14.01.2014 Views

RHD Prelude Chapter - Health Systems Trust

RHD Prelude Chapter - Health Systems Trust

RHD Prelude Chapter - Health Systems Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“We give every manager a chance to collate the information from their facilities and districts<br />

and then to prepare a submission and the entire presentation. That facility manager, district<br />

or hospital manager, is responsible for the collation for the preparation of the report, for<br />

the preparation of the presentation and then to present it there on behalf of the region.”<br />

(Regional <strong>Health</strong> Director)<br />

Although acknowledged as still developing and not perfect, the monitoring and evaluating system<br />

is seen by health officials to be working. Community members from the governance structures<br />

are part of evaluation meetings, but their opinions are not always acknowledged. As mentioned,<br />

there are councilors with a good understanding of indicators and good knowledge of the health<br />

problems and needs in their own community. A comment made by a community member in a<br />

discussion group indicates some dissatisfaction with the current system of monitoring, especially<br />

in the more disadvantaged, deep rural areas:<br />

260<br />

“I can make a comment on the government policy which includes all the people since 1994.<br />

I was carefully looking at the way they do things; they do not have a follow up or have a<br />

monitoring process, to see exactly whether their implementation of that policy is working<br />

on a local level. Things are working well at the top, provincial and local levels. But deep<br />

down at the disadvantaged communities, that’s where things do not work smoothly. You<br />

see, just at local levels, that’s where there is no monitoring process and the government<br />

need to do something on that. Long time ago, during the old government, the white people<br />

were making use of these government health facilities day and night, 24 hours, making sure<br />

that their government policy works, but this new democracy of ours; we don’t guard it to<br />

make sure that it works for the people. So that is why you could find that this new democracy<br />

is enjoyed by the people at the top.”<br />

(District Community Discussion Group)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Planning, monitoring and evaluating of health services are an essential, although complex,<br />

process. Although improving, a top-down approach appears to still dominate. The national Ten<br />

Point Strategic Plan for 2004 to 2009 has shifted from the previous ten points and does not<br />

mention that services are to be delivered through a district health system. Primary health care<br />

and strengthening governance structures (and presumably community participation) are specifically<br />

mentioned. The DHS may be implicit within the Ten Point Plan.<br />

The National <strong>Health</strong> Act of 2003, <strong>Chapter</strong> 5, establishes a DHS for South Africa. For this to be<br />

realised horizontal and vertical gaps in the systems need to be bridged. Planning processes for<br />

the vertical programmes at national and provincial levels require coordination; the voice of the<br />

communities served by the health services require to be heard and noted in the planning process.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!