NO. AP-75,363 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ...
NO. AP-75,363 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ...
NO. AP-75,363 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TEX. RULE <strong>OF</strong> EVIDENCE 1006 .............................................................................. 64<br />
TEX. RULE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>AP</strong>P. PROC. 38.1 ............................................................................. 27<br />
Tex. Crim. Jury Charge § 12:900.14 .................................................. 111, 113, 114<br />
MISCELLANEOUS<br />
Chuck Lindell, The Great Writ and Some Who Were Exonerated, Austin American-<br />
Statesman, Oct. 29, 2006 ................................................................................ 24<br />
Gisli Gudjonsson, The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A<br />
Handbook (2003) ........................................................................................... 44<br />
Jonathan R. Sorensen & James W. Marquart, Prosecutorial and Jury<br />
Decision-Making in Post-Furman Texas Capital Cases, 18 N.Y.U. Rev.<br />
L. & Soc. Change 743 (1990/91) .................................................................. 145<br />
th<br />
Judge Cathy Cochran, Texas Rules of Evidence Handbook 238, (6 ed. 2005) ..<br />
59<br />
Laurence Benner et. al., Criminal Justice in the Supreme Court: An<br />
Analysis of United States Supreme Court Criminal and Habeas Corpus<br />
Decisions (October 2, 2000 - September 30, 2001), 38 Cal. W. L. Rev.<br />
87 (2002) ....................................................................................................... 144<br />
Linda E. Carter, Harmless Error in the Penalty Phase of a Capital Case:<br />
A Doctrine Misunderstood and Misapplied, 28 Ga. L. Rev. 125<br />
(1993) ............................................................................................................ 121<br />
Louis D. Bilionis, Moral Appropriateness, Capital Punishment, and the<br />
Lockett Doctrine, 82 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 283 (1991) ....................... 121<br />
Soering v. United Kingdom, 11 Eur. Hum. Rts. Rep. 439 (1989) ...................... 147<br />
Stephen P. Garvey, Aggravation and Mitigation in Capital Cases: What<br />
Do Jurors Think?, 98 Colum. L. Rev. 1538 (1998) ...................................... 122<br />
xxvi