Right-Wing Groups - South African Government Information
Right-Wing Groups - South African Government Information
Right-Wing Groups - South African Government Information
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
weapons and equipment from the Group 34 Commando Base at Welkom during<br />
the night of 2nd/3rd January 1993.<br />
118. Under the leadership of Mr Jordaan (who holds the rank of General in the AWB),<br />
the applicants broke into the military base and made off with a large amount of<br />
w e a p o n r y, including rifles, handguns, ammunition, flares and smoke gre n a d e s<br />
as well as other equipment. No one was injured during the incident. The police<br />
re c o v e red the stolen weapons and equipment a few days later on a farm in the<br />
Hobhouse district.<br />
119. The applicants testified that they had committed the offence as an organised<br />
g roup of AWB members pursuant to a decision that was made by the AWB at<br />
regional level. The motivation behind the theft was to arm farmers on the eastern<br />
b o rder of the then Orange Free State in order to enable them to protect themselves<br />
from attacks by members of the Azanian People’s Liberation Army<br />
(APLA) who were operating from Lesotho. They testified that this was necessary<br />
as the government of the day was unable to maintain law and order in that<br />
region. None of the applicants derived any personal gain from the theft of the<br />
weapons and equipment.<br />
120. The Committee was satisfied that the applications related to an act associated<br />
with a political objective committed in the course of the conflicts of the past<br />
and that the applicants had made a full disclosure. All were granted amnesty<br />
[ A C / 1998 / 0075 ].<br />
P O S T-1990 VIOLAT I O N S<br />
Sabotage of the transitional pro c e s s<br />
121. The Committee received thirty-five applications from members of right-wing<br />
o rganisations in respect of a range of violations committed with the aim of sabotaging<br />
the process of negotiations in the country. The violations, for the most<br />
part, consisted of attacks on individuals and included targeted assassinations.<br />
Most (71 %) were refused amnesty.<br />
122. The Committee received forty-one applications in respect of attacks on<br />
symbolically important targets such as schools, business premises and court<br />
buildings. Most of these (95 %) were granted.<br />
V O L U M E 6 S E C T I O N 3 C H A P T E R 6 P A G E 4 6 8