Digestibility - Department of Animal Sciences

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In vivo DOMD Relationship between in vivo and in vitro DOMD <strong>of</strong> wheat silage (g/kg DM) 690 670 650 Year One Year Two 630 r 2 =0.24 610 590 570 550 530 530 580 630 680 Rumen fluid-pepsin DOMD (Adesogan et al. 1998)
Rumen fluid technique - problems Standards needed to correct for variability in rumen fluid composition & activity Disregards / inappropriately represents: – Ruminal outflow (uses a batch process) – Digests maillard product not digested in vivo – Associative effects between feeds – Endogenous secretions – Post abomasal digestion
Page 1 and 2: DIGESTIBILITY
Page 3 and 4: In vivo digestibility methods Direc
Page 5 and 6: In vivo digestibility trials in met
Page 7 and 8: Total collection calculations Diges
Page 9 and 10: 2. Difference method Allows digy ca
Page 11 and 12: DMD (g/kg) Regression method 800 Ba
Page 13 and 14: Marker digestibility trials Particu
Page 15 and 16: Marker digestibility Pros - Total f
Page 17 and 18: Marker issues Difficulty of mixing
Page 19 and 20: Ideal in vitro methods should be: -
Page 21 and 22: Prediction of silage OMD in vivo fr
Page 23: Rumen fluid problems Analytical iss
Page 27 and 28: Prediction of DMD in vivo from in v
Page 29 and 30: Relationships between DMD in vivo a
Page 31 and 32: Prediction of in vivo OMD of spring
Page 33 and 34: 14 C-Casein hydrolysis (mg/ml) 0.5
Page 35 and 36: The ANKOM equipment
Page 37 and 38: ANKOM pros & cons Pros - Simplifies
Page 39: Digestibility references Chapters 6

Digestibility - Department of Animal Sciences

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?