03.02.2014 Views

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Minimising Cardiotomy Suction induced risk<br />

of fat embolism in patients undergoing cardiac<br />

surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass<br />

Ahmed Ajzan MD, Clive Weston FRCP, Pankaj Kumar FRCS<br />

Morriston Hospital, Swansea United Kingdom<br />

Swansea University School of Medicine, United Kingdom


Declaration<br />

This study was funded by Astra ® Sweden without<br />

input into sampling, randomisation or the research<br />

data


Complications of CPB<br />

• Neurological/Neuropsychological dysfunction with CPB<br />

• Stroke at 20% in 1973, 8% in 1982 and 3% in 1995<br />

• Neuropsychological dysfunction recognised in up to 50%<br />

• Study of 46 brain tissues of patients who died after cardiac<br />

surgery with CPB showed only 9 had normal brain tissue<br />

Brierley JB . Brain damage <strong>com</strong>plicating open heart surgery: a neuropathological study of<br />

46 patients. Proc.R.Soc.Med . 1967 :60(9):858-9


Studies in the incidence of Neurological and<br />

Neuropsychological deficit<br />

Author Year Incidence of<br />

Neurological<br />

deficit<br />

Sontaniemi 1983 39%<br />

Breuer 1983 17%<br />

Carrella 1988 48%<br />

Strenge 1992 51%<br />

Murkin 1995 38%


•Diffused brain damage (type II injury) Ranging from visual field<br />

defects to hyper-reflexia to more long term persistent neurological<br />

deficits that involve intellectual and cognitive functions without<br />

localizing or focal signs that are attributed to the CPB<br />

Van Dijk D, Keizer AM, Diephuis JC, Durand C, Vos LJ, Hijman R. Neurocognetive dysfunction after coronary<br />

artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Surg.2000;120:632-9<br />

•Pericardial Suction Blood (PSB) used to recycle blood during<br />

cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is a major source of<br />

fat re-introduction<br />

Caguin F, Carter MG. Fat embolisation with cardiotomy with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc<br />

Surg.1963;46:665-72


3 Major causes of Cerebral injury During<br />

cardiac surgery with CBP<br />

• Global or regional cerebral hypoperfusion<br />

• Macroemboli<br />

• Microemboli<br />

Moody DM, Bell MA, Challa VR, Johnston WE, Prough DS. Brain microemboli during cardiac surgery or<br />

aortography. Ann Neurol.1990;28:477-86


Macroemboli<br />

• Large air bubbles<br />

• Atheromatous debris from valve lesions or aortic plaques<br />

• Intracardiac thrombi<br />

• fat emboli<br />

• Aortic instrumentation<br />

• Excessive surgical manipulation<br />

• size ; > 40 um


Causes of Microemboli<br />

• Air<br />

• Gaseous<br />

• Lipid globules<br />

• Muscle and connective tissue fragments<br />

• Platelets and Leukocyte aggregates<br />

• plastic fragments<br />

• calcified particles<br />

• size ; < 40 um


Microemboli<br />

• Stump and colleagues studied<br />

CABG patients reported, the<br />

number and size emboli<br />

detected via Doppler methods is<br />

directly proportional to the<br />

degree of Neuropsychological<br />

dysfunction .<br />

Okies JE, Goodnight SH, Litchford B, Connel RS,<br />

Starr A et al. Effects of cardiotomy suction<br />

blood extracorporial circulation for coronary<br />

artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc<br />

Surg.1977;74(3):440-4


• It has been feasible to quantify the fat being<br />

generated and mobilised during routine cardiac<br />

surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and<br />

establish that the current filtration systems are<br />

unable to deal with the generated fat<br />

Ajzan A, Modine T, Punjabi P, Ganeshalingam K, Philips G, Gourlay T et al.<br />

Quantification of fat mobilization in patients undergoing coronary artery<br />

Revascularization using off-pump and on-pump techniques. Extra Corpor Technol. 2006<br />

Jun;38(2):122.


During cardiac surgery fat is<br />

generated and mobilised via<br />

the surgical procedure and<br />

surgical manipulation and can<br />

be re-admitted into the<br />

circulation.<br />

Fat can be measured<br />

biochemically analysed and<br />

<strong>com</strong>pared in a particular<br />

patient or between different<br />

patients.<br />

Existing Filtration methods<br />

are unable to deal with<br />

circulating fat Emboli


Count/dl<br />

counts/dl<br />

2950<br />

Embolic Load of the CABG group<br />

2450<br />

Mid-Bypass Suction<br />

Mid-Bypass Arteial<br />

5900<br />

4900<br />

3900<br />

2900<br />

1900<br />

1950<br />

1450<br />

950<br />

Mid-Bypass Venous<br />

End-Bypass Suction<br />

End-Bypass Arterial<br />

End-Bypass Venous<br />

900<br />

-100<br />

Pre-Op Mid-Bypass End-Bypass<br />

Bypass Time (min)<br />

Suction Arterial Venous<br />

450<br />

-50<br />

0-10 m 10-15 m 15-20 m > 20 m<br />

Size<br />

Ajzan et al


PLAN OF STUDY AND AIMS<br />

To evaluate the effectiveness of a fat filtration<br />

device in minimising the fat emboli mobilised via<br />

the cardiotomy suction during cardiopulmonary<br />

bypass.<br />

Study Design<br />

Prospective Randomised Trial<br />

Consecutive isolated CABG cases (aged 18-80, No<br />

emergencies)


MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

•Study approved by Ethics & Research <strong>com</strong>mittees<br />

•Randomisation via number generator<br />

•Investigator blinded to randomisation & not part of the<br />

surgical team<br />

Single surgical team was to minimise technical variations<br />

•50 consecutive patients (n=50) were consented and<br />

randomised for this study<br />

•25 patients (n=25) had a fat reducing system installed to the<br />

cardiotomy suction line of the CPB and 25 patients (n=25) had<br />

no system installed.


Sampling sites<br />

•Cadiotomy suction vs.<br />

Cardiotomy suction after<br />

the filter<br />

•Arterial line<br />

•Venous line<br />

At :<br />

•Start of bypass time<br />

•Mid bypass<br />

•End of bypass before<br />

<strong>com</strong>ing off


Fat Reducing System<br />

•soft shell reservoir with<br />

two <strong>com</strong>partments each<br />

able to house 500mls of<br />

cardiotomy suction blood,<br />

separated by a water lock<br />

mechanism<br />

•the filter is manufactured<br />

using uncoated standard<br />

PVC materials identical to<br />

that used in venous<br />

reservoirs<br />

•Appelblad M, Engström KG. Fat<br />

content in pericardial suction blood<br />

and the efficacy of spontaneous density<br />

separation and surface adsorption in a<br />

prototype system for fat reduction .J<br />

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007<br />

Aug;134(2):366-72..


•Oil Red O stain 1-[4-<br />

(Xylylazo)]-2-<br />

naphthol;solvent red<br />

27 to stain the fat<br />

globules<br />

•size estimation is<br />

established using<br />

microspheres (dyetrack,<br />

Triton<br />

technologies,UK)<br />

(6MILLION/2MLS)(1<br />

5U in size)(violet)


Results


Patient Demographic and surgical data<br />

Filtered Group Non-Filtered Group p value<br />

Mean SD Mean SD<br />

Age 68.56 7.74 66.2 7.14 0.14<br />

Sex(males) 74% 76%<br />

Height(cm) 171.61 7.79 170.23 7.42 0.5274<br />

Weight(Kg) 80.6 8.7 79.2 8.23 0.562<br />

Body Surface Area (m2) 2.03 0.74 1.99 0.68 0.843<br />

No. of Grafts 2.8 0.96 3.12 0.86 0.2205<br />

Euroscore 2.56 1.41 2.48 1.44 0.8435<br />

Surgery Time 120.84 24.66 126.84 11.73 0.2774<br />

CPB Time(min) 87.6 22.6 84.88 29.21 0.55<br />

Cross Clamp Time(min) 55.24 19.4 53.48 20.81 0.65<br />

Cardiotomy shed Blood(mls) 309.72 55 327.44 43 0.2105


• we identified that Embolic load to the<br />

patient during cardiopulmonary bypass is<br />

reflected by the number of fat emboli<br />

greater than 15um that detected arterial line<br />

cannula which pose greater risk to the<br />

patient<br />

• Venous Sample results:<br />

No statistically significant differences were<br />

found in venous samples in both groups at<br />

CPB sampling points


Venous Line Samples


Cardiotomy suction Samples


2500<br />

2000<br />

P < 0.001<br />

1416<br />

count/dl<br />

1500<br />

P < 0.001<br />

1000<br />

P = 0.1001<br />

698<br />

500<br />

335.64<br />

273.32<br />

330 342<br />

0<br />

start of bypass mid bypass end of bypass<br />

filtered group<br />

non-filtered group


Arterial Line Samples


140<br />

120<br />

Mean Embolic Load Counts/dl<br />

p< 0.001<br />

100<br />

p = 0.0209<br />

104.68<br />

80<br />

60<br />

p = 0.646<br />

66<br />

40<br />

35.48<br />

32.56<br />

46.72<br />

50.52<br />

20<br />

0<br />

start of bypass mid bypass end bypass<br />

non filtered<br />

filtered


140<br />

120<br />

Mean Embolic Load Counts/dl<br />

p< 0.001<br />

100<br />

p = 0.0209<br />

104.68<br />

80<br />

60<br />

p = 0.646<br />

66<br />

40<br />

35.48<br />

32.56<br />

46.72<br />

50.52<br />

20<br />

0<br />

start of bypass mid bypass end bypass<br />

non filtered<br />

filtered


Filtered Group<br />

(n=25)<br />

Non-Filtered Group (n=25)<br />

p value<br />

Start of Bypass suction 273.32 +/- 123.34 335.64 +/- 130.60 0.1001<br />

arterial 32.56 +/- 22.14 35.48 +/- 23.97 0.646<br />

Mid Bypass suction 330.0 +/- 119.60) 698.0 +/- 250.61 < 0.001<br />

arterial 46.72 +/- 27.30 46.72 +/- 27.30 0.0209<br />

End of Bypass suction 342.0 +/- 98.26 1416 +/- 485.76 < 0.001<br />

arterial 50.52 +/- 28.47 104.68 +/- 35.87 < 0.001


Conclusion


•we demonstrated in a randomised trial that<br />

fat being generated and mobilised during<br />

cardiac revascularisation with<br />

cardiopulmonary bypass CPB can be<br />

reduced using Fat reducing Systems and<br />

that such reduction can be calculated and<br />

measured at different time intervals during<br />

bypass achieving more than 50% reduction<br />

in Embolic load to the patient in the group<br />

where these systems are used


Study Limitations<br />

•We Acknowledge that the longer the bypass time, the more Fat<br />

Emboli will be generated and mobilised in the cardiopulmonary<br />

bypass circuit<br />

•Longer bypass times and testing this system on more <strong>com</strong>plex cases<br />

including valvular surgery and open chamber surgeries will be<br />

beneficial<br />

•Clinical observations in the form of neuro-psychometric analysis or<br />

fundoscopy in future continuation of this study will help in<br />

demonstrating clinical out<strong>com</strong>e in using these systems


Our goal


• References<br />

• Gibbon JH Jr.: The development of the heart-lung apparatus. Rev Surg., 1970;(4):231-44<br />

• Becerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, Walther T, Doll N, Onnasch JF, et al. Stroke after cardiac<br />

surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg.2003;<br />

75:472-8.<br />

• Newman MF, Krrchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al. Neurological<br />

out<strong>com</strong>e Research group and cardiothoracic Anesthesiology research Endeavours<br />

Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognetive function after coronary artery<br />

bypasses surgery. N Engl J Med.2001;344:395-402<br />

• Van Dijk D, Keizer AM, Diephuis JC, Durand C, Vos LJ, Hijman R. Neurocognetive dysfunction<br />

after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Surg.2000;120:632-9<br />

• Moody DM, Bell MA, Challa VR, Johnston WE, Prough DS. Brain microemboli during cardiac<br />

surgery or aortography. Ann Neurol.1990;28:477-86<br />

• Caguin F, Carter MG. Fat embolisation with cardiotomy with the use of cardiopulmonary<br />

bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg.1963;46:665-72<br />

• Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, Hammon JW,Reboussin DM, Deal DD et al. Cardiotomy<br />

suction: a major source of brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass .Ann Thorac Surg.<br />

1998:65 1651-5<br />

• Ajzan A, Modine T, Punjabi P, Ganeshalingam K, Philips G, Gourlay T et al. Quantification of fat<br />

mobilization in patients undergoing coronary artery Revascularization using off-pump and onpump<br />

techniques. Extra Corpor Technol. 2006 Jun;38(2):122.<br />

• Okies JE, Goodnight SH, Litchford B, Connel RS, Starr A et al. Effects of cardiotomy suction<br />

blood extracorporial circulation for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc<br />

Surg.1977;74(3):440-4<br />

• Appelblad M, Engström KG. Fat content in pericardial suction blood and the efficacy of<br />

spontaneous density separation and surface adsorption in a prototype system for fat<br />

reduction .J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Aug;134(2):366-72..<br />

• Brierley JB . Brain damage <strong>com</strong>plicating open heart surgery: a neuropathological study of 46<br />

patients. Proc.R.Soc.Med . 1967 :60(9):858-9<br />

• Appelblad M, Engström KG. Fat reduction in pericardial suction blood by spontaneous density<br />

separation: an experimental model on human liquid fat versus soya oil. <strong>Perfusion</strong>. 2003<br />

Mar;18(1):39-45.<br />

•<br />


Thank you

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!