08.01.2014 Views

Cylinder Pressure in a Spark-Ignition Engine - Harvard Computer ...

Cylinder Pressure in a Spark-Ignition Engine - Harvard Computer ...

Cylinder Pressure in a Spark-Ignition Engine - Harvard Computer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Undergrad. Sci. 3: 141-145 (Fall 1996)<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Sciences<br />

<strong>Cyl<strong>in</strong>der</strong> <strong>Pressure</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Spark</strong>-<strong>Ignition</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>e: A<br />

Computational Model<br />

PAULINA S. KUO<br />

The project described <strong>in</strong> this article attempts to accurately<br />

predict the gas pressure changes with<strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

of a spark-ignition eng<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g thermodynamic<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. The model takes <strong>in</strong>to account the <strong>in</strong>take, compression,<br />

combustion, expansion and exhaust processes<br />

that occur <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. Comparisons with<br />

actual pressure data show the model to have a high<br />

degree of accuracy. The model is further evaluated on<br />

its ability to predict the angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn<br />

duration.<br />

Introduction<br />

Gas pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der of an eng<strong>in</strong>e varies throughout<br />

the Otto four-stroke eng<strong>in</strong>e cycle (see ref. 1 for an elaboration<br />

of this process). Work is done on the gases by the<br />

piston dur<strong>in</strong>g compression and the gases produce energy<br />

through the combustion process. These changes <strong>in</strong> energy<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with changes <strong>in</strong> the volume of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der lead to<br />

fluctuations <strong>in</strong> gas pressure. The ability to accurately predict<br />

the pressure allows for better understand<strong>in</strong>g of the processes<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der such as the <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

between the gases, oil film, piston and l<strong>in</strong>er. In the first phase<br />

of this project, a computer model was developed to predict<br />

pressure based on <strong>in</strong>itial conditions and eng<strong>in</strong>e geometries.<br />

A problem encountered <strong>in</strong> gather<strong>in</strong>g data was the fact<br />

that the spark tim<strong>in</strong>gs were not accurately known due to<br />

variations <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>e speed. The exact moments of spark<br />

fir<strong>in</strong>g and cessation of combustion were unknown. <strong>Spark</strong><br />

fir<strong>in</strong>g was estimated to be at 25 ° to 5 ° before top center (BTC)<br />

and the burn duration is approximately 60 ° to 80 ° . The second<br />

phase <strong>in</strong>volved determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the most precise values for<br />

spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn duration by compar<strong>in</strong>g the model to<br />

actual data.<br />

The Model<br />

The model, which was programmed <strong>in</strong> FORTRAN, predicts<br />

the cyl<strong>in</strong>der pressure throughout the <strong>in</strong>take, compression,<br />

combustion, expansion and exhaust processes that<br />

make up the eng<strong>in</strong>e operat<strong>in</strong>g cycle. <strong>Pressure</strong> was modeled<br />

as a function of the angle of the crank (see ref. 1),<br />

which ran for 720 degrees per cycle or two revolutions because<br />

the crank completed two rotations per cycle. The valve<br />

and spark tim<strong>in</strong>gs, eng<strong>in</strong>e geometry, eng<strong>in</strong>e speed and <strong>in</strong>let<br />

pressure were entered <strong>in</strong>to the model.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dividual processes of the eng<strong>in</strong>e cycle, <strong>in</strong>take,<br />

compression, combustion, expansion and blowdown/exhaust,<br />

are discussed below <strong>in</strong> order of occurrence.<br />

Intake. Intake occurs between exhaust valve clos<strong>in</strong>g (EVC)<br />

and the start of compression. The <strong>in</strong>take valve opens before<br />

the exhaust valve closes, so there is a period of overlap dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which both valves are open. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, the model used<br />

an s-curve to describe the gradual transition between exhaust<br />

pressure and <strong>in</strong>take or <strong>in</strong>let pressure. The start of compression,<br />

which marks the end of the <strong>in</strong>take process, does not necessarily<br />

occur at the same time as the close of the <strong>in</strong>take valve<br />

(IVC). The <strong>in</strong>take valve closes after bottom center (BC) while<br />

the volume <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der is decreas<strong>in</strong>g. The eng<strong>in</strong>e speed<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>es the po<strong>in</strong>t at which the fuel/air mixture stops flow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. At lower revolutions per m<strong>in</strong>ute (rpm), the start<br />

of compression is closer to IVC; at higher speeds, it is closer to<br />

BC. An s-curve approximates the angle of the start of compression<br />

as a function of eng<strong>in</strong>e speed.<br />

The volume of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>take <strong>in</strong>creases as<br />

the piston descends, thereby draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the fuel mixture.<br />

There is little resistance to gas flow <strong>in</strong>to the cyl<strong>in</strong>der, which<br />

causes the pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der to rema<strong>in</strong> relatively constant<br />

and equal to the <strong>in</strong>let pressure.<br />

Compression. Both the <strong>in</strong>take and exhaust valves are<br />

closed dur<strong>in</strong>g the compression stroke so that the gases can<br />

neither enter nor exit the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. The piston is mov<strong>in</strong>g upward,<br />

so cyl<strong>in</strong>der volume decreases. <strong>Pressure</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

as the gas <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der is compressed. Because of the<br />

high speed of the piston, the duration of compression is short<br />

and negligible heat is lost to the walls of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. Relatively<br />

little energy is dissipated due to <strong>in</strong>ternal friction of the<br />

gas. Overall, there is little change <strong>in</strong> entropy dur<strong>in</strong>g compression,<br />

and the gas behavior can be described by the<br />

equation: 2 (1)<br />

This equation allowed for calculation of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der pressure<br />

at any crank angle dur<strong>in</strong>g compression based on the<br />

knowledge of <strong>in</strong>itial pressure and volume, P 0<br />

and V 0<br />

, which<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the constant. The volume of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der is a direct<br />

function of crank angle, cyl<strong>in</strong>der geometries, crank radius<br />

and connect<strong>in</strong>g rod length (see ref. 1). The ratio of the<br />

specific heat of the fuel at constant pressure to the specific<br />

heat at constant volume is γ; its value varies from compression<br />

to combustion to expansion. Dur<strong>in</strong>g compression, γ is<br />

approximately equal to 1.3. 3<br />

Combustion. The combustion process was described by<br />

the McCuiston, Lavoie and Kauffman (MLK) model. 4 The<br />

mass-burn fraction, χ b<br />

, was modeled as a function of pressures<br />

and volumes:<br />

where<br />

P = pressure correspond<strong>in</strong>g to burn fraction<br />

V = volume correspond<strong>in</strong>g to burn fraction<br />

P 0<br />

= pressure at start of combustion<br />

V 0<br />

= volume at start of combustion<br />

P f<br />

= pressure at end of combustion<br />

V f<br />

= volume at end of combustion<br />

n = polytropic constant<br />

(2)<br />

PAULINA S. KUO is a recent graduate of Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. She completed the research described <strong>in</strong> this article under the supervision of<br />

Professor John Heywood at the MIT Sloan Automotive Laboratory. Ms. Kuo was honored as a West<strong>in</strong>ghouse Science Talent Search f<strong>in</strong>alist for this work, and she was a member of the<br />

1996 US Physics Team; she aspires to a career as an eng<strong>in</strong>eer or a professor.


142 Journal of Undergraduate Sciences<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Sci.<br />

The polytropic constant, n, is an empirically determ<strong>in</strong>ed constant<br />

about equal to γ which has a value close to 1.25 dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

combustion. 3<br />

The fraction of fuel burned varies with an s-curve which<br />

runs from 0% burned at the start of combustion to 100%<br />

burned at the end of combustion. The Weibe function is an<br />

s-curve that is used to describe the burn fraction: 1 (3)<br />

θ 0<br />

is the angle at which combustion beg<strong>in</strong>s; it is about equal<br />

to the angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g. The angle of the duration of combustion<br />

is ∆θ. The constants a and m are determ<strong>in</strong>ed experimentally.<br />

Real burn fraction curves have been fitted by<br />

the Weibe function with a=5 and m=2.<br />

The terms <strong>in</strong> equation (2) can be rearranged to give an<br />

expression for pressure <strong>in</strong> terms of the crank angle and the<br />

conditions at the onset and end of combustion. The f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

conditions can be represented as functions of the <strong>in</strong>itial conditions<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g the fact that the gases <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der act<br />

almost ideal and that negligible energy is lost or ga<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

the system. S<strong>in</strong>ce the combustion process occurs almost<br />

symmetrically about top center (TC), the volume of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

at the spark is approximately equal to the volume at<br />

the end of combustion. Because the <strong>in</strong>itial and f<strong>in</strong>al volumes<br />

are about equal, little net work is done on the piston and the<br />

change <strong>in</strong> temperature between the spark and end of combustion<br />

is due to the burn<strong>in</strong>g of the fuel.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the ideal gas law, the gas pressure at the<br />

end of combustion, P f<br />

, is a function of the gas constant of<br />

the fuel, mass of the gases, temperature, and volume. The<br />

gas constant of the fuel is equal to the universal gas constant<br />

divided by the molar mass of the fuel. The total mass<br />

of the gas mixture was calculated at IVC, just when the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

is sealed, by us<strong>in</strong>g the ideal gas law. Temperature at<br />

the end of combustion was estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the assumption<br />

that nearly all of the chemical energy of the fuel caused a<br />

temperature change of the gases. This idea is expressed <strong>in</strong><br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g equation: 5 (4)<br />

gases drives the piston down, does work by turn<strong>in</strong>g the crankshaft<br />

and, <strong>in</strong> turn, provides power to the car. Dur<strong>in</strong>g expansion,<br />

the heat transferred to the cyl<strong>in</strong>der l<strong>in</strong>er is small compared<br />

to the work done. Energy lost to <strong>in</strong>ternal friction of the<br />

gas is also m<strong>in</strong>imal. The gas behavior was described by<br />

equation (1) which is also used to model the compression<br />

process. The conditions at the end of combustion determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

the constant term. Dur<strong>in</strong>g expansion, γ has a value of about<br />

1.48. 3<br />

Blowdown and Exhaust. Exhaust valve open<strong>in</strong>g (EVO) occurs<br />

before the crank reaches BC. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, the pressure<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der is much greater than the exhaust system<br />

pressure. The higher pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der helps push<br />

the burnt gases out of the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. The process by which<br />

the pressure aids <strong>in</strong> the expulsion of burnt gases is called<br />

blowdown. The flow of the gases can be described by a<br />

model of gas flow through an orifice where the valve acts<br />

like the flow restriction. 1 This model depends on the velocity<br />

of the gas. When the gas velocity at the smallest portion of<br />

the open<strong>in</strong>g, the throat, is equal to the speed of sound, the<br />

flow is said to be choked. The flow rate under choked flow is<br />

described by:<br />

where<br />

(5)<br />

.<br />

m real<br />

= real mass flow rate<br />

C D<br />

= discharge coefficient<br />

A T<br />

= cross-sectional area of throat<br />

p T<br />

= pressure at throat<br />

p 0<br />

= pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

T 0<br />

= temperature <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

R = characteristic gas constant of the exit<strong>in</strong>g gases<br />

γ = ratio of specific heats of the exit<strong>in</strong>g gases<br />

Subsonic flow is described by the equation:<br />

(6)<br />

where<br />

m total<br />

= total mass of gases <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

c v<br />

= specific heat of gas mixture at constant vol.<br />

T f<br />

= temperature at the end of combustion<br />

T spark<br />

= temperature at the start of combustion<br />

C = coefficient for unburned fuel<br />

m fuel<br />

= mass of fuel <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

Q HV<br />

= heat<strong>in</strong>g value of the fuel<br />

The temperature at the spark was calculated by apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the ideal gas law to the conditions at the end of compression.<br />

The constant C took <strong>in</strong>to account the fact that not all of<br />

the fuel was burned and thus not all of the chemical energy<br />

available was changed <strong>in</strong>to thermal energy; C is approximately<br />

0.95. The mass of the fuel was calculated by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the air-to-fuel ratio and not<strong>in</strong>g that the total mass is equal to<br />

the mass of air plus the mass of fuel. The heat<strong>in</strong>g value is a<br />

constant dependent upon the type of fuel used. For gasol<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

the heat<strong>in</strong>g value is about 44 megajoules per kilogram.<br />

Expansion. The end of combustion occurs slightly after TC<br />

at which po<strong>in</strong>t expansion beg<strong>in</strong>s. The pressure of the burned<br />

The discharge coefficient is an experimentally determ<strong>in</strong>ed constant<br />

which relates the effective throat area to the actual throat<br />

area. It is roughly equal to 0.7. Secondary flow near the throat<br />

cause the ma<strong>in</strong> flow to pass through a smaller area than the<br />

actual cross-sectional area of the throat. The pressure at<br />

.<br />

the<br />

throat is equal to that of the gases <strong>in</strong> the exhaust system. m, p 0<br />

and T 0<br />

are variable but can be related by the ideal gas law:<br />

and the isentropic process gas model: 2 (8)<br />

These models are valid because there is negligible entropy<br />

change <strong>in</strong> the system and the gases <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der do not<br />

deviate far from ideal behavior.<br />

The resultant equation<br />

.<br />

is a differential equation where<br />

the mass flow rate, m, is dependent on the mass of the gases<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der, m. The value of m is computed numerically<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g the three-step Runge-Kutta algorithm and then used<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>d the gas pressure.<br />

(7)


143 Journal of Undergraduate Sciences<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Sci.<br />

The flow of the gases depends on the area of the open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the exhaust valve. This area changes as the valve is<br />

pushed open and closed. It <strong>in</strong>creases quickly to a maximum,<br />

reaches a plateau and falls off aga<strong>in</strong> as the valve closes.<br />

The maximum area is determ<strong>in</strong>ed ma<strong>in</strong>ly by the shape of<br />

the duct to the exhaust system. <strong>Pressure</strong> <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

settles down to the exhaust system pressure as the exhaust<br />

valve rema<strong>in</strong>s open. The valve closes after TC after the next<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>e cycle has begun.<br />

The exhaust system pressure is a function of eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

speed. There are several barriers to the exit<strong>in</strong>g gas <strong>in</strong> the<br />

exhaust system, such as the catalytic converter and the<br />

muffler, which resist the flow of the burnt gases and cause<br />

the pressure <strong>in</strong> the exhaust system to <strong>in</strong>crease roughly as<br />

the square of the speed of the exit<strong>in</strong>g gases. The speed of<br />

the gases is directly proportional to the eng<strong>in</strong>e speed. Generally,<br />

the exhaust pressure is between 1 atmosphere (atm)<br />

and 1.5 atm.<br />

Table 1. Model <strong>in</strong>puts. BTC stands for “before top center.”<br />

Table 2. Analysis of 2000 rpm HL. ATC stands for “after top center.”<br />

Model Evaluation<br />

Data was collected from a Renault production eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

at different eng<strong>in</strong>e speeds and <strong>in</strong>let pressures. The geometries<br />

of the eng<strong>in</strong>e were entered <strong>in</strong>to the model and the<br />

model was then used to predict the pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der.<br />

Specifications of the test eng<strong>in</strong>e are located <strong>in</strong> Appendix A.<br />

The angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn duration angle were not<br />

explicitly known. Reasonable estimates for the tim<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

made from prior experiences and by visual approximation.<br />

The model was fairly accurate <strong>in</strong> its cyl<strong>in</strong>der pressure<br />

predictions. It was tested with eng<strong>in</strong>e pressure data at 2000<br />

rpm full load (FL), 2000 rpm half load (HL), 4000 rpm FL,<br />

and 4000 rpm HL. The first figure <strong>in</strong> Appendix B plots the<br />

actual and model data at 4000 rpm FL. Of the four trials, the<br />

model deviated the most at 4000 rpm FL. The differences of<br />

all four trials between the model data and the actual data<br />

are shown <strong>in</strong> the second figure of Appendix B. Differences<br />

were greatest at higher rpm and greater load.<br />

Under full load, the <strong>in</strong>let pressure was about 1 atm and<br />

0.5 atm at half load. The spark tim<strong>in</strong>g was changed from<br />

model to model. Generally, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>e speed was<br />

accompanied by earlier spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and longer combustion<br />

duration. An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>let pressure meant that the spark<br />

fired later, and the burn duration was shorter. The exact values<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>let pressure <strong>in</strong> kilopascals (kPa) and the spark<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> each model are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

The model results were compared to actual eng<strong>in</strong>e data.<br />

Differences <strong>in</strong> P spark<br />

, θ peak pressure<br />

, P peak<br />

and P EVO<br />

were recorded<br />

and analyzed. The accuracy of P spark<br />

is a measure of the<br />

performance of the compression model. Discrepancies <strong>in</strong><br />

θ peak pressure<br />

and P peak<br />

gauge the model of combustion while<br />

P EVO<br />

shows how well the expansion model described the<br />

expansion process. Tables 2 through 5 show the performance<br />

of the model under different eng<strong>in</strong>e conditions.<br />

The compression model produced pressure values<br />

slightly greater than the actual values. The percent error of<br />

P spark<br />

was around 10%. In an actual eng<strong>in</strong>e, some energy is<br />

lost dur<strong>in</strong>g the compression process. Because the energy<br />

loss was not taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> the model, the pressure<br />

predictions at the spark fir<strong>in</strong>g angle were larger than the<br />

actual pressure values.<br />

In some trials, the predicted angle of peak pressure <strong>in</strong><br />

the model was less than the actual angle. Because the encoder<br />

on the eng<strong>in</strong>e that records the crank angle is sometimes<br />

faulty at high eng<strong>in</strong>e speed, the actual pressure data<br />

Table 3. Analysis of 2000 rpm FL. ATC stands for “after top center.”<br />

Table 4. Analysis of 4000 rpm HL. ATC stands for “after top center.”<br />

Table 5. Analysis of 4000 rpm FL. ATC stands for “after top center.”<br />

may be slightly <strong>in</strong>accurate. The peak pressure was usually<br />

accurate but was at times lower than the actual value. These<br />

variations were, <strong>in</strong> part, due to the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the angle<br />

spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn duration.<br />

The cyl<strong>in</strong>der pressure at EVO was the most variable.<br />

The model <strong>in</strong>corporated a representation for blowdown,<br />

which caused a visible drop off at EVO <strong>in</strong> the plots of the<br />

model, but the actual data did not show such a large decrease.<br />

The differences were more pronounced <strong>in</strong> the trials<br />

at higher eng<strong>in</strong>e speeds. These discrepancies <strong>in</strong> pressure<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g combustion and expansion were partially due to the<br />

mechanics of the pressure transducer. The transducer does<br />

not work well at high temperatures or at quickly chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

temperatures. Because of the rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der, it may not have recorded all the changes <strong>in</strong><br />

pressure dur<strong>in</strong>g blowdown.<br />

Another reason for the differences is the <strong>in</strong>accuracy of<br />

the function that describes the area of the valve open<strong>in</strong>g.


144 Journal of Undergraduate Sciences<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Sci.<br />

Table 6. Load <strong>in</strong>let pressures.<br />

Table 7. Optimal spark tim<strong>in</strong>gs. BTC stands for “before top center.”<br />

Without actually measur<strong>in</strong>g the area of the valve open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the test eng<strong>in</strong>e, it is impossible to predict the changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

size of the open<strong>in</strong>g. Valves can be opened by more than<br />

one mechanism. The valves are opened at different rates,<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on the mechanism. Hence, the time it takes for<br />

the area to reach the maximum varies from eng<strong>in</strong>e to eng<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The curve that predicted the area of the valve open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

may have been <strong>in</strong>correct for the test eng<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

On the whole, the model predicted the pressure <strong>in</strong> the<br />

cyl<strong>in</strong>der fairly accurately. The shape of the curve was well<br />

matched with the actual data. <strong>Pressure</strong> rose through compression,<br />

peaked dur<strong>in</strong>g combustion and fell dur<strong>in</strong>g expansion<br />

and blowdown. The standard deviation of the model<br />

was 1.33 for 2000 HL, 2.40 for 2000 FL, 3.13 for 4000 HL<br />

and 8.61 for 4000 FL. Consider<strong>in</strong>g that the pressure varies<br />

from 50 kPa to 5000 kPa, the model was very accurate.<br />

<strong>Spark</strong> and Burn Duration Determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

The exact angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and duration of combustion<br />

were not known. The eng<strong>in</strong>e cycles are completed extremely<br />

quickly and the spark tim<strong>in</strong>g varies slightly each cycle<br />

which made it difficult to accurately measure the spark tim<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

By vary<strong>in</strong>g spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn duration <strong>in</strong>puts of the<br />

model, the best fit curve was obta<strong>in</strong>ed that gave a prediction<br />

of the spark tim<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Data Fitt<strong>in</strong>g. The error of the model is calculated by an sum<br />

of the differences between the real and model pressure<br />

values:<br />

Data was sampled at <strong>in</strong>tegral crank angles. The error was<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imized to f<strong>in</strong>d optimal values for the angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and burn duration. <strong>Pressure</strong> data came from a Renault production<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>e (see Appendix A for specifications). The pressure<br />

measurements were taken at 2000 rpm under quarter<br />

load, half load, three-quarters load and full load. The <strong>in</strong>let<br />

pressures correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the loads are given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.<br />

The optimal angle of spark fir<strong>in</strong>g, θ spark<br />

, and burn duration,<br />

∆θ, for the sets of pressure data are given <strong>in</strong> Table 7.<br />

The error, approximate area of the actual pressure curve<br />

and the error as a percentage of the area are also given <strong>in</strong><br />

the table.<br />

The percent error of the model was approximately 0.5%<br />

for all the trials. Error <strong>in</strong>creases with higher <strong>in</strong>let pressures<br />

because of the greater pressures <strong>in</strong> the data.<br />

<strong>Spark</strong> and Burn Duration Evaluation. The results of the<br />

spark fir<strong>in</strong>g and burn duration determ<strong>in</strong>ation are shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 7. Generally, the burn duration angle <strong>in</strong>creases with<br />

load and, with the exception of the quarter load data, the<br />

angle spark fir<strong>in</strong>g becomes later with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g load. The<br />

(9)<br />

delay <strong>in</strong> spark fir<strong>in</strong>g as the <strong>in</strong>let pressure <strong>in</strong>creases is<br />

expected, however, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> burn duration goes<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the predicted trend.<br />

In the model, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>let pressure is reflected<br />

as a larger pressure at the spark and a greater mass of fuel<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der. With more fuel to burn, the model lengthens<br />

the burn time. Burn duration is decreased only slightly by<br />

the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> pressure at the spark.<br />

In actuality, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial pressure dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

combustion can greatly alter the way the fuel burns. Higher<br />

pressure <strong>in</strong> a limited volume means that the temperature <strong>in</strong><br />

the cyl<strong>in</strong>der is higher and that the fuel and air molecules are<br />

more reactive. The mixture burns faster, so the burn duration<br />

becomes shorter. The delayed spark fir<strong>in</strong>g takes advantage<br />

of the more reactive nature of the fuel to get more<br />

power out of the stroke.<br />

The model does not take <strong>in</strong>to account the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

temperature at the spark. The reactivity of the fuel is not a<br />

factor <strong>in</strong> the MLK combustion relation that is used by the<br />

model. Under higher <strong>in</strong>let pressure, the gases <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

are hotter throughout combustion and the combustion,<br />

which is an oxidation reaction, occurs faster. This <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> reaction rate is due to the <strong>in</strong>creased k<strong>in</strong>etic energy so it<br />

takes a smaller amount of additional energy to reach the<br />

activation energy for the reaction. 6<br />

The MLK and similar burn fraction models were orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

formulated from burn profile pictures. These relations<br />

were empirically determ<strong>in</strong>ed by observ<strong>in</strong>g the photographs,<br />

which means that the models were not based on pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

of thermodynamics. This fact caused the error <strong>in</strong> the model.<br />

An improvement would be to f<strong>in</strong>d a combustion model based<br />

on the work-energy theorem where pressure and temperature<br />

are related to the total energy of the system.<br />

Summary<br />

This model predicts the pressure of the gas <strong>in</strong> a cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the isentropic gas process model, the<br />

McCuiston, Lavoie and Kauffman model and the gas flow<br />

through an orifice model. It predicts the pressure <strong>in</strong> the cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

fairly accurately. The most significant weakness of the<br />

model is that is does not take the changes <strong>in</strong> fuel reactivity<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g combustion <strong>in</strong>to account. However, the model is<br />

simple and can be used to give quick estimates of pressure<br />

for other models, such as oil film thickness.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This project would not have been possible without the<br />

help and advice of Professor John Heywood and Tian Tian<br />

at the Sloan Automotive Laboratory at MIT. Thanks also go<br />

to Bouke Noordzij and Peter H<strong>in</strong>ze for supply<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>e data.<br />

The author is grateful to Mr. Don Hyatt for provid<strong>in</strong>g the use<br />

of the Thomas Jefferson High School <strong>Computer</strong> Systems<br />

lab. Lastly, the author thanks Dr. John Dell for his support<br />

and help through all the difficulties.


145 Journal of Undergraduate Sciences<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Sci.<br />

References<br />

(1) Heywood, J. B. 1988. Internal Combustion Fundamentals (New<br />

York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.).<br />

(2) Gyftopoulos, E. P., and G. P. Beretta. 1991. Thermodynamics:<br />

Foundations and Applications (New York: Macmillan Publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Company).<br />

(3) Cheung, H. M., and J. B. Heywood. 1993. “Evaluation of a One-<br />

Zone Burn-Rate Analysis Procedure Us<strong>in</strong>g Production SI Eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>Pressure</strong> Data.” SAE paper 932749.<br />

(4) Amann, C. 1985. “<strong>Cyl<strong>in</strong>der</strong>-<strong>Pressure</strong> Measurement and Its Use<br />

<strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>e Research.” SAE paper 852067.<br />

(5) This equation was suggested by Professor John Heywood.<br />

(6) Rossotti, H. 1993. Fire (New York: Oxford University Press).<br />

Appendix A: Renault Eng<strong>in</strong>e Specifications<br />

Appendix B: Graphical Comparisons

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!