china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
of the US to <str<strong>on</strong>g>its</str<strong>on</strong>g> strategic competitor. Besides, China does<br />
not figure at all in President Bush's legislative agenda for<br />
2001 which includes a global round of negotiati<strong>on</strong>s, a<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al round of negotiati<strong>on</strong>s for the free trade agreement<br />
for the Americas by January 2005 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a bilateral route for<br />
negotiati<strong>on</strong>s. In the bilateral route, three countries- Jordan,<br />
Singapore <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chile -have been identified for further<br />
bilateral negotiati<strong>on</strong>s towards a free trade agreement in<br />
additi<strong>on</strong> to a bilateral preferential trade agreement with<br />
Vietnam <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Laos. This is unlike during the Clint<strong>on</strong><br />
administrati<strong>on</strong> when China's entry into the WTO was seen<br />
to be a major achievement for the US.<br />
There is also a technical problem. The US C<strong>on</strong>gress<br />
extended PNTR to China in 1999 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> then subsequently in<br />
May 2000 <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> that the US President would<br />
certify to the C<strong>on</strong>gress that the WTO multilateral<br />
agreement is as beneficial to the Americans as the bilateral<br />
agreement that China <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> America had signed in 1999. The<br />
last date for fulfilling this c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> is June 3, 2001 1 . The<br />
multilateral agreement however, has not been c<strong>on</strong>cluded<br />
yet. If this certificati<strong>on</strong> does not take place by June 3,<br />
1<br />
There was a provisi<strong>on</strong> in last year’s (2000) legislati<strong>on</strong> approving<br />
PNTR that China join the World Trade Organizati<strong>on</strong> by June 2001.<br />
Because China failed to meet that deadline, US lawmakers had been<br />
preparing for another PNTR vote. But <strong>on</strong> June 11, 2001, US <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Chinese trade negotiators reached an agreement <strong>on</strong> key outst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing<br />
bilateral issues. “It now appears that C<strong>on</strong>gress need <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e last<br />
time - for the span of just a few m<strong>on</strong>ths – before China becomes a<br />
full member of the WTO.” China has now completed all of <str<strong>on</strong>g>its</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
bilateral talks <strong>on</strong> WTO entry except for Mexico <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Central<br />
America.<br />
Source: Asia Times Online, 12 July, 2001 in WTO Press review<br />
dated 12 July 2001.<br />
9