06.01.2014 Views

2010 - European Fair Trade Association

2010 - European Fair Trade Association

2010 - European Fair Trade Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.2. North versus South<br />

The common division of North versus South is often used in<br />

the <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> industry . North represents the developed markets,<br />

whereas South represents the developing markets. In <strong>Fair</strong><br />

<strong>Trade</strong> the South is furthermore the producing side of the <strong>Fair</strong><br />

<strong>Trade</strong> supply chain; this is where most <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> products<br />

originate. In this report, the South is seen as consisting of<br />

three continents, Africa, Asia and South-America. Each of<br />

these continents will be discussed separately in each chapter.<br />

The North on the other hand, represents the consumer side<br />

of the supply chain and forms the main market for <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong><br />

products. However, as will be discussed in chapter 4.2, a new<br />

trend is slowly arising: it is no longer only the Northern countries<br />

who buy <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> products, local <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> sales in the<br />

South are increasing as well.<br />

1.3. <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>: where it all started<br />

Where free trade has been the most common form of trade for<br />

centuries, along with protectionism and planned economies,<br />

<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> is a relatively new concept. Free trade characterizes<br />

most of the developed markets and is seen by many people<br />

as being beneficial for all. Unfortunately free trade is subject<br />

to market failures as well, such as price discrimination.<br />

Free trade is not necessarily beneficial for all and might even<br />

lead to unfair trade at times. Examples of this are people<br />

who cannot afford to pay market prices and people for whom<br />

the entry barriers are too high and remain too high. Protectionist<br />

methods such as trade tariffs, trade quota and subsidies<br />

enhance this effect. Free trade supporters argue against <strong>Fair</strong><br />

<strong>Trade</strong> by claiming that <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> will in fact hinder fair competition<br />

by offering the incentive of overpriced products to<br />

enter the <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> market. The high price will attract a larger<br />

number of producers to the market, leading to an oversupply<br />

of goods, which will eventually lead to lower prices in the<br />

non-<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> market. But where free trade places its faith in<br />

the self-correcting abilities of the market for the good of all,<br />

<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> points to the marginalized producers who are left<br />

behind, and advocates an active policy to improve their lives.<br />

Tracing <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> back to its origins, one of the first welldocumented<br />

expressions of dissatisfaction with the free trade<br />

system came from an assistant resident employed by the<br />

Dutch East Indies, Eduard Douwes Dekker. Under the pen name<br />

of Multatuli he wrote a book in which he criticized colonial<br />

politics, titled ‘Max Havelaar: Or The Coffee Houses Of The<br />

Dutch Trading Society’ (Zook, 2006; Douwes Dekker, 1860).<br />

With this book, Multatuli managed to create awareness among<br />

Dutch citizens who started to realize that their luxury came at<br />

the cost of human suffering elsewhere (Aram, 1985). In the<br />

1950s, an alternative approach to the opposing ideas of a free<br />

or regulated market arose. The concept was called Alternative<br />

<strong>Trade</strong> and was sustained by the argument that international<br />

trade can be beneficial to developing countries as long as it is<br />

performed in an honest way. If successful, improved trading<br />

conditions for farmers and workers in the developing world<br />

would accelerate economic growth and subsequently be a solution<br />

to poverty. Many <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> initiatives originate from<br />

this period, such as Ten Thousand Villages (formerly Self Help<br />

Crafts) in the United States, which started buying needlework<br />

from Puerto Rico in 1946, and SERRV International who began<br />

to trade with poor communities in the South in the late<br />

1940s. In Europe Oxfam UK started to sell crafts made by Chinese<br />

refugees in Oxfam shops, in the late 1950s. Oxfam also<br />

set up the first alternative trading company, Oxfam Trading,<br />

in 1964.<br />

The Netherlands played a significant role in the development<br />

of Alternative <strong>Trade</strong>. In 1959 the importing organisation SOS<br />

Wereldhandel (now known as <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> Original) was founded.<br />

Other Dutch third world groups began to sell cane sugar with<br />

the message: “if you buy cane sugar you give people in poor<br />

countries a place in the sun of prosperity”. The same group<br />

opened the first Worldshop in 1969 (EFTA, 2006). According<br />

to the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (2006), these shops<br />

have played a crucial role in the development of Alternative<br />

and then <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> . In 1988 the Max Havelaar Foundation<br />

for fair coffee was founded, named after the key character in<br />

Multatuli’s ‘Max Havelaar’ (Max Havelaar, 2011).<br />

During the same period, many Non-Governmental Organisations<br />

and motivated individuals in the South started <strong>Fair</strong> marketing<br />

organisations which would provide advice, assistance<br />

and support to disadvantaged producers. These organisations<br />

established partnerships with the new organisations in the<br />

North, in order to fight for greater equity in international<br />

trade (EFTA, 2006).<br />

<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> also managed to attract attention at international<br />

political fora. Debates between the North and the South on<br />

the “New International Economic Order” were already taking<br />

place (UNCTAD, 2002). In 1968 UNCTAD (United Nations Conference<br />

on <strong>Trade</strong> and Development) adopted the ‘<strong>Trade</strong> Not<br />

Aid’ approach, which was considered to be more efficient<br />

and fair than providing development aid to the South (EFTA,<br />

2006). Other agreements of UNCTAD in the same period encompassed<br />

the stabilization of international prices of export<br />

products crucial for developing countries (UNCTAD, 2002).<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!