Partnerships in Hospice Accreditation.pdf - Hospice Palliative Care ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Survey process (cont.) • Survey team (2-3 members for 2- 2½ days) 1. Documentation review (policies and procedures, patient record audit, minutes, HR management and training records, etc.) 2. Assessment of facilities and equipment 3. Staff interviews (clinical, reception, practice manager)
Architecture and Data Capture Process Aggregated criteria scores are used to determine standard scores, which in turn are aggregated to PIs, SEs and Overall Facility Scores Criteria Standards Performance Indicators COHSASA data capture process: Criteria assessments are entered directly into database using guidelines. Services and departments Elements OVERALL Facility assessment score Scores in each of these areas: • range from 0 to 100 • give a measure of the performance in that area as shown below: 100 – 90 (Excellent) 89 – 80 (Good) 79 – 40 (Weak) 39 – 5 (Poor)
Page 1 and 2: Ms Esme Pudule Prof Stuart Whittake
Page 3 and 4: Hospice Development through Mentors
Page 5 and 6: Beginning Our Journey in 2003 HPCA-
Page 7 and 8: Initial HPCA surveyor training by C
Page 9 and 10: 90 80 82 Number of HPCA members 200
Page 11 and 12: HPCA MEMBERSHIP RATING STAR 3 *** S
Page 13 and 14: GHANA COHSASA The Council for Healt
Page 15 and 16: The International Society for Quali
Page 17 and 18: Accreditation programmes developed
Page 19 and 20: The tools: Standards Standards: def
Page 21 and 22: Developing standards: a road map Fi
Page 23 and 24: Having standards is not enough, the
Page 25: When it is believed that a facility
Page 29 and 30: Accreditation award process Accredi
Page 31 and 32: DRAKENSTEIN HOSPICE GRAHAMSTOWN HOS
Page 33 and 34: Geographic representation of Accred
Page 35: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Partnerships in Hospice Accreditation.pdf - Hospice Palliative Care ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?