Implementation of 9100 Implementation of 9100 - SAE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Relationship with Second Party Schemes • Within Europe, AECMA have defined a policy defining the situations that could lead to a second party QMS audit (Ref AECMA/QC/25035) – Low QMS score – New suppliers – Unsatisfactory Product Quality – Evidence from Product/Process audits – Unsatisfactory CRB performance – Risk Prevention – No certificated QMS • AECMA-EASE EASE shared second party programme will be adapted in consideration of the above criteria • Rest of World have similar criteria
Future Changes • IAQG 104 and Scheme documents are being updated to incorporate improvements and lessons learnt – Mandatory scoring, Certificate wording, Confidentiality, • Certification/Registration against 9110 (Maintenance/Repair) & 9120 Stockists) – Introduced into the existing 9100 scheme – Separate Authentication for Auditors – Aerospace Auditors will have training for the additional standard – Additional Experience requirement for 9110
Page 1 and 2: Implementation of 9100 Internationa
Page 3 and 4: Goal of the System The goal of the
Page 5 and 6: Aerospace Supplier Quality System C
Page 7 and 8: Implementation Status -1 • Asia -
Page 9 and 10: IAQG - OASIS Database • IAQG On-l
Page 11 and 12: screenshot
Page 13 and 14: Industry Oversight • IAQG oversig
Page 15: 9100 Certification Attributes • S
Page 19 and 20: Summary ! The Aerospace Sector QMS
Page 22 and 23: Additional Slides

Implementation of 9100 Implementation of 9100 - SAE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?