20.01.2014 Views

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

china, wto and its impact on india - icrier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lawyers. But are they prepared for rule by law? Be that<br />

as it may, there is little doubt that the Chinese have<br />

taken the first step by building the legal expertise.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

Two greatest fears the Chinese have are in respect of<br />

agriculture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> TRIPS. What would the WTO agreement<br />

do to agriculture? This is much the same fear that has been<br />

expressed even in India. What would TRIPS do to Chinese<br />

expertise in this area?<br />

The day I l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed in China the pharmaceutical<br />

companies, who had taken the South African government<br />

to court over what they felt was patent infringement by the<br />

South African government <strong>on</strong> AIDS drugs, actually<br />

withdrew their petiti<strong>on</strong>. This is a major victory for those<br />

who believe that there is a balance between the interest of<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>sumers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the producers of knowledge. Just four<br />

days ago, Robert Zoellick, the US trade negotiator, has<br />

given a speech where, for the first time in fifteen years, an<br />

American trade negotiator has said that there is a public<br />

interest angle in intellectual property. When it comes to<br />

public health emergencies like AIDS, intellectual property<br />

must give way to c<strong>on</strong>sumer interest. The noti<strong>on</strong> that there<br />

is balance between the c<strong>on</strong>sumer interest <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the producer<br />

interest is now sinking in. This is <strong>on</strong>e of the reas<strong>on</strong>s why<br />

the Americans did not take part in dispute settlement over<br />

TRIPS <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Americans are foot-dragging over taking<br />

Argentina into dispute settlement over their patent laws.<br />

The Argentinians <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Brazilians have g<strong>on</strong>e very far in<br />

introducing public interest provisi<strong>on</strong>s in their patent<br />

legislati<strong>on</strong>. This is of great interest to China.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!