04.01.2014 Views

MARIANA ISLANDS RANGE COMPLEX ... - Guam Legislature

MARIANA ISLANDS RANGE COMPLEX ... - Guam Legislature

MARIANA ISLANDS RANGE COMPLEX ... - Guam Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>MARIANA</strong> <strong>ISLANDS</strong> <strong>RANGE</strong> <strong>COMPLEX</strong> FEIS/OEIS MAY 2010<br />

Table ES-3: Summary of Environmental Impacts<br />

Resource<br />

Category<br />

Alternative<br />

National Environmental Policy Act<br />

(Land and Territorial Waters,<br />

12 nm)<br />

Section 3.1<br />

Geology, Soils,<br />

and Bathymetry<br />

No Action<br />

Alternative,<br />

Alternative 1,<br />

or<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Under No Action Alternative localized<br />

disturbance to topography and localized<br />

erosion would continue; however,<br />

topographic and surface soil changes<br />

would be minimal and would be<br />

managed in accordance with established<br />

protective measures. Dispersion and<br />

suspension of marine sediments as a<br />

result of detonation of underwater mines<br />

and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)<br />

demolition would continue. Continuation<br />

of disturbance to some sandy beaches;<br />

these effects would be similar to that<br />

from normal wave action during stormy<br />

conditions.<br />

Under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 the<br />

impacts would be similar to those<br />

described under the No Action<br />

Alternative; however, the intensity of<br />

impacts to geologic resources and soils<br />

would be greater.<br />

Impacts would be similar to those<br />

described for the No Action<br />

Alternative, Alternative 1, and<br />

Alternative 2 for territorial waters.<br />

No significant harm to geology,<br />

soils, and bathymetry resources.<br />

Section 3.2<br />

Hazardous<br />

Materials<br />

No Action<br />

Alternative,<br />

Alternative 1,<br />

or<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Under the No Action Alternative use of<br />

training materials would continue<br />

deposition of expendable training<br />

material on the ranges. Most of the<br />

degradation products of these materials<br />

are nonhazardous inorganic materials.<br />

Under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 the<br />

impacts would be similar to the No<br />

Action Alternative; however the rate of<br />

deposition of expendable training<br />

material on the ranges would slightly<br />

increase compared to the No Action<br />

Alternative.<br />

Existing ashore hazardous material and<br />

waste management systems are<br />

sufficient for handling of wastes<br />

generated under the No Action<br />

Alternative, Alternative 1, and Alternative<br />

2.<br />

Impacts would be similar to those<br />

described for the No Action<br />

Alternative, Alternative 1, and<br />

Alternative 2 for territorial waters.<br />

Existing hazardous materials and<br />

waste management systems are<br />

sufficient for handling of wastes<br />

generated by the No Action<br />

Alternative, Alternative 1, and<br />

Alternative 2.<br />

No significant harm to resources<br />

from hazardous materials and<br />

waste.<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

ES-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!