26.12.2013 Views

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SUMMERS, KAREN CRADY, Ph.D. Reading Incest - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

sibling, and mother-son. 2<br />

She notes that incest “creates convoluted and ambiguous<br />

family relationships” (2) and finds that most incest stories do not fall into clear-cut<br />

categories. In other words, the borders confining families, definitions, and even literary<br />

groupings are rarely static. According to the ultimate medieval authority—the Bible—all<br />

people are products of the incestuous couplings of brothers and sisters; but as part of<br />

God’s design, why should it be prohibited? It was church fathers who interpreted the<br />

move away from incestuous brother-sister couplings as later revisions of the divine plan.<br />

Like the serpent in the Garden, the question of incest poses a problem for medieval<br />

thinkers: if all things come from an omnipotent God, how can evil exist? Yet medieval<br />

writers saw their societies beset by war, plague, royal ineptitude, and human cruelty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1563 version of the English Book of Common Prayer reaffirmed the incest<br />

prohibition, incorporating a “Table of Kindred and Affinity” that listed sixty<br />

relationships for which marriage was forbidden, among them marriage with sisters- or<br />

brothers- in law; man and niece; and, man and aunt; cousin marriages were acceptable,<br />

though (McCabe 63). 3<br />

Tudor matrimonial prospects were particularly vulnerable to the<br />

many possible contemporary interpretations of Biblical law, because the legitimacy of the<br />

succession to the throne depended upon it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> legitimacy of Elizabeth I’s clams to the throne was troubled by Henry VIII’s<br />

marital machinations and the ambiguity of the definition of incest. Was his marriage to<br />

Katherine incestuous or not? According to Levitical law, it would have been; the Pope<br />

declared that it was not through a dispensation. <strong>The</strong> “implications for English history are<br />

2 Archibald, Elizabeth. <strong>Incest</strong> and the Medieval Imagination.<br />

3 James I was the son of first cousins, so this was fortunate for his claim to the throne.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!