26.12.2013 Views

The population dynamics and host utilization of ... - Phthiraptera

The population dynamics and host utilization of ... - Phthiraptera

The population dynamics and host utilization of ... - Phthiraptera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 287--304 (1974)<br />

9 by Springer-Verlag 1974<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Population Dynamics<br />

Host Utilization <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus,<br />

a Parasite <strong>of</strong> Thomomys bottae<br />

R. W. Rust<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology <strong>and</strong> Applied Ecology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711<br />

Received January 28, 1974<br />

Summary. This study treats the <strong>population</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>host</strong> <strong>utilization</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Geomydoecus oregonus Price <strong>and</strong> Emerson, a mallophagan parasite <strong>of</strong> the pocket<br />

gopher, Thomomys bottae (Eydous <strong>and</strong> Gervais). Over 135000 lice were collected<br />

from 393 gophers over a period <strong>of</strong> 20 months. Average infestation on all gophers<br />

was 357 lice. Bimonthly mean densities showed an increase in June-July <strong>of</strong> both<br />

years, <strong>and</strong> these data were statistically different from the rest. Population age<br />

structure remained relatively constant in time with 9.3% females, 7.2% males,<br />

47.4% nymphs <strong>and</strong> 36.1% eggs. Sex-age class separation <strong>of</strong> the gophers showed<br />

juveniles <strong>of</strong> both sexes to average 86 lice; subadult males averaged 210 lice; adult<br />

males averaged 544 lice; subadult <strong>and</strong> adult females averaged 255 <strong>and</strong> 296 lice,<br />

respectively.<br />

Lice were not r<strong>and</strong>omly distributed on the gopher, but were most numerous on<br />

the head <strong>and</strong> anterior dorsal body. Lice eggs were restricted to hairs around the<br />

ears <strong>and</strong> eyes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong>. Over 80% <strong>of</strong> the animals sampled had eggs restricted to<br />

that region.<br />

Embryonic development <strong>and</strong> eelosion <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus proceeded over a wide range<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental parameters. Over 80% <strong>of</strong> the ova tested survived <strong>and</strong> hatched in<br />

conditions between 33 ~ <strong>and</strong> 37~ <strong>and</strong> 22 % <strong>and</strong> 84 % relative humidity. <strong>The</strong> greatest<br />

survival was 98% at 35~ 75% R. H. <strong>and</strong> in a 3% COs atmosphere.<br />

<strong>The</strong> generation time <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus was 40• days. Duration <strong>of</strong> embryogenesis<br />

<strong>and</strong> nymphal stadia approximated 10• days for each. Adult lice lived 30-t- days<br />

on gophers.<br />

Age frequency mortalities were calculated as 0.02 for eggs, 0.18, 0.24, <strong>and</strong> 0.06<br />

for nymphal instars <strong>and</strong> 0.50 for adult lice. This indicates a Type II survivorship<br />

curve.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a direct linear relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> female lice on a<br />

gopher <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> lice eggs. <strong>The</strong> average number <strong>of</strong> eggs per female was four.<br />

Using the pivotal frequency for reproduetives, it was possible to calculate R o for the<br />

louse at 1.272. Thus, r was equal to 0.24 per generation or 0.006 per day, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

<strong>population</strong> doubles in 2.8 generations.<br />

Speculations regarding <strong>population</strong> regulation are also included.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> relationshi p between an ectoparasite <strong>and</strong> its <strong>host</strong> is governed by<br />

a complex set <strong>of</strong> interacting biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotie parameters. For the ecto-<br />

1913 Oecologia (Bet1.), Vol. 10


288 R.W. Rust<br />

parasite, the biotic parameters are in general related to or originate from<br />

the <strong>host</strong>. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> adaptation <strong>of</strong> the parasite to the biotic parameters<br />

corresponds to the <strong>host</strong> specificity <strong>of</strong> the parasite. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong><br />

specificity also indicates the adaptations <strong>of</strong> the parasite to the abiotie<br />

parameters influencing the <strong>host</strong>. Mallophaga, biting lice, are <strong>host</strong> specific<br />

(Hopkins, 1949; Werneck, 1950), <strong>and</strong> the restriction <strong>of</strong> all life stages to<br />

the body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong> refines the specificity <strong>and</strong> adaptations <strong>of</strong> a louse to<br />

its <strong>host</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>host</strong>'s environment (see Clay, 1949; Ash, 1960; Baum, 1968;<br />

Foster, 1969, for avian lice; Ewing, 1924; Hopkins, 1949; Waterhouse,<br />

1953; Craufurd-Benson, 1941; Scott, 1952; Murray, 1957b-d, 1965;<br />

Hopkins <strong>and</strong> Chamberlain, 1969, for mammalian lice). For lice, the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> interacting mortality factors <strong>and</strong> a species innate capacity<br />

for increase will determine the <strong>population</strong> level on a particular <strong>host</strong>.<br />

Evans <strong>and</strong> Smith (1952), in their classic demographic analysis <strong>of</strong> Pedi.<br />

culus humanus Linnaeus, were the first to study the reproductive potentials<br />

<strong>of</strong> an ectoparasite. Murray <strong>and</strong> Gordon (1969) modeled the <strong>population</strong><br />

<strong>dynamics</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bovicola ovis (Linnaeus), a biting louse <strong>of</strong> sheep. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

showed mathematically the development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>population</strong> from a low<br />

summer density to a winter high density.<br />

<strong>The</strong> genus Geomydoecus, parasites <strong>of</strong> the fossorial rodent family<br />

Geomyidae, possesses morphological adaptations not found in other<br />

trichodectid lice (Ewing, 1936). Degenerate adaptations as the absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> eyes <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> abdominal spiracles <strong>and</strong> tergites might be a response<br />

to the altered conditions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong>'s burrow environment (Kennerly,<br />

1964; McNab, 1966; Darden, 1970), <strong>and</strong> specializations <strong>of</strong> the antennae<br />

<strong>and</strong> well-developed hair-groove could relate to life on the gopher. Recently,<br />

Price <strong>and</strong> Emerson (1971) studied Geomydoecus <strong>and</strong> found 45 taxa<br />

on 29 <strong>of</strong> the 36 species <strong>of</strong> gophers. Most gophers have only one louse<br />

species; exceptions were <strong>host</strong>s with extensive geographical distributions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relative accessibility, small size, <strong>and</strong> peculiar habitat <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong><br />

provide a system for analyzing a parasite's <strong>population</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong>. Thus,<br />

Geomydoecus oregonus Price <strong>and</strong> Emerson, a parasite <strong>of</strong> Thomomys bottae<br />

(Eydoux <strong>and</strong> Gervais), was selected for analysis <strong>and</strong> interpretation.<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong> Materials<br />

Field<br />

A minimum <strong>of</strong> 20 pocket gophers per month as live-trapped from two irrigated<br />

alfaHa fields located on the University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis Farm, <strong>and</strong> 2 consecutive<br />

months <strong>of</strong> collection data were combined for analysis. <strong>The</strong> field sizes, agricultural<br />

practices, measurement <strong>of</strong> environmental parameters, gopher collecting <strong>and</strong> laboratory<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ling techniques <strong>and</strong> parasite recovery methods are treated in Rust<br />

(1973a, b).<br />

Three age classes were established for both sexes <strong>of</strong> gophers: juvenile, subadult<br />

<strong>and</strong> adult. Separation was based on reproductive condition, skull features, <strong>and</strong> body


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 289<br />

measurements (Miller, 1946, 1962; Hansen, 1960; Thaeler, 1968). Juveniles had the<br />

following sutures unfused: parietal-squamosal, maxilla-alisphenoid, <strong>and</strong> alisphenoidsquamosal;<br />

the dorsal surface <strong>of</strong> the maxilla (in the zygomatic arch) <strong>and</strong> palatine<br />

showed distinct porosity. Juveniles had gray pelage <strong>and</strong> were still in association<br />

with their mother, as determined from trapping. Subadults had partial fusion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cranial sutures, reduced porosity <strong>and</strong> brownish pelage. Subadult females had a<br />

closed pubic symphysis <strong>and</strong> limited follicular development; subadult male testes<br />

were only 3-6 mm long. Adults had skull sutures <strong>and</strong> nonporous bones. Adult<br />

females had the pubic symphysis open, placental scars, embryos, or were lactating.<br />

Adult males had testes from 7-15 mm long. Body length <strong>and</strong> maximum skull length<br />

<strong>and</strong> width showed overlap due to a continuous breeding <strong>population</strong> (Miller, 1946)<br />

but were also used in the separation.<br />

Time for the age categories would be approximately one <strong>and</strong> one-half to two<br />

months for juveniles, 2-5 months for subadults <strong>and</strong> the mean length <strong>of</strong> life for adult<br />

gophers has been estimated by Howard <strong>and</strong> Childs (1959) as 7.6 months for males<br />

<strong>and</strong> 12.3 months for females.<br />

Laboratory<br />

Eelosion <strong>and</strong> first instar survival in vitro were examined under various environmental<br />

conditions. 8 different temperatures (27-41~ were maintained in Percival<br />

environmental chambers. <strong>The</strong> chambers were set for total darkness with the<br />

photophase only when eggs or nymphs were checked. Eight different relative<br />

humidities (10-96%)were maintained in liter desiccator jars containing various<br />

saturated salt solutions (Winston <strong>and</strong> Bates, 1960). Eclosion was tested in normal<br />

air <strong>and</strong> a 3% COz atmosphere. <strong>The</strong> high CO 2 atmosphere was created by removing<br />

3 % <strong>of</strong> the gas volume from the jars <strong>and</strong> replacing it with CO 2. <strong>The</strong> CO 2 concentration<br />

was measured with a Unieo Gas Analyzer.<br />

Four replicates <strong>of</strong> 25 eggs each were tested at 64 different temperature-relative<br />

humidity combinations. Translucent eggs were plucked individually from gophers<br />

for the temperature-relative humidity tests. Eclosion <strong>and</strong> nymphal survival in 3%<br />

CO 2 atmosphere were recorded at 33 ~ <strong>and</strong> 35~ both at 62%, 75% <strong>and</strong> 84% R. It.<br />

Nymphal survival was also checked in normal CO 2 atmosphere.<br />

<strong>The</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> embryonic development was obtained by allowing female lice<br />

to oviposit in small petri dishes. This gave eggs <strong>of</strong> a known age (-4-12 h), <strong>and</strong> these<br />

eggs were placed in separate containers in various temperature-relative humidity<br />

conditions.<br />

Louse survival on the <strong>host</strong> was checked in a normal CO 2 atmosphere at various<br />

humidities. Humidities tested were 35 % • 5, 50 % =J: 5, 75 % • 5 <strong>and</strong> 100 % -- 2 <strong>and</strong><br />

were maintained in environmental chambers at 21~1771.<br />

Louse demography was studied (in rive) in an artificial burrow system simulating<br />

natural conditions (Darden, 1970). Four artificial burrows were housed in<br />

adjoining chambers in a soil box (60.9 X 91.4 X 121.9 cm). Burrows were constructed<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7 • 7 mm hardware cloth welded together. A system consisted <strong>of</strong> an above ground<br />

holding cage (14.2 • 20.3 X 30.4 ore), an initial diagonal tunnel (30 cm), a horizontal<br />

tunnel (24 cm) <strong>and</strong> a nest chamber (19x24 era). <strong>The</strong> tunnels were 7.5 cm in diameter.<br />

Before an animal was placed in a burrow system, carrot pieces <strong>and</strong> fresh<br />

alfalfa were placed in the next chamber. <strong>The</strong> system was packed with soil <strong>and</strong><br />

buried in the soil box, with 25 to 30 em <strong>of</strong> soil over the nest chamber. <strong>The</strong> surface<br />

was moistened with approximately 2 1 <strong>of</strong> water <strong>and</strong> allowed to st<strong>and</strong> for 24 h before<br />

a gopher was introduced. Additional fresh alfalfa was provided daily. Two Plexiglas<br />

tubes (6 mm O. D.) were attached to the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the nest chamber <strong>and</strong> horizontal<br />

tunnel. Both gas samples <strong>and</strong> temperatures were measured via the tubes. <strong>The</strong> entire<br />

system was housed in a greenhouse with a regime <strong>of</strong> controlled temperature <strong>and</strong>


290 R.W. Rus~<br />

natural light. Every seventh day <strong>of</strong> an experiment an additional 21 <strong>of</strong> water were<br />

added to the surface.<br />

Two different treatments were designed for gophers placed in the artificial<br />

system. Newly eclosed first instar nymphs were introduced on a clean gopher, <strong>and</strong><br />

the animal was released in a system for a set period--6, 10, 15, 20, 25, <strong>and</strong> 30 days.<br />

Freshly caught gophers were cleaned <strong>of</strong> parasites, empty lice eggs were plucked<br />

from the animal, <strong>and</strong> the remaining lice eggs were counted <strong>and</strong> mapped. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

animals were released in a system for 20, 30 <strong>and</strong> 40 days. At the end <strong>of</strong> an experiment,<br />

the animal was sacrificed <strong>and</strong> cleaned.<br />

Statistical analyses used in this study were Student's t-test, linear regression <strong>and</strong><br />

correlation, single class analysis <strong>of</strong> variance <strong>and</strong> curvilinear regression.<br />

Results<br />

Macro- <strong>and</strong> Microenvironmental Parameters<br />

During this study, average monthly temperatures varied from a low<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.3~ in winter to a high <strong>of</strong> 25.4~ in summer. <strong>The</strong> Davis weather<br />

station mean maximum temperatures were 16.2 ~ <strong>and</strong> 30.2~ <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mean minima were 5.1 ~ <strong>and</strong> 11.8~ in winter <strong>and</strong> summer, respectively.<br />

Average monthly precipitation was from a high <strong>of</strong> 61.5 mm in winter<br />

months to 1 mm in summer months. Average monthly soil temperatures<br />

at 101 mm depth ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> 7.2~ in January to a high <strong>of</strong><br />

32.3~ in July. <strong>The</strong> soil moisture averaged 6.6% in winter <strong>and</strong> 5.3% in<br />

summer. <strong>The</strong> high summer soil moisture level was maintained by irrigation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> alfalfa fields were flood-irrigated at approximately 30-day<br />

intervals from April to September, with water covering the fields, except<br />

irrigation levees, for nearly 24 h.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relative humidity <strong>of</strong> the burrow measured 97.4• (N-=96).<br />

Kennerly (1964), McSTab (1966), <strong>and</strong> Darden (1970) also recorded the<br />

near saturated atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the gopher burrow. Darden (1970) determined<br />

that the CO S concentration <strong>of</strong> the gopher burrow averaged 2.3 %,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 03 averaged 18%. MeNab (1966) found an average CO S concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.4 % in the burrow <strong>of</strong> Geomys pinetis Rafinesque, <strong>and</strong> Kennerly<br />

(1964) measured only 0.8 % CO S in Geomys bursarius (Shaw) burrows. <strong>The</strong><br />

burrow temperatures showed less fluctuation than ambient temperatures<br />

<strong>and</strong> were out <strong>of</strong> phase with them. Rust (1973b) showed the relationship<br />

between ambient <strong>and</strong> burrow temperatures at two extreme times,<br />

August <strong>and</strong> January.<br />

In the artificial burrow system, the nest chamber temperature<br />

averaged 20.5-V0.6~ C (N-=30) <strong>and</strong> the CO S concentration was 2.4-4-0.1%<br />

(N=24). <strong>The</strong> soil moisture averaged 6.2% <strong>and</strong> ranged from 7.2% to<br />

4.1%. <strong>The</strong> greenhouse temperature was maintained between 14.4 ~ <strong>and</strong><br />

25.0 ~ C. Thus, the conditions for experimentation are considered similar<br />

to those that would be found in a natural burrow system, except during<br />

the cooler winter months.


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 291<br />

Population Density <strong>and</strong> Structure<br />

Over 135000 Geomydoecus oregonus were removed from the gophers;<br />

5 animals were clean <strong>of</strong> lice. <strong>The</strong> average infestation for all gophers was<br />

357.5q-13.9 lice, <strong>and</strong> 1941 was the maximum number <strong>of</strong> lice recovered<br />

from an adult. Five other gophers (2 females <strong>and</strong> 3 males) had more than<br />

1000 lice on them. <strong>The</strong> bimonthly mean densities (Fig. 1) showed an<br />

increase in June-July <strong>of</strong> both years, <strong>and</strong> these sample means were found<br />

to be statistically different from the rest (F=2.7417, P~0.005). <strong>The</strong> 15<br />

"dry l<strong>and</strong>" gophers from August-September 1971 had a mean density <strong>of</strong><br />

376.1-~66.4 lice. This was not found to be significantly different from the<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> the "irrigated l<strong>and</strong>" sample for the same period or the overall<br />

mean (t=0.4253, 0.9~P ~0.5 <strong>and</strong> t=0.2709, 0.9~P~0.5, respectively).<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>population</strong> age structure remained relatively constant in time with<br />

9.3% females, 7.2% males, 47.4% nymphs <strong>and</strong> 36.1% eggs (Fig. 1).<br />

Juveniles had an increased proportion <strong>of</strong> eggs (44.8) <strong>and</strong> reduced nymphs<br />

(36.2), but adults were nearly equal. Geomydoecus oregonus has three<br />

nymphal instars as determined from head capsule measurements <strong>and</strong><br />

increased number <strong>of</strong> abdominal setae. <strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> the nymphs<br />

represented by each was 19.9% first, 13.3% second <strong>and</strong> 14.2% third.<br />

1Vlean louse <strong>population</strong>s on male <strong>and</strong> female gophers were strikingly<br />

different with males averaging over 430 <strong>and</strong> females under 290. Further<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>population</strong> based on gopher age classes <strong>of</strong> juvenile, subadult,<br />

<strong>and</strong> adult revealed a greater difference. Juvenile gophers (N~--18),<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> sex, averaged only 86.3~ 13.7 lice. Subadult males (N=46)<br />

had 210.8~19.8 lice, <strong>and</strong> adult males (N----120) averaged 544.2-~25.6.<br />

However, subadult (2V=71) <strong>and</strong> adult females (N----123) averaged nearly<br />

the same number <strong>of</strong> lice 255.0q-26.3 <strong>and</strong> 296.0• respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

bimonthly sex-age class averages are plotted in Fig. 2.<br />

When the sex-age class averages are considered, the seasonal changes<br />

are at most slight although when combined, they show a statistically<br />

significant increase in June-July. This early summer increase in 1970 was<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> large louse <strong>population</strong>s on adult male gophers with 8 <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

having over 600 lice. <strong>The</strong> 1971 louse increase resulted from an increase in<br />

both adult female <strong>and</strong> subadult <strong>population</strong>s. Three <strong>of</strong> the adult females<br />

had over 800 lice, which if removed from the sample, reduces the mean<br />

to 299.<br />

Lice were not r<strong>and</strong>omly distributed on the gophers, but were most<br />

numerous on the head <strong>and</strong> anterior dorsal body. Selective cleaning<br />

produced the following distribution <strong>of</strong> lice: 19.7% dorsal head, 14.0%<br />

ventral head, 49.5% anterior dorsal body, 7.5% posterior dorsal body<br />

<strong>and</strong> 9.3 % ventral body. Lice on the ventral body were restricted to the<br />

area between the forelegs <strong>and</strong> axillae. If the above were based on the


292 R. W. Rust<br />

600<br />

5OO<br />

9 g~ ~ 400<br />

~300<br />

2OO<br />

I<br />

Nymphs<br />

6O<br />

5O<br />

40<br />

.... ~ ~ "'"~"~ 30<br />

20<br />

Females 10<br />

-- Males<br />

A-IM J'-J A:S O'-N D% F'-M A:M J:J A'-S O'-N<br />

Months<br />

Fig. 1. Population structure <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus from 378 Thomomys bottae<br />

collected from Davis, California, from April 1970 through November 1971. Left <strong>and</strong><br />

above: mean <strong>population</strong> density for all gophers, vertical lines equal st<strong>and</strong>ard error.<br />

Right <strong>and</strong> below: <strong>population</strong> age structure<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

5OO<br />

~ 400<br />

g<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Adutt Femc~le ~/"/'x"-,<br />

/, x,<br />

X ,,... ~<br />

~ ~ ? "',",~"- "......... 7~ "".......<br />

..~" " Subadu[[ Mole<br />

Mean Juvenile<br />

A"M J"J A~S ' O"N D~'J F~'M AIM J.J A"S O~'N<br />

Months<br />

:Fig. 2. Mean <strong>population</strong> density <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus based on sex-age class<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> Thomomys bottae. Juvenile gophers represented by overall mean only


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 293<br />

Fig. 3. Distribution <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus eggs on 89 Thomomys bottae, above.<br />

Mean regional body temperatures in degrees centigrade, below<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the gopher's body inhabited, then 92.5 % <strong>of</strong> the lice were<br />

found on 55 % <strong>of</strong> the animal's surface.<br />

Egg Distribution, Numbers <strong>and</strong> Environmental Tolerance<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> the lice eggs was more restricted than thedistribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> nymphs <strong>and</strong> adults. <strong>The</strong> proportional distribution <strong>of</strong> eggs on 89 gophers<br />

is shown in Fig. 3. Over 80 % <strong>of</strong> the gophers had lice eggs located around<br />

the ears <strong>and</strong> eyes. If juvenile animals <strong>and</strong> adults with high infestations<br />

(800q-lice) were removed from the sample, the lice eggs on the mid-dorsal<br />

back were excluded from the distribution. An egg <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus is glued<br />

to the base <strong>of</strong> the hairs from one follicle <strong>and</strong> only one egg]hair group was<br />

observed. Although oviposition was not observed, the placement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

egg on the hairs suggests an oviposition behavior similar to that described<br />

for other lice (Murray, 1957a). <strong>The</strong> chorion remains attached after<br />

eclosion <strong>and</strong> until the hair group is shed with the subsequent molt.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a direct linear relationship (Fig. 4) between the number <strong>of</strong><br />

female lice on a gopher <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> lice eggs (bz3.253=k0.208),<br />

with a correlation <strong>of</strong> 0.868. Thus 74% <strong>of</strong> the egg variation was explained<br />

by the presence <strong>of</strong> the female lice (r~=0.7396). <strong>The</strong> average number <strong>of</strong><br />

eggs per female was 4 (3.93) <strong>and</strong> ranged from 0.6 to 11.2. If juveniles,<br />

females with litters, <strong>and</strong> old gophers were removed, the range was<br />

narrowed to 2.9 to 8.2 eggs/female. In terms <strong>of</strong> eggs per day, G. oregonus<br />

lays 0.2 eggs/day in an average life span.


294 R.W. Rust<br />

400 .', 9 ' '"<br />

9 ~6<br />

350<br />

3oo<br />

~" 250<br />

0<br />

~200 ....<br />

0<br />

-' 100 , ,,,-/:," , , r =0.868<br />

n 89<br />

50 ~.~, ," "~.X, ,: , : ,<br />

, _ , , , , , ,<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

Female Lice per Gopher<br />

Fig. 4. Regression <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> female Geomydoecus oregonus per Thomomys bo#ae<br />

to number <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus eggs per gropher<br />

Embryonic development <strong>and</strong> eclosion <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus proceeded over a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> environmental parameters. An 80 % or greater plateau <strong>of</strong> ova<br />

survival <strong>and</strong> hatching (Fig. 5) was found between 33-37~ <strong>and</strong> 22-84%<br />

relative humidity. <strong>The</strong> greatest survival was 96% at 35~ <strong>and</strong> 75% R. It.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mean rectal temperature <strong>of</strong> T. bottae was 36.5~0.4~ (N=26).<br />

Darden (1970) recorded an average <strong>of</strong> 36.7~ for the same species. This<br />

temperature was near the upper end <strong>of</strong> the survival range. However,<br />

surface temperatures (Fig. 3) <strong>of</strong> the cheek <strong>and</strong> head region were approximately<br />

1~ lower <strong>and</strong> corresponded to the highest eclosion rate.<br />

Development <strong>and</strong> hatching occurred in 3 % CO 2 atmosphere <strong>and</strong> with<br />

a slightly higher survival rate than eggs reared in a normal CO S atmosphere.<br />

Ninety-eight percent <strong>of</strong> over 500 eggs hatched in vitro <strong>and</strong><br />

97.7% <strong>of</strong> the eggs hatched on gophers in the artificial burrow system.<br />

Darden (1970) determined the CO s concentration <strong>of</strong> the gopher burrow<br />

to average 2.3 %, <strong>and</strong> O 3 averaged 18 %. I found an average CO 2 concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.4% in the nest chamber <strong>of</strong> the artificial burrow system.<br />

Normal atmospheric CO 2 was determined to slightly reduce the survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> the louse. Eggs on 3 gophers maintained in normal atmosphere <strong>and</strong><br />

exposed to a relative humidity greater than 75 % for 30 days hatched <strong>and</strong><br />

developed to third instar <strong>and</strong> adult lice with an average mortality <strong>of</strong><br />

56.3%.


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 295<br />

100 100<br />

m "U<br />

zs<br />

zs<br />

D -I<br />

50 50 C<br />

| .7<br />

U ~.<br />

D- e~<br />

25 25<br />

~'/<br />

qb<br />

Fig. 5. Survival <strong>and</strong> eclosion <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus eggs reared in vitro under<br />

constant temperature <strong>and</strong> relative humidity<br />

Population Development<br />

<strong>The</strong> embryonic development <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus averaged 10.5days<br />

(N=18) <strong>and</strong> ranged from 9 to 12 days. This time plus the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

nymphal development (Table 1) indicates a generation time <strong>of</strong> 40=k6<br />

days. Duration <strong>of</strong> nymphal stadia approximated 10• days for each.<br />

<strong>The</strong> longevity <strong>of</strong> adult lice was not ascertained. However, 6 females <strong>and</strong><br />

3 males out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 80 lice lived 30~-days on gophers in the<br />

artificial burrow system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mortality rate (Table 1) from cohorts beginning with first instar<br />

lice was extremely high as indicated by a 50 % mortality <strong>of</strong> first instar<br />

lice after 6 days. This high death rate was probably induced by h<strong>and</strong>ling


296 R.W. Rust<br />

Table 1. Recovery <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus from gophers, each artificially infested<br />

with newly hatched first instar nymphs. Gophers maintained in artificial burrows<br />

Days Inoc- I~umber <strong>and</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> development Total %<br />

after ulum Mortality<br />

infesta- Immatures Adults<br />

tion 1st 2nd 3rd ~<br />

6 36 18 . . . . 18 50.0<br />

10 58 1 16 -- -- -- 17 70.3<br />

15 49 -- 8 1 -- -- 9 81.7<br />

20 32 -- 2 2 -- -- 4 87.5<br />

25 31 -- -- 2 -- -- 2 93.5<br />

30 40 -- -- -- 2 1 3 90.0<br />

the lice <strong>and</strong> a delay (12 h) before they could feed or assume a correct<br />

posture on the gopher. <strong>The</strong> results (Table 2) obtained from cohorts<br />

starting with the egg stage, indicate a Type II survivorship curve for the<br />

louse <strong>population</strong>. Thus, age frequency mortalities can be calculated as<br />

0.02 for eggs, 0.18, 0.24, <strong>and</strong> 0.06 for the nymphal instars, <strong>and</strong> 0.50 for<br />

adult lice. Due to the 10 day age difference <strong>of</strong> eggs used to initiate these<br />

tests, females <strong>and</strong> new eggs were already present on the gophers in the<br />

30 day samples, <strong>and</strong> at 40 days, new first instar lice appeared in the<br />

samples. Using the pivotal frequency for reproductives, it is possible to<br />

estimate the net reproductive rate, Ro=Zlxm x. Thus, R o for G. oregonus<br />

is 1.272 (0.53 X 2.4= 1.272). This assumes a 1:1.2 sex ratio, equal survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexes <strong>and</strong> an average <strong>of</strong> 4 eggs per female louse. <strong>The</strong> intrinsic rate <strong>of</strong><br />

increase (r) can be calculated from Ro=e% Thus, r is equal to 0.24 per<br />

generation or 0.006 per day, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>population</strong> doubles in 2.8 genera-<br />

tions.<br />

Duration<br />

days<br />

Table 2. Recovery <strong>of</strong> Geomydoecu8 oregonus from gophers, each naturally infested<br />

with eggs. Gophers maintained in artificial burrow systems<br />

Num- Inoc- Number <strong>and</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> development Mortality<br />

ber<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

ulum<br />

eggs Immatures Adults Eggs % %<br />

gophers eggs total<br />

1st 2nd 3rd ~ !~ Unhatched new<br />

%a<br />

age<br />

interval<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

2 295 65 127 34 7 -- 2.3 20.0<br />

4 551 -- 7 187 42 43 11 21 1.9 49.4<br />

5 914 13 b -- 30 150 180 ? 157 ? 60.7<br />

a Determined initially from 2 % egg mortality <strong>and</strong> rounded to nearest whole number.<br />

b First instars <strong>of</strong> second generation.<br />

18.0<br />

30.0<br />

ll.0


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 297<br />

Discussion<br />

Population Structure <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fman (personal communication) studied Geomydoecus geomydis<br />

(Osborn), a parasite <strong>of</strong> Geomys bursarius. He found nearly twice the mean<br />

density <strong>of</strong> lice as I did for G. oregonus as well as a seasonal shift with a<br />

spring increase for G. geomydis in South Dakota. Geomys bursarius is one<br />

<strong>and</strong> one-half to two times as large (body weight) as T. bottae from the<br />

Davis area (Hall <strong>and</strong> Kelson, 1959), breeds once a year, is subject to<br />

different climatic regimes <strong>and</strong> possibly different microenvironmental<br />

conditions such as lower CO S concentration (Kennerly, 1964). Size <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong><br />

(decreased surface area), continous breeding (Miller, 1946), the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

a different climatic regime, <strong>and</strong> flood irrigation are elements which<br />

probably reduce the <strong>population</strong> size <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus on T. bottae in the<br />

Davis area. Other trichodectid lice are found primarily on fissiped<br />

carnivores, hyraxes <strong>and</strong> ungulates (Hopkins, 1949; Emerson, 1964), <strong>and</strong><br />

seasonal fluctuations in other small mammal mallophagans are unknown<br />

to me. Large mammal mallophagan species show a general late fall to<br />

winter increase <strong>and</strong> a summer decline (Crauford-Benson, 1949 ; Matthysse,<br />

1944, 1946; Scott, 1952; Enzie, 1956; Murray, 1960, 1963a, b). Vysotoskaya<br />

(1950) <strong>and</strong> Murray (1961) have suggested that the fall to winter<br />

increase may relate to the <strong>host</strong>'s responses to the severity <strong>of</strong> the winter<br />

conditions. However, the general uniformity <strong>of</strong> G. oregonus <strong>population</strong><br />

structure through time may result from the modified summer environmental<br />

conditions brought about by irrigation. <strong>The</strong> homogenous conditions<br />

in irrigated l<strong>and</strong>s are also responsible for year-round reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> gophers (Miller, 1946). If the louse is affected by the environmental<br />

conditions in the late summer as is the <strong>host</strong> (Miller, 1946; Howard <strong>and</strong><br />

Childs, 1959), then a <strong>population</strong> decline may be predicted. <strong>The</strong> small<br />

"dry l<strong>and</strong>" sample mean, however, equalled the mean number on <strong>host</strong>s<br />

from irrigated l<strong>and</strong>s. Howard <strong>and</strong> Childs (1959) suggested that gophers<br />

may retreat to lower burrows <strong>and</strong> seal shallower ones to escape the<br />

summer heat. This could equalize environmental conditions <strong>and</strong> allow<br />

louse reproduction to proceed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> different louse densities on the sex-age classes <strong>of</strong> gophers result<br />

from at least two factors : the size <strong>of</strong> the animal <strong>and</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> a portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> adult female's parasites to the young <strong>of</strong> each litter. Thus, the time <strong>of</strong><br />

maximum gopher reproduction would also be the most disruptive period<br />

for the lice on female gophers. <strong>The</strong> reduced mean density <strong>of</strong> lice on adult<br />

females in February-March is concomitant with maximum gopher<br />

reproduction (Miller, 1946), <strong>and</strong> the increased density <strong>of</strong> lice in the early<br />

winter months corresponds to minimum gopher reproduction. <strong>The</strong><br />

solitary habits <strong>of</strong> gophers (Ingles, 1952 ; Howard <strong>and</strong> Childs, 1959) suggest<br />

that the exchange <strong>of</strong> parasites takes place primarily between females with


298 1%. W. Rust<br />

litters <strong>and</strong> between litter mates. This explains the adult sex differences<br />

<strong>and</strong> small louse <strong>population</strong> (inoculum) on juvenile gophers. Miller (1946)<br />

found an average <strong>of</strong> 5 young/litter <strong>and</strong> 2 litters/year for gophers inhabiting<br />

irrigated fields in the Davis area. Thus, ideally 84% <strong>of</strong> the female's<br />

louse <strong>population</strong> could be lost twice a year. Actual measurements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>population</strong> lost ranged from 56% to 66% for litter<br />

sizes <strong>of</strong> 2 <strong>and</strong> 4 (N=4).<br />

Lice are generally found on the head <strong>and</strong> foreparts <strong>of</strong> the small<br />

mammals <strong>and</strong> may spread over the dorsal <strong>and</strong> lateral aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong><br />

as the <strong>population</strong> increases (Vysotoskaya, 1950; Dubinin, 1953; Murray,<br />

1961). In general, louse distribution is controlled by the grooming<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong> (Murray, 1961). Observations <strong>of</strong> gopher<br />

grooming indicate that lice can be nipped from the ventral body <strong>and</strong><br />

possibly the hind quarters. <strong>The</strong> short neck <strong>and</strong> large pectoral girdle<br />

prevent more extensive preening with incisors. Preening with the hind<br />

<strong>and</strong> fore claws in the form <strong>of</strong> scratching probably does not remove many<br />

lice because <strong>of</strong> their tenacity. This action could destroy stationary nits,<br />

but gophers were observed to rub the head region with their fore claws<br />

rather than scratch with claw tips.<br />

Preening is an important control agent in the distribution <strong>of</strong> nits<br />

(Murray, 1961), but hair size <strong>and</strong> configuration (Murray, 1957b-d;<br />

Hopkins <strong>and</strong> Chamberlain, 1969) <strong>and</strong> <strong>host</strong> regional body temperatures<br />

(Murray, 1957e, 1963b, 1965) also affect their distribution. Another<br />

factor on the gopher is the structure <strong>of</strong> the hairs on which eggs are glued.<br />

Most hair follicles on the gopher contain 9-18 hairs (Morejohn <strong>and</strong><br />

Howard, 1956), but the character <strong>of</strong> hairs per follicle differs in the<br />

various body regions. Hair follicles on the dorsal <strong>and</strong> lateral aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

the head bear 4-6 large guard hairs <strong>and</strong> 7-12 fur hairs, whereas follicles<br />

on the dorsal body lack the stiff guard hairs. Follicular separation is<br />

nearly equal over the body, with the hairs follicles being separated by<br />

0.25-0.33 ram. <strong>The</strong> response <strong>of</strong> female lice to a particular hair configuration<br />

for oviposition may result in the limited distribution as seen<br />

on over 80% <strong>of</strong> the gophers sampled. On juveniles, all hairs are <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fur type <strong>and</strong> thus the possible wider distribution <strong>of</strong> nits, but as the<br />

gopher loses its juvenile pelage the hair per follicle change to the fur<br />

hair-guard hair arrangement. <strong>The</strong> wider distribution <strong>of</strong> nits on gophers<br />

with large infestations (800-~) possibly indicates a spreading to less<br />

favorable sites.<br />

Molting restricts the availability <strong>of</strong> oviposition sites <strong>and</strong> may result<br />

in a loss <strong>of</strong> eggs already laid. Evidence for the latter is sparse, although<br />

Vysotoskaya (1950) considered molting a major factor for <strong>population</strong><br />

decline. Three gophers with active molt lines in <strong>and</strong> around the ears <strong>and</strong><br />

eyes had no unhatched nits in the area. When examined 30 days later the


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 299<br />

molt line had moved posteriorly <strong>and</strong> the empty eggs were gone. Morejohn<br />

<strong>and</strong> Howard (1956) studied the molt patterns <strong>of</strong> captive <strong>and</strong> field gophers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y found two distinct seasonal pelages, winter <strong>and</strong> summer, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

constant molt period with a short non-molt period from December to<br />

February. It is therefore possible to have a reduction in the hair follicles<br />

available twice a year. <strong>The</strong> dense replacement hairs <strong>and</strong> thickened dermis<br />

during active molting renders an area inaccessible to lice <strong>and</strong> oviposition.<br />

Lice were not observed in this thick, new hair.<br />

Using an average juvenile gopher inoculum <strong>of</strong> 86 lice <strong>and</strong> no upper<br />

restriction on <strong>population</strong> growth, the average mean density <strong>of</strong> lice on<br />

subadults can be reached in about 200 days <strong>and</strong> for adult males in 300<br />

days. <strong>The</strong> mean louse density <strong>of</strong> adult female gophers would also be<br />

reached in 200 days, <strong>and</strong> this represents an approximation <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />

maturity (Miller, 1946). On male gophers, the louse density would reach<br />

nearly 1000 in 400 days, which is the mean longevity <strong>of</strong> male gophers<br />

(I-Ioward <strong>and</strong> Childs, 1959). <strong>The</strong> small sample <strong>of</strong> gophers with 1000 or<br />

more lice suggests that factors must be operating to maintain the density<br />

at a lower level than predicted.<br />

To examine the <strong>population</strong> growth curve, an arbitrary measure <strong>of</strong> time<br />

was necessary because <strong>of</strong> the difficulty in accurate aging <strong>of</strong> gophers. <strong>The</strong><br />

measurement selected was the increase in surface area <strong>of</strong> the gopher<br />

(cm 2) <strong>and</strong> was obtained by combining body length <strong>and</strong> circumference <strong>of</strong><br />

the thorax cavity, legs <strong>and</strong> tail excluded from the measurement. An<br />

accuracy check was made by measuring fresh, fiat skins. It has been<br />

shown that gophers continue to grow as adults (Miller, 1952 ; Howard <strong>and</strong><br />

Chflds, 1959). <strong>The</strong>refore, a clumping <strong>of</strong> older animals in a younger age<br />

group is not expected.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average densities on categoric age groups showed nearly equal<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> lice on subadult <strong>and</strong> adult female gophers. Thus, the louse<br />

<strong>population</strong> on a female gopher should reach an asymptote at some body<br />

size or point in time. <strong>The</strong> relationship between female gopher area <strong>and</strong><br />

lice per area was curvilinear (Fig. 6) <strong>and</strong> the curve was defined by a<br />

second degree polynomial, Y=--8.9990+O.15884X--O.OOO56X 2. On<br />

female gophers, the louse <strong>population</strong> leveled at 2.2 lice per cm ~ over<br />

140 cm 2 <strong>of</strong> body area, or 308 lice. <strong>The</strong> mean densites <strong>of</strong> lice on male<br />

gophers differed according to age groups, <strong>and</strong> the relationships were<br />

analyzed for both linear <strong>and</strong> eurvilinear regression. <strong>The</strong> test for curvilinear<br />

regression (Snedecor, 1956) was highly significant (F--~7.1604,<br />

P>0.001), <strong>and</strong> a linear relationship was rejected. <strong>The</strong> curve (Fig. 6) was<br />

defined by a second degree polynominal, Y------5.4723-~0.09352X--<br />

0.0026X 2. <strong>The</strong> louse <strong>population</strong> on male gophers leveled at around 2.9 lice<br />

per cm ~ over an area <strong>of</strong> 175 cm ~, or 507 lice. <strong>The</strong> respective asymptotes<br />

are equal to the overall mean densities for adult animals.


300 R. W. Rust<br />

%<br />

o.<br />

._J<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Juveniles ..;'if"'" Female<br />

Adult Mate<br />

SubaduIt ..,.'J............................................<br />

Male ..,'": ............<br />

,.'..;~;:'~"~ j Adult Ferna[e<br />

4O<br />

, I " | , t I , i .... ,<br />

80 100 120 140 160 180 200<br />

Gopher Body Area (cm 2)<br />

Fig. 6. Population growth curve for Geomydoecus oregouus on male <strong>and</strong> female<br />

Thomomys bottae as determined from regression analysis <strong>of</strong> the relationship <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> lice per body area to the total body area available<br />

Population Regulation<br />

Population growth as presented above can be controlled by both<br />

density dependent <strong>and</strong> density independent factors. Food is not considered<br />

to be an important factor, since it is in constant supply on the <strong>host</strong><br />

(Waterhouse, 1953). One dependent factor appears to be the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> a proper oviposition site. This was indicated by the narrow distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> nits on gophers <strong>and</strong> the inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> a site until the hairs<br />

were replaced. Cannibalism has been reported for avian mallophagans<br />

(Waterston, 1926; Rothschild <strong>and</strong> Clay, 1952; Nelson, 1971). Hopkins<br />

<strong>and</strong> Chamberlain (1969) found destruction <strong>of</strong> nits, as high as 25% in<br />

in vitro colonies <strong>of</strong> B. crass@es. I found no evidence for cannibalism in<br />

G. oregonus. Empty chorions on the gophers appeared intact <strong>and</strong> undamaged.<br />

Lice held in small containers for 5 days did not destroy or consume<br />

newly laid eggs or immature individuals. This does not, however, exclude<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> cannibalism for G. oregonus.<br />

Density independent factors such as preening, molting, <strong>and</strong> social<br />

interaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong> can lead to <strong>population</strong> reduction or control.<br />

Environmental conditions in the Davis area <strong>and</strong> especially in irrigated<br />

fields do not appear to restrict the <strong>population</strong> densites. Irrigation may<br />

destroy a proportion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>population</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> flooding. Wet<br />

gophers were found in the fields during the initial stages <strong>of</strong> irrigation, but<br />

more commonly, dry animals were found on field levees, murray (1963a)<br />

showed that adults <strong>and</strong> nymphs <strong>of</strong> B. ovis can survive immersion in


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 301<br />

water for 1 h with less than 20 % mortality. Eggs could be immersed for<br />

up to 7 days before a substantial reduction in hatching occurred. It is<br />

therefore possible to have a reduction in the nymph <strong>and</strong> adult <strong>population</strong><br />

with each irrigation. <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the lice on the gopher <strong>and</strong> the<br />

inability <strong>of</strong> the gopher to withst<strong>and</strong> immersion for even one hour probably<br />

reduces the severity <strong>of</strong> irrigation.<br />

Interaction <strong>and</strong> competition with other ectoparasites may influence<br />

the upper densities (Hopkins, 1949; Vysotoskaya, 1950). Geomydoecus<br />

oregonus co-inhabits the gopher in the Davis area with three other<br />

parasites (Rust, 1973 a, b). <strong>The</strong> small size <strong>and</strong> restricted distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

Geomylichus n. sp. <strong>and</strong> the nidicolous habits <strong>of</strong> Haemolaelaps geomys<br />

Str<strong>and</strong>tmann remove them from interactions with the louse (Rust,<br />

1973 b). Hirstionyssus ]emuralis Allred is found both in the nest <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

<strong>host</strong> in low numbers <strong>and</strong> are not considered to pose any serious deterrent<br />

in the louse density increase.<br />

Finally, the physiological state <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong>, either environmentally or<br />

pathologically induced, may influence <strong>population</strong> size. Sick animals have<br />

been reported by several workers as having unusually heavy infestations<br />

<strong>of</strong> lice (Thompson, 1936; Spencer, 1939; Craufurd-Benson, 1941; <strong>and</strong><br />

Eichler, 1942). <strong>The</strong> state <strong>of</strong> health <strong>of</strong> the 6 gophers with heavy infestations<br />

could not be determined. However, they appeared healthy. <strong>The</strong><br />

only "unhealthy" animals encountered were wounded males, but this<br />

is probably a common condition resulting from their pugnacious behavior<br />

(Howard <strong>and</strong> Childs, 1959). Increased louse reproduction induced by<br />

ingestion <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong> hormones, as in the classical case <strong>of</strong> Spilopsyllus cuniculi<br />

Dale <strong>and</strong> its <strong>host</strong> the rabbit (Mead-Briggs <strong>and</strong> Rudge, 1960; Rothschild<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ford, 1964 a, b), is not considered important. <strong>The</strong> food <strong>and</strong> feeding<br />

habits <strong>of</strong> trichodectid lice (Waterhouse, 1953) would prevent contact with<br />

<strong>host</strong>'s blood. If estrogens enter the dermal tissue fluids, then they may be<br />

ingested <strong>and</strong> could then be considered an important factor.<br />

Acknowledgements. I thank K. Emerson <strong>and</strong> 1%. D. Price for their identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> Geomydoecus oregonus. 1%. F. Denno, D. L. McLean, R.W. Thorp <strong>and</strong> R.K.<br />

Washino read various stages <strong>of</strong> the manuscript. <strong>The</strong>ir criticisms <strong>and</strong> suggestions<br />

were appreciated. Charles C<strong>of</strong>fman provided unpublished data which was most<br />

helpful. Aileen K. Rust assisted throughout the study. Her comments <strong>and</strong> suggestions<br />

are sincerely appreciated.<br />

References<br />

Ash, J. S. : A study <strong>of</strong> the Mallophaga <strong>of</strong> birds with particular reference to their<br />

ecology. Ibis 120, 93-102 (1960)<br />

Bantu, H. :Biologie nnd Okologie der Amselfederl~use. Angew. Parasit. 9, 129-175<br />

(1968)<br />

Clay, T.: Some problems in the evolution <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> eetoparasites. Evolution 3,<br />

279-299 (1949)<br />

20 Oeeologia (Berl.), Vol. 15


302 R.W. Rust<br />

Craufurd-Benson, H. J. : <strong>The</strong> cattle lice <strong>of</strong> Great Britain. Parasitology 88, 331-358<br />

(1941)<br />

Darden, T. R. : Respiratory adaptations <strong>of</strong> a fossorial mammal, the pocket gopher<br />

(Thomomys bottae). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. California, Davis<br />

(1970)<br />

Dubinin, V. B.: Parasitic fauna <strong>of</strong> Murid rodents <strong>and</strong> its changes in the fauna <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Volga Delta. Parazit. Sbornik 15, 252-301 (1953)<br />

Eichler, W. : Die Entfaltungsregel und <strong>and</strong>ere Gesetzm~Bigkeiten in den parasitogenetischen<br />

Beziehungen der Mallophagen und <strong>and</strong>ere st~ndiger Parasiten zu<br />

ihren Wirten. Zool. Anz. 187, 77-83 (1942)<br />

Emerson, K. C.: Checklist <strong>of</strong> Mallophaga <strong>of</strong> North America (north <strong>of</strong> Mexico),<br />

p. 1-171. Dugway, Utah: Dugway Proving Grounds 1964<br />

Enzie, F.D.: Mange <strong>and</strong> lice <strong>of</strong> horses <strong>and</strong> mules. Yearbk. Agr. USDA 1956,<br />

555-558 (1956)<br />

Evans, :F. C., Smith, F. E.: <strong>The</strong> intrinsic rate <strong>of</strong> natural increase for human louse,<br />

Pediculus humanus L. Amer. Nat. 86, 299-310 (1952)<br />

Ewing, H. E. : On the taxonomy, biology <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the biting lice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

family Gyropidae. U. S. Nat. Mus. Prec. 68, 1-42 (1924)<br />

Ewing, H. E.: <strong>The</strong> taxonomy <strong>of</strong> the mallophagan family Trichodeetidae, with<br />

special reference to the New World fauna. J. Parasit. 22, 233-246 (1936)<br />

Foster, M. S.: Synchronized life cycles in the Orange-crowned Warbler <strong>and</strong> its<br />

mallophagan parasites. Ecology 50, 315-323 (1969)<br />

Hall, E. R., Kelson, K. P.: <strong>The</strong> mammals <strong>of</strong> North America, Vol. 1. New York:<br />

Ronald Press 1959<br />

Hansen, R. M.: Age <strong>and</strong> reproductive characteristics <strong>of</strong> mountain pocket gophers<br />

in Colorado. J. Mamm. 41, 323-335 (1960)<br />

Hopkins, G. H. E. : <strong>The</strong> <strong>host</strong>-associations <strong>of</strong> the lice <strong>of</strong> mammals. Zool. Soc. London<br />

Prec. 119, 387-604 (1949)<br />

Hopkins, D. E., Chamberlain, W. F. : In vitro colonization <strong>of</strong> the goat biting lice,<br />

Bovicola crassipes <strong>and</strong> B. timbata. Ann. ent. See. Amer. 62, 826-828 (1969)<br />

Howard, W. E., Childs, H. E. : Ecology <strong>of</strong> pocket gophers with emphasis on <strong>The</strong>morays<br />

bottae mewa. Hilgardia 29, 277-358 (1959)<br />

Ingles, L. G. : <strong>The</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> the mountain pocket gopher, Thomomys monticola.<br />

Ecology 88, 87-95 (1952)<br />

Kennerly, T. E.: Mieroenvironmental conditions <strong>of</strong> the pocket gopher burrow.<br />

Texas J. Sci. 16, 395~41 (1964)<br />

Matthysse, J. G. : Biology <strong>of</strong> the cattle biting louse <strong>and</strong> notes on cattle sucking lice.<br />

J. econ. Ent. 87, 436-442 (1944)<br />

Matthysse, J. G.: Cattle lice, their biology <strong>and</strong> control. New York State Agr. Exp.<br />

Sta. Ithaca Bull. 832 (1946)<br />

MeNab, B.K.: <strong>The</strong> metabolism <strong>of</strong> fossorial rodents: a study <strong>of</strong> convergence.<br />

Ecology 47, 712-733 (1966)<br />

Mead-Briggs, A. R., Rudge, A. J. B.: Breeding <strong>of</strong> the rabbit flea, Spilopsyllus<br />

cuniculi (Dale): Requirement <strong>of</strong> a "factor" from a pregnant rabbit for ovarian<br />

maturation. Nature (Lond.) 187, 1136 (1960)<br />

Miller, M. A.: Reproductive rates <strong>and</strong> cycles in the pocket gopher. J. Mamm. 27,<br />

335-358 (1946)<br />

Miller, M. A.: Size characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Sacramento Valley pocket gopher (Thomo.<br />

mys bottae marvus Merriam). J. Mamm. 83, 442-456 (1952)<br />

Morejohn, G.V., Howard, W. E.: :Holt in the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae.<br />

J. Mamm. 37, 201-213 (1956)


Population Dynamics <strong>of</strong> the Gopher Louse 303<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> mammalian lice on their <strong>host</strong>s.<br />

I. Description <strong>of</strong> the oviposition behavior. Aust. J. Zool. 5, 13-18 (1957a)<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> mammalian lice on their <strong>host</strong>s.<br />

II. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the oviposition behavior <strong>of</strong> Damalinia ovis (L.). Aust. J. Zool. 5,<br />

19-29 (1957b)<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> mammalian lice on their <strong>host</strong>s.<br />

III. <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> Damalinia ovis (L.) on the sheep. Aust. J.<br />

Zool. 5, 173-182 (1957c)<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> mammalian lice on their <strong>host</strong>s.<br />

IV. <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the eggs <strong>of</strong> Damalinia equi (Denny) <strong>and</strong> Haematopinus<br />

asini (L.) on the horse. Aust. J. Zool. 5, 183-187 (1957d)<br />

Murray, M. D. : <strong>The</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> lice on sheep. II. <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong><br />

humidity on the development <strong>and</strong> hatching on the eggs <strong>of</strong> Damalinia ovis (L.).<br />

Aust. J. Zoo1. 8, 357-362 (1960)<br />

Murray, M. D. : <strong>The</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> the louse Polyplax serrata (]3urm.) on the mouse<br />

Mus musculus L. Aust. J. Zool. 9, 1-13 (1961)<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> lice on sheep. V. Influence <strong>of</strong> heavy rain on <strong>population</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> Damalinia ovis (L.). Aust. J. Zool. 11, 173-182 (1963a)<br />

Murray, M. D. : Influence <strong>of</strong> temperature on the reproduction <strong>of</strong> Damalinia equi<br />

(Denny). Aust. J. Zool. 11, 183-189 (1963b)<br />

Murray, M. D.: <strong>The</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> the ecology <strong>of</strong> mammalian lice. Proc. 12th int.<br />

Congr. Ent. (1964), p. 366-367. (1965)<br />

Murray, M. D., Gordon, G. : Ecology <strong>of</strong> lice on sheep. VII. Population <strong>dynamics</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Damalinia ovis (Schrank). Aust. J. Zool. 17, 179-186 (1969)<br />

Nelson, ]3. C.: Successful rearing <strong>of</strong> Colpocephalum turbinatum (<strong>Phthiraptera</strong>).<br />

Nature (Load.) 282, 255 (1971)<br />

Price, R. D., Emerson, K. C.: A revision <strong>of</strong> the genus Geomydoecus (Malloph~ga:<br />

Trichodectidae) <strong>of</strong> the New World pocket gophers (Rodentia: Geomyidae).<br />

J. ivied. Ent. 8, 228-257 (1971)<br />

Rothschild, M., Clay, T.: Fleas, flukes <strong>and</strong> cuckoos: A study on bird parasites.<br />

London: Collins 1952<br />

Rothschild, M., Ford, ]3. : Maturation <strong>and</strong> egg laying <strong>of</strong> the rabbit flea [SpilopsyUus<br />

cuniculi (Dale)] induced by the external application <strong>of</strong> hydrocortisone. Nature<br />

(Lond.) 208~ 210-211 (1964a)<br />

Rothschild, M., Ford, ]3. : Breeding <strong>of</strong> the rabbit flea [Spilopsyllus cuniculi (Dale)]<br />

controlled by the reproductive hormones <strong>of</strong> the <strong>host</strong>. Nature (Load.) 21)4,<br />

103-104 (1964b)<br />

Rust, R. W. : Ectoparasites <strong>and</strong> nidicolous Acari <strong>of</strong> the pocket gopher, Thomomys<br />

bottae. Pan-Pacific Eat. 49, 59-60 (1973a)<br />

Rust, R. W. : <strong>The</strong> acarinium <strong>of</strong> the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae. J. Med. Ent.<br />

1O, 169-175 (1973b)<br />

Scott, M. T. : Observations on the bionomics <strong>of</strong> the sheep body louse (Damalinia<br />

ovis). Aust. J. Attic. Res. 3, 60-67 (1952)<br />

Snedecor, G. W. : Statistical methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Univ. Press 1956<br />

Spencer, G. J.: Ectoparasites <strong>of</strong> deer in ]3ritish Colombia. Proc. eat. Soc. ]3rit.<br />

Colombia 85, 15-19 (1939)<br />

Thaeler, C. S. : An analysis <strong>of</strong> three hybrid <strong>population</strong>s <strong>of</strong> pocket gophers (Genus<br />

Thomomys). Evolution 22,543-555 (1968)<br />

Thompson, G. ]3. : Mallophaga on sickly birds. Brit. Birds 29, 356 (1936)<br />

Vysotoskaya, S. O.: Seasonal changes in the infestation <strong>of</strong> the grey mole with lice<br />

(Russian). Parazit. Sbornik 12, 73-79 (1950)<br />

20*


304 R.W. Rust<br />

Waterhouse, D. F. : Studies on the digestion <strong>of</strong> wool by insects. IX. Some features<br />

<strong>of</strong> digestion in chewing lice (Mallophaga) from bird <strong>and</strong> mammalian <strong>host</strong>s.<br />

Aust. J. biol. Sci. 6, 258-275 (1953)<br />

Waterston, J.: On the crop contents <strong>of</strong> certain Mallophaga. Zooh Soc. Lond. Proc.<br />

1926, 1017-1020 (1926)<br />

Werneck, F. L.: Os Mal<strong>of</strong>agos de Mamiferos. Parte II; Ischnocera (continuacao de<br />

Triehodeetidae) e Rhyncophthirina. Ed. do Inst. Osw. Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (1950)<br />

Winston, P. W., Bates, D. H. : Saturated solutions for the control <strong>of</strong> humidity in<br />

biological research. Ecology 41, 232-237 (1960)<br />

Dr. R. W. Rust<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />

<strong>and</strong> Applied Ecology<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Delaware<br />

Newark, Delaware 19711, USA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!