KD Auclair & Associates, LLC - Hanford Site

EIR Team
PRELIMINARY
Observations and Conclusions
[cont.]
‣ The details of the EIS were sufficient to evaluate the
protectiveness of the alternatives presented. {Sections
2.2.1, 2.3.1.4, 2.3.3.3}
‣ This EIS was a result of less than satisfactory QA/QC carried out
in the previous Solid Waste EIS. As such, it would have been
expected that the QA/QC efforts of this EIS would have been
documented. They were not documented in the EIS. A review team‟s
report of the QA/QC procedures for this EIS appeared in November
2008 and is separate from the EIS, but no final QA/QC report
seems to have been produced. {Sections 2.2.2, 2.2.4, 2.3.1.1,
2.3.2.2}
1/3/2011 21
HAB 2-17-2010 Presentation – Contract # 046-007-000
KD Auclair & Associates, LLC