30.12.2013 Views

Discovery of human antibodies against the C5aR target using ... - DCU

Discovery of human antibodies against the C5aR target using ... - DCU

Discovery of human antibodies against the C5aR target using ... - DCU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN ANTIBODIES AGAINST THE <strong>C5aR</strong> TARGET 333<br />

on streptavidin beads; in bead binding selection, <strong>the</strong> input<br />

phage were incubated with <strong>the</strong> <strong>target</strong> immobilized on beads.<br />

There are advantages and disadvantages for both selection<br />

strategies. In liquid binding selection, high-affinity binders<br />

may be enriched due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> avidity effect, but <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>target</strong> concentration should be well controlled so that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>target</strong> is well below <strong>the</strong> saturating concentration and potential<br />

binders will not be lost after immobilizing to beads. In<br />

bead binding selection, low-affinity binders also may be<br />

enriched due to avidity effect, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>target</strong> concentrations<br />

did not need to be well-controlled as in liquid binding<br />

selection. In this study, we included both selection strategies<br />

to ensure maximum success. Our results showed that both<br />

selections worked very well, resulting in similar hit rates.<br />

Representative Fab clones were reformatted into IgGs, and<br />

tested for cell binding activities by flow cytometry. Approximately<br />

40% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reformatted IgGs showed binding to<br />

differentiated U-937 cells in which <strong>C5aR</strong> expression was<br />

induced. Flow cytometric analysis <strong>of</strong> HepG2 cells known to<br />

express <strong>C5aR</strong> (Haviland et al., 1995) paralleled <strong>the</strong> results<br />

from U-937 cells: positive binders to differentiated U-937<br />

cells were also positive binders to HepG2 cells, and negative<br />

binders to differentiated U-937 cells were also negative<br />

binders to HepG2 cells (data not shown). These positive<br />

cell binders were specific for <strong>C5aR</strong> since <strong>the</strong>y bound to<br />

<strong>C5aR</strong> N-terminal peptide DX-1186 in peptide-based<br />

ELISA, and <strong>the</strong>ir binding was competed by S5/1, an<br />

anti-<strong>C5aR</strong> mAb known to bind <strong>the</strong> same <strong>C5aR</strong> N-terminal<br />

region (Oppermann et al., 1993). The cell binding activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se positive binders also were competed by<br />

S5/1, suggesting specific binding to <strong>the</strong> <strong>C5aR</strong> N-terminal<br />

region.<br />

The library used here for selection is a Fab phage display<br />

library with combined natural and syn<strong>the</strong>tic diversity (Hoet<br />

et al., 2004). The advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>using</strong> a Fab phage library for<br />

selection is that <strong>the</strong>re is no need to do phagemid rescue<br />

during selection and phage ELISA, thus greatly reducing <strong>the</strong><br />

amount <strong>of</strong> time for selection and screening. The <strong>human</strong> Fab<br />

library has been used for selection with many soluble<br />

protein <strong>target</strong>s, yielding <strong>target</strong>-specific <strong>human</strong> <strong>antibodies</strong><br />

with high affinity (Hoet et al., 2004). With <strong>the</strong> Fab library<br />

and <strong>the</strong> IgG reformatting procedure (Jostock et al., 2004),<br />

we were able to obtain specific <strong>human</strong> IgGs to a GPCR<br />

within a short period <strong>of</strong> time (8 weeks), demonstrating<br />

that our phage display approach has utility for rapid development<br />

<strong>of</strong> antibody <strong>the</strong>rapeutic and imaging agents to<br />

GPCRs.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank Greg Conley for peptide syn<strong>the</strong>sis and Gary Bassil for DNA<br />

sequencing. We also thank Albert Edge for helpful discussions and Clive<br />

Wood for critical reading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> manuscript.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Azzazy HME, Highsmith WE Jr. 2002. Phage display technology:<br />

clinical applications and recent innovations. Clin. Biochem.<br />

35: 425–445.<br />

Gerard C, Gerard NP. 1994. C5a anaphylatoxin and its seven transmembrane-segment<br />

receptor. A. Rev. Immunol. 12: 775–808.<br />

Gerard NP, Gerard C. 1990. The chemotactic receptor for <strong>human</strong><br />

C5a anaphylatoxin. Nature 349: 614–617.<br />

Haviland DL, McCoy RL, Whitehead WT, Akama H, Molmenti EP,<br />

Brown A, Haviland JC, Parks WC, Perlmutter DH, Wetsel RA.<br />

1995. Cellular expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C5a anaphylatoxin receptor<br />

(<strong>C5aR</strong>): demonstration <strong>of</strong> <strong>C5aR</strong> on nonmyeloid cells <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

liver and lung. J. Immunol. 154: 1861–1869.<br />

Hoet RM, Cohen EH, Kent RB, Rookey K, Schoonbroodt S, Hogan<br />

S, Rem L, Frans N, Daukandt M, Pieters H, van Hegelsom R,<br />

Coolen-van Neer N, Nastri HG, Rondon IJ, Leeds JA, Hufton<br />

SE, Huang L, Kashin I, Devlin M, Kuang G, Steukers M,<br />

Viswanathan M, Nixon AE, Sexton DJ, Hoogenboom HR,<br />

Ladner RC. 2004. High affinity <strong>human</strong> <strong>antibodies</strong> from<br />

combined syn<strong>the</strong>tic and captured diversity. Nat. Biotechnol.<br />

in press.<br />

Jostock T, Vanhove M, Brepoels E, van Gool R, Daukandt M,<br />

Wehnert A, van Hegelsom R, Dransfield D, Sexton D, Devlin<br />

M, Ley A, Mullberg J. 2004. Rapid generation <strong>of</strong> functional<br />

<strong>human</strong> IgG <strong>antibodies</strong> derived from Fab-on-phage display<br />

libraries. J. Immunol. Meth. 289: 65–80.<br />

Makrides SC. 1998. Therapeutic inhibition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complement<br />

system. Pharmac. Rev. 50: 59–87.<br />

Oppermann M, Raedt U, Hebell T, Schmidt B, Zimmermann B,<br />

Gotze O. 1993. Probing <strong>the</strong> <strong>human</strong> receptor for C5a anaphylatoxin<br />

with site-directed <strong>antibodies</strong>. Identification <strong>of</strong> a potential<br />

ligand binding site on <strong>the</strong> NH2-terminal domain. J.<br />

Immunol. 151: 3785–3794.<br />

Pellas TC, Wennogle LP. 1999. C5a receptor antagonists. Curr.<br />

Pharm. Des. 5: 737–755.<br />

Stockwin LH, Holmes S. 2003. Antibodies as <strong>the</strong>rapeutic agents:<br />

vive la renaissance! Exp. Opin. Biol. Ther. 3: 1133–1152.<br />

Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Mol. Recognit. 2005; 18: 327–333

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!