11.01.2014 Views

Advances in Laboratory Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis

Advances in Laboratory Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis

Advances in Laboratory Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Trichomonas</strong> vag<strong>in</strong>alis Test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Public Health Laboratories, 2010<br />

The Association <strong>of</strong> Public Health Laboratories and the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control fielded<br />

an onl<strong>in</strong>e survey <strong>in</strong> 2011 to characterize the role <strong>of</strong> public health laboratories (PHLs) <strong>in</strong> STD prevention.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this survey was to determ<strong>in</strong>e current STD test<strong>in</strong>g capabilities and capacities <strong>of</strong> state and<br />

local PHLs over the period <strong>of</strong> January 1, 2010–December 31, 2010. The survey aimed to gather data from<br />

96 state and local public health laboratories with<strong>in</strong> the United States on overall capacities and capabilities<br />

as well disease-specific <strong>in</strong>formation. Of note, the first NAAT for T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis was FDA-cleared <strong>in</strong> 2011 and<br />

was not assessed <strong>in</strong> this survey.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> 2010, the capability <strong>of</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>Trichomonas</strong> vag<strong>in</strong>alis was limited <strong>in</strong> public health laboratories.<br />

Of the 60 state and local PHLs that responded to T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis specific questions <strong>in</strong> the survey, 12 (20%)<br />

provided <strong>in</strong>-house test<strong>in</strong>g for T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis. Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the PHLs provid<strong>in</strong>g T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis test<strong>in</strong>g were local<br />

PHLs with only one state PHL provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>-house test<strong>in</strong>g. Two local PHLs referred test<strong>in</strong>g outside <strong>of</strong> the PHL<br />

system and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 47 PHLs did not provide any type <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-house test<strong>in</strong>g for T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis.<br />

Of the 12 laboratories that did provide <strong>in</strong>-house test<strong>in</strong>g, five provided culture (four used InPouch TV and<br />

one used Diamond broth) and 10 provided wet mount test<strong>in</strong>g services. Other exist<strong>in</strong>g diagnostic tests such<br />

as the Affirm VPIII, PCR and Xenostrip (now OSOM) were unavailable at these PHLs.<br />

Of the two local PHLs who referred test<strong>in</strong>g, culture, wet mount, Affirm VPIII, PCR and Xenostrip (now OSOM)<br />

were listed as test<strong>in</strong>g services that could be sent out <strong>of</strong> the PHL system.<br />

Of the 12 PHLs who provide <strong>in</strong>-house test<strong>in</strong>g, 10 reported test volume data. At these laboratories <strong>in</strong> 2010,<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> 9,424 specimens were tested with 691 (7.3%) specimens reported as positive for T. vag<strong>in</strong>alis.<br />

4 APHL Public Health <strong>Laboratory</strong> Issues <strong>in</strong> Brief

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!