26.10.2012 Views

Pallid Sturgeon in the headwaters of Lake Sakakawea

Pallid Sturgeon in the headwaters of Lake Sakakawea

Pallid Sturgeon in the headwaters of Lake Sakakawea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>headwaters</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Sakakawea</strong><br />

Ryan Wilson, Everett Nelson, Zac Sandness and Tyler Berger<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office<br />

Bismarck, North Dakota


<strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> Population<br />

Assessment Program<br />

• Implemented <strong>in</strong> 2005 <strong>in</strong> North Dakota<br />

(segment 4)<br />

• Confluence to <strong>headwaters</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Sakakawea</strong><br />

(~55 river miles)<br />

• 12 random bends sampled twice per year<br />

• Trammel nets, otter trawl, trotl<strong>in</strong>es, m<strong>in</strong>ifyke<br />

nets


Yearl<strong>in</strong>g Equivalents (<strong>in</strong> thousands)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Cumulative Number <strong>of</strong> Yearl<strong>in</strong>g Equivalents<br />

Stocked <strong>in</strong> RPMA 2<br />

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010<br />

Year Class


Hatchery Released <strong>Pallid</strong><br />

<strong>Sturgeon</strong> (HRPS) Captures<br />

2005 – 25 captured (19 TN – 6 OT) 2006 – 24 captured (18 TN – 6 OT)<br />

2007 – 40 captured (15 TN – 25 OT) 2008 – 78 captured (23 TN – 41 OT – 14 TL)


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> Trammel Nets<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Sample Year


2009 Fall Sampl<strong>in</strong>g


2009 Fall Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 71 HRPS captured <strong>in</strong> 2 mile<br />

reach (one day)<br />

• Only 4 HRPS captured <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

previous 4 years <strong>in</strong> this area<br />

• 8 <strong>of</strong> 11 year classes sampled


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> Trammel Nets<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Sample Year


Discharge (m 3 /s)<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

MO/YE Discharge 2005-2007<br />

0<br />

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov<br />

Date<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

Average


Discharge (m 3 /s)<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

MO/YE Discharge 2008-2009<br />

200<br />

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov<br />

Date<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

Average


Elevation (ft)<br />

1850<br />

1840<br />

1830<br />

1820<br />

1810<br />

1800<br />

<strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Sakakawea</strong> Elevations 2005-2009<br />

Max. Normal Pool Elevation<br />

Base Flood Control Elevation<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


2008 Headwaters


2009 Headwaters


Questions for 2010<br />

• Was 2009 a random occurrence?<br />

• Will <strong>the</strong> pallids still be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same area?<br />

• Will <strong>the</strong> fish move up or down with lake<br />

levels?<br />

• Are <strong>the</strong>re pallids below <strong>the</strong> <strong>headwaters</strong>?


Discharge (m 3 /s)<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

MO/YE Discharge 2008-2010<br />

200<br />

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov<br />

Date<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

Average


Elevation (ft)<br />

1850<br />

1840<br />

1830<br />

1820<br />

1810<br />

1800<br />

<strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Sakakawea</strong> Elevations 2005-2010<br />

Max. Normal Pool Elevation<br />

Base Flood Control Elevation<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

2010


2010 Headwaters


2010 Standard Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 345 HRPS captured; 2 Hybrids<br />

– 227 captured with trammel net<br />

– 71 captured with trotl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

– 46 captured with otter trawl<br />

• 102 captured <strong>in</strong> a 2 mile reach (<strong>headwaters</strong>)<br />

– 101 <strong>in</strong>dividual fish captured<br />

– One fish sampled twice


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> Trammel nets<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Sample Year


2010 Headwaters


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> Trammel Nets<br />

Headwaters River


Meters<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Average Depth<br />

Pre July Post July<br />

Meters per second<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Average Velocity<br />

Pre July Post July


• August 16 – 18<br />

Targeted Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Five Boats (3 MTFWP, 2 USFWS)<br />

• Drifted trammel nets<br />

• 244 deployments<br />

• 45,746 meters drifted<br />

• River mile 1558 -1553


2010 Headwaters


Targeted Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 371 captures <strong>of</strong> HRPS<br />

– 344 <strong>in</strong>dividuals captured<br />

– 25 pallids captured multiple times<br />

• 112 different pallids captured <strong>in</strong> same area<br />

• All year classes represented*<br />

• Fish from all stock<strong>in</strong>g sites were captured<br />

– 77% from Yellowstone stock<strong>in</strong>g sites<br />

– 33% from Missouri stock<strong>in</strong>g sites


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pallid</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> <strong>in</strong> Trammel Nets<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Targeted<br />

Sample Year


Number Captured<br />

Thousands<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Numbers Sampled by Year Class<br />

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Numbers Stocked by Year Class<br />

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Year Class


Number Captured<br />

Thousands<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Numbers Sampled by Year Class<br />

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Numbers Stocked by Year Class<br />

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Year Class<br />

8<br />

*17,952


• 2009 was not a fluke<br />

Answers<br />

• <strong>Pallid</strong> abundance 4x higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>headwaters</strong><br />

than <strong>the</strong> river<br />

• Aggregation followed <strong>the</strong> <strong>headwaters</strong> upriver<br />

• No pallids were captured downstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>headwaters</strong>


More Questions<br />

• Did we overstock some year classes?<br />

• What effect does this aggregation have on<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r fish species?


CPUE (Fish/100 m)<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Mean CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sturgeon</strong> Chub <strong>in</strong> Otter Trawls<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Sample Year


How can <strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs help guide<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>e future Missouri River<br />

Recovery Program efforts?<br />

• The stock<strong>in</strong>g program is WORKING!


How can <strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs help guide<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>e future Missouri River<br />

Recovery Program efforts?<br />

• The stock<strong>in</strong>g program is WORKING!<br />

• More precise survival estimates<br />

– Population estimates<br />

– Adjust stock<strong>in</strong>g numbers


How can <strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs help guide<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>e future Missouri River<br />

Recovery Program efforts?<br />

• The stock<strong>in</strong>g program is WORKING!<br />

• More precise survival estimates<br />

– Population estimates<br />

– Adjust stock<strong>in</strong>g numbers<br />

• Available river miles does not equal usable<br />

pallid habitat


Everett Tyler Zac


Tyler Ryan<br />

Landon<br />

Landon<br />

John<br />

Bob


Questions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!