11.01.2014 Views

Reproductive strategies in Angiosperms

Reproductive strategies in Angiosperms

Reproductive strategies in Angiosperms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Reproductive</strong> <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angiosperms</strong>


Overview<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Self Incompatibility and changes <strong>in</strong> a mat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system<br />

Types of mixed reproduction <strong>strategies</strong><br />

Obligate apomicts<br />

How plants enforce outcross<strong>in</strong>g


Mechanisms to promote<br />

Outcross<strong>in</strong>g<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Dioecy – separation of sexes between<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual plants, not hermaphrodite.<br />

Self <strong>in</strong>compatibility – sometimes too effective<br />

Dichogamy – Male and Female reproductive<br />

parts mature asynchronously<br />

Herkogamy – Spatial separation of sex parts


Arabidopsis Lyrata<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Normally a genetically SI obligate outcrosser<br />

Shift <strong>in</strong> mat<strong>in</strong>g system resulted <strong>in</strong> loss of<br />

heterozygosity<br />

Low population density and poll<strong>in</strong>ator scarcity drive<br />

loss of SI system<br />

SI will evolve with high <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g depression


Why mixed reproduction?<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Perennials have more opportunities to outcross<br />

Resource allocation depends on environment<br />

Most species are hermaphroditic<br />

High seed set versus Inbreed<strong>in</strong>g depression


Viola lanceolata<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Mixed breed<strong>in</strong>g with two flower types<br />

Either Outcross<strong>in</strong>g chasmogamous flowers or<br />

self<strong>in</strong>g cleistogamous flowers<br />

Tradeoff between two types<br />

Chasmogamy results from favorable<br />

(Cortes 2006)<br />

environmental factors.


Bulb<strong>in</strong>e vagans<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Hermaphroditic flowers accessible to bees<br />

Spatial separation of pistils and stamens<br />

Sex parts fold together when flower expires<br />

Inbreed<strong>in</strong>g depression observed<br />

<strong>Reproductive</strong> assurance without wast<strong>in</strong>g ovules<br />

(Vaughton 2007)


Evidence of Inbreed<strong>in</strong>g Depression


Taraxacum offic<strong>in</strong>ale<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Polyploid Amomicts<br />

Clonal reproduction results <strong>in</strong> highly<br />

homogeneous communities.<br />

Numerous hybridization events<br />

Asexual offspr<strong>in</strong>g from sexual parents<br />

(Majesky 2012)


Conclusion<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Both autogamy or self <strong>in</strong>compatibility will evolve<br />

under certa<strong>in</strong> conditions.<br />

Costs associated with reproduc<strong>in</strong>g sexually<br />

Mixed reproduction can be accomplished<br />

different ways.<br />

Asexual species arise from hybridization


Works Cited<br />

Majeský L, Vasut RJ, Kitner M, Trávnícek B. The pattern of genetic variability <strong>in</strong> apomictic clones of taraxacum offic<strong>in</strong>ale <strong>in</strong>dicates the<br />

alternation of asexual and sexual histories of apomicts. PLoS One. 2012;7(8).<br />

Aurea CC, Ballard,Harvey E.,,Jr. Influence of annual fluctuations <strong>in</strong> environmental conditions on chasmogamous flower production <strong>in</strong> viola<br />

striata1. J Torrey Bot Soc. 2006;133(2):312-320.<br />

Mable BK, Robertson AV, Dart S, Berardo CD, Witham L. Breakdown of self-<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong> the perennial ArabidopsisLyrata (brassicaceae)<br />

and its genetic consequences. Evolution. 2005;59(7):1437-1448. http://search.proquest.com/docview/55590502?accountid=14696. doi:<br />

http://dx.doi.org/10.1043/0014-3820(2005)059[1437:BOSITP]2.0.CO;2.<br />

Porcher E, Lande R. Loss of gametophytic self-<strong>in</strong>compatibility with evolution ofInbreed<strong>in</strong>g depression. Evolution. 2005;59(1):46-60.<br />

http://search.proquest.com/docview/55697690?accountid=14696. doi: 2.0.CO;2" TARGET="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1043/0014-<br />

3820(2005)0592.0.CO;2<br />

Vaughton G, Ramsey M, Simpson I. Does self<strong>in</strong>g provide reproductive assurance <strong>in</strong> the perennial herb bulb<strong>in</strong>e vagans (asphodelaceae)? Oikos.<br />

2008;117(3):390-398. http://search.proquest.com/docview/211499354?accountid=14696. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-<br />

1299.16365.x. .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!