26.12.2013 Views

Rex v. Hugh

Rex v. Hugh

Rex v. Hugh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

And he asked the twelve if <strong>Hugh</strong> [married his wife when she was a widow]. The<br />

twelve said on oath that she was a widow when Lord <strong>Hugh</strong> contracted [marriage] with<br />

her. But it should be noted that they were not sworn again, because they were sworn first.<br />

JUDGE. And thus the court considers that you ought to respond as a layman, and<br />

do you consent to these worthy men of the twelve, because we know that they do not<br />

want to lie for us.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. Lord, I was accused by them; therefore I will not consent to them. In<br />

addition, Lord, I am a knight, and I ought not to be judged except by my peers.<br />

And knights were named. And he was asked wither he wanted to set forward any<br />

challenges against them.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. Lord, I do not consent to them, you can take whatever inquest you want ex<br />

officio, but I will not consent<br />

JUDGE. Lord <strong>Hugh</strong>, if you will to consent to them, with God's help, they will<br />

decide for you, if you will consent to them. And if you want to reject the common law,<br />

you will bear the penalty ordained for it, that is "one day you will eat and the other you<br />

will drink; and on the day you drink you will not eat, and the reverse; and you will eat<br />

barley bread and not with salt, and water [not wine or beer] etc.", explaining to him at<br />

length whence it would not be good to die in this way, but it would be better to consent to<br />

them.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. I will consent to my peers, but not to the twelve through whom I was<br />

accused. You ought to hear my challenges against them.<br />

JUDGE. Freely. Let the challenges be read; but if you know any reason why they<br />

ought to be removed, say it in a single voice or in writing.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. Lord, because I do not know how to read, I request my counsel.<br />

JUDGE. No, because it touches the lord King.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. You ought to have the challenges and you ought to read them.<br />

JUDGE. No, because they ought to be set out by your mouth.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong>. I don't know how to read them.<br />

JUDGE. How is it that you wanted to help yourself with the clerical privilege, and<br />

now you don't know how to read your challenges.<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong> stood silent as if confused.<br />

JUDGE. Don't be stupified, now is the time to speak.<br />

JUDGE (to Lord N. de Leicester). Do you want to read Lord <strong>Hugh</strong>'s challenges?<br />

Lord N. Lord, may I have the paper that he has in his hands?<br />

This was allowed.<br />

Lord N. Many challenges are named here against many people, do you want me<br />

to read them publicly?<br />

JUDGE. No, rather you should read them to the prisoner secretly, because they<br />

ought to be stated by his mouth.<br />

And it was done in this way. When they had been propounded by his mouth,<br />

because there were found to be truly challenged, those against whom he had propounded<br />

were removed from the inquest.<br />

JUDGE. We accuse Lord <strong>Hugh</strong> of rape of a certain woman. He denies. He was<br />

asked how he wants to acquit himself; he said through the country. For good or evil, he<br />

put himself on you. Therefore we order you in virtue of your oath to tell us whether Lord<br />

<strong>Hugh</strong> raped this woman or not.<br />

Prof. Klerman 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!