20.01.2014 Views

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the US to <str<strong>on</strong>g>its</str<strong>on</strong>g> strategic competitor. Besides, China does<br />

not figure at all in President Bush's legislative agenda for<br />

2001 which includes a global round of negotiati<strong>on</strong>s, a<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>al round of negotiati<strong>on</strong>s for the free trade agreement<br />

for the Americas by January 2005 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a bilateral route for<br />

negotiati<strong>on</strong>s. In the bilateral route, three countries- Jordan,<br />

Singapore <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chile -have been identified for further<br />

bilateral negotiati<strong>on</strong>s towards a free trade agreement in<br />

additi<strong>on</strong> to a bilateral preferential trade agreement with<br />

Vietnam <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Laos. This is unlike during the Clint<strong>on</strong><br />

administrati<strong>on</strong> when China's entry into the WTO was seen<br />

to be a major achievement for the US.<br />

There is also a technical problem. The US C<strong>on</strong>gress<br />

extended PNTR to China in 1999 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> then subsequently in<br />

May 2000 <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> that the US President would<br />

certify to the C<strong>on</strong>gress that the WTO multilateral<br />

agreement is as beneficial to the Americans as the bilateral<br />

agreement that China <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> America had signed in 1999. The<br />

last date for fulfilling this c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> is June 3, 2001 1 . The<br />

multilateral agreement however, has not been c<strong>on</strong>cluded<br />

yet. If this certificati<strong>on</strong> does not take place by June 3,<br />

1<br />

There was a provisi<strong>on</strong> in last year’s (2000) legislati<strong>on</strong> approving<br />

PNTR that China join the World Trade Organizati<strong>on</strong> by June 2001.<br />

Because China failed to meet that deadline, US lawmakers had been<br />

preparing for another PNTR vote. But <strong>on</strong> June 11, 2001, US <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Chinese trade negotiators reached an agreement <strong>on</strong> key outst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing<br />

bilateral issues. “It now appears that C<strong>on</strong>gress need <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e last<br />

time - for the span of just a few m<strong>on</strong>ths – before China becomes a<br />

full member of the WTO.” China has now completed all of <str<strong>on</strong>g>its</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

bilateral talks <strong>on</strong> WTO entry except for Mexico <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Central<br />

America.<br />

Source: Asia Times Online, 12 July, 2001 in WTO Press review<br />

dated 12 July 2001.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!