08.01.2014 Views

Summary - Department of Health and Ageing

Summary - Department of Health and Ageing

Summary - Department of Health and Ageing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Australia’s well-developed public health system focuses on priority areas identified as<br />

having a significant impact on population health. Current national health priorities include<br />

the following areas.<br />

<br />

<br />

Cardiovascular health: tobacco <strong>and</strong> alcohol misuse are risk factors for cardiovascular<br />

disease as well as other health problems; there have been successes in reducing adult,<br />

but not adolescent, tobacco smoking. A recent initiative, the Smoking, Nutrition,<br />

Alcohol <strong>and</strong> Physical activity Framework, directs the attention <strong>of</strong> general practitioners<br />

to behavioural risk factor modification. Evaluations are not yet available.<br />

Cancer prevention: this includes a number <strong>of</strong> policies <strong>and</strong> strategies relevant to drug<br />

use, including reduction <strong>of</strong> tobacco <strong>and</strong> high-risk alcohol use. All initiatives<br />

encouraging reductions in smoking or limiting drinking to within recommended<br />

consumption guidelines can be considered cancer prevention initiatives.<br />

Injury prevention: some interventions in this area are relevant to drug policy,<br />

including reducing drink-driving <strong>and</strong> providing alcohol treatment services. Alcohol<br />

causes, or contributes to, many injuries, including road trauma, falls, fire injury,<br />

drowning, assault <strong>and</strong> suicide; dependence on alcohol dramatically increases the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

death through injury. Falls injuries in older people are especially associated with<br />

problematic alcohol use. Other relevant injury prevention strategies include night<br />

patrol schemes in Indigenous communities, enforcing responsible service legislation to<br />

reduce alcohol-related injury; <strong>and</strong> more widespread use <strong>of</strong> brief interventions by<br />

doctors to reduce problem drinking.<br />

Many health education initiatives include information relevant to avoiding harmful drug<br />

use. While it is a popular health promotion strategy, there is a body <strong>of</strong> evidence to show<br />

that health education, as a st<strong>and</strong>-alone strategy, has only limited effects in changing<br />

behaviour. <strong>Health</strong> education may have a role, however, as a component supporting a<br />

broader set <strong>of</strong> behaviour change interventions.<br />

Given the strong link between SES <strong>and</strong> health problems, including drug use, there is some<br />

literature on attempting to reduce differentials in socioeconomic status. Structural <strong>and</strong><br />

legislative measures appear to be the most effective means <strong>of</strong> reducing health inequalities<br />

but there is not yet sufficient evidence on which to base rational policy in this area. The<br />

potential to reduce harmful drug use through these approaches is unclear.<br />

<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> the strategies for promoting mental health are also relevant to the prevention<br />

<strong>of</strong> drug-related harm. These include strategies to reduce social exclusion, alcohol <strong>and</strong> drug<br />

problems, homelessness <strong>and</strong> unemployment; <strong>and</strong> strategies to increase or improve<br />

parenting skills, social support networks, education <strong>and</strong> training opportunities, <strong>and</strong> healthy<br />

work environments.<br />

Mental health promotion <strong>and</strong> drug-related prevention rest on the same principle, that <strong>of</strong><br />

reducing risk factors <strong>and</strong> building protective factors. There is a strong theoretical case that<br />

treating mental health problems is likely to be effective in reducing substance use, even in<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> treatment for substance use problems; but no direct evidence <strong>of</strong> this was<br />

found. Nor is there direct evidence that mental health promotion programs reduce<br />

substance use in the community, or that reductions in rates <strong>of</strong> mental health problems or<br />

mental illness have a positive impact on rates <strong>of</strong> substance use problems. There is<br />

increasing evidence that reducing drug use in youth may prevent mental health problems<br />

later in life. This evidence suggests that mental health investment should form one<br />

component in programs aiming to prevent early age or regular drug use in adolescence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!