13.02.2014 Views

2010-2011 Corporate Plan Performance Report - Thanet District ...

2010-2011 Corporate Plan Performance Report - Thanet District ...

2010-2011 Corporate Plan Performance Report - Thanet District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annual <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

on <strong>2010</strong> - <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Page 3 of 45


Explanation of Tables<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Indicators<br />

Comparing against target<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> is on target<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> is slightly below target<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> is significantly below target<br />

Data not available<br />

Target has not been set (usually for new indicators)<br />

Data and target not available<br />

Comparing against last year<br />

Figure has fallen - an improvement on last year<br />

Figure has risen - an improvement on last year<br />

Figure has fallen - worse than last year<br />

Figure has risen - worse than last year<br />

No change compared to last year<br />

Page 4 of 45


Theme 1: Prosperity<br />

Attracting employment especially by supporting tourism and the green economy<br />

The Council is committed to develop planning policies that support the economic development of <strong>Thanet</strong>. It will provide support to local<br />

businesses and work with partners to secure developments within <strong>Thanet</strong> that provide job opportunities and bring investment into the area. It<br />

will also work with partners to ensure that local people have the skills and motivation they need to take advantage of new job opportunities<br />

as they arise. The Council is committed to managing the Ramsgate Port and the Royal Harbour in a way that supports the local visitor<br />

economy.<br />

LI152 Total number<br />

of major applications<br />

decided<br />

LI109 No. of visits<br />

to the tourism<br />

website<br />

LI140 Number of<br />

accompanied freight<br />

units through the Port<br />

LI141 No.of<br />

unaccompanied<br />

freight units through<br />

the Port<br />

LI142 No. of<br />

passenger vehicles<br />

through the Port<br />

LI144 No. of<br />

aggregate vessel<br />

berthings at the Port<br />

LI136 Avg no. of<br />

occupied permanent<br />

berths in RRH<br />

LI138 Number of<br />

leisure boat visitor<br />

nights at RRH<br />

2008/09<br />

Actual<br />

2009/10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

109 40 39 50<br />

457,078 515,164 592,175 530,620<br />

127,036 103,829 104,807 129,672<br />

21,909 21,770 24,292 24,756<br />

26,963 20,265 29,058 27,780<br />

Indicators relating to prosperity<br />

Change<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11 Yr End<br />

from last End of year comment<br />

Target Status<br />

Year<br />

Adecline in the number of major planning applications coming to<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> over the past three years is a trend that we would like to<br />

see reversed, as each is a way of bringing prosperity to the area.<br />

The website traffic for this financial year shows a 15% increase on<br />

previous year, which shows improved interest in the <strong>Thanet</strong> Area.<br />

Operating conditions have been difficult in the past year, and the<br />

three year trend has shown overall contraction. With the economic<br />

recession TEF reduced their vessel rotations to survive. Significantly<br />

Dover lost 9.1% of its freight traffic in the year <strong>2010</strong>, though<br />

Eurotunnel saw their freight shuttles grow a massive 42% in the<br />

year <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Unaccompanied freight is showing a positive three year trend,<br />

though this is low yield traffic and the smaller proportion of TEF's<br />

business.<br />

Pax Car has shown excellent year-on-year growth, exceeeding<br />

targets - this year 45% above 2009-10, assisted by the earlier<br />

volcanic ash impact on air travel and the LD Lines link.<br />

12 11 21 12 Targets have been exceeded by a considerable margin this year.<br />

451.42 443.25 427.08 443.92<br />

Predicted levels haven't been achieved this year; recession impact<br />

and complaints about upkeep.<br />

10,291 9,935 9,342 9,500 This has been another difficult year for this business.<br />

Page 5 of 45


Page 6 of 45


Margate Renewal, Turner &<br />

Neighbourhood <strong>Plan</strong> (CP1.1.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Derek Harding<br />

Project Sponsor: Brian White<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

Margate Renewal, Turner Contemporary & the Neighbourhood <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Support the Margate Renewal Programme through the delivery of<br />

key developments in central Margate and Cliftonville:<br />

Turner Contemporary: Support Turner Contemporary to become<br />

a regional cultural attraction.<br />

Key Partners: SEEDA, KCC, Homes and Communities<br />

Agency, GOSE, English Heritage, Arts Council England<br />

Neighbourhood <strong>Plan</strong>: To provide a long-term plan for<br />

regeneration interventions in Cliftonville and Margate.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Substantial Progress on several fronts, including:<br />

Dreamland Heritage Amusement Park: Business plan work nearing completion, urgent works contract for Cinema awarded, CPO statement of reasons ready for Cabinet,<br />

funding strategy agreed.<br />

Arlington Tower Block refurbishment: <strong>Plan</strong>ning brief approved & application prepared for future Council consideration.<br />

Work in Old Town: Ideas for development of Queens Arms Yard, and redevelopment of Fort Road site are progressing.<br />

Turner Contemporary: Ready for operning on 16th April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Margate Public Realm Proposal for seafront: Project initiated<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £194,837<br />

Financial Comment • These costs were incurred as<br />

enabling costs in association with Margate Renewal.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

As this report is being written Turner Contemporary is enjoying a successful opening, with higher visitor numbers than expected. The foundations have been laid for several<br />

initiatives with the aim of turning round the fortunes of Margate. The drafted plans will be reappraised to achieve best focus after the local elections.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Reappraisal of plans after the election, with a view to confirming the futures of key areas of Margate including the Dreamland Heritage Amusement Park, the Arlington area,<br />

the old town area, the Rendezvous & winter gardens area, and the seafront.<br />

Page 7 of 45


Pathway to Turner (CP1.1.5)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Derek Harding<br />

Project Sponsor: Brian White<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

Key Partners: KCC, English Heritage, Margate Town<br />

Partnership, Groundwork UK<br />

Pathway to Turner Contemporary<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Complete the Countdown to Turner Project delivering<br />

improvements to the Margate approaches and nearby<br />

infrastructure. In preparation for the Turner Contemporary Gallery<br />

opening in spring <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Preparation had three strands: (1) Getting the message across (publicity) (2) Prepare the town (securing funding and undertaking physical environmental improvements) (3)<br />

Opening for business (business support). All three strands progressed to schedule, including the following: the majority of physical works were completed by end of March<br />

before gallery opening on 16th April; the station improvements were achieved; Fort Road Hotel was acquired; the Old Town Green Space Consultation was completed;<br />

and, works on the Arcadian underway undertaken.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

As this report is being written Turner is enjoying a successful opening with higher visitor numbers than predicted.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£100,000 £72,380<br />

Financial Comment • Main costs are environmental<br />

improvements prior to Turner Contemporary opening.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The main aim is to develop an ongoing dialogue with Turner Contemporary to ensure that it acts as a catalyst for regeneration of Margate. There are a number of initiatives<br />

that will be revisited after the election.<br />

Page 8 of 45


Response to airport master plan<br />

(CP1.2.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Doug Brown<br />

Project Sponsor: Brian White<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

Key Partners: Kent County Council, Airport Consultative<br />

Committee<br />

Response to airport master plan<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Produce a response to the Airport Master <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

To support the environmentally responsible growth of the airport.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The response to the airport master plan has been approved by Council, completing this particular project. The Council now has a policy position on the Master plan.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

We can now monitor airport growth effectively based upon Master plan predications.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in completion<br />

of this project.<br />

The report refers to the need for further work through the working party, and these further projects need to be progressed. Also ongoing monitoring of traffic should continue.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI327 No. heavy flights at the airport 3,281<br />

LI328 No. passengers through the airport 30,128<br />

Page 9 of 45


Business plan for Ramsgate<br />

port & harbour (CP1.2.2)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Robert Brown<br />

Business plan for Ramsgate port & harbour<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

To develop a 25 year plan for Ramsgate Port & harbour, to form the<br />

framework for:<br />

Project Sponsor: Brian White<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

Key Partners: SEEDA (SE Ports Group), KCC<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Regeneration of central Ramsgate;<br />

Creation of new jobs;<br />

Bringing new technology to <strong>Thanet</strong> e.g. Wind Farms,<br />

possible links to further education;<br />

Improved environmental performance;<br />

Improved land usage; and<br />

Improved income streams from the Port and Marina.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

First draft Masterplan in production and discussed with Chairman of Masterplan Working Party. Site visit of Working Party on 11 April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Assisted in locating Siemens onto the Port adjacent to its client, London Array. And, improve working arrangement with Fishermen's Association leading to revised, more cost<br />

efficient fuelling facilities. Has enabled identification of sites for supporting commercial activities.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in completion<br />

of this project.<br />

Site visit of Working Party on 11 April. Draft Masterplan available for<br />

consultation after elections and the New Council <strong>2011</strong>-15 in place.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI138 Number of leisure boat visitor nights at RRH 9,342<br />

LI143 Number of ferry berthings at the Port 1,863<br />

LI340 No. of operational fishing boats in Port of Ramsgate 47<br />

Page 10 of 45


Ramsgate marina programme<br />

(CP1.2.5)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Ramsgate marina improvements programme<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

Key details<br />

this?<br />

Both the outer marinas and the entrance of the Royal Harbour had<br />

become silted with deposits from both the sea and the river Stour.<br />

Customers had expected to be able to navigate their vessels at all<br />

Lead Officer: Robert Brown<br />

states of the tide. But many areas of the marinas where the water<br />

depth was expected to be 2.5m deep at low water were actually<br />

Project Sponsor: Brian White<br />

less than 40cm deep and in some areas actually dry. This has<br />

impacted on the visitor number to the Royal Harbour and with it the<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

associated economic benefit to the whole area. Additionally it was<br />

impossible to service the needs of the lcoal fishing industry,<br />

Key Partners:<br />

commercial workboats, wind farm vessels, pilot cutters, HM<br />

customrs and the Lifeboat at low tides. Finger pontoons required<br />

overhaul and re decking due to rotten unsafe decking.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Inner East rewire for Smart Metering is now complete. No.1 Substation switchgear complete. No.3 Substation switchgear and generator interswitch with new generator<br />

housing now complete. Terminal roof complete. Amsa roof complete. Finger pontoons on the western outer redecking complete. Outer east and outer west dredging<br />

undertaken. Turning circle dredging undertaken. Outer east breakwater replacement 95% complete.<br />

Facilitation of both windfarms and associated supply chain ongoing.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£325,000 £325,000<br />

Financial Comment Further expenditure yet to be<br />

reported.<br />

Inner East rewire for Smart Metering is now complete. A secure system whereby customers have to pay for supply of electricity and only charged for the actual consumption.<br />

No.1 Substation switchgear complete. No.3 Substation switchgear and generator interswitch with new generator housing now complete. Short supply for both customers and<br />

stakeholders. Terminal roof now complete. Safety of customers using building. Amsa roof complete. Safety of customers and stakeholders using building. Finger pontoons on<br />

the western outer redecking complete. Safety and visual appearance. Outer east and outer west dredging undertaken. Safe navigation. Turning circle dredging undertaken.<br />

Safe navigation.<br />

Outer east breakwater replacement 95% complete. Improved facility to service windfarm industry. Delivery of new income stream. Facilitation of both windfarms and<br />

associated supply chain ongoing. To ensure the beneficial working partnership and bring economic benefit to the area.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

To promiligate the Smart metering system to all berths. To undertake replacement of No.2 Substation switchgear. To undertake repairs to road surfaces within the Port. to<br />

replace the pontoons adjacent to Pier Yard access way. Improve the pontoons in the inner basin.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

LI136 Avg no. of occupied permanent berths in RRH 427.08<br />

Page 11 of 45


LI103 Visits to TLF<br />

run leisure centres<br />

LI105 Total<br />

throughput for TDC<br />

organised sports<br />

activities for CYP<br />

LI118 Total number<br />

of participants in<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> Coast project<br />

events<br />

LI229 Average wait<br />

time for all Gateway<br />

Plus customers<br />

2008/09<br />

Actual<br />

2009/10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

332,707 335,019 348,730 338,000<br />

9,327 9,851 8,725 10,000<br />

? 13,950 15,890 13,950<br />

? 5.17 5.15 10.00<br />

Theme 2: Place<br />

Keeping <strong>Thanet</strong> beautiful by making the place clean, green and a healthy place to be<br />

The Council is responsible for maintaining and keeping clean the areas parks, open spaces and beaches and bays. It is also responsible for<br />

cleaning the streets and providing the household waste collection service. It is committed to considering the environmental impact of any<br />

proposed developments. It maintains a Local Development Framework, a portfolio of documents whose purpose is to guide decisions<br />

and investment to help deliver planned changes in <strong>Thanet</strong>. The Council’s housing teams are committed to improving the quality of <strong>Thanet</strong>’s<br />

housing, particularly in Margate and Cliftonville where the availability of cheap, poor quality accommodation is linked to poor health and<br />

increasing crime.<br />

Page 12 of 45<br />

Indicators relating to people<br />

Change<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11 Yr End<br />

from last End of year comment<br />

Target Status<br />

Year<br />

As can be seen from the figures visits were considerably higher<br />

than target. This is due to a number of factors. Firstly facility<br />

improvements have led to an increase in members and therefore<br />

attendances. Secondly the final quarter included enrolments for<br />

swimming lessons which unfortunately cannot be split and therefore<br />

include some attendances for the next year.<br />

The figure is lower than last years total of 9851 and therefore the<br />

target figure which can be attributed to a number of factors.<br />

External funding changes meant the focus of our Sport 4 NRG<br />

project moved towards using sport to assist older teenagers into<br />

employment or training and therefore resulted in more targeted<br />

sessions rather than open access sessions and less frequent events<br />

in the school holidays. Furthermore, the disability sports project<br />

ended in August which attributed for a number of specialised events<br />

and therefore reduced down numbers.<br />

To summarise whilst the target was set on previous years they are<br />

not totally comparable given the change in outcomes required by<br />

the external funding. It has been a successful year however work<br />

has been with a lower number of harder to reach young people.<br />

Engaging with the local community figures exceeded expectations<br />

for the public and community events programme thanks to lottery<br />

funding for supporting the school water safety lectures (which sadly<br />

ends in <strong>2011</strong>, and so means 5,500 participants less in <strong>2011</strong>/12).<br />

One lottery scheme finishes and another smaller (Footprints in the<br />

Sands - access to nature lottery) grant begins.<br />

Wait times have fluctuated during <strong>2010</strong>/11 refkecting the changes<br />

in service provision that have happened during that time. Wait<br />

times are lower than targets for the year averaging 5.15 minutes as<br />

opposed to the 10 min target.<br />

The actual year end figure of homelessness preventions per 1,000<br />

households has exceeded the years target. The target was 4.50<br />

preventions per 1,000 households and actual total was 5.98 (this


equates to a total figure of 390 homelessness preventions for the<br />

year).<br />

This represents a 1.38 increase in homelessness prevention per<br />

1,000 households from the previous year 2009/10.<br />

BV213 No. of<br />

homeless preventions<br />

in <strong>Thanet</strong> per 1000<br />

households<br />

? 4.21 5.98 4.50<br />

Whilst this is a positive increase there are areas<br />

where homelessness preventions have not been captured, in<br />

particular households being assisted through the Sanctuary Scheme<br />

to enable them to remain in their homes following an incident of<br />

domestic abuse. Progress has been made to work with In-touch<br />

the facilitator of the Sanctuary Scheme to record and report on<br />

these in future.<br />

The figure of 5.98 preventions is also less than both the South East<br />

and Nation average of homelessness preventions for 2009/10,<br />

which were 7.3 and 7.7 per 1,000 households respectively.<br />

With greater empathis on the team ensuring that all positive<br />

prevention casework is recorded and by recording of preventions<br />

which have previously not been recorded, the number of<br />

homelessness preventions per 1,000 households should continue to<br />

rise next year, with the aim of achieving 12 preventions per 1,000<br />

households during <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

Page 13 of 45


'Top 10' Environmental Action<br />

Projects (EAP) (CP3.1.2)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Mick Bates<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Seed<br />

'Top 10' Environmental Action Program (EAP) projects<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Members require entrances into <strong>Thanet</strong> & town centres to be clean<br />

and well presented to visitors. Also, local residents require open<br />

spaces and park areas to be maintained to a reasonable standard.<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP3 Beautiful <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Key Partners: KCC, Pipeline, Probation Service<br />

* These projects are only part of the wider EAP programme. The<br />

complexity of the programme makes it very difficult to provide cost<br />

information for just these 10 projects on a regular basis. Instead,<br />

costs will be evaluated during the project evaluation at year-end.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

This year we have completed the following projects<br />

Hanging Basket Trees in Margate High Street, installation of new litter bins in Margate and Ramsgate, completion of ongoing maintenance programme across <strong>Thanet</strong>. In<br />

addition the Nayland Rock derelict land has been completely cleared of all debris and sealed to prevent further deterioration on parcel of land.<br />

Unfortunately the following projects are still in obeyance due to planning restrictions and decisions: Welcome Signs into <strong>Thanet</strong> on 3 major roads, Entry buoy at Ramsgate<br />

Port, Buoy on Roundabout at Margate Station, Painting of lighthouse on Margate Harbour,<br />

With regard to Margate Old Town Lighting Scheme, discussions are taking place with KCC for the implementation of new equipment.<br />

The final project not completed this year is work to Andrews Passage. This is due to KCC Engineers needing to carry out a full detailed structure survey with the possibility of<br />

a full closure of this passageway.<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Financial Comment<br />

BUDGET<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

? ?<br />

Details of the savings made by TDC direct arrangement of<br />

works are still being prepared for those projects completed in<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The work undertaken by the EAP team has enhanced the visual impact of <strong>Thanet</strong>'s key town and seafront areas. Positive feedback has been received from local residents and<br />

partners congratulating us on the improvements.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

To carry forward oustanding works into the new financial year and focus on obtaining planning permission to complete the programme. This will be as part of the new<br />

programme of works which will be agreed shortly.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

LI322 Savings in the cost of EAP service (when compared to ext contractors) ?<br />

Page 14 of 45


Waste containment project<br />

(CP3.3.4)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Jay Jones<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Seed<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP3 Beautiful <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Key Partners: Kent Waste Partnership, Changing<br />

Attitudes & Behaviours Group<br />

Pilots for improved waste containment<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

As clearly evidenced by the rollout and extension of the wheeled<br />

bin scheme across <strong>Thanet</strong>, effective containment of waste has a<br />

benefit in reducing the damage by seagulls and vermin and<br />

consequently, reduces the spillage of waste on the streets.<br />

This not only improves the residents' perception of the cleanliness<br />

of their streets, but reduces the need for additional street cleansing<br />

resources to clear up rubbish and litter on the streets particularly on<br />

waste collection days.<br />

The dual wheeled bin scheme also provides residents with the<br />

facility to recycle a range of household waste that would otherwise<br />

go to landfill.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Wheeled bin rollout to a total of 3,500 households during <strong>2010</strong>-11 bringing total to 51,700 households on bins. Seagull proof bag trial completed. Educational campaigns<br />

delivered to schools (as part of recycling and "Lilly loves... clean streetc/parks/beaches" campaign) as well as to residents groups.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£60,000 £100,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Roll-out has been successful and we have maximised use of<br />

available resources.<br />

Improved the cleanliness of streets and provided kerbside recycling for households in areas of dual wheeled bins scheme. Campaigns help to promote recycling as well as to<br />

educate on waste management and correct use of bins and bags.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Further rollout of seagull proof bags to approx. 1,000 households and combined containment comprising dual & single wheeled bins and seagull proof bags to a further approx.<br />

3,000 properties planned for Spring <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI304 No. households on the wheeled bin scheme 51,000<br />

LI214 Complaints/service requests for refuse collection 8,636<br />

Page 15 of 45


Public perception of<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong>'s cleanliness (CP3.1.5)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Jay Jones<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Seed<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP3 Beautiful <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Perception of cleanliness in <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Street cleanliness has been identified as one of the top priorities of<br />

the residents of <strong>Thanet</strong>.<br />

Adjustment of waste collections particularly in areas that do not<br />

have wheeled bins and scheduling of street cleaning resources will<br />

help to reduce rubbish on the street and clear up spilt waste on<br />

waste collection days.<br />

Key Partners: Kent Waste Partnership, PACTs, Police<br />

Educational campaigns particularly in schools will help to get<br />

children and young people to think about their role and<br />

responsibilities which in turn it is is hoped) will engender a change<br />

in behaviour and attitude.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Two campaigns delivered to schools with over 2,500 children signing a pledge promising not to drop litter. Street cleansing crew redirected to areas remaining on black<br />

sack collections. Further rollout of wheeled bins and extension of seagull proof bag scheme in Spring <strong>2011</strong> expected to futher improve public perception.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£3,000 £600<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Campaigns at primary schools helps raise awareness and create sense of responsibility from a young age. Rollout of wheeled bins and seagull proof bags help protect waste<br />

from seagulls and other vermin thus reducing litter on streets and improving public perception.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Further rollout of seagull proof bags and wheeled bins planned for Spring <strong>2011</strong> to help reduce litter on streets from unprotected black sacks which in turn will improve public<br />

perception of street cleanliness.<br />

Apart from expenditure on staff costs the total cost of campaigns<br />

was £600.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

DE LI209 F1 Street Cleansing complaints (excl. dumped waste) 1,550<br />

DE LI209 F2 Dumped waste & gull damage reports 2,701<br />

Page 16 of 45


Blank white box<br />

Cost effectiveness of<br />

TDC works services<br />

(CP3.3.3)<br />

Develop cost effective works services as part of East Kent joint waste project<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

Key details<br />

this?<br />

The Works services in <strong>Thanet</strong>, which comprise waste collection,<br />

street cleaning and grounds maintenance make up one of the<br />

Lead Officer: Mark Seed<br />

largest areas of spend for the Council. It is imperative that these<br />

services, and the way they are organised, are reviewed in detail to<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Seed<br />

ensure that they represent the most cost effective solution for the<br />

Council.<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP3 Beautiful <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Key Partners: East Kent <strong>District</strong>s, Kent County Council,<br />

Kent Waste Partnership<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

In addition, the Council is committed to seeking joint delivery<br />

solutions with the East Kent authorities and KCC which drive wider<br />

cost savings and service improvements. This work is an essential<br />

part of the approach to 2013 by which the new services have to be<br />

in place.<br />

The service has delivered over £0.5 million of savings for the Council during <strong>2010</strong>/11. In addition, a cost report comparing the current costs with the tendered contract in<br />

Dover and Shepway has been completed for <strong>Thanet</strong> and Canterbury. This will lead to a report to members in the summer on the way forward with the service up to 2013.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The work during <strong>2010</strong>/11 has delivered a signifcant saving for the council to counteract overspends in other areas, and has allowed a significant contribution to be made to<br />

the council's main reserves as well as contributing £200,000 to a specific reserve in relation to maintenance of the council's front line assets.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in this project.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The project work undertaken in combination with Canterbury will be developed into a report to Cabinet at both councils in June and July, to allow a decision to be made about<br />

joining the services together and whether the service will be put out to tender.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11 <strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Yr End Status<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

LI303 Savings achieved in the Works services £104,000 £104,000<br />

Page 17 of 45


Affordable homes programme<br />

(CP4.2.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Ashley Stacey<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP4 Quality Housing<br />

Key Partners: Homes & Communities Agency, RSLs,<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning Officers<br />

Deliver 280 affordable homes between 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

We want to ensure that the housing in <strong>Thanet</strong> meets local demand<br />

and helps to reduce homelessness,<br />

There are 4,500 people on the housing register but only 800<br />

lettings annually. 450 households applied to the council as<br />

homeless between April and September 2009.<br />

The LA currently own around 3000 homes and the RSL's have<br />

approx 4111.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

By March <strong>2010</strong>, we had already provided 286 affordable homes, meeting the target of 280 over a year early. An additional target was then set to deliver a further 110<br />

affordable homes between <strong>2010</strong>-11. This target was almost reached and only missed by 13 units, which was as a result of the current economic climate and also an impact of<br />

the reduced budget of the Homes and Communities Agency.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£300,000 £300,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

These monies represent the Homes & Communities Agency part<br />

of the funding for building of new homes.<br />

The affordable homes delivered in the last financial year and across the <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> period have provided a range of much needed affordable accommodation within the<br />

district. The mixture of social rent and shared ownership units has helped to deliver the sustainable communities agenda and housed a number of residents on the Housing<br />

Register. We have also achieved funding from the Homes and Communities Agency as part of the Local Authority New Build programme to add 5 new units of family<br />

accommodation to the HRA portfolio. Despite the current economic climate there has not yet been a negative impact on the delivery of affordable housing and the provision<br />

of new supply has been successful.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The target for the next financial year <strong>2011</strong>-2012 has been set at 60 units. This is in accordance with developments which should be completing in this period. The changes to<br />

the Homes and Communities Agency's affordable homes framework <strong>2011</strong>-2015 may start to have an affect on the provision of affordable housing as there will be less funding<br />

available for Registered Providers to build new supply. The new affordable rent model, with rents at 80% of the market rents is not likely to generate enough income to build<br />

new supply as intended in <strong>Thanet</strong>. We have a number of larger schemes, however, which are due for completion in the next couple of years, which should continue to<br />

produce new supply and are working with Registered Providers and the HCA in accordance with the new framework.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

NI155.TH Number of affordable homes delivered (gross) 97<br />

Page 18 of 45


Programme to rebalance<br />

Cliftonville housing market<br />

Blank white box<br />

(CP4.1.1)<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Tanya Wenham<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP4 Quality Housing<br />

Key Partners: KCC, Homes and Communities Agency,<br />

Registered Social Landlords<br />

Changing housing market in Cliftonville<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Support the Margate Renewal Programme by developing a<br />

programme to change the nature of the housing market in<br />

Cliftonville, reducing the number of HMOs and increasing levels of<br />

home ownership.<br />

This involves writing and implementing two key strategies - the<br />

Housing intervention strategy and the Cliftonville enforcement<br />

strategy:<br />

1) making Margate attractive to investors and ultimately a selfsustaining<br />

economy;<br />

2) improving the living and housing standards in Margate; and<br />

3) rebalancing the housing tenure in Cliftonville West and Margate<br />

Central<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Designated a selective licensing area due to come into force on 21st April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

<br />

<br />

Secured £500K from KCC to enhance the housing regeneration team and increase enforcement activity.<br />

Appointed 4.5 additional housing improvement officer posts bringing the team up to 8.5 enforcement posts.<br />

Increased enforcement activity by 96% from 136 notices served in 2009-10 to 267 notices served in 20010-11.<br />

<br />

<br />

Set up the pro-active Your Home Your Health project with aim of attempting access to every unit of accommodation in the selective licensing area. In <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong> the<br />

team attempted access to 660 units.<br />

Set up the housing intervention approach in partnership with KCC and HCA. Identified sites for intervention and the approach to be taken. Governance currently being<br />

agreed and procurement of delivery partners due in the new financial year.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£305,913 £305,913<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

We have seen a reduction in the number of HMOs in the area following increased enforcement action.<br />

We have seen greater engagement with landlords following the selective licensing consultation.<br />

There has been an increase in the number of landlords becoming accredited under our landlord accreditation scheme which should encourage a better quality of<br />

accommodation.<br />

We have been able to help a number of vulnerable people living in poor conditions who weren't aware they could get help from the council during the proactive 'your<br />

home your health' inspections.<br />

We have increased our understanding of the areas we have been targeting and have a better idea of the level of private rented property and its condition.<br />

We have a better idea of the type of community living in the areas and the sort of services people require.<br />

The intervention strategy has identified key sites that will have the biggest impact on the area.<br />

The target budget is a two-year target until end of March 2012.<br />

The major expenditure this year is £30,355 employee costs.<br />

Due to slight delay in recruiting the total spend so far is slightly<br />

less than expected at this stage. The project will continue to<br />

incurr expenditure into 2012/13 financial year, achieving a total<br />

spend of the £500,000 KCC allocation.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

To develop a document detailing measures of success for selective licensing and collect baseline data to show improvements<br />

Procure partners to deliver the intervention strategy<br />

Confirm priorities to target intervention strategy<br />

Implement and deliver selective licensing<br />

Page 19 of 45


Continue to deliver the 'your home your health' scheme<br />

Continue to deliver the housing enforcement programme<br />

Implement the tenant referencing scheme to compliment selective licensing<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

BV064 No. of dwellings returned to occupation / demolished 108<br />

LI189 No. of disrepair cases resolved 501<br />

LI196 No. of licensed HMOs in the renewal area 20<br />

Page 20 of 45


Review allocations policy<br />

(CP4.2.3)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Ashley Stacey & Stuart Clifton<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP4 Quality Housing<br />

Key Partners: Supporting People<br />

Review allocations policy<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

The current allocations policy has expired and needs to be<br />

reviewed to discourage the inward migration of benefit dependant<br />

households, which puts additional strain on existing resources.<br />

It is also important to ensure local people are given priority to<br />

affordable housing.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

This project had to be put on hold due to central government's plan for social housing reform in the Localism Bill which is expected to become law in Sept <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Not applicable.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

As a result of the proposals for social housing reform, a number of projects which affect the Letting Policy have been placed on hold (Common Housing Assessment Framework<br />

(CHAF) and Kent Agency Assessment). These initiatives will need to be re-assessed when the Localism Bill is enacted.<br />

Implementing a new letting policy will involve expenditure, currently estimated at £8,000. This will be used to update the current housing systems, which will need to be<br />

reviewed and changed as a result of a decision to sign up to the CHAF (when the reform within social housing becomes law). This will involve further costs in system updates.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time was incurred in this project.<br />

Page 21 of 45


Programme for improvement<br />

of play facilities in <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Blank white box<br />

(CP5.1.1)<br />

Program for improving play facilities in <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

Key details<br />

this?<br />

The projects contribute to achieving improvements in key areas of<br />

the <strong>Corporate</strong> plan theme identified. The thee year revenue<br />

Lead Officer: Chris Tull<br />

projects, Beach Play and Doorstep Play are designed to engage<br />

with hard to reach groups in the local community and deprived<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Seed<br />

wards as priorities across <strong>Thanet</strong>. These are delivered via the<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> Coast project. They have and continue to engage with<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP5 Healthy Communities<br />

children, young people and their families. Beach Play also<br />

demonstrates how these improvements can be achieved through<br />

Key Partners: <strong>Thanet</strong> Coast Project, local community<br />

the use of natural assets in the district rather than rely on expensive<br />

groups, <strong>Thanet</strong> Play Partnership<br />

facility led play activities. Attendances to play sessions have met<br />

Big Lottery targets and funding is confirmed for the three year<br />

programme completion.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Beach Play and Doorstep Play - This current year project has successfully completed. This project has enabled further recognition via the <strong>Thanet</strong> Coast Project, for the<br />

importance of the sustainable natural coastline that can provide many engaging play opportunities for local children, families and visitors alike. Whilst the numbers<br />

attending are yet to be finalised, they have exceeded the projected figures for the Big Lottery Funding. They will include hard to reach groups and sections of the<br />

community that are considered deprived, based on the targeted approach to attendances.<br />

Multi-Use Games Areas - The two capital projects consisting of ball courts at Ramsgate and Westgate have proven to be popular in use with their respective local<br />

communities. The Ramsgate facility is situated in one of the most deprived Ramsgate Wards whilst the Westgate facility recognised the efforts of the local community<br />

supporting provision of play facilities through their efforts and fundraising not only for the ball court but additional on-site play facilities. The Big Lottery Fund money will be<br />

spent by end of March <strong>2011</strong>, the end of the three year funding period.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Through this work doors have been opened to recognise the potential wider benefits that the coast has to offer beyond play as a contribution to economic recovery through<br />

Tourism and as a valuable asset to <strong>Thanet</strong> and its residents.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£308,911 £260,739<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

These additional facilities act as beacons to attract further investment in <strong>Thanet</strong>'s play facilities, through giving clear evidence of engagement with hard to reach sections of<br />

the community, and potential for reduction in anti-social behaviour associated with younger age groups in the community.<br />

The budget comprised £145,627 Big Lottery Play fund, and<br />

£163,284 revenue funding. All of the lottery funding has now<br />

been spent.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI305 No. of CYP attending beach play 2,651<br />

LI306 No. of CYP attending doorstep play 14,677<br />

Page 22 of 45


LI103 Visits to TLF<br />

run leisure centres<br />

LI105 Total<br />

throughput for TDC<br />

organised sports<br />

activities for CYP<br />

LI118 Total number<br />

of participants in<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> Coast project<br />

events<br />

LI229 Average wait<br />

time for all Gateway<br />

Plus customers<br />

2008/09<br />

Actual<br />

2009/10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

332,707 335,019 348,730 338,000<br />

9,327 9,851 8,725 10,000<br />

? 13,950 15,890 13,950<br />

? 5.17 5.15 10.00<br />

Theme 3: People<br />

Working together to make <strong>Thanet</strong> safe and improve the quality of life for all<br />

The Council has a strong commitment to improving health and reducing crime locally, although it is the Police, Kent County Council (KCC)<br />

and the health authorities that have the most direct role in tackling these issues. The Council recognises that the work of its community,<br />

housing and enforcement services must be properly aligned to those of our partners in the Police, KCC and the health authorities in order<br />

to effectively tackle these problems which have long term causes that take time to change. Cliftonville West and Margate Central are of<br />

particular concern, and here the Council is working in partnership with other public sector organisations through the Margate Task Force.<br />

Page 23 of 45<br />

Indicators relating to people<br />

Change<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11 Yr End<br />

from last End of year comment<br />

Target Status<br />

Year<br />

As can be seen from the figures visits were considerably higher<br />

than target. This is due to a number of factors. Firstly facility<br />

improvements have led to an increase in members and therefore<br />

attendances. Secondly the final quarter included enrolments for<br />

swimming lessons which unfortunately cannot be split and therefore<br />

include some attendances for the next year.<br />

The figure is lower than last years total of 9851 and therefore the<br />

target figure which can be attributed to a number of factors.<br />

External funding changes meant the focus of our Sport 4 NRG<br />

project moved towards using sport to assist older teenagers into<br />

employment or training and therefore resulted in more targeted<br />

sessions rather than open access sessions and less frequent events<br />

in the school holidays. Furthermore, the disability sports project<br />

ended in August which attributed for a number of specialised events<br />

and therefore reduced down numbers.<br />

To summarise whilst the target was set on previous years they are<br />

not totally comparable given the change in outcomes required by<br />

the external funding. It has been a successful year however work<br />

has been with a lower number of harder to reach young people.<br />

Engaging with the local community figures exceeded expectations<br />

for the public and community events programme thanks to lottery<br />

funding for supporting the school water safety lectures (which sadly<br />

ends in <strong>2011</strong>, and so means 5,500 participants less in <strong>2011</strong>/12).<br />

One lottery scheme finishes and another smaller (Footprints in the<br />

Sands - access to nature lottery) grant begins.<br />

Wait times have fluctuated during <strong>2010</strong>/11 refkecting the changes<br />

in service provision that have happened during that time. Wait<br />

times are lower than targets for the year averaging 5.15 minutes as<br />

opposed to the 10 min target.<br />

The actual year end figure of homelessness preventions per 1,000<br />

households has exceeded the years target. The target was 4.50<br />

preventions per 1,000 households and actual total was 5.98 (this<br />

equates to a total figure of 390 homelessness preventions for the


year).<br />

This represents a 1.38 increase in homelessness prevention per<br />

1,000 households from the previous year 2009/10.<br />

BV213 No. of<br />

homeless preventions<br />

in <strong>Thanet</strong> per 1000<br />

households<br />

? 4.21 5.98 4.50<br />

Whilst this is a positive increase there are areas<br />

where homelessness preventions have not been captured, in<br />

particular households being assisted through the Sanctuary Scheme<br />

to enable them to remain in their homes following an incident of<br />

domestic abuse. Progress has been made to work with In-touch<br />

the facilitator of the Sanctuary Scheme to record and report on<br />

these in future.<br />

The figure of 5.98 preventions is also less than both the South East<br />

and Nation average of homelessness preventions for 2009/10,<br />

which were 7.3 and 7.7 per 1,000 households respectively.<br />

With greater empathis on the team ensuring that all positive<br />

prevention casework is recorded and by recording of preventions<br />

which have previously not been recorded, the number of<br />

homelessness preventions per 1,000 households should continue to<br />

rise next year, with the aim of achieving 12 preventions per 1,000<br />

households during <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

Page 24 of 45


<strong>Thanet</strong> Works Programme<br />

(CP1.4.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Project Team: Jacqui Ward, Barry Mileham,<br />

Susan Adkins, Carrie Donegan, Joe Vizer, Colin<br />

McClean<br />

Project Sponsor: Sarah Carroll<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP1 <strong>Thanet</strong>'s Economy<br />

Key Partners: <strong>Thanet</strong> College, Kent County<br />

Council, TDC, Pipeline, Pie Factory, Kent<br />

Community Organisation, Turner Contemporary,<br />

Margate Renewal Partnership.<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> Works Programme<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

The Working Neighbourhood Fund (WNF) is a £4.099m<br />

grant aimed at tackling concentrated pockets of<br />

worklessness and getting people off benefits and into work<br />

through training and work, particularly young people. The<br />

emphasis is on innovation, step change and challenge to<br />

produce real impact. The money is for use between April<br />

2008 and March <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> Works is the 'brand name' for the partnership<br />

responsible for the funding of the WNF. <strong>Thanet</strong> Works<br />

objective was to target the following National Indicators<br />

(NI):<br />

NI 152 - Reduction in working age people on out of work<br />

benefits.<br />

NI 161 - Adult Learners achieving Level 1 qualification in<br />

Literacy.<br />

NI 163 - Proportion of population 19+ qualified to at least<br />

Level 2<br />

NI 117 - Reduce the level of 16-18 year old's not in<br />

Education, Employment or training.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Over the past 3 years the <strong>Thanet</strong> Works Team has commissioned 13 projects, match funded the DWP Future Job Fund initiative for 119 job placements, has funded a<br />

discretionary training budget for each placement and launched a <strong>Thanet</strong> Works Apprenticeship scheme providing 39 apprenticeship opportunities.<br />

All phase 1 projects have now completed and an evaluation report is now being drafted.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The main (but not sole) target of Working Neighbourhood Fund (WNF) initiatives has been to engage local young people who are not in employment, education or training.<br />

Final evaluation is long-term, but in the short term WNF has engaged several hundred local people in training, education and employment in an attempt to prevent cycles of<br />

long-term worklessness.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£1,952,842 £1,521,337<br />

Financial Comment • The figure for expenditure to<br />

date from the working Neighbourhood Fund is an<br />

early/provisional estimate.<br />

Phase 2 and Phase 3 projects are still in progress with the last project completing in 2012.<br />

Phase 2 is a twenty month youth offender initiative that aims to enrol 70 people onto a twelve week course, with a target of 18 jobs created (two people are in jobs from the<br />

first course).<br />

Also, <strong>Thanet</strong> Works apprenticeship initiative created 39 apprenticeship opportunities of which 27 are already in place with 6 places yet to be filled.<br />

Phase 3 includes a Dreamland, Margate initiative which aims to provide substantial local job opportunities when the Dreamland Heritage Theme Park is realised. Phase 3 also<br />

includes EK Opportunities, an employment brokerage that aims to create 25 jobs in the area.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

CI LI345 Total number of contacts 2,393<br />

CI LI348 No. of qualifications achieved 708<br />

Page 25 of 45


Page 26 of 45<br />

CI LI349a No. of leavers/completers who went straight into employment 89<br />

CI LI349b No. of leavers/completers who went straight into education 81<br />

CI LI349c No. of leavers/completers who went straight into training 30


Community Safety campaigns<br />

(CP2.5.4)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Jess Bailey<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing & Parking Services<br />

Community safety campaigns<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

To improve public confidence in the police and council of dealing<br />

with ASB and Community Safety and form part of TCSP's annual<br />

consultation. To reduce negative feelings associated with ASB and<br />

improve quality of life.<br />

To promote the work of community safety<br />

To promote CP2.5.5 - regular open forums, and consult with the<br />

public around community safety issues.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Six cost neutral campaign co-ordinated, covering bonfire night, halloween, safer socialising at christmas, promoting safety and the SOS trailer, promoting getting some safely<br />

utilising the Night bus over Christmas and New Year and also promoting domestic abuse awareness over Christmas and Valentines day utilising exisiting campaigns.<br />

Editorials went out in the local 'KM' newspapers, utilising free editorial space and the TCSP, TDC and Kent Police websites promoted the key campaigns along with facebook<br />

and twitter.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

We have been able to promote safety messages to <strong>Thanet</strong> residents without incurring further costs. We have explored new mediums to circulate safety messages such as<br />

facebook and twitter which have demonstrated success particularly reaching different residents. By combining online media with pre paid newspaper editorial we have reached<br />

a wider audience than we may have previously done, and by utilising successful existing campaigns we have not incurred any further costs.<br />

By linking in with other projects such as the SOS trailer, Community pastor scheme and night bus we have seen an increase in visitors using or visiting these services and<br />

certainly crime figures over Christmas and New year remained low.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in this project.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Community Safety will continue to utilise existing cost neutral media, primarily through the internet, to run seasonal safety messages and campaigns linking in to partner<br />

agency projects as part of day to day business where there is the opportunity to promote campaigns based around Community Safety priorities.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI297a No. of PACT panels/community forums held 5<br />

LI297b No. of open forums held 4<br />

Page 27 of 45


Extend KCAP to Margate<br />

& Cliftonville (CP2.1.4)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Lacy Dixon<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: PCSOs, Community Wardens, Off<br />

Licences & Pubs<br />

Extend Kent Community Alcohol Partnership (KCAP) to Margate & Cliftonville<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

We are doing this to reduce the number of proxy sales, underage<br />

drinkers and unnecessary violent behaviour. By linking in with the<br />

licensed premises we are able to build relationships with them<br />

allowing for trust and information to be shared should any problem<br />

occur. If this is not done we could see an increase in ASB related<br />

to alcohol and a decrease in young people's health.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

KCAP carried out multi agency visits to licensed premises across <strong>Thanet</strong> to ensure that the license conditions were being adhered too and that young peoples health can be<br />

approved through reducing the underage drinking in the area. Supporting the businesses also to become more confident with their sales and refusals assisted this issue.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

This has reduced the number of underage drinkers in the area and resulted in less confiscations of alcohol by our local officers. This in turn reduces ASB and crime that is<br />

associated with the immediate areas surrounding the licensed premise. Several Of Licenses have been shut down and two other licensed premises have had additional<br />

conditions added to their licenses.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Monitoring will continue on those areas that have been worked on to date including Westwood Cross, Broadstairs, Margate and Cliftonville. Ramsgate is currently going<br />

through the enforcement stage and the three premises that are currently experiencing underage sales will be worked on through the processes set out by each agency. Once<br />

this has been complete, monitoring of all premises will continue and follow up visits will continue.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI287 No. of accreditations through KCAP 16<br />

LI288 No. of premises experiencing problems with underage drinking 3<br />

No cost, other than staff time, has been incurred in this<br />

project.<br />

Page 28 of 45


Establish domestic abuse courts<br />

(CP2.2.2)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Establish domestic abuse court in <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Domestic abuse is higher in <strong>Thanet</strong> than elsewhere in<br />

Kent, with many repeat victims.<br />

Lead Officer: Mark Richardson<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing & Parking Services<br />

The Specialist Domestic Violence Court project is part of a<br />

multi agency coordinated response to domestic abuse. The<br />

aim is to improve the safety of adults and children<br />

experiencing domestic abuse and to hold abusers<br />

accountable from their initial point of contact with the<br />

police and throughout the criminal justice system. Each<br />

agency involved in the SDVC is committed to providing<br />

working practices with other member agencies, sharing<br />

information and providing the best possible service to<br />

survivors and their families within the roles, resources and<br />

responsibilities of individual agencies and ensuring that<br />

any gaps in the service are identified and addressed.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The specialist domestic abuse court is now established and operates out of margate magistrates court on a fortnightly basis.<br />

An idva has been employed to support victims through the court process.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£20,000 £20,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Expenditure on this project has matched the target.<br />

We are currently chasing the host agency for the evaluation of the specialist court. Further info to follow when that materialises<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The remaining issue for this initiative is sustainability of both the specialist court day and also the idva post<br />

Oasis, the host agency, have applied for funding from the ministry of justice around both.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI043 % domestic abuse victims who are repeat victims 23.90 %<br />

Page 29 of 45


SOS bus project (CP2.1.3)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Lacy Dixon<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing and Parking<br />

services<br />

SOS bus project<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

We are deploying this unit to ensure that crime levels in the night<br />

time economy remain at the lowered level achieved by the<br />

partnership over the past couple of years.<br />

This unit also aims to reduce the vulnerability in the night time<br />

economy, be that those intoxicated or those that are not. If they<br />

are concerned with something that may have occurred while they<br />

are out, they are then able to gain access to the services that are<br />

there for them (Police, Council, NHS, Community Pastors).<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The SOS trailer since the launch in July has been used a total of 13 times, allowing over 200 individuals to access the services on board; in both the day time and night time<br />

economies, consultations and events. During which time 5 incidents were dealt with by a combination of agencies. An analysis was also completed after the pilot deployments<br />

which allowed for the agencies, times and locations to be better placed/utilised with regards to future deployments.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Violence in the night time economy has been reduced considerably on last years figures which were also very positive. Many members of the public have given feedback on<br />

the service and highlighted their appreciation for them, this from both those that are enjoying the social scene as well as those that live locally.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£35,000 £35,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

This successful project was to budget.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The SOS Trailer already has several bookings for this coming year including consultations, engagement sessions and night time economy deployments. Drug outreach, Kent<br />

fire and rescue service, Domestic abuse services and Counter terrorism strands will also be linking in with the trailer on more occasions this year.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI285 Number of times SOS bus services were accessed 546<br />

LI286A Staff costs for running SOS bus £500<br />

LI286B Number of serious incidents dealt with through SOS bus 5<br />

Page 30 of 45


Anti-Social Behaviour<br />

noise car project (CP2.4.4)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Gordon Hunt<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing & Parking Services<br />

ASB noise car project<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Improve response and action from both <strong>Thanet</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council and<br />

Kent Police to both ASB and Noise calls received during the<br />

evening period between 17:00 and 02:00 at specified peak times of<br />

the year.<br />

Also to improve joint working procedures between <strong>Thanet</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Council and Kent Police in response to ASB and Noise calls<br />

received.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Two operations were undertaken during the last year during 21 June to 04 July <strong>2010</strong> and 25 October to 07 November <strong>2010</strong>. Two operations were cancelled for Aug/Sept <strong>2010</strong> and<br />

over the lead up to Christmas <strong>2010</strong>period, both being cancelled due to other committments for both TDC and Police staff.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Image courtesy of Kent Police<br />

The ASB Noise nuisance car has been very well recieved by both TDC and Police staff as well as the community it serves. The initial trial inJune/July <strong>2010</strong> was very successful and<br />

feedback from the community was for more of the same to be carried out. Noisy perpetrators were suprised to find a joint team arriving at their homes, some were genuinely sorry<br />

for their actions, for others a more robust approach was needed. Such was the success of the venture that enquiries were recieved from other Kent areas as to how we acheived<br />

our aims and how could they follow suit. The operation was also nominated by the Home Office as good practice for tackling ASB nuisance noise. Although unable to run the<br />

operation full time, the limited time it does operate for has acheived a reduction in noise nuiance calls to both the police and TDC and a swift resolution of disputes over noise<br />

issues.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Following on from last years successes it is envisaged to run the scheme at peak call times throughout the next year. Although both financial and staffing cuts have impinged on<br />

the scheme it will be run during the late spring/summer months which have been identified as peak times for noise nuisance calls with first being for Easter <strong>2011</strong>. Provisional dates<br />

are set for the June/July and Aug/Sept perioda also.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time was incurred in this project.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI291 No. of incidents of ASB per 1000 pop 2.28<br />

LI048 % people consider there's high level ASB locally 11.20 %<br />

LI289 No. of ASB calls dealt with by the ASB noise car 81<br />

LI290 No. of noise calls dealt with by ASB noise nuisance car 91<br />

Page 31 of 45


Support programme for<br />

ASB witnesses (CP2.4.5)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Establish support program for ASB witnesses<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

Key details<br />

this?<br />

The idea of this action is to ensure that victims and witnesses in<br />

ASB cases (civil action) receive the same level of support as those<br />

in criminal cases. This includes people providing evidence to<br />

Lead Officer: Tiffany Hall<br />

secure an ASBO, injunction, eviction, or action under environmental<br />

laws.<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

Support will be provided to the most high end cases and where<br />

victims are especially vulnerable. All officers will have referral forms<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

and can make suggestions for cases to the newly appointed Victim<br />

and Witness Officer. Support provided is emotional, but can<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing & Parking Services<br />

sometimes include small costs such as taxi fares to get people to<br />

court. There will be particular emphasis on keeping victims updated<br />

throughout the case, which has been highlighted as most important<br />

to victims when surveyed by the Home office in 2008.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

This year we have established a new service to support those giving evidence in civil cases. This can be a very intimidating process and we have assigned a designated officer<br />

to fill the role, taking on referrals from services across TDC and partner agencies. Referrals can be made through a form we have designed with all the relevant information<br />

and a risk matrix assigned.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£15,000 £15,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Spending on this project has been the budgeted amount.<br />

This role has given support to many local people who are suffering and need someone to talk to and assitance at court. They have had the support that was previoualy lacking<br />

because the case was not criminal (where victim support would step in) and the lead officer is busy dealing with the case itself.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

We plan to continue this service and keep reminding lead officers that they should be referring to Russell when they have any victims or witnesses that need support. Tiffany<br />

Hall will continue to oversee the workload and provide advice to Russell in the case work and about assessing risk.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI293 Caseload of the witness support programme (latest) 3<br />

LI294 % who believe that council & police are dealing with ASB and crime ?<br />

Page 32 of 45


Community Safety Partnership<br />

open forums (CP2.5.5)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Jess Bailey<br />

Project Sponsor: Mark Richardson<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing & Parking Services<br />

Community safety open forums<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

To fulfil a statutory requirement to be consulting with the public on a<br />

large scale.<br />

To establish public perception, and reduce negative perceptions<br />

around ASB and Crime.<br />

To inform and shape current CSP priorities.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

We have held four forums in February and March and over 120 residents attended.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

It has given us a better understanding of residents perceptions, we were able to consult with residents over our priorities for the next year and involve them in projects we<br />

may then work on. It has influenced our Community Safety <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-12 and a focus now included 'public safety' and KFRS will be working on Road safety following concerns<br />

by residents.<br />

It has enabled us to dispel some of the myths around crime and public services and present accurate figures to the public about where they live. We have had volunteers<br />

come forward to organise residents panels and also be part of neighbourhood watch schemes and also offering to work with and support community safety activity. At the end<br />

of all forums we had feedback that stated how useful and appreciative residents were for this type of engagement and the opportunity to speak directly to senior officers from<br />

TDC and partner agencies.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

We will be running four further forums this year, one a quarter for residents across <strong>Thanet</strong>. The forums will not be area specific but crime figures will be presented for the<br />

whole of <strong>Thanet</strong> and the venues will be in different locations for accessibility. The provisional dates for the forums are: 7/6/11 (Margate venue) 6/9/11 (Broadstairs venue)<br />

6/12/11 (Ramsgate Venue) 6/3/12 (Birchington venue).<br />

No cost, other than staff time, has been incurred in this<br />

project.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

LI302 Avg no. of residents attending each open forum 38<br />

Page 33 of 45


Establish Margate Task Force<br />

(CP5.3.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Sara Woodward<br />

Margate Task Force<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Implement the Margate Task Force to join up public services in<br />

Margate and Cliftonville<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£240,000 ?<br />

Financial Comment<br />

Project Sponsor: Richard Samuel<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP5 Healthy Communities<br />

Key Partners: Kent County Council, Homes &<br />

Communities Agency, Kent Police, Eastern & Coastal<br />

Kent PCT, Kent Probation, Jobcentre Plus, Kent &<br />

Medway Mental Health Trust, Kent Fire & Rescue<br />

Service<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

xCP5.3.1 CHNG10 Margate Renewal: Margate Task Force<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

To address the significant cosio-economic disadvantage in the two<br />

wards of Margate Central and Cliftonville West through a broad<br />

programme of multi-agency partnership. MTF comprises the<br />

following work strands:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Housing intervention and regeneration in Cliftonville West;<br />

Tackling low skills and worklessness;<br />

Addressing significant health inequalities;<br />

Reducing out of area placement of vulnerable people;<br />

Transforming multi-agency delivery of services.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI341a No. interventions/enforcement relating to individuals/households (CW & MC) ?<br />

LI341b No. interventions/enforcement relating to property/environment (CW & MC) ?<br />

LI342 Number of Operation Clean Sweep interventions 11<br />

LI343 No. of drug users accessing treatment (CW & MC) ?<br />

LI344 No. of YPs NEET from MC & CW accessing training, apprenticeships or work ?<br />

Page 34 of 45


CI BV008 %<br />

Invoices paid within<br />

30 days<br />

LI165 % of staff<br />

located in main<br />

building<br />

LI063 % Calls<br />

answered within 4<br />

rings<br />

LI061 %<br />

Complaints responded<br />

to on time<br />

LI228 Percentage<br />

FOIs responded to<br />

within 20 days<br />

BV012 Sickness<br />

days lost per FTE<br />

LI180 % of Council<br />

Tax payers paying by<br />

DD<br />

BV009 % CTAX<br />

collected<br />

BV010 % NNDR<br />

collected<br />

LI261 Potential<br />

housing rental income<br />

lost from voids<br />

NI181.OLD.TH<br />

Average no. of days<br />

to process benefit<br />

claims and change<br />

events<br />

2008/09<br />

Actual<br />

2009/10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

98.88 % 97.97 % 99.05 % 98.00 %<br />

66.60 % 86.80 % 89.78 % 86.00 %<br />

93.00 92.17 91.95 95.00<br />

87.70 % 91.91 % 93.90 % 98.00 %<br />

? ? 80.43 89.58<br />

8.00 8.09 8.29 7.70<br />

48.81 % 45.10 % 48.10 % 50.00 %<br />

96.12 % 96.34 % 96.28 % 97.00 %<br />

98.57 % 98.15 % 98.05 % 98.50 %<br />

Theme 4: <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Working together to make <strong>Thanet</strong> safe and improve the quality of life for all<br />

The Council has a strong commitment to improving health and reducing crime locally, although it is the Police, Kent County Council (KCC)<br />

and the health authorities that have the most direct role in tackling these issues. The Council recognises that the work of its community,<br />

housing and enforcement services must be properly aligned to those of our partners in the Police, KCC and the health authorities in order<br />

to effectively tackle these problems which have long term causes that take time to change. Cliftonville West and Margate Central are of<br />

particular concern, and here the Council is working in partnership with other public sector organisations through the Margate Task Force.<br />

Indicators relating to performance<br />

Change<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11 Yr End<br />

from last End of year comment<br />

Target Status<br />

Year<br />

Whilst the average target is shown in the table, over the year the<br />

performance target was raised to 100% as this is a statutory<br />

measure. Whilst performance improved from 66% to 94% over the<br />

year, averaging 80%, the target was not achieved.<br />

The end of year target has not been achieved, although results<br />

were significantly lower than the public sector average of 10.7 days<br />

? ? 761,231 ? No target was set for <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong> as this was a new indicator.<br />

12.00 10.64 10.45 12.50<br />

Page 35 of 45


LI342 Number of<br />

Operation Clean<br />

Sweep interventions<br />

LI013 % satisfied<br />

with overall service of<br />

benefits team<br />

? ? 11 6<br />

90.86 % 92.50 % 90.91 % 92.00 %<br />

Page 36 of 45


Establish joint management of<br />

council housing in East Kent<br />

Type your text here<br />

(CP4.4.1)<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Madeline Homer<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP4 Quality Housing<br />

Key Partners: East Kent Local Authorities, TDC tenants<br />

& leaseholders<br />

Establish ALMO for joint management of council housing<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

To achieve the setting up of an arms length management<br />

organisation (ALMO) combining landlord services for Canterbury,<br />

Dover, Shepway and <strong>Thanet</strong> local authorities<br />

Aims:<br />

1) Realise greater efficiencies and savings for reinvestment in<br />

council housing<br />

2) Deliver excellent customer service with ambition for 3 star award.<br />

3) Improving procurement capacity<br />

4) More long-term resilience for individual HRAs<br />

5) Create a stronger role for tenants in shaping housing services<br />

6) Encouraging stronger and more prosperous communities<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The first Kent ALMO went live on 1st April <strong>2011</strong>, when staff were transferred to East Kent Housing (by TUPE process). The clientside monitoring role has been established, and<br />

the delivery plan for the ALMO is being monitored. Service to residents is continuing as before.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Business delivery to tenants will continue as before, with the promise of more cost-effective service.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£170,000 £170,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

We will continue to monitor progress towards achieving a 10% efficiency saving. The East Kent Housing management structure will be finalised. Monthly meetings with TDC's<br />

Client Officer will deal with practical matters arising from the new organisation. The HRA business plan will be reviewed, and the business plan for year 2 will be prepared<br />

based on evidence of year 1 experiences.<br />

Each district has contributed £170,000 towards this project.<br />

Total East Kent Housing budget 170,000 x 4 = £680,000<br />

Page 37 of 45


Improve purchase to pay cycle<br />

(CP6.1.3)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Sarah Martin<br />

Project Sponsor: Sue McGonigal<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

Key Partners: N/A<br />

Streamline purchase-to-pay financial cycle<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

To ensure that the procure-to-pay process runs as efficiently as<br />

possible and to ensure that supplier invoices can be paid promptly<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The number of originators has been reduced. POPR63 is being piloted before being rolled out across the authority - this will improve the creditor process by allowing an<br />

automated 3-way match between the order, goods receipt and invoice. All incorrect invoices are now being workflowed back to the originators for correction. From April,<br />

invoices are to be returned to suppliers if they do not quote an order number.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Reducing the number of originators has meant that only those who use the system regularly are able to enter orders. By returning invoices with no order number back to the<br />

supplier will encourage suppliers and departments to quote order numbers on all invoices, thus speeding up the payment process. The creditor process is gradually becoming<br />

more automated with less duplicate handling of paperwork.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in this project.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

All invoices will now be returned to suppliers where an order number is not quoted. Refresher training is to be provided to originators. Drop-in surgeries are to be set up to<br />

discuss and resolve issues. POPR63 is to be rolled out across the council. More joined up working will be encouraged between procurement and creditors to identify further<br />

process improvements.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

LI253 % invoices with a missing/incorrect order number 34.59 %<br />

Page 38 of 45


Establish 1st tranche of EK<br />

shared services (CP6.2.7)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: David Willis<br />

Project Sponsor: Richard Samuel<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

Key Partners: Other East Kent <strong>District</strong> Authorities<br />

Develop 1st Tranche East Kent shared services<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Deliver the first tranche of share services within the East Kent<br />

Shared Service Programme.<br />

To ensure that services can continue to be delivered to meet the<br />

needs of our communities while saving money, continuing to deliver<br />

transformation and resilience.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Service level agreements (SLAs) have been agreed for the Phase 1 services (Revenues & Benefits, ICT services & Customer Services). The transfer of phase one services was<br />

undertaken on 1 February <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

Service delivery has continued as before. Re-structuring has been longer than originally intended, to allow a 90 day staff consultation.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD) Actual (YTD)<br />

£80,000 £80,000<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Re-structuring will be completed following completion of the staff consultation period on 3rd May <strong>2011</strong>. Meetings with TDC Client Officer are taking place for quality control<br />

purposes. <strong>Performance</strong> levels for <strong>2011</strong>/12 will be based on closing performance for <strong>2010</strong>/11. This will include monitoring of efficiency savings.<br />

The allocated budget has been spent.<br />

Page 39 of 45


Implementation of<br />

accommodation strategy (CP6.3.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Karen Paton<br />

Project Sponsor: Sue McGonigal<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

Key Partners: Gateway Plus - TDC/KCC<br />

Implement Accommodation strategy<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Improved access/delivery of front line services-Gateway;<br />

Rationalisation of Council Office Portfolio;<br />

Reduced overheads/running costs by accommodating<br />

majority of TDC staff in Cecil Street Offices;<br />

Reduction in record storage;<br />

Vacating of leased office accommodation, saving leasing<br />

and service charges;<br />

Disposal of buildings no longer required realising Capital<br />

Receipts;<br />

Cecil Street building made more sustainable-fit for purpose<br />

and efficient building for the future operation including<br />

improved working environment and improved resilience of<br />

infrastructure (energy/technology) & DDA compliance;<br />

Open plan working optimising use of accommodation<br />

reducing accommodation foot print Greater synergy of<br />

operation by sections within departments being located on<br />

same floor;<br />

Reduction in carbon emissions;<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The Accommodation Strategy is now fully implemented with the completion of the Accommodation Review Project. The project has delivered all objectives for both time and<br />

money. The Project, received substantial assurance level from an internal audit and has come in under budget by in excess of £16K.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£1,297,744 £1,284,456<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The majority of TDC officer staff are now accommodated within the one building, enabling efficient working between officers, and reducing the cost of servicing multiple<br />

buildings.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

This multi-year project was successfully achieved under<br />

budget.<br />

This project is now completed.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI165 % of staff located in main building 89.78 %<br />

LI333 Capital Receipts for properties vacated through the accommodation review £255,000<br />

LI334 Revenue savings achieved through the accommodation project £165,380<br />

Page 40 of 45


Review face-to-face<br />

service delivery (CP6.4.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Review face-to-face service delivery<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

Key details<br />

this?<br />

Lead Officer: Julie Smee<br />

Transaction costs for face to face services are far more expensive<br />

than other access channels.<br />

Project Sponsor: David Willis<br />

Analysis of transactional data by access channel and service, and<br />

the identification of avoidable contacts, will enable us to identify key<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

areas for channel shift, thereby reducing transactional costs.<br />

The work undertaken on this project during <strong>2010</strong>/11 will be<br />

Key Partners: KCC, NHS, Police, Pas de Calais & all Kent authorities<br />

transferrable to the East Kent Shared Service.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Transactional data has been routinely monitored at the end of each month, and quarterly meetings with service managers have considered trend.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

As a result of this monitoring Benefits standard correspondance has been amended, the benefits application process has been reviewed, and the CRM service forms have been<br />

updated.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

Subject to results of evaluation workable options for piloting of website self-serve should begin. With the start of EKServices the channel shift will be considered by the new<br />

management team.<br />

No cost other than staff time has been spent on this project.<br />

Page 41 of 45


Establish communications strategy<br />

for TDC (CP6.5.2)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Sophie Chadwick<br />

Project Sponsor: Sue McGonigal<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP3 Beautiful <strong>Thanet</strong><br />

Key Partners: N/A<br />

Develop communications strategy<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Develop a communications strategy to improve communication<br />

methods with our members, residents and staff.<br />

To ensure our communications resources are targeted in the most<br />

effective way to improve the council's reputation.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

The strategy was approved by management team in August, and launched to staff in November.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The new strategy has already delivered a reduction in the communications spend on print, and enabled the team to support projects that have clear and deliverable<br />

objectives.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The next stage in the strategy will be to make sure each comms project is evaluated against the original objectives, to see if the project delivered what was intended.<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

No cost other than staff time has been incurred in this project.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

PI reference & name<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Actual<br />

LI325a % of press articles which are positive 74.65 %<br />

LI325b % of press articles which are neutral 22<br />

LI325c % of press articles which are negative 3.04 %<br />

Page 42 of 45


CCTV business plan (CP2.1.1)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Mark Richardson<br />

Project Sponsor: Madeline Homer<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP2 Safe Neighbourhoods<br />

Key Partners: Kent Police, Housing and Parking<br />

Services<br />

Community Safety CCTV business plan<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

CCTV service has not had any improvements or upgrades to<br />

equipment for quite some time and the current system is very old<br />

and increasingly becoming unreliable.<br />

There should be an identified business plan for the service looking<br />

ahead as to what is needed to provide an improved service for<br />

<strong>Thanet</strong> in the coming years.<br />

Part of this project will also be to mitigate the risk posed by an<br />

aging system and £50,000 would be needed to purchase a new<br />

matrix to do this allocated from a corporate projects pot.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

A paper has been written with options to take CCTV forward in a more efficient way. A collaboration with another authority plus some scaling back of the service is an option<br />

that is being considered.<br />

Further work will take place after may <strong>2011</strong><br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£50,000 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Spend on this project is deferred. A cost of £50,000 is<br />

anticipated.<br />

There is a clear way forward now for CCTV in thanet<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

After may <strong>2011</strong>, a further report highlighting the impact of CCTV will be presented to CMT along with a service level agreement with Canterbury CC.<br />

The matrix for the existing system will also be installed during June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

NI015.TH Serious violent crime rate 0.76<br />

Page 43 of 45


Climate change strategy<br />

(CP6.3.4)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Karen Paton<br />

Project Sponsor: Sue McGonigal<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

Key Partners: N/A<br />

Implement climate change strategy<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Obligation to report against NI185/186/188/194;<br />

Obligation under Carbon Reduction Commitment to register<br />

half-hourly metered electricity sites;<br />

Reduction in Carbon Footprint;<br />

Reduction in use of natural resources;<br />

Cost Savings;<br />

Reducing negative impact Council operations have on<br />

environment;<br />

Raise awareness to issue of Climate Change, show<br />

community leadership;<br />

Sustainable procurement policy;<br />

(187: Private Sector Housing);<br />

Tackling fuel poverty;<br />

Achieve the current statutory level for new homes within the<br />

Code for Sustainable Homes;<br />

Meet recycling, composting and landfill waste management<br />

targets.<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Efficiencies and reduction in per Capita emissions of staff occupying Cecil Street has been achieved by installation of a voltage optimiser and rationalisation of office portfolio<br />

by optimising effective use of space with main office.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£200 £200<br />

Financial Comment • This budget was for<br />

publicity/communications.<br />

Ongoing efficiencies are being achieved through use of the voltage optimiser. The Accommodation strategy has also reduced TDC carbon footprint.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

The climate change action plan has now been devolved to individual departments. Update monitoring reports will be given every half-year. Also, further sustainability energy<br />

options are currently being explored.<br />

Supporting Data<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

PI reference & name<br />

Actual<br />

LI176 No. of green awareness events 6<br />

Page 44 of 45


Develop TDC priorities for <strong>2011</strong><br />

onwards (CP6.5.2)<br />

Blank white box<br />

Key details<br />

Lead Officer: Adrian Halse<br />

Project Sponsor: Sue McGonigal<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Theme: CP6 Modern Council<br />

Develop TDC priorities for <strong>2011</strong> onwards<br />

Answering the "so what?" question - why are we doing<br />

this?<br />

Developing priorities and a new <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is vital to ensure<br />

the council maintains a clear focus to its activities.<br />

The current financial difficulties facing the public sector make it all<br />

the more important that the <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is drawn up alongside<br />

the council's budget and medium-term financial strategy.<br />

Key Partners: N/A<br />

Year End <strong>Performance</strong> Comments on the project<br />

Yr End comment: What's been achieved this yr<br />

Other key stakeholders will need to be involved including members,<br />

staff, partners and the public.<br />

At the start of the year we planned to develop a new four-year <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. During the course for the year a decision was taken to develop an interim one year plan whilst<br />

the numerous changes proposed by the coalition governement started to become more clear.<br />

The interim plan has been developed and was approved by Council on the 21 April <strong>2011</strong>. It sets out key projects and other goals for the council over the coming year.<br />

Yr End comment: Difference it's made so far<br />

The interim plan has only recently been approved. The intention is that some significant pieces of work will be driven forward over the coming year including work on the<br />

Margate Dreamland site, the delivery of 65 affordable homes, a new pool and Spa in Ramsgate and the continuation of the EK services project into its next phases.<br />

Yr End comment: What are the next steps?<br />

BUDGET<br />

Target (YTD)<br />

Actual (YTD)<br />

£0 £0<br />

Financial Comment •<br />

Following approval at Council the interim <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> will be uploaded onto the Council's website. Progress against the plan will then be monitored throughout the coming<br />

year.<br />

No cost other than staff time has been spent on this project.<br />

Page 45 of 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!