01.01.2014 Views

Stage Kiss - Goodman Theatre

Stage Kiss - Goodman Theatre

Stage Kiss - Goodman Theatre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“She’s really trying to get at this emotional<br />

truth that I find to be very exciting…<br />

and she does it through a highly<br />

theatrical language, which is appealing<br />

to any director.”<br />

—Director Jessica Thebus on Playwright Sarah Ruhl<br />

and what is imagined—assuming the<br />

two can ever really be separated.<br />

In a 2008 profile in The New Yorker by<br />

critic John Lahr, Ruhl described her desire<br />

as a playwright to capture “how people<br />

subjectively experience life…. Everyone<br />

has a great, horrible opera inside him.”<br />

In <strong>Stage</strong> <strong>Kiss</strong>, He and She, whose past<br />

love affair is given a new form and a new<br />

language in the often hilarious but clunky<br />

1930s play, find themselves struggling to<br />

parse the difference between their interior<br />

drama and the roles they’ve been hired<br />

to perform. What results is a very human<br />

exploration of love, nostalgia and commitment,<br />

and how we perform not only roles<br />

on the stage—but also the roles we take<br />

on and shed throughout our everyday lives.<br />

In a recent conversation with the<br />

<strong>Goodman</strong>’s Director of New Play<br />

Development, Tanya Palmer, Ruhl and<br />

her longtime collaborator Jessica Thebus<br />

talk about how this play emerged, what<br />

connects it to Ruhl’s previous work and<br />

what fuels their collaboration.<br />

Tanya Palmer: What was the initial<br />

inspiration for <strong>Stage</strong> <strong>Kiss</strong>?<br />

And to what extent do these external<br />

gestures reflect or change internal states?<br />

I was interested in looking at that phenomenon.<br />

And as I read more 1930s<br />

Broadway chestnuts, I was interested in<br />

the question of the language of intimacy<br />

more broadly. That is, who is to say<br />

what’s a more “real” way of talking about<br />

love; our shaggy televised way of talking<br />

about love in the year 2011, or the highflown<br />

romantic language of the ’30s?<br />

TP: The two of you have collaborated on<br />

a number of plays through the years—<br />

including the <strong>Goodman</strong>’s production of<br />

The Clean House and Steppenwolf’s production<br />

of Dead Man’s Cell Phone, among<br />

many others. What elements draw you<br />

together as collaborators so frequently?<br />

SR: I love working with Jessica because<br />

at this point we have a shared vocabulary.<br />

Things I always love about Jessica<br />

are her sense of playfulness, her visual<br />

imagination and her gifts as a storyteller.<br />

Jessica Thebus: I’m drawn to Sarah’s<br />

work because it’s so truthful. It feels like<br />

she is always exploring and digging at<br />

the heart of a true experience—an experience<br />

which is difficult to get to or put into<br />

words. She’s really trying to get at this<br />

emotional truth—about grief, about love,<br />

about relationships, about acceptance—<br />

that I find very exciting, and she does<br />

it through a highly theatrical language,<br />

which is appealing to any director. But to<br />

me, that makes the struggles of the characters<br />

in the play feel even more true,<br />

because it conveys what it’s like to be in<br />

your own head struggling with something.<br />

The language is very theatrical—you<br />

could even say magical—and that’s<br />

always delightful to put on the stage. But<br />

it goes with the emotional heart of the<br />

play—she uses that theatrical language to<br />

really capture what it’s like to have a certain<br />

kind of fantasy, or obsession, or fear,<br />

and so it feels very familiar in an unusual<br />

and very, very exciting way.<br />

TP: As a director, what do you most strongly<br />

connect with in this particular play?<br />

JT: I think the temptation to make your<br />

fantasy real. We’re in a business where<br />

everyone is always hugging each other<br />

and where your bread and butter is fan-<br />

Sarah Ruhl: Watching rehearsals for the<br />

past 15 years or so, I got to thinking,<br />

“What a weird job it must be to have to<br />

kiss people in front of other people.” And<br />

of course any kiss has some reality on<br />

stage, as does drinking a glass of water<br />

on stage or urinating on stage. But to<br />

what extent is the kiss a performance?<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

Actors and ex-lovers He and She are thrown together as the romantic leads in a<br />

present-day revival of a long-forgotten 1930s melodrama; neither has seen the other<br />

in the 20 years following their break-up. In that time She has married and had a<br />

daughter; He is currently living with a girlfriend. Once rehearsals for the play begin,<br />

they quickly lose touch with reality as the romantic story onstage begins to follow<br />

them offstage. <strong>Stage</strong> <strong>Kiss</strong> explores what happens when these lovers share a stage<br />

kiss—or a real one.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!