An Evaluation of the NAMFI/ICEIDA Cooperation Project 2002 -2004
An Evaluation of the NAMFI/ICEIDA Cooperation Project 2002 -2004
An Evaluation of the NAMFI/ICEIDA Cooperation Project 2002 -2004
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tumi Tómasson <strong>ICEIDA</strong> May <strong>2004</strong><br />
Hafeni Mungungu<br />
<strong>An</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>NAMFI</strong><br />
The results and recommendations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation are to guide <strong>the</strong> involved parties in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
decision-making regarding <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> co-operation: continuation/changes/termination.<br />
7. Scope and focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation<br />
The evaluation will focus on providing information for decision-makers, <strong>ICEIDA</strong> and MFMR.<br />
The evaluation shall consider outcomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project and if <strong>the</strong> main results will indicate that<br />
<strong>ICEIDA</strong> should at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> year <strong>2004</strong> withdraw its support as agreed upon in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />
Document in October <strong>2002</strong> by both parties, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> evaluator shall outline in <strong>the</strong> report a<br />
proposal for <strong>the</strong> project completion and a timetable for <strong>the</strong> phasing out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
In general, <strong>the</strong> evaluation shall;<br />
‣ consider <strong>the</strong> goal and purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project, as well as inputs and outputs and financial<br />
management;<br />
‣ consider unintended outcomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project;<br />
‣ evaluate <strong>the</strong> impact for <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries or how it can be measured in <strong>the</strong> future if not<br />
obvious yet;<br />
‣ provide a description <strong>of</strong> major constraints and risk factors for project implementation and<br />
sustainability;<br />
‣ assess <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> project sustainability;<br />
‣ provide a description <strong>of</strong> lessons learned in relation to future projects implementation;<br />
‣ give recommendations on future modifications and improvements within <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> existing <strong>Project</strong> Document in light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above listed objectives.<br />
8. Issues to be covered in <strong>the</strong> evaluation<br />
Special attention shall be given to but not necessarily limited to, <strong>the</strong> following issues:<br />
Efficiency:<br />
Results achieved (inputs -outputs).<br />
Have resources been effectively used in <strong>the</strong> project? What problems have arisen? Could <strong>the</strong>y be<br />
avoided in similar projects?<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project organisation on all levels (including management, reporting and<br />
monitoring, human resources and technical backup);<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> financial management including disbursement <strong>of</strong> funds at <strong>the</strong> different<br />
levels and financial reporting;<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> staff development ;<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infrastructure facilities;<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Achievement <strong>of</strong> objectives.<br />
Has <strong>the</strong> project achieved its objectives? What has facilitated or prevented <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
project?<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> if and how <strong>ICEIDA</strong> and MFMR have fulfilled <strong>the</strong>ir objectives as planned<br />
in <strong>the</strong> agreed <strong>Project</strong> Document <strong>of</strong> <strong>2004</strong>;<br />
40