china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
china, wto and its impact on india - icrier
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
lawyers. But are they prepared for rule by law? Be that<br />
as it may, there is little doubt that the Chinese have<br />
taken the first step by building the legal expertise.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />
Two greatest fears the Chinese have are in respect of<br />
agriculture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> TRIPS. What would the WTO agreement<br />
do to agriculture? This is much the same fear that has been<br />
expressed even in India. What would TRIPS do to Chinese<br />
expertise in this area?<br />
The day I l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed in China the pharmaceutical<br />
companies, who had taken the South African government<br />
to court over what they felt was patent infringement by the<br />
South African government <strong>on</strong> AIDS drugs, actually<br />
withdrew their petiti<strong>on</strong>. This is a major victory for those<br />
who believe that there is a balance between the interest of<br />
the c<strong>on</strong>sumers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the producers of knowledge. Just four<br />
days ago, Robert Zoellick, the US trade negotiator, has<br />
given a speech where, for the first time in fifteen years, an<br />
American trade negotiator has said that there is a public<br />
interest angle in intellectual property. When it comes to<br />
public health emergencies like AIDS, intellectual property<br />
must give way to c<strong>on</strong>sumer interest. The noti<strong>on</strong> that there<br />
is balance between the c<strong>on</strong>sumer interest <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the producer<br />
interest is now sinking in. This is <strong>on</strong>e of the reas<strong>on</strong>s why<br />
the Americans did not take part in dispute settlement over<br />
TRIPS <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Americans are foot-dragging over taking<br />
Argentina into dispute settlement over their patent laws.<br />
The Argentinians <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Brazilians have g<strong>on</strong>e very far in<br />
introducing public interest provisi<strong>on</strong>s in their patent<br />
legislati<strong>on</strong>. This is of great interest to China.<br />
18