
3)Degree of<br />
Collaboration 4)Urgency<br />
5)Multiple<br />
Benefits<br />
6)Habitat<br />
Benefits<br />
12)Sustainability<br />
6.00 8.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 1.00 9.00 5.00 10.00 7.00 9.00 8.00<br />
8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 8.00<br />
8.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 6.00 7.00 3.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 7.00<br />
9.00 9.00 8.00 6.00 7.00 6.00 9.00 10.00 8.00 4.00 10.00 8.00 10.00 8.00<br />
AVERAGES 7.75 8.00 6.00 4.75 7.00 6.75 7.75 6.25 7.75 4.50 10.00 8.50 9.50 7.75<br />
TOTAL<br />
SCORE 143.25<br />
14)Budget<br />
and Cost<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Page 23 of 24
Change language