11.01.2014 Views

HFC_issue8 1.indd - Hificritic.com

HFC_issue8 1.indd - Hificritic.com

HFC_issue8 1.indd - Hificritic.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wilson Duette on the Road<br />

MARTIN COLLOMS ASSESSES WHAT MIGHT WELL BE THE ULTIMATE STAND-MOUNT –<br />

EXTRAVAGANTLY PRICED BUT EXQUISITELY BUILT, EXCEPTIONALLY FLEXIBLE AND OBSESSIVELY<br />

SPECIFIED. TONY FAULKNER ADDS A FIELD REPORT ON USING IT ON LOCATION AS A<br />

PROFESSIONAL RECORDING MONITOR.<br />

Wilson Audio is no ordinary loudspeaker maker,<br />

and the Duette is no ordinary loudspeaker.<br />

Discounting the CUB (which was best suited<br />

to home cinema systems), this is the <strong>com</strong>pany’s first<br />

statement stand-mount loudspeaker since the original<br />

WATT. Founder and designer David Wilson makes no<br />

excuses with this Duette. He has simply set about making<br />

the finest <strong>com</strong>pact or bookshelf speaker he can, with no ifs<br />

or buts.<br />

Built to exacting standards, it costs what it costs.<br />

The idea of building to a price does not appeal to this<br />

man, nor does subcontracting its construction to less<br />

costly overseas sources. Much as a serious purchaser of a<br />

good piano would not consider a lower cost Far Eastern<br />

import, a Wilson Audio customer is well aware of the<br />

proposition on offer.<br />

This particular reviewer is sometimes excessively led by<br />

value-for-money considerations. At a higher price than<br />

any equivalent – an extravagant £8,888 for the speakers<br />

plus £2,000 for the partnering stands here in the UK<br />

– the Duette challenges this perception. With so many<br />

large, capable floor standing speakers on the market, why<br />

produce such a very costly <strong>com</strong>pact? For an answer we<br />

need to go back to the early, glory days of audio, before<br />

1970, when the popular format, especially in the US, was<br />

the large ‘bookshelf’ speaker – the term ‘bookshelf’ being<br />

optimistically applied in view of the bulk and weight<br />

often involved. These speakers were usually mounted on<br />

their sides, and more or less acoustically matched to this<br />

boundary condition. Perhaps the most famous example<br />

of the ‘East Coast’ sound was the Acoustic Research AR3,<br />

a classic and deservedly popular ‘bookshelf’ design, and<br />

no pipsqueak as it was a full three way with advanced mid<br />

and treble dome units and a powerful 12in bass driver.<br />

In the same era, JBL’s similarly massive ‘bookshelf’ L100<br />

epitomised the ‘West Coast’ sound.<br />

Aesthetic considerations mean that our ideal of a free<br />

space stereo layout can be too intrusive for some, so some<br />

demand remains for high quality ‘bookshelf’ models,<br />

even though the apocryphal ‘bookshelf’ has now given<br />

way to a proper stand.<br />

The Duette is a powerful yet <strong>com</strong>pact full range<br />

loudspeaker with as little engineering <strong>com</strong>promise as<br />

possible, targeted at near wall siting despite its known<br />

limitations. It’s a versatile two-way based on the classic and<br />

potentially powerful <strong>com</strong>bination of a 220mm (8.5in)<br />

bass/mid unit and a 25mm (1in) soft dome tweeter. While<br />

stand-mounts have tended to be<strong>com</strong>e rather diminutive<br />

these days, often using 130mm (5in) bass/mid drivers with<br />

a 90mm effective cone diameter, the Duette has a 170mm<br />

diameter main cone radiator. Given its considerable peak<br />

excursion and powerful c50mm (2in) voice coil, its acoustic<br />

capacity is close to four of those small 130mm units.<br />

The crossover network is separately housed in its<br />

own box, which is neatly stowed away in the stand<br />

structure. The speaker is supplied with two different<br />

sets of umbilical cables, specified either for wall or free<br />

space siting, connecting the crossover to the enclosure<br />

terminals, and there are also accessory resistors to trim the<br />

treble to match. These are selected according to detailed<br />

instructions provided in the <strong>com</strong>prehensive operating<br />

manuals.<br />

10 HIFICRITIC MARCH / APRIL 2008


◆ REVIEW<br />

MARTIN COLLOMS<br />

TONY FAULKNER<br />

Technology<br />

Engineers will be impressed by the micro-grained, energydissipating<br />

lower surface of the brass cups, which sit<br />

between the enclosure’s hardened magnetic cones and<br />

milled recesses on the stand’s alloy top plate. The tripod<br />

coupling between enclosure and support is inherently<br />

self-adjusting, and the stand has generous, adjustable<br />

floor-coupling hardware. Between the milled alloy top<br />

and bottom plates, the stand has a massive non-resonant<br />

central pillar of ‘M’ material, a proprietary mineral-loaded<br />

polymer, locked in by tensioned, hardened steel bolts.<br />

The enclosure, made from the same tough yet well<br />

damped proprietary ‘M’ material, is singularly inert, and<br />

reinforced by <strong>com</strong>plex bracing. Providing the drivers with a<br />

firm foundation, the front panel is 50mm (2in) deep, and<br />

the material is so tough it may be threaded directly to take<br />

the driver fixing screws. Internal volume damping relies on<br />

a familiar <strong>com</strong>bination of acoustic foam pads and a well<br />

packed pad of fibre absorbent fixed behind the bass driver<br />

only, leaving the main volume unobstructed. Were that all<br />

loudspeakers were built as well as this one.<br />

Computer aided design was <strong>com</strong>bined with extended<br />

listening to design the crossover, which provides 18db/<br />

oct slopes for each driver at a lower than usual 1.8kHz<br />

frequency. External mounting makes the crossover largely<br />

immune from vibration and electromagnetic interference.<br />

To attain the 90dB sensitivity, it’s a 4ohm system, using<br />

a custom built SEAS Excel series 3.9ohm bass/mid unit<br />

with a unique cone, dust cap, termination and voice coil<br />

assembly. It has an open construction die-cast frame, and<br />

a <strong>com</strong>plex progressive non-resonant spider. The 3.6ohm<br />

tweeter is a well terminated soft dome from ScanSpeak,<br />

built on a massive alloy plate, solidly bolted to the<br />

enclosure, and with rear cavity back wave termination.<br />

Both drivers have conductive copper elements in their<br />

magnetic circuits to reduce eddy-currents and minimise<br />

distortion.<br />

Sound Quality<br />

I first heard a quartet of near wall mounted Duettes in a<br />

40 seat demonstration at last September’s Heathrow show,<br />

ably operated by Peter McGrath. I heard a convincing,<br />

generous, enveloping and focused sound field of fine<br />

bandwidth and exceptional dynamic range. At times Peter<br />

used the new Wilson subwoofer, but on one particularly<br />

impressive organ piece we then discovered that he had<br />

forgot to switch on the sub. ‘Who needs it?’ we said<br />

to a man. Later I popped over to Henry Wood Hall to<br />

hear them monitoring one of Tony Faulkner’s recording<br />

sessions, and was impressed by their dynamic and vibrant<br />

replay, and their grip on the live acoustic. (Tony reports<br />

separately on his Duette experiences.)<br />

The ex-dem review speakers were well run in and<br />

seemed free from strain from the moment they were<br />

installed. While the bookshelf option was not attempted,<br />

near-to-wall and free space locations were both tried.<br />

Initial listening with LPs was very civilised. One<br />

hallmark of a refined well blended deign is the ability to<br />

pay baroque music quite loudly. This sat <strong>com</strong>fortably with<br />

one facet of my consciousness, while allowing me to write<br />

down these observations without mental anguish.<br />

Despite the large physical disparity between the bass<br />

and treble drivers I could not hear the join between them.<br />

The sound is not spoiled with the grilles on, but I suspect<br />

most enthusiasts will leave them off for the ultimate level of<br />

micro detail and dynamic expression. Happily the drivers<br />

look reasonably finger-proof.<br />

In free space very good results are possible when used<br />

as suggested with the appropriate supplied cable and HF<br />

resistor, although the perfectionist might well still note a<br />

lightness to midrange tonality, and a thinning of voices.<br />

The lower registers of a piano are recessed, leaving the<br />

higher notes sounding somewhat coloured and boxy.<br />

Initially fretting over this, I thought that Wilson might<br />

well have considered a crossover option more objectively<br />

optimised for free space: perhaps a bit more inductance in<br />

HIFICRITIC MARCH / APRIL 2008 11


◆ REVIEW<br />

EQUIPMENT USED<br />

Conrad Johnson<br />

ACT2-2 pre-amp,<br />

Audio Synthesis Passion<br />

passive pre-amp, Naim<br />

NAP250, Conrad<br />

Johnson Premier 350SA,<br />

Linn LP12, Naim ARO<br />

tonearm, Koetsu Red<br />

T cartridge, Origin<br />

Live DC drive (top<br />

spec). Naim CDS3,<br />

Marantz CD-7 CD<br />

players. Kimber KS<br />

3035 speaker cable, Van<br />

den Hul First Ultimate<br />

interconnect.<br />

the midrange network, and a further tweak of the overall<br />

balance. However, free space use showed the high potential<br />

for a precision stereo image – well focused, deep and wide,<br />

with fine perspectives.<br />

Moving the speakers closer to a wall, I found that the<br />

immediate locality should not be cluttered. All positional<br />

adjustments must be carefully made: the left-to-right<br />

spacing, the angling and the actual spacing from the wall<br />

behind. Once achieved, the tonal balance was close to<br />

perfect here: the upper-to-lower midrange now sounded<br />

uniform, and the speaker really sang. Near the wall I have<br />

to admit that it sounded much better than I expected, and<br />

after an hour or so it actually became quite convincing.<br />

The Duette sounded even and well blended, highly<br />

articulate and with the sort of natural expressive dynamics<br />

that are usually the preserve of much larger speakers. It<br />

informs you how well a musician is playing, revealing<br />

nuances of timbre and expression, along with upbeat tempos<br />

and fine timing. This is certainly an involving reproducer<br />

which reaches into the heart of performances. Instinctively I<br />

suspect that this has much to do with its inherent simplicity<br />

and engineering honesty, much like the original WATT.<br />

With the boundary gain in place the bass sounds free<br />

and un<strong>com</strong>pressed, and extends to 40Hz at good power<br />

– better than a number of larger floorstanding designs.<br />

It excels on jazz material, and here its special ability to<br />

assemble the leading edges of <strong>com</strong>plex percussion sounds<br />

and meld them into natural coherent transients approaches<br />

the performance of a Quad electrostatic. You begin to learn<br />

to trust how this speaker puts <strong>com</strong>plex sounds together,<br />

which I think is what appeals to Tony Faulkner for studio<br />

monitoring work. The meld of mid and treble also reminds<br />

me of the best BBC inspired monitors – articulate, with<br />

pure sibilants on vocals. Most impressive.<br />

I enjoyed many aspects of this loudspeaker’s<br />

performance and regard it as a true successor to the CUB,<br />

which never quite worked for me stereophonically. From<br />

one viewpoint the Duette may be regarded as a masterwork,<br />

helping to define the potential and possibilities available<br />

from a properly designed, almost perfectly optimised<br />

<strong>com</strong>pact loudspeaker. Its timbre is clearly balanced to<br />

utilise a fair amount of acoustic gain from a wall boundary,<br />

and while the provided alternative adjustments allow<br />

it to perform in free space with deeper, more spacious<br />

and better focused stereo images, the midrange timbre is<br />

then perceptibly light, to the detriment of piano ‘tone’.<br />

In fact solo piano recorded with a sensible mike spacing<br />

(not under the lid), is perfect for checking that particular<br />

spacing from the wall, adjusting for even note playing and<br />

good tonality, especially for the left hand <strong>com</strong>pass.<br />

So good is the stereo, stuff left between the speakers<br />

is readily audible and furniture, equipment etc should<br />

not be placed between them. Carpeted floors also are<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mended. It is remarkably transparent, highly detailed<br />

with very good image depth. Reverberant recorded<br />

acoustics are revealed well.<br />

Incidentally I tried those two near identical umbilical<br />

cables provided with the Duettes, and was not at all<br />

prepared for the out<strong>com</strong>e. I was most sceptical about the<br />

need to have two, and while not great, the sonic differences<br />

were audible, and quite appropriate to the professed<br />

requirement. The ‘wall’ cable set, if used in free space,<br />

generated a slightly ‘airy’ almost harmonic quality for<br />

piano, much like harder felts on the hammers. Conversely,<br />

superior tonal balance and smoothness was obtained in free<br />

space with the ‘right’ cable. However, used for the speakers<br />

near a wall, the ‘free space’ cable was then insufficiently<br />

‘crisp’, impairing mid articulation. Duette sounded ‘just<br />

right’ with the ‘wall’ cable assembly fitted as instructed.<br />

Lab Report<br />

I measured an above average 90dB sensitivity for an 8ohm<br />

watt (2.83V) input, and while it does have a nominal<br />

4ohm impedance, with minima of 4 ohms in the bass<br />

and 3.6 ohms at 3kHz, the running average is about<br />

6ohms with only moderate reactive content. A wide range<br />

of amplifiers will drive this speaker without difficulty,<br />

especially in view of its good sensitivity.<br />

It will take 150W of undistorted program power and<br />

reach a healthy maximum spl of 107dB in-room. This<br />

design has a big heart, and the huge motor driving the bass/<br />

mid driver has fine linearity. Distortion is much lower than<br />

average for a stand mount loudspeaker, rivalling many threeway<br />

models, in part thanks to the good efficiency, which<br />

means that input power is relatively low for a given test level.<br />

The Z or impedance curve indicates that the port<br />

tuning is at about 43 Hz. A mild surround termination<br />

‘wrinkle’ at 800 Hz reflects a mild resonance which is<br />

visible in the impedance characteristic.<br />

The actual frequency response will be boundary<br />

dependent, and the measured spatial response average for<br />

the listening zone corresponds to the near-wall location<br />

used mainly for auditioning. This shows a very smooth<br />

and well integrated mid-to-treble, but with a mild +2.5dB<br />

midband plateau (350 Hz - 1.5kHz). The bass is a bit<br />

‘rich’ around 60Hz but with good extension to 38Hz<br />

-6dB. The treble is well maintained to 17kHz, with a<br />

‘natural’ down-slope above 4kHz. The overall result is a<br />

little mid prominent, but not in an aggressive way, and this<br />

corresponds closely with the listening <strong>com</strong>ments.<br />

The topmost red trace of the semi-anechoic response<br />

measurements is a hybrid of nearfield bass (dashed) and the<br />

12 HIFICRITIC MARCH / APRIL 2008


◆ REVIEW<br />

axial mid-to-treble (unsmoothed). There is a hint of upper<br />

bass depression, about 2dB, and a mildly lifted upper<br />

midrange; the bass is well tuned and reaches 38Hz -6dB,<br />

while the main trend meets finely toleranced +/- 2.5dB<br />

limits out to 20 kHz, and extends still further, to about<br />

34kHz for -6dB.<br />

The above axis trace holds up well, but a 7dB suckout<br />

is visible in the crossover region when measured at<br />

15 degrees below the bass driver. The crossover point is<br />

located at a relatively low 1.8kHz, thanks to the powerful<br />

wide-band tweeter. Despite the relatively large bass/mid<br />

unit, system integration is good, but ideally you should<br />

not listen with your ears much below the centre of the<br />

bass unit unless the enclosure is mounted on its side<br />

(tweeters inward).<br />

The hard work expended on reducing enclosure<br />

diffraction has paid off, for example in the 30 degree lateral<br />

response, which, like the Watt 8, is first rate. The 45 degree<br />

off-axis output is also very good, and the still smooth<br />

output only begins to fade more rapidly above 6kHz at a<br />

wide 60 degrees off-axis.<br />

The decay response seen in the waterfall display is<br />

impressive for its excellent driver integration (phase and<br />

frequency) and quite rapid decay, confirming the natural<br />

timbre, the very good subjective dynamics and substantial<br />

clarity. Using a stethoscope, stray sound radiation from<br />

the enclosure panels seems very low, and makes a minimal<br />

contribution to the sound output.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The substantial US-UK price differential forces me to<br />

make a split conclusion. In the UK this is an undeniably<br />

costly design, yet one built and finished to an exceptional<br />

standard, and it is hard to put a price on such excellence.<br />

These very good, <strong>com</strong>pact stand-mounts designs have<br />

a special voice and deliver their most natural sound when<br />

used as intended quite near a wall, so they have a special<br />

part to play as unobtrusive high quality speakers for more<br />

difficult room layouts. Here the Duette is as good as it<br />

gets, and is well capable of delivering the goods in a system<br />

costing as much as £40,000.<br />

I enjoyed its considerable transparency and retrieval<br />

of fine detail, its sense of performance and expressive<br />

dynamics, its healthy bass power and extension, and the<br />

fine sense of drive and involvement. It’s relatively easy to<br />

drive, efficient, with a natural and neutral tonal balance<br />

and very sweet treble. Many valve amplifiers will sing nicely<br />

with it.<br />

For US purchasers it actually constitutes fine value for<br />

money, while over here in Britain it still <strong>com</strong>fortably merits<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mendation.<br />

Wilson Audio Duette Frequency Response<br />

Wilson Audio Duette Impedance and Phase<br />

Wilson Audio Duette Waterfall<br />

HIFICRITIC MARCH / APRIL 2008 13


◆ REVIEW<br />

TONY FAULKNER TAKES THE<br />

DUETTES OUT MONITORING<br />

As a professional classical recording engineer I am<br />

very dependent on the quality of my monitoring<br />

equipment. When I am working, the information<br />

supplied by my monitor speakers and/or headphones<br />

determines whether the producer and I think we have<br />

our microphones and settings in the right place. The<br />

monitoring also presents our work to artists and clients,<br />

who can decide whether they like what they hear or not.<br />

Most recording engineers end up using a loudspeaker<br />

that tells them what they need to know, and is consistent<br />

for them in its presentation and tonal balance however<br />

dubious the quality of the listening room. We primarily<br />

need to know where we are in the time available for<br />

setting up, and thereafter to get on with our microphone<br />

technique and musical duties alongside the producer<br />

and artists. In such a context, people like me are nervous<br />

of using typical consumer floorstanding loudspeakers<br />

originally optimised for controlled home listening in a<br />

living room. With a few exceptions (such as B&W and<br />

ATC in the UK), consumer moving-coil speakers are not<br />

usually ideal for monitoring, nor would it be reasonable<br />

to expect them to be so. Home speakers can be excessively<br />

awkward and heavy, time-consuming to set up, and often<br />

do not sound nice in makeshift control-rooms where the<br />

bass end can run wild with booms and honks.<br />

It’s no secret that I am an enthusiastic user of Quad’s<br />

electrostatic loudspeakers for monitoring, as they give me<br />

so much of what I need to hear, though I acknowledge<br />

they are not to everyone’s taste. Their stereo imaging is<br />

excellent, the midrange is transparent and consistent, and<br />

they provide masses of fine detail without having to turn<br />

the volume too high – a serious issue because listening too<br />

loud makes one tired and impairs judgment, as well as<br />

making a bad control-room sound even worse. Hence my<br />

trepidation at being asked to try a pair of Wilson Duettes as<br />

monitors for a Busoni recording project for Hyperion, with<br />

pianist Hamish Milne in London’s Henry Wood Hall. My<br />

doubts about the Wilsons proved ill-founded, and I found<br />

that the Duettes were overall the finest two-driver movingcoil<br />

speakers I had heard to date. My only <strong>com</strong>plaint is that<br />

having heard them I’m now confronted with trying to find<br />

the wherewithal to buy a pair.<br />

First major feature of importance to an electrostatic<br />

enthusiast is that there is no obvious ‘moving-coil’<br />

weakness in the crossover zone between the two drivers,<br />

and the clarity, integration and transparency are unusually<br />

un<strong>com</strong>promised. Listening to a recent recital recording of<br />

Christine Brewer (soprano) and Roger Vignoles (piano)<br />

for the Wigmore Hall Live label, it was immediately<br />

apparently that the Duettes reproduced the <strong>com</strong>ponents<br />

of the singing voice as though they came from one entity.<br />

Many other moving-coil models somehow separate the<br />

human voice into unnatural unintegrated <strong>com</strong>ponents,<br />

with high and low frequencies living different lives – the<br />

tweeter squeaking with consonants and the woofer<br />

sounding chesty and a bit boomy. Here the bass is very<br />

well controlled and sensibly voiced for the size of cabinet<br />

and drive unit, and can be simply and convincingly finetuned<br />

by moving the speaker closer to or further from the<br />

wall behind it. The treble is extended and does not shriek<br />

nor squeak, unless the recording is shrieky or squeaky,<br />

and the balance is ideal for detailed listening. The Duettes<br />

deliver oodles of headroom for high power work, with no<br />

glare, boom or rattle.<br />

The Duettes will never replace my Quads, but<br />

for circumstances where I need significantly higher<br />

output, especially in bass power handling, and/or want<br />

the alternative qualities of a finely tuned moving-coil<br />

loudspeaker to suit the music and/or circumstances. These<br />

Wilsons are so very convincing and are fundamentally both<br />

accurate and very pleasurable to listen to. They <strong>com</strong>e with<br />

all sorts of fine setting-up procedures for audiophiles, but<br />

in my professional work I seldom have time to do hours<br />

of tweaking beyond moving the loudspeakers a foot or so<br />

until they sound more or less right. When I <strong>com</strong>e to use<br />

them on a more regular basis, I suspect I shall determine a<br />

nominal median arrangement and not mess around with<br />

them too much. Their conventional 2-wire connection<br />

worked well for me, and was a change from wrestling with<br />

the bi-wire plugs needed with some other designs. The<br />

highish 90dB sensitivity was very helpful, and the load was<br />

fine for my EAR valve monoblock power amps, using the<br />

4ohm output terminals. The Duette crossovers are fitted<br />

within the speaker stands (two sizes, normal and high, the<br />

latter useful for Pro users on the road). This feature makes<br />

the system more easily transportable, as it’s divided into<br />

four reasonable size and weight boxes, rather than two<br />

unwieldy backbreaking ones.<br />

The designer of this unique speaker deserves<br />

congratulations, for creating a model that reproduces music<br />

faithfully and confidently without imposing its presence in<br />

any ostentatious way, visually or audibly. It simply delivers<br />

without sounding noticeably ‘audiophile’ at all. I winced<br />

when I heard the price, but ‘no <strong>com</strong>promise’ describes both<br />

design and manufacture, and such quality does not <strong>com</strong>e<br />

without some penalty.<br />

14 HIFICRITIC MARCH / APRIL 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!