02.02.2014 Views

Research Report No - International Panel on Fissile Materials

Research Report No - International Panel on Fissile Materials

Research Report No - International Panel on Fissile Materials

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The “reactor-grade” plut<strong>on</strong>ium in the high burn up spent fuel being discharged by these<br />

reactors has a different mix of isotopes from weap<strong>on</strong> grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium. However, reactorgrade<br />

plut<strong>on</strong>ium can be used to make a nuclear explosive and, as menti<strong>on</strong>ed earlier, <strong>on</strong>e<br />

of India’s May 1998 nuclear tests is reported to have involved such material. 93<br />

An estimated 8 kg of reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium would be required to make a simple<br />

nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>. 94 If this plut<strong>on</strong>ium is not put under safeguards, it could provide an<br />

arsenal of over 1300 weap<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

A comm<strong>on</strong>ly cited problem with the use of reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium is the increased risk<br />

of a “fizzle yield”, where a premature initiati<strong>on</strong> of the fissi<strong>on</strong> chain reacti<strong>on</strong> by neutr<strong>on</strong>s<br />

emitted by fissi<strong>on</strong>ing of plut<strong>on</strong>ium-240 leads to pre-det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> of the weap<strong>on</strong> and an<br />

explosive yield <strong>on</strong>ly a few percent of the design value. In Indian PHWR spent fuel,<br />

plut<strong>on</strong>ium-240 is over 22% of the total plut<strong>on</strong>ium (compared to about 5% in weap<strong>on</strong><br />

grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium). 95 The greater abundance of plut<strong>on</strong>ium isotopes other than Pu-239 in<br />

reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium also leads to increased heat generati<strong>on</strong> and radiati<strong>on</strong> from a mass<br />

of this material. However, these are not insuperable engineering difficulties.<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy has noted that “At the lowest level of sophisticati<strong>on</strong>, a<br />

potential proliferating state or sub-nati<strong>on</strong>al group using designs and technologies no more<br />

sophisticated than those used in first-generati<strong>on</strong> nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s could build a nuclear<br />

weap<strong>on</strong> from reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium that would have an assured, reliable yield of <strong>on</strong>e or<br />

a few kilot<strong>on</strong>s (and a probable yield significantly higher than that). At the other end of<br />

the spectrum, advanced nuclear weap<strong>on</strong> states such as the United States and Russia, using<br />

modern designs, could produce weap<strong>on</strong>s from reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium having reliable<br />

explosive yields, weight, and other characteristics generally comparable to those of<br />

weap<strong>on</strong>s made from weap<strong>on</strong>s-grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium.” 96 India presumably falls somewhere in<br />

this spectrum.<br />

One ‘modern design’ feature that allows reactor grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium to be used for weap<strong>on</strong>s<br />

is ‘boosting’, in which a gas mixture of deuterium and tritium is introduced into the<br />

hollow core of an implosi<strong>on</strong> weap<strong>on</strong> just before it det<strong>on</strong>ates. 97 The fusi<strong>on</strong> reacti<strong>on</strong> that is<br />

triggered releases a large quantity of neutr<strong>on</strong>s, which are able in turn to initiate fissi<strong>on</strong><br />

more quickly in a larger mass of the fissile material than the normal chain reacti<strong>on</strong>. This<br />

serves to greatly increase the yield. Indian weap<strong>on</strong> designers claim to have tested a<br />

therm<strong>on</strong>uclear weap<strong>on</strong> with a boosted fissi<strong>on</strong> primary in 1998. 98 One history of India’s<br />

nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s program notes explicitly the use of boosting in a reactor grade<br />

plut<strong>on</strong>ium device test in 1998 and observes that “if validated it would increase India’s<br />

stock of fissile material dramatically.” 99<br />

The fast breeder reactor program<br />

India’s Department of Atomic Energy has c<strong>on</strong>sistently offered the potential shortage of<br />

domestic uranium and India’s abundant thorium reserves as the justificati<strong>on</strong> for its<br />

plut<strong>on</strong>ium fuelled fast breeder reactor program. India would gain access to the<br />

internati<strong>on</strong>al uranium market as part of the agreement with the United States and so end<br />

the prospect of future uranium shortages.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!