25.01.2014 Views

microsatellite markers – a novel tool in molecular genetics - ijrpc

microsatellite markers – a novel tool in molecular genetics - ijrpc

microsatellite markers – a novel tool in molecular genetics - ijrpc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IJRPC 2012, 2(2) Pokhriyal et al ISSN: 22312781<br />

Homozygous<br />

(Both strands have 7 CT repeats)<br />

…CGTAGCCTTGCATCCTTCTCTCTCTCTCT<br />

CTATCGGTACTACGTGG…<br />

…CGTAGCCTTGCATCCTTCTCTCTCTCTCT<br />

CTATCGGTACTACGTGG…<br />

5’ flank<strong>in</strong>g region <strong>microsatellite</strong> locus 3’ flank<strong>in</strong>g region<br />

Heterozygous<br />

(One strand has 7 repeats, and the other has<br />

8 repeats)<br />

…CGTAGCCTTGCATCCTTCTCTCTCTCTCT<br />

CTATCGGTACTACGTGG…<br />

…CGTAGCCTTGCATCCTTCTCTCTCTCTCT<br />

CTCTATCGGTACTACGTGG…<br />

Microsatellites are useful genetic <strong>markers</strong><br />

because they tend to be highly polymorphic. It<br />

is not uncommon to have human<br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong>s with 20 or more alleles with<br />

heterozygosities. [8]<br />

Microsatellites generally tend to occur <strong>in</strong> noncod<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regions of the DNA although a few<br />

human genetic disorders are caused by (tr<strong>in</strong>ucleotide)<br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong> regions <strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regions. On each side of the repeat unit<br />

are flank<strong>in</strong>g regions that consist of "unordered"<br />

DNA. The flank<strong>in</strong>g regions are critical because<br />

they allow us to develop locus-specific primers<br />

to amplify the <strong>microsatellite</strong>s with PCR<br />

(polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction). That is, given a<br />

stretch of unordered DNA 30-50 base pairs<br />

(bp) long, the probability of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

particular stretch more than once <strong>in</strong> the<br />

genome becomes vanish<strong>in</strong>gly small. This<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of widely occurr<strong>in</strong>g repeat units<br />

and locus-specific flank<strong>in</strong>g regions are a part<br />

of strategy for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong> primers. The primers for PCR<br />

will be sequences from these unique flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regions. By hav<strong>in</strong>g a forward and a reverse<br />

primer on each side of the <strong>microsatellite</strong>, we<br />

will be able to amplify a fairly short (100 to 500<br />

bp, where bp means base pairs) locus-specific<br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong> region.<br />

There are two hypotheses that expla<strong>in</strong> how<br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong>s mutate 5<br />

1. “Polymerase slippage” or “slippedstrand<br />

mispair<strong>in</strong>g”: When the DNA<br />

replicates, the polymerase loses track of its<br />

place, and either leaves out repeat units or<br />

adds too many repeat units. The result is that<br />

the new strand has a different number of<br />

repeats as the parent strand. This is thought to<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> small changes <strong>in</strong> numbers of repeats.<br />

It also expla<strong>in</strong>s how <strong>microsatellite</strong> loci could be<br />

generated <strong>in</strong> the first place; it is likely that<br />

sequences <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g two or three repeats are<br />

randomly distributed throughout the<br />

genome. Slippage could then amplify these<br />

401<br />

short repeat sequences <strong>in</strong>to many repeats<br />

over successive generations. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, the<br />

effectiveness of the mismatch repair system<br />

would also play an important role <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>microsatellite</strong> mutation rate.<br />

2. Unequal cross<strong>in</strong>g-over dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

meiosis:This is thought to expla<strong>in</strong> more<br />

drastic changes <strong>in</strong> numbers of repeats. In the<br />

diagram below, chromosome A obta<strong>in</strong>ed too<br />

many repeats dur<strong>in</strong>g cross<strong>in</strong>g-over and<br />

chromosome B obta<strong>in</strong>ed too few repeats. 9<br />

Model for Microsatellite Mutation 5<br />

Many models have been proposed to expla<strong>in</strong><br />

the mutation <strong>in</strong> <strong>microsatellite</strong>s but due to some<br />

or the other limitations or unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed facts<br />

they have been discarded. So a model is<br />

proposed which expla<strong>in</strong>s most of the<br />

mutational mechanisms and facts and<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> <strong>microsatellite</strong> mutation are<br />

been described <strong>in</strong> stepwise mutation model as<br />

follows:<br />

Stepwise Mutation Model (SMM)<br />

The idea that add<strong>in</strong>g or subtract<strong>in</strong>g one repeat<br />

is likely easier than add<strong>in</strong>g or subtract<strong>in</strong>g two<br />

or more beads is the basis for us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Stepwise Mutation Model (SMM). This<br />

model holds that when <strong>microsatellite</strong>s mutate,<br />

they only ga<strong>in</strong> or lose one repeat. This implies<br />

that two alleles that differ by one repeat are<br />

more closely related (have a more recent<br />

common ancestor) than alleles that differ by<br />

many repeats. In other words, size matters<br />

when do<strong>in</strong>g statistical tests of population substructur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

An advantage of the SMM is that<br />

the difference <strong>in</strong> size conveys additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the phylogeny of alleles. The<br />

SMM is generally the preferred model when<br />

calculat<strong>in</strong>g relatedness between <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

and population sub-structur<strong>in</strong>g, although there<br />

is the problem of homoplasy.<br />

Problem: Homoplasy<br />

Pretend that you are study<strong>in</strong>g a population and<br />

you f<strong>in</strong>d four <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Three of them have<br />

the same genotype, and one is different. This<br />

would <strong>in</strong>dicate that the three with the same<br />

genotype are more closely related to each<br />

other than they are to the other. However, this<br />

is not necessarily the case. To understand<br />

why, study the phylogeny below. Asterisks<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>microsatellite</strong> mutations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!