29.12.2013 Views

Southeast Idaho Phosphate Mining Resource Area - Agency for ...

Southeast Idaho Phosphate Mining Resource Area - Agency for ...

Southeast Idaho Phosphate Mining Resource Area - Agency for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Discussion<br />

3.1 Data and In<strong>for</strong>mation Used<br />

The data used in this document to assess possible health impacts from contaminants in<br />

the <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Idaho</strong> <strong>Phosphate</strong> <strong>Resource</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are from the following sources:<br />

Montgomery Waton reports prepared <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Idaho</strong> <strong>Mining</strong> Association’s Selenium<br />

Subcommittee (MW 1999a, 1999b, 1999c, 2000, 2001), Tetra Tech EM Inc. reports<br />

prepared <strong>for</strong> IDEQ (TtEMI 2001, 2002), elk muscle and liver data collected in 2000<br />

(Personal communication: R.L. Clegg, selenium project officer, IDEQ, email, July 2003),<br />

<strong>for</strong>mer BCEH health consultations (BCEH 2001a, 2001b, 2003), IDEQ’s Public Water<br />

System record (1983-2001) (Personal communication: J. Henry, drinking water<br />

regulatory analyst, IDEQ, email, September 2001), and Cancer Data Registry of <strong>Idaho</strong><br />

data.<br />

The conclusions reached in this document are based on currently available data, previous<br />

health consultations, in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained from site visits, community concerns, and<br />

public and agency input. If additional data or in<strong>for</strong>mation becomes available, the<br />

conclusions may be modified at a later time.<br />

3.2 Evaluation Process<br />

The general process by which BCEH evaluates the possible health effects of<br />

environmental contaminants is summarized here and described in more detail in<br />

Appendix B. BCEH follows a two-step methodology to evaluate public health issues<br />

related to the contamination. First, BCEH obtains environmental contamination data <strong>for</strong><br />

the site of concern and compiles a comprehensive list of site-related contaminants.<br />

Second, BCEH uses health-based comparison values (CVs) (Appendix C, Table C-1 and<br />

C-2) to screen out those contaminants that do not have a realistic possibility of causing<br />

adverse health effects. For the remaining contaminants, BCEH reviews recent scientific<br />

studies to determine whether the levels of environmental contamination and exposure<br />

indicate a public health hazard.<br />

Using CVs provides a way to screen and prioritize the contaminants at a site <strong>for</strong> further<br />

evaluation. CVs are derived <strong>for</strong> each of the various media (soil, air, water) and reflect an<br />

estimated contaminant concentration that is not expected to cause adverse health effects<br />

<strong>for</strong> a given chemical, assuming a standard daily contact rate (e.g., an amount of water or<br />

soil consumed) and body weight.<br />

CVs are set at levels many times lower than levels where studies show there are no health<br />

effects in either animals or, if data is available, humans. CVs are deemed conservative or<br />

cautious because they include safety or protective factors that account <strong>for</strong> more sensitive<br />

populations, such as young children. If a contaminant concentration is above its CV,<br />

BCEH further analyzes exposure variables (<strong>for</strong> example, duration and frequency of<br />

exposure), the toxicology of the contaminant, other epidemiology studies, and the weight<br />

of evidence <strong>for</strong> health effects.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!