08.01.2014 Views

Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan

Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan

Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(15) CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE<br />

Section 3 – Medical <strong>Evidence</strong> – Alleged variance with ocular evidence – Eye-witnesses account<br />

found to be credible and trustworthy – Medical evidence po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to alternative possibilities is not to be<br />

accepted as conclusive – 2008 AIR SCW 5578.<br />

(a) Prosecution case solely based on the circumstantial evidence:-<br />

<strong>Evidence</strong> – <strong>Appreciation</strong> <strong>of</strong> – Prosecution can solely based on the circumstantial evidence –<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> circumstances from which the conclusion <strong>of</strong> guilt can be drawn.<br />

In Sarbir S<strong>in</strong>gh vs. State <strong>of</strong> Punjab – 1993 Supp (3) SCC 41 it was held as follows :<br />

"It is said that men lie but circumstances do not. Under the circumstances prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the society<br />

today, it is not true <strong>in</strong> many cases. Sometimes the circumstances which are sought to be proved aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the accused for purpose <strong>of</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g the charge are planted by the elements hostile to the accused who<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d out witnesses to fill up the gaps <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> circumstances. In Countries hav<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated modes<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation, every trace left beh<strong>in</strong>d by the culprit can be followed and pursued immediately.<br />

Unfortunately it is not available <strong>in</strong> many parts <strong>of</strong> this country. That is why the Courts have <strong>in</strong>sisted<br />

I.The circumstances from which the conclusion <strong>of</strong> guilt is to be drawn should <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stance be fully<br />

established;<br />

II.All the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused and<br />

should be such as to exclude every hypothesis but the one sought to be proved;<br />

III.The circumstances should be <strong>of</strong> a conclusive nature;<br />

IV.The cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> evidence should not have any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>nocence <strong>of</strong> the accused.<br />

In Padala Veera Reddy v. State <strong>of</strong> A.P. [1989 Supp (2) Supreme 706], the Hon’ble Apex Court laid<br />

down the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence, such evidence must satisfy the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g tests:<br />

"(1) the circumstances from which an <strong>in</strong>ference <strong>of</strong> guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently and firmly<br />

established;<br />

(2) those circumstances should be <strong>of</strong> a def<strong>in</strong>ite tendency unerr<strong>in</strong>gly po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g towards guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused;<br />

(3) the circumstances, taken cumulatively, should form a cha<strong>in</strong> so complete that there is no escape from<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!