18.01.2014 Views

Destruction of Waste Ozone Depleting Substances and Synthetic ...

Destruction of Waste Ozone Depleting Substances and Synthetic ...

Destruction of Waste Ozone Depleting Substances and Synthetic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Destruction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong><br />

<strong>Ozone</strong> <strong>Depleting</strong> <strong>Substances</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Synthetic</strong> Greenhouse Gases Program<br />

Comments on Consultation Paper<br />

January 2013


Executive Summary<br />

Australia is a world leader in international <strong>and</strong> domestic efforts to protect the ozone layer<br />

<strong>and</strong> reduce synthetic greenhouse gasses. This has been achieved through the combined<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> the Australian Government <strong>and</strong> the refrigeration <strong>and</strong> air conditioning (RAC)<br />

Industry.<br />

Such a positive stance is critical to the economic well-being <strong>and</strong> public health <strong>of</strong> a nation<br />

which is already predominantly arid <strong>and</strong> in close proximity to the ozone hole.<br />

Australia’s ODS <strong>and</strong> SGG product stewardship scheme involves three key players:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Australian Government – which administers the import / manufacturing licence<br />

Australian Refrigeration Council Ltd (ARC)– administers h<strong>and</strong>ling & storage licences<br />

Refrigerant Reclaim Australia (RRA) – operates the reclaim <strong>and</strong> destruction facilities<br />

These are interrelated <strong>and</strong> work in unison to have an effective impact on minimising<br />

emissions <strong>of</strong> ODS <strong>and</strong> SGG’s – thereby having a real <strong>and</strong> positive impact on the environment.<br />

The current system works. It works extremely well. Indeed it is widely viewed as a global<br />

leader. Not only does it have a very real positive impact, it also provides Australia with<br />

significant credibility on the global stage.<br />

The Australian scheme is built around the notion <strong>of</strong> control. In contrast to economic matters,<br />

issues such as public safety <strong>and</strong> environmental protection control are seen as the most<br />

effective means <strong>of</strong> achieving good policy outcomes. The introduction <strong>of</strong> variables reduces<br />

control <strong>and</strong> increases administration costs.<br />

Introducing competition into an area prefaced on single-point control carries potential risk<br />

<strong>and</strong> adds to the complexity <strong>of</strong> the scheme, resulting in confusion. These ‘macro’ issues should<br />

be further explored as part <strong>of</strong> the consultation paper.<br />

At a micro level potential issues such as reduced accountability, transparency <strong>and</strong> access to<br />

valuable information as a result <strong>of</strong> ‘commercial – in – confidence should be considerations.<br />

In general terms the ARC supports regulation for which there is a demonstrated need, net<br />

benefit, is simple to implement at low cost <strong>and</strong> is both efficient <strong>and</strong> effective. These are<br />

fundamental characteristics <strong>of</strong> good regulation.<br />

ARC Submission on ODS&SGG <strong>Destruction</strong> Page 2


Introduction<br />

Australia has been a leading supporter <strong>of</strong> international efforts to protect the ozone layer <strong>of</strong><br />

the atmosphere since the early 1980s when initial moves were made through the United<br />

Nations to limit the global consumption <strong>of</strong> ozone depleting substances (ODS). When vented<br />

into the atmosphere ODS damages the ozone layer which protects humans, animals, plants<br />

<strong>and</strong> building materials from the harmful effects <strong>of</strong> UV-B radiation.<br />

Australia has ratified the Vienna Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ozone</strong> Layer 1985 <strong>and</strong><br />

the Montreal Protocol on <strong>Substances</strong> that Deplete the <strong>Ozone</strong> Layer 1987. It has also ratified<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the amendments to the Protocol designed to extend international ozone protection<br />

measures.<br />

As the ozone layer protects the Earth from ultraviolet radiation, protecting Australia from this<br />

radiation can effectively be achieved by implementing mechanisms that minimise the use <strong>of</strong><br />

substances that are known to deplete the ozone layer. Currently, minimising the use <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />

depleting substances is approached in two ways:<br />

1. through the implementation <strong>of</strong> domestic policies that minimise the domestic emission <strong>of</strong><br />

ozone depleting substances; <strong>and</strong><br />

2. by encouraging all countries to minimise emissions <strong>of</strong> ODS through participation in<br />

Protocol forums.<br />

On the domestic front there exists a product stewardship program by virtue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ozone</strong><br />

Protection <strong>and</strong> <strong>Synthetic</strong> Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989. This scheme broadly<br />

involves three key components:<br />

1. Import Licences administered by the Australian Government.<br />

2. A licence scheme regarding the use, h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> storage <strong>of</strong> refrigerants –<br />

administered on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Australian Government by the Australian Refrigeration<br />

Council Ltd.<br />

3. <strong>Destruction</strong> <strong>of</strong> waste ODS <strong>and</strong> SGG refrigerants by Refrigerant Reclaim Australia.<br />

The three controls work in unison to minimise the emissions <strong>of</strong> refrigerants thereby protecting<br />

the environment. In many quarters the Australian system is seem as world leading best<br />

practice. This is particularly so <strong>of</strong> RRA.<br />

Existing Regulatory Arrangements - Australia<br />

The <strong>Ozone</strong> Protection <strong>and</strong> <strong>Synthetic</strong> Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

prohibits the import, export or manufacture <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbons, halons, carbon<br />

tetrachloride, methyl chlor<strong>of</strong>orm <strong>and</strong> hydrobrom<strong>of</strong>luorocarbons without an essential-uses<br />

or used-substances licence;<br />

establishes a system <strong>of</strong> controlled-substances licences <strong>and</strong> reporting requirements for the<br />

import, export or manufacture <strong>of</strong> hydrochlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbons <strong>and</strong> methyl bromide<br />

consistent with Australia's obligations under the Montreal Protocol;<br />

establishes an <strong>Ozone</strong> Protection Reserve to allow revenue from the licensing system to be<br />

directed towards the cost <strong>of</strong> its administration, <strong>and</strong> industry awareness programmes for<br />

the phase out <strong>of</strong> hydrochlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbons <strong>and</strong> methyl bromide; <strong>and</strong><br />

various administrative requirements (such as fees for licences) set under the <strong>Ozone</strong><br />

Protection <strong>and</strong> <strong>Synthetic</strong> Greenhouse Gas Regulations 1995 No. 389.<br />

ARC Submission on ODS&SGG <strong>Destruction</strong> Page 3


Control vs Competition<br />

Commercialisation <strong>of</strong> the ODS <strong>and</strong> SGG destruction process currently successfully operated<br />

by RRA by opening it up to competition is not without risk.<br />

Historically the Australian scheme has been about control. Controlling refrigerant such that it<br />

is not emitted into the atmosphere causing significant environmental damage.<br />

It is worth remembering that Australia has a great deal to lose economically <strong>and</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

public health should emissions increase – given our proximity to the hole in the ozone layer<br />

<strong>and</strong> given we are fundamentally already an arid l<strong>and</strong>. Hence the focus on control is<br />

warranted.<br />

In essence critical policy issues such as public safety <strong>and</strong> environmental protection occupy a<br />

similar policy space, both essentially being about control. It is critical in areas such as these<br />

that commercial interests be stringently regulated to avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

price <strong>and</strong> quality st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Control <strong>and</strong> competition are fundamentally juxtaposed.<br />

There is no question adequate control becomes much more difficult with multiple operatives<br />

– both in an administrative <strong>and</strong> operational sense. It introduces the potential for variability<br />

<strong>and</strong> in a commercial environment where the drive for market share can result in a ‘race to<br />

the bottom’, with quality st<strong>and</strong>ards suffering.<br />

At a micro level potential issues such as reduced accountability, transparency <strong>and</strong> access to<br />

valuable information to both industry <strong>and</strong> used by Government to inform future policy may<br />

suffer as a result <strong>of</strong> ‘commercial – in – confidence’. These should be considerations.<br />

The current destruction arrangements through the single point <strong>of</strong> RRA have significant<br />

Industry currency <strong>and</strong> credibility, <strong>and</strong> is simple <strong>and</strong> well understood by Industry. Changing<br />

this is likely to add complexity <strong>and</strong> confusion for Industry.<br />

The Australian Refrigeration Council Ltd<br />

The Australian Refrigeration Council (ARC) is at the forefront <strong>of</strong> environmental best practice –<br />

we have a very real impact on minimising avoidable emissions into the atmosphere <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />

depleting substances <strong>and</strong> synthetic greenhouse gasses.<br />

The ARC administers various important end-use controls in the reduction <strong>of</strong> global warming<br />

<strong>and</strong> ozone depletion <strong>and</strong> increasing energy efficiency. We make a positive difference to the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the environment.<br />

The Australian Refrigeration Council is a private company limited by guarantee. The Board is<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> the Refrigeration <strong>and</strong> Air Conditioning Industry <strong>and</strong>, in partnership with staff,<br />

provide a unique perspective <strong>and</strong> ability to respond to complex issues.<br />

In achieving its objectives the ARC works in partnership with national governments <strong>and</strong> with<br />

various stakeholders including key Industry bodies, licensed individuals, manufacturers <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses.<br />

ARC Vision - A better quality environment<br />

ARC Mission - To reduce direct <strong>and</strong> indirect greenhouse gas <strong>and</strong> ozone depleting substance<br />

emissions through licensing, compliance <strong>and</strong> education<br />

Through the administration <strong>of</strong> the Australian Government’s <strong>Ozone</strong> <strong>Depleting</strong> Substance<br />

(ODS) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Synthetic</strong> Greenhouse Gasses (SGG) licensing scheme, the ARC has a very real<br />

<strong>and</strong> positive impact on the environment.<br />

ARC Submission on ODS&SGG <strong>Destruction</strong> Page 4


The ARC administers the scheme with expertise, innovation <strong>and</strong> environmental <strong>and</strong> business<br />

acumen.<br />

ARC has fifteen affiliated Industry bodies, representing the various sub-sectors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Refrigeration <strong>and</strong> Air conditioning industry.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Appliance Industry Association (AIA)<br />

Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Refrigeration Air Conditioning & Heating (AIRAH)<br />

Air Conditioning & Mechanical Contractors Association (AMCA)<br />

Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturers Association (AREMA)<br />

Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Wholesalers Association (ARWA)<br />

Federation <strong>of</strong> Automotive Products Manufacturers (FAPM)<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Automotive Mechanical Engineers (IAME)<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Service Engineers (IRASE)<br />

Motor Trades Association <strong>of</strong> Australia (MTAA)<br />

National Electrical & Communication Association (NECA)<br />

Refrigerants Australia (RA)<br />

Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Contractors Association (RACCA)<br />

Refrigerant Reclaim Australia (RRA)<br />

Victorian Automotive Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce (VACC)<br />

Vehicle Air Conditioning Specialists Association (VASA)<br />

The inclusion <strong>of</strong> RRA as a member <strong>of</strong> ARC is <strong>of</strong> critical importance, providing for cross<br />

organisational dialogue <strong>and</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> the quality across two critical elements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian product stewardship program. Opening this up to market forces will reduce the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this relationship.<br />

Options<br />

The consultation paper unfortunately ignores the fundamental question <strong>of</strong> if the recovery<br />

<strong>and</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> ODS <strong>and</strong> SGG refrigerants should be opened up to market competition,<br />

preferring instead to jump to options which are pro – competition.<br />

This ignores the many risks in moving to the open market whilst disregarding the success <strong>of</strong><br />

the current scheme. In short it fails the fundamental test <strong>of</strong> good regulation <strong>of</strong> demonstrating<br />

‘market failure’. In the view <strong>of</strong> the ARC these factors need to be further explored.<br />

Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing this there are some poignant issues that flow from the paper worth further<br />

consideration:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Financial incentives to encourage reclamation <strong>and</strong> destruction are to be applauded<br />

notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing that any such incentives should be managed with the current,<br />

successful scheme by increasing the rebate on returned refrigerant.<br />

Additional enforcement should be m<strong>and</strong>ated in order to improve levels <strong>of</strong><br />

compliance with a consequent increase in the level <strong>of</strong> recovery – ultimately reducing<br />

emissions.<br />

Additional regulation <strong>and</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> life products <strong>and</strong> equipment.<br />

The ARC would be happy to explore additional enforcement options further.<br />

In general terms the ARC supports regulation for which there is a demonstrated need, net<br />

benefit, is simple to implement at low cost <strong>and</strong> is both efficient <strong>and</strong> effective. These are<br />

fundamental characteristics <strong>of</strong> good regulation.<br />

ARC Submission on ODS&SGG <strong>Destruction</strong> Page 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!