17.01.2014 Views

Propositional Argumentation Systems and Symbolic Evidence Theory

Propositional Argumentation Systems and Symbolic Evidence Theory

Propositional Argumentation Systems and Symbolic Evidence Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 Doubt <strong>and</strong> Plausibility 11<br />

An argument a supporting some h ′ ∈ C(h) is an argument against h (or<br />

in favour of h ❁ ). Let DB(h) ⊆ A be the set of arguments a ∈ A, which<br />

allow to assert any h ❁ . Such arguments are called refuting arguments.<br />

Again, DB(h) forms a downward–set with a unique maximal element.<br />

This maximal element is given by the coarsest refuting argument db(h).<br />

The function db(h), which assigns to each hypothesis h ∈ H the coarsest<br />

refuting argument, is called doubt in h. It defines a mapping d : H −→ A<br />

called allocation of doubt. It satisfies the following conditions (Kohlas,<br />

1995):<br />

(D1) db(△) = ▽ (with △ ∈ H <strong>and</strong> ▽ ∈ A),<br />

(D2) db(h 1 ⊔ h 2 ) = db(h 1 ) ⊓ db(h 2 ),<br />

(D3) if h 1 ⊑ h 2 , then db(h 2 ) ⊑ db(h 1 ),<br />

(D4) db(h 1 ⊓ h 2 ) ⊒ db(h 1 ) ⊔ db(h 2 ).<br />

For a body of arguments B = (H, A, qs) allocation of doubt db can be derived<br />

from allocation of quasi–support qs <strong>and</strong> vice versa. Let h be a hypothesis<br />

in H <strong>and</strong> h ❁ its complementary hypothesis, then we have:<br />

db(h) = qs(h ❁ ), qs(h) = db(h ❁ ). (2.5)<br />

Given two finite Boolean algebras H <strong>and</strong> A of hypotheses <strong>and</strong> arguments, it<br />

can be interesting to look at arguments for which a hypothesis h is not excluded.<br />

Such arguments are called plausible arguments for h. In general,<br />

plausible arguments do not necessarily allow to infer the hypothesis h, but in<br />

all cases h remains possible. A hypothesis h is possible with an argument<br />

a, if a does not support h ❁ . Let P L(h) ⊆ A be the set of plausible arguments<br />

which do not allow to infer h ❁ . P L(h) is the complement of DB(h).<br />

Note that the complement of an downward–set is always an upward–set.<br />

Therefore, P L(h) forms an upward–set, <strong>and</strong> the set of its minimal elements<br />

(lower bound) is denoted by νP L(h) (there is no unique minimal element).<br />

We call<br />

pl(h) =⊔ {a : a ∈ νP L(h)} (2.6)<br />

plausibility of h. This mapping from H to A is called allocation of<br />

plausibility. It satisfies the following properties (Kohlas, 1995):<br />

(P1) pl(△) = △ (the first △ is in H, the second in A),<br />

(P2) pl(h 1 ⊔ h 2 ) = pl(h 1 ) ⊔ pl(h 2 ),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!