Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan
Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan
Appreciation of Evidence in Sessions Cases - Justice D.Murugesan
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(15) CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE<br />
Section 3 – Medical <strong>Evidence</strong> – Alleged variance with ocular evidence – Eye-witnesses account<br />
found to be credible and trustworthy – Medical evidence po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to alternative possibilities is not to be<br />
accepted as conclusive – 2008 AIR SCW 5578.<br />
(a) Prosecution case solely based on the circumstantial evidence:-<br />
<strong>Evidence</strong> – <strong>Appreciation</strong> <strong>of</strong> – Prosecution can solely based on the circumstantial evidence –<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> circumstances from which the conclusion <strong>of</strong> guilt can be drawn.<br />
In Sarbir S<strong>in</strong>gh vs. State <strong>of</strong> Punjab – 1993 Supp (3) SCC 41 it was held as follows :<br />
"It is said that men lie but circumstances do not. Under the circumstances prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the society<br />
today, it is not true <strong>in</strong> many cases. Sometimes the circumstances which are sought to be proved aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
the accused for purpose <strong>of</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g the charge are planted by the elements hostile to the accused who<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d out witnesses to fill up the gaps <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> circumstances. In Countries hav<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated modes<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation, every trace left beh<strong>in</strong>d by the culprit can be followed and pursued immediately.<br />
Unfortunately it is not available <strong>in</strong> many parts <strong>of</strong> this country. That is why the Courts have <strong>in</strong>sisted<br />
I.The circumstances from which the conclusion <strong>of</strong> guilt is to be drawn should <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stance be fully<br />
established;<br />
II.All the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused and<br />
should be such as to exclude every hypothesis but the one sought to be proved;<br />
III.The circumstances should be <strong>of</strong> a conclusive nature;<br />
IV.The cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> evidence should not have any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the<br />
<strong>in</strong>nocence <strong>of</strong> the accused.<br />
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State <strong>of</strong> A.P. [1989 Supp (2) Supreme 706], the Hon’ble Apex Court laid<br />
down the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence, such evidence must satisfy the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g tests:<br />
"(1) the circumstances from which an <strong>in</strong>ference <strong>of</strong> guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently and firmly<br />
established;<br />
(2) those circumstances should be <strong>of</strong> a def<strong>in</strong>ite tendency unerr<strong>in</strong>gly po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g towards guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused;<br />
(3) the circumstances, taken cumulatively, should form a cha<strong>in</strong> so complete that there is no escape from<br />
39